2125 Royce Street, Portsmouth, OH 45662 · Scioto County · (740) 354-6635
99 certified beds, about 85 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1975
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365313 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 28, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 28 health citations since April 2022, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.36 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.80 of those hours.
58.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Communicare Health, an affiliated group of 110 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident record review, review of the of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) form, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an incident of resident elopement was appropriately identified and addressed according to the policy implemented by the facility. This affected one resident (#90) out of the three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately completed. This affected four residents (#9, #11,#27, and #86) out of the 26 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 85.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review,observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure the dental status care plan was completed accurately. This affected two residents (#27 and #35) of three residents reviewed for dental care. The facility census was 85.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were not left at the bedside unattended. This affected one resident (#13) out of the 24 residents observed during the initial pool process. The facility census was 85.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment for Resident #28, #47 and #74. This affected three residents (Resident #28, #47 and #74) of thirteen reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility census was 86 in house.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized range of motion program to timely identify and implement therapy recommendations to treat and prevent potential worsening of a right-hand contracture for Resident #47, a resident admitted to the facility with diagnosis of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia/hemiparesis affecting the right side. This affected one resident (#47) of one resident reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Self Reporting Incident (SRI), record review, and interview the facility failed to implement individualized interventions and revise the care plan to address the Resident #69's dementia care needs related to sexual behaviors. This affected one resident (Resident #69) of one reviewed for dementia care. The facility census was 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, observation, and facility policy review, this facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier protection including gloves were in place during wound care. This affected one (Resident #126) of the three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor Resident #36's skin under a splint/boot on the left foot to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer. Actual harm occurred on 12/26/23 when Resident #36, who was cognitively impaired was identified to have a deep tissue injury (DTI) pressure ulcer (described as intact skin with a localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration due to damage of underlying soft tissue) to the left foot caused by a splint. The splinting device had been implemented following a fracture on 12/18/23. However, staff failed to monitor/assess the resident's skin integrity under the splint resulting in the DTI pressure ulcer development. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #36 received adequate staff assistance during a staff assisted transfer from bed to chair to prevent a fall with injury. Actual harm occurred on 12/18/23 when Resident #36, who was cognitively impaired, at risk for falls and required substantial/maximal assistance from staff for transfers sustained a fall during a one-person staff assisted transfer. At the time of the transfer, the nursing assistant, (NA) #170 failed to use a gait belt and the resident fell to the floor with a resulting fracture of the left ankle. This affected one resident (#36) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 92.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included the level of staff assistance required for transfers. This affected one of three sampled residents (Resident #36). The facility census was 92.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to include all the mental health diagnoses on the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) for Resident #8. This affected one (#8) of three residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to identify and implement treatment for residents with skin alterations. This affected two (#3 and #20) of the two residents reviewed for non-pressure skin alterations during the annual survey. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #31 was provided a speech therapy screen or evaluation as recommended by the dietitian on admission. This affected one (Resident #31) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physicians orders were in place for the administration of oxygen therapy. This affected one (Resident #9) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care during the annual survey. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was an appropriate diagnosis for the administration of an antipsychotic medication for Resident #52. This affected one (#52) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's bathroom tiles remained in good repair. This affected one bathroom that was shared by three residents in two rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]). The facility identified the three residents in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] who were ambulatory and used the bathroom. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review, review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance and interview the facility failed to maintain acceptable infection control practices, including the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and isolation precautions to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19. This affected two residents (#49 and #185) and had the potential to affect all 84 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 01/21/22 with the latest readmission of 04/01/22 with the admitting diagnoses of non-pressure chronic ulcer of foot, diabetes mellitus, plantar fascia affirmations, constipation, obstructive sleep apnea and chronic peripheral venous insufficiency. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a clean and functional environment for all residents with evidence of poor repair to five rooms that required wall repairs and paint. This affected seven residents who resided in Rooms 38, 32, 28, 157 and 165. The facility census was 84. Findings Include: On 04/06/22 at 4:35 P.M. observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the west wall of the room had paint that was visually bubbled up and peeling away from the wall. Some areas had exposed dry wall and other exposed areas from missing paint. Observation and interview with Maintenance Director #237 and Maintenance Technician #318 at the time of the observation verified the finding. On 04/06/22 at 4:38 P.M. observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the south wall and the west wall of this room had bubbled paint that extended from the ceiling to the floor. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain Resident #136's dignity when the resident's indwelling urinary catheter collection bag was uncovered and visible. This affected one resident (#136) of two residents reviewed for dignity. Findings Include: Review of Resident #136' medical record revealed an initial admission date of 02/22/22 with the latest readmission of 03/29/22 and diagnoses including sepsis, diabetes mellitus, osteomyelitis, hyperlipidemia, begin prostate hypertrophy (BPH) with obstruction, fracture of lumbar vertebra and non-displaced fracture of first cervical vertebra. Review of an admission seven day evaluation, dated 03/01/22 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with an indwelling urinary catheter for (BPH) with obstruction. