3500 Shiloh Springs Road, Trotwood, OH 45426 · Montgomery County · (937) 854-1180
84 certified beds, about 59 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2004
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366302 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 8, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 64 health citations since December 2019, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $62,956 in the last three years; the largest was $62,956, and the latest is dated May 21, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.07 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.55 of those hours.
CMS links it to Aventura Health Group, an affiliated group of 11 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 64 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of a facility investigation, review of a facility self reported incident (SRI), review of a police report, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse. The affected one (#58) out of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 57.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of online resources from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices were implemented. This affected four Residents (#47, #46, #16, and #38) of four residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure falls were documented and investigated in a thorough manner. This affected one (#21) of three residents reviewed for safety. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility's smoking policy, the facility failed to adequately assess and supervise residents identified as being supervised smokers to prevent them from smoking while oxygen was in place. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm and/or injuries on 04/14/26 when Resident #43 lit a cigarette while wearing oxygen via nasal cannula and sustained burns to his face. On 05/31/25, Resident #43 again lit a cigarette while wearing oxygen and sustained additional burns to his face. This affected one (Resident #43) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility identified 28 residents (#04, #06, #08, #11, #12, #16, #22, #24, #26, #27, #28, #31, #32, #33, #36, #40, #41, #42, #43, #50, #53, #54, #57, #58, #59, #60, and #61) who smoked. The facility census was 61. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review , staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when a resident experienced a change in condition. This affected one resident (#43) of three reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 61.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician progress notes were written, signed and dated at the time of the visit. This affected three Residents (#33, #50, and #62) of three residents reviewed for physician visits. The facility census was 61.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident's records were complete and accurately documented. This affected one (#43) of three residents reviewed for documentation. The facility census was 61.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff provided the necessary level of supervision for safe smoking and residents smoked in the designated smoking areas. This affected two (Residents #29 and #41) of three residents reviewed for smoking safety. The facility census was 57.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, Long-Term Care Ombudsman interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the residents' floors and medical equipment in a clean manner. This affected two residents (Residents #38 and #40). The facility census was 57.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, physician interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were transcribed accurately. This affected one (Resident #08) of four residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 60.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to submit the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing information to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as required. This had the potential to affect all 55 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were accurate to reflect the residents needs. This affected three (#2, #3, and #65) of 21 residents reviewed in the sample. The census is 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, review of information from Medscape and review of information from the National Library of Medicine, the facility failed to ensure bowel movements were monitored for residents at risk of constipation. This affected one (#2) out of two residents reviewed for constipation. The census was 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter (Foley) was attempted to be removed as ordered. This affected one (#2) of one reviewed for Foley catheter care. The census was 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff cared for a resident's tracheostomy appropriately. This affected one (#10) of one residents reviewed for tracheostomy care. The census was 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, interview with dialysis staff, review of dialysis treatment logs, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis evaluations were completed, failed to ensure communication with dialysis center was consistently done, failed to ensure the medical record contained documentation related to missed dialysis treatments, and failed to ensure the physician was notified of missed dialysis treatments. This affected the one (#03) of one residents reviewed for dialysis services. The facility census was 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at a resident's bedside. This affected one (#50) out of 55 residents observed during the initial pool. The census was 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory (labs) values were obtained as per physician orders. This affected three (#02, #03, and #09) residents out of five residents reviewed for lab services. The facility census was 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented enhance barrier precautions (EBP). This affected one (#10) of five reviewed for transmission-based precautions (TBP). The census was 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were supervised while smoking and further failed to ensure residents smoked in designated areas per facility policy. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents utilized non-combustible containers to extinguish smoking materials. This affected two (#21 and #07) of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified 15 (#07, #08, #13, #15, #16, #20, #21, #24, #26, #32, #34, #43, #48, #49, and #50) residents who smoked. The facility census was 50.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide notification to the physician or family for a newly identified pressure ulcer. This affected one (#10) of three reviewed for pressure ulcers. care. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with personal hygiene and Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, interviews with staff and Wound Physician and policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to pressure ulcers. This affected two (#10 and #11) of three reviewed for pressure wounds. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of a hospital referral and interviews with staff, the facility failed to provide timely therapy services. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for therapy services. