Burbank Parke Care Center
14976 Burbank Road, Burbank, OH 44214 · Wayne County · (330) 624-1030
81 certified beds, about 76 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2010
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366392 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 11, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 23 health citations since January 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.48 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.
29.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Jag Healthcare, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
June 11, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided the appropriate level of supervision during mealtimes for residents at risk for choking. This affected one (Resident #49) of three residents observed for change in condition. Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility also failed to ensure medications were stored in a safe and secure manner. This had the potential to affect eight facility-identified cognitively impaired and independently mobile (Residents #18, #45, #57, #59, #61, #77, #78, #80.) The facility census was 74 residents.
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff notified the physician promptly of a change in resident condition. This affected one (Resident #56) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 74 residents.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for dependent residents. This affected one (Resident #69) of The facility census was 74 residents.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the failed to provide appropriate care and treatment to a resident with a pressure ulcer. This affected one (Resident #69) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 74 residents.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during care activities for residents with orders for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP.) The affected two (Residents #6 and #69) of the residents reviewed for EBP. The facility census was 74 residents.
September 5, 2024Complaint inspection, Infection control · 1 citation
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions to maintain skin integrity were implemented per the resident's care plan. This affected one (Resident #50) of five sampled residents. The facility census was 71.
July 26, 2024Complaint inspection, Infection control · 2 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented as required for Resident #65. This had the potential to affect ten residents (#55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, and #64) that resided on the same hall as Resident #65.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff followed appropriate hand hygiene and glove use when completing pressure ulcer treatments. This affected one of three residents (Resident #24) for pressure ulcer dressing changes. The census was 72. Findings Included: Review of the open medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date 03/13/23. Diagnoses included diabetes type 2 and Stage 4 pressure ulcer (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss). Review of the physician orders for July 2024 revealed a treatment to cleanse sacrum with normal saline, apply collagen sheet to wound bed, Skin prep peri wound and cover with border gauze dressing. Observation of Resident #24's dressing change on 07/26/24 at 9:31 A.M. [...]
January 29, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were transferred in a safe manner and in accordance with the plan of care in order to prevent injury. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for assistance with activities of living (ADLs). The facility census was 68.
December 29, 2023Standard inspection · 10 citations
- F Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure cold, perishable food (milk) was maintained a proper temperatures. This had the potential to affect all 66 residents in the facility.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary nursing unit refrigerator and failed to ensure milk was stored safely to maintain proper temperature during meal service. This had the potential to affect all 66 residents.
- E Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were complete and accurate. This finding affected four (Residents #15, #50, #51, and #64) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments.
- E Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate serving sizes were served for the pureed meal. This affected two residents (#3 and #39) but had the potential to affect all 10 residents (#1, #3, #9, #12, #19, #23, #36, #39, #47, and #55) residents who received pureed diet. The facility census was 66.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15's sacral pressure ulcer wound dressing was in place. This finding affected one (Resident #15) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #51's fall interventions were implemented according to the physician orders and care plans. This finding affected one (Resident #51) of five residents reviewed for accidents and hazards.
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed ensure Resident #51's narcotic pain medications were administered as ordered and failed to adequately monitor and assess Resident #51's pain levels prior to and following administration of the narcotic pain medications. This finding affected one (Resident #51) of two residents reviewed for pain management.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering Resident #3 and Resident #53's anti-anxiety medication. This finding affected two (Residents #3 and #53) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% (percent). Twenty-five medications were observed with two errors for a medication error rate of 8%. This finding affected one (Resident #53) of four residents observed for medication administration.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure basic infection control practices were maintained related to catheter bag placement for Resident #5. This affected one resident (Resident #5) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 67. Findings Include: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance of one staff person for completing her activities of daily living and the use of indwelling foley catheter to empty her bladder. Observation of Resident #5 on 12/27/23 at 10:29 A.M. revealed Resident #5 was up and sitting in her recliner. [...]
January 20, 2022Standard inspection · 4 citations
- F Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, review of a test tray, review of resident council minutes, diet list review and recipe review, the facility failed to ensure foods were served at safe and palatable temperatures and failed to ensure pureed items were prepared appropriately. This affected 66 of 67 residents residing in the facility as Resident #43 received nothing by mouth (NPO).
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, observation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff screened for COVID-19 signs and symptoms prior to working, failed to ensure proper use and disposal of personal protective equipment (PPE) was in place. This had the potential to affect all 67 residents in the facility.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner. This affected one resident (Resident #65) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care.
- D Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #44's assistive device for drinking was in place as ordered. This affected one resident (Resident #44) out of four residents reviewed for adaptive equipment.
Fire safety inspections
17 fire safety citations on file: 4 on June 11, 2026, 3 on December 29, 2023, 10 on January 20, 2022.
Every fire safety citation17 citations
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Use approved construction type or materials.
- E Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- F Meet requirements for outpatient facilities located next to inpatient facilities separated by fire resistive construction.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
- F Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- E Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
- E Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- E Have properly sized and located compartments to protect residents from smoke.
- E Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
- E Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.48 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.48 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.80 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.13 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.87 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 29.2% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 25.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.36 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.75 on weekdays and 2.80 on weekends, 25% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.01 in April to June 2025 to 3.48 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.48 | 0.48 | 3.75 | 2.80 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 76 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.64 | 0.42 | 3.87 | 3.07 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 73 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.80 | 0.41 | 4.08 | 3.09 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 73 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.01 | 0.36 | 4.26 | 3.37 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 75 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.1 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: BURBANK PARKE CARE CENTER, INC.. CMS links this home to Jag Healthcare, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 3.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burbank Park Re, LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 08/01/2017 | |
| Griffiths, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/04/2013 | |
| Burbank Park Re, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2017 | |
| Jag Healthcare Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2013 | |
| Fiser, Lauren | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Griffiths, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2013 | |
| Khandelwal, Shobha | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/16/2010 | |
| Burbank Park Re, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2017 | |
| Jag Healthcare Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2013 | |
| Fiser, Lauren | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Griffiths, James | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2013 | |
| Khandelwal, Shobha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/16/2010 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on June 11, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on December 29, 2023: "Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 11, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 5, 2024: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.80 hours per resident per day, below the Ohio average of 3.28.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Avenue at Wooster Wooster, 9.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Smithville Western Care Center Wooster, 10 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Champion Creek Health and Rehabilitation Medina, 11.1 mi · not rated · 0 citations
- West View Healthy Living Wooster, 11.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Apostolic Christian Home Inc Rittman, 11.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- Wooster Community Hospital SNF Wooster, 11.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 2 citations
- Country Pointe Wooster, 11.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 4 citations
- Autumnwood Nursing & Rehab Center Rittman, 11.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 34 citations
Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Ohio Department of Health, Nursing Homes and Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Ohio Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-800-282-1206. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Ohio Long-Term Care Quality Navigator (Ohio Department of Aging), where Ohio publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Burbank Parke Care Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Burbank Parke Care Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Burbank Parke Care Center get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 11, 2026. The Ohio average is 10.5.
- Has Burbank Parke Care Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Burbank Parke Care Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Burbank Parke Care Center?
- CMS lists 12 owners and managers, and links the home to Jag Healthcare. Legal business name: BURBANK PARKE CARE CENTER, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.