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to reasonably accommodate Resident #69's seating/positioning needs to address physical limitations for the resident to ensure the resident maintained her highest level of functioning. This affected one resident (#69) of three residents reviewed for positioning. Findings Include: Record review for Resident #69 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbances, anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, unsteadiness on feet, unspecified psychosis, dysphagia, cellulitis, need for assistance with personal care, abnormal posture and delusional disorders. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 and Resident #25 received their preferred frequency and method of bathing. This affected two residents (#2 and #25) of four residents reviewed for choices. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 12/02/21 with the latest readmission of 02/19/22. Resident #2 had diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, severe morbid obesity, repeated falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and hypertension. Review of the plan of care, dated 12/13/21 revealed the resident had an activity of living (ADL) care performance deficit; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to provide Resident #3 with a bed hold notification prior to hospital stay. This affected one resident (#3) of four residents reviewed for notification of bed hold. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 08/09/21 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, depression, congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/01/22 revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact with no behaviors. The resident had clear speech, was understood and understands. Review of the nursing progress notes revealed on 10/24/21 at 4:17 P.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to complete a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) as required. This affected one resident (#74) of two sampled residents reviewed for PASARR Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 08/17/21 with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety, delusional disorder and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/31/22 revealed Resident #74 had clear speech, was understood and understands. The assessment revealed Resident #74 was cognitively intact with no behaviors. Resident #74 required two person physical assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene and bathing. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #25 and Resident #8, who required staff assistance for activities of daily living receiving timely and adequate assistance with bathing, nail care and/or dressing to maintain proper hygiene and grooming. This affected two residents (#8 and #25) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/31/22 with admitting diagnoses of congestive heart failure, asthma, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, chronic ischemic heart disease, insomnia, atrial fibrillation, hypothyroidism and hypertension. Review of an evaluation, dated 01/31/22 revealed the resident preferred showers in the evening two days a week. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to timely identify new areas of non-pressure related skin impairment for Resident #69 and failed to ensure non-pressure related wound care treatments were completed as ordered for Resident #67. This affected two residents (#67 and #69) of three residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. Findings Include: 1. Record review for Resident #67 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including iron deficiency anemia, acute gastritis with bleeding, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, insomnia, presence of cardiac pacemaker, history of falls, unsteadiness on feet, weakness, need for assistance with personal care, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, atrial fibrillation and hypertension. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to provide routine dental services for Resident #8. This affected one resident (#8) of one resident reviewed for dental services. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 01/31/17 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, congestive heart failure, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/10/22 revealed Resident #8 had clear speech, was understood and understands. Resident #8 was cognitively intact with no behaviors. Resident #8 required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene and bathing. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #2's medical record was complete and accurate related to the resident's diagnoses. This affected one resident (#2) of 25 sampled residents whose medical records were reviewed. Findings Include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 12/02/21 with the latest readmission of 02/19/22. Resident #2 had diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, severe morbid obesity, repeated falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and hypertension. Review of the acute care hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE] failed to identify a diagnoses of seizures. [...]
22 fire safety citations on file: 3 on August 28, 2025, 6 on December 14, 2023, 13 on April 11, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.36 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.80 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.93 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.70 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.86 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.5% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.23 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.53 on weekdays and 2.93 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.31 in April to June 2025 to 3.36 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.36 | 0.80 | 3.53 | 2.93 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 85 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.34 | 0.70 | 3.49 | 2.93 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.26 | 0.46 | 3.42 | 2.86 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.31 | 0.34 | 3.46 | 2.94 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 89 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.1 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.1 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Bridgeport Health Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (57.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
57.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 78 eligible stays.
6.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 41 eligible stays.
74.2% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ROYCE LEASING CO., LLC. CMS links this home to Communicare Health, a group of 110 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Second Option Op Co LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2008 |
| Option Holdings II LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2008 |
| Romeo, Dominic | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Stoltz, Charles | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2008 | |
| Wilheim, Ronald | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2008 | |
| Royce Management Co., LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2008 | |
| Bell, Rebecca | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2021 | |
| Groves, Donna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Juschka, Dirk | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Romeo, Dominic | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| C R Stoltz II LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2008 | |
| C.r. Stoltz Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2008 | |
| Hc Real Estate Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2008 | |
| I. Rosedale Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2008 | |
| Omg Re Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2008 | |
| Option Holdings II LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2008 | |
| R.s. Wilheim Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2008 | |
| Ronald S Wilheim 2012 Spousal Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2008 | |
| Rosedale Family Investment Company, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2008 | |
| Royce Management Co., LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/15/2025 | |
| Rrw, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2008 | |
| S.l. Rosedale Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2008 | |
| Wilheim Family Investment Company, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2008 | |
| Bell, Rebecca | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2021 | |
| Juschka, Dirk | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.