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed during resident care. This affected one (#12) out of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain and clean and sanitary environment. This affected two (#13 and #34) of six resident's rooms observed for environmental cleanliness. The facility census was 59. Findings Included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date 12/15/24. Diagnoses included chronic diastolic heart failure, cognitive communication deficit, atrial flutter, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 was assessed with severely impaired cognition. Observation on 01/22/25 at 11:01 A.M. of Resident #34's room revealed the floor to the left side of the bed had 25 circular brownish-black marks approximately two to three inches in diameter scattered on the floor. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide timely care and services when answering call lights. This affected one (#29) of three residents reviewed for call light response. The facility census was 59. Findings Included: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 11/11/24. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, type two diabetes, morbid obesity, anxiety, and major depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was assessed with intact cognition, required partial to moderate assistance with bathing, toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, dressing the lower body, placing shoes on and off the feet, and required a walker to ambulate. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide timely pain medication as ordered to effectively treat pain. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for pain management. This facility census was 59. Findings Included: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed a most recent admission date of 01/10/25. Diagnoses included cellulitis of the right lower limb, acute kidney failure, major depressive disorder, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was assessed with moderately impaired cognition. Review of a physician order dated 01/10/25 revealed Resident #3 had an order for the narcotic pain medication oxycodone immediate release (IR) five (5) milligrams (mg) to take one tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed for pain. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure blood glucose levels were adequately monitored as ordered to determine the need for sliding scale insulin. This affected one (#13) of three residents reviewed for insulin usage. The facility census was 59. Findings Included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 had an admission date 11/06/24. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, alcohol dependence, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, acute kidney failure, and hypertension. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was assessed as cognitively intact. Review of a plan of care dated 11/06/24 revealed Resident #13 had the potential for hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia related to diabetes. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration records were accurately documented to reflect blood glucose monitoring. This affected one (#13) of three residents reviewed for insulin usage. The facility census was 59. Findings Included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 had an admission date 11/06/24. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, alcohol dependence, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, acute kidney failure, and hypertension. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was assessed as cognitively intact. Review of a plan of care dated 11/06/24 revealed Resident #13 had the potential for hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia related to diabetes. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the administration of as needed medication was documented in the resident's medical record. Additionally, the facility failed to document care and services related to incontinent care and application of durable medical equipment as ordered. This affected three (#15, #45 and #18) of three residents reviewed for medical record accuracy. The facility census was 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interviews, review of the facility's self-reported incident (SRI) and investigation, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident physical abuse when a resident struck another resident with a cane, and a third resident came up behind the resident and struck the same resident. This affected one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 51.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent elopement. This affected one (Resident #24) of three reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered timely. This affected one resident (#12) of four observed for medication administration. The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of staffing schedules and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide eight hours of continuous Registered Nurse (RN) care seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, review of dishwasher logs and manufacturers instructions, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher temperatures and sanitation was being followed as per manufacturer instructions. This had the potential to affect 44 out of 45 residents residing in the facility, two (#39 and #46) residents did not receive their meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an admission assessment on a newly admitted residents. This affected one (#33) of three residents reviewed who were newly admitted . The facility census was 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected two (#57 and #33) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and review of manufacturer instructions, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as physician orders resulting in three medication errors out of 32 opportunities or a 9.37 percent (%) medication error rate. This affected two (#32, #56) of three residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interviews and review of manufacturer instructions, the facility failed to ensure a residents insulin pen was primed according to manufacturer guidelines resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (#32) of three residents observed for medication administration. Facility census was 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of hospital medical records, observations, staff interview, review of manufactures instruction policy review and review of guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed. This affected two residents (#33 and #34) of three residents reviewed for infection control. Facility census was 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview, review of the facility policy, and review of the guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to thoroughly assess the resident's skin and failed to timely identify the resident's pressure ulcers until they reached an advanced stage. This resulted in Actual Harm to Residents #32, #39, and #42 who developed pressure ulcers while in the facility which were not identified until they had reached an advanced stage. Resident #42 was not assessed for the risk of pressure ulcer until after the resident developed four pressure ulcers (a stage III pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed) to the right thigh, a stage III pressure ulcer to the superior coccyx, an unstageable pressure ulcer (slough and/or eschar: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident's oxygen tubing was clean and changed regularly and failed to ensure Resident #16 had a physician's order for the administration of oxygen. This affected two (Residents #16 and #41) of three residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility census was 41 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications including ensuring that expired medications were not being used. This affected two of the four medication carts and one of one medication storage room located in the facility. This had the potential to affect eighteen residents due to expired medications and one other resident (#30) related to medication storage. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (Resident #31) of one resident reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one (Resident #31) of one resident reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment of the resident's cognition and behavior on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected three (#37, #38, and #47) of 22 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have a discharge summary or recapitulation of stay for a resident. This affected one (Resident #307) of four residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to complete urinary catheter care as physician ordered for a resident. This affected one (Resident #25) one resident reviewed for a urinary catheter. The facility identified two residents with urinary catheters. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely re-assess and address the resident's significant weight gain or weight loss. This affected two residents (#37 and #47) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record was accurate. This affected one (Resident #20) of 22 residents reviewed for accuracy of the medical records. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide or offer the COVID-19 vaccines to residents. This affected two (#2 and #48) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide notification to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the residents' transfers to the hospital. This affected two (Residents #26 and #54) of six residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility risk assessment, review of water temperature logs, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedures the facility failed to ensure the laundry room maintain proper infection control measures. In addition the facility failed to ensure an effective Legionella monitoring program was in place. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the electronic medical record contained documentation of physician's orders for advanced directives for two Residents (#23 and #46) of three reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedures the facility failed to ensure a request for a demand bill was carried out appropriately to ensure a resident continued to receive Medicare Part A services as requested. This affected one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and their responsible parties were provided with transfer discharge notices for residents hospitalization. This affected three Residents (#8, #23 and #46) of three reviewed for transfer discharge notices. The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were submitted within 14 days of completion to Center for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS). This affected one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for resident assessments based on information submitted to CMS. The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, and resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to ensure care planning conferences were being held. This affected two Residents (#7 and #21) of four reviewed for care planning conferences. The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered splint was implemented. This affected one (Resident #21) of one resident reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM). The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure the facility failed to ensure medical care equipment was plugged into a proper electrical outlet. This affected one (Resident #15) resident during a random observation. In addition the facility failed to ensure smoking material was properly secure for a dependent resident. This affected one (Resident #8) out of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility further failed to ensure fall interventions were in place to prevent a resident's fall. This affected one (Resident #37) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had proper diagnoses for medications and also failed to ensure blood draw orders had the correct reason. This affected one (Resident #8) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of five medication carts were locked and secure. This had the potential to affect two Resident's (#44 and #45) the facility identified as independently mobile and cognitively impaired. The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to have all require staff members attendance the quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings as required. This had the potential to effect all 48 residents residing in the facility.
39 fire safety citations on file: 7 on January 8, 2026, 10 on February 20, 2025, 7 on December 13, 2022, 15 on December 5, 2019.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | Fine | $62,956 |
| May 21, 2026 | Payment Denial | 3 days from July 22, 2026 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.07 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.82 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.79 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.72 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 4.27 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.17 on weekdays and 2.82 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 27.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.94 in July to September 2025 to 3.07 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.07 | 0.55 | 3.17 | 2.82 | 27.9% | 0 of 90 | 59 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.09 | 0.49 | 3.19 | 2.85 | 24.2% | 0 of 92 | 58 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.94 | 0.27 | 3.00 | 2.79 | 15.1% | 0 of 92 | 50 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.5 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 30.2 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.8 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.1 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Aventura at Shiloh Springs's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 20 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 16 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
3.9% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: AVENTURA AT SHILOH SPRINGS LLC. CMS links this home to Aventura Health Group, a group of 11 nursing homes averaging 1.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaszirer, Moishe | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 12/01/2021 |
| Scharf, Mordechai | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 12/01/2021 |
| Kaszirer, Moishe | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Scharf, Mordechai | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Kaszirer, Moishe | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.