1387 Highway 41 North, Calhoun, GA 30701 · Gordon County · (706) 629-1289
100 certified beds, about 89 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 115340 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 29, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Georgia average is 5, the national average 9.2).
Of 34 health citations since March 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 7 fines totaling $107,867 in the last three years; the largest was $69,934, and the latest is dated August 28, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.08 hours per resident per day, against 3.56 across Georgia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.30 of those hours.
52.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Georgia average 46.0%).
CMS links it to Journey Healthcare, an affiliated group of 33 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 34 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy titled Use of Psychotropic Medication(s), the facility failed to ensure a stop date was implemented, not to exceed 14 days, for psychotropic medications administered to one resident (R) (R84) from a sample of 33 residents. The deficient practice increased the risk of adverse clinical outcomes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement a person-centered comprehensive plan of care with measurable goals and plans related to fall prevention for three of 22 sampled residents (R31, R47, and R10). Harm was identified to have occurred on 07/18/24 when the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for R31 that addressed his desire for more independence with ambulation and his desire for bilateral prostheses. (Cross reference F657, F689 and F688)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate adaptive equipment as directed by Physical Therapy recommendation for one of 22 sampled residents (R) (R31) related to a bi-lateral prosthesis to prevent further potential decline in muscle strength, joint mobility, and an ability to ambulate independently. Psychosocial harm was determined to exist on 7/18/24 due to R31's emotional state when he repeatedly expressed his need for the prosthesis to promote his independence. (Cross Reference F656)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent a fall for two of three residents (R) (R10 and R47) reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in harm to R10 when the nursing assistant failed to provide incontinence care with the assistance of another staff member per the care plan; R10 fell off the bed and suffered a closed head injury, laceration to the forehead, and fracture of the fifth finger on the right hand.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was developed to drive quality assurance (QA) measures that addressed resident care and safety, quality of life, and resident choice. This failure had the potential to affect all 91 residents who currently lived in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide Form CMS-10055 (Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services) Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) to two of three residents (R) (R145 and R146) reviewed for liability notices. This failure prevented the resident or responsible party the ability to make an informed decision related to the cost of continued therapy services.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure notice regarding the reason for the transfer was provided, in writing for three of three residents (R) (R64, R70, and R94) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure created the potential for the residents to be uninformed about their rights related to hospital transfer and subsequent return to the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR) as required for two of three sampled residents (R) (R31 and R64) reviewed for PASARR status.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to contain specific language in the facility's arbitration agreement for two of three sampled residents (R) (R86 and R84) reviewed for an arbitration agreement.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure the timely availability of personal resident funds for three of eight residents (R) (R3, R31, and R37) reviewed for access to their funds. The facility's banking hours were limited to Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM and residents did not have access to their money outside of these hours.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate financial accounting and record retention for two of eight residents (R) (R31 and R37) reviewed for resident funds.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident funds managed by the facility in a Personal Needs (PN) Account were released to the resident or resident's Responsible Party (RP) within 30 days of discharge for three of eight residents (R) (R195, R197, and R199) reviewed for personal funds.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the facility's Bed Hold Policy was provided in writing to three of three residents (R) (R64, R70, and R94) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure created the potential for the residents to be uninformed about their rights related to the facility's bedhold procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to make a referral for a Level II Preadmission admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) evaluation for one of three sampled residents (R) (R31) reviewed for PASARR Level II evaluations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to label the enteral feeding bag in accordance with professional standards of practice for enteral feeding tube administration for one of 22 sampled residents (R) (R69). This failure had the potential to result in the incorrect amount of feeding administered to the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for two of six residents (R) (R54 and R79) reviewed for medication administration. Two errors were made with a total of 33 opportunities for error, resulting in a 6.06% error rate. The nurse observed administering medication to R54 failed to ensure the resident's insulin pen was primed appropriately before the administration of insulin and the nurse observed administering R79's medication did not leave the resident's insulin pen needle inserted in the resident's skin for the proper amount of time to ensure full absorption of the medication. These failures created the potential for R54 and R79 to experience negative effects related to not receiving the full dose of their insulin.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program for two of 22 sampled residents (R) (R10 and R89) related to R89's indwelling catheter tubing observed on the floor and R10 was COVID-19 positive, however, staff failed to don personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering the resident's room. This failure had the potential to spread the COVID-19 virus to other residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) guidelines, and facility policy review, the facility failed to offer the pneumococcal vaccination in accordance with the nationally recognized standards for two of six residents (R) (R48 and R55) reviewed for immunizations. This failure had the potential to increase the risk for the residents to contract pneumonia.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R) 87) of two residents reviewed for abuse was free from physical abuse. Actual harm occurred on 2/4/2023 when R87 sustained a contusion to the scalp, left shoulder, and left knee after R300 attacked him in the common area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in a manner designed to assure food sanitation. The facility failed to assure the kitchen's metal exhaust hood cover was free of chipping paint. Food preparation sheet pans were not cleaned and sanitized prior to storing them for use, bread products and nutritional shakes that were stored in the kitchen were not dated. Undated and expired foods that were stored in the two resident hallway refrigerators were not discarded. This had the potential to affect 88 of 92 residents who consumed food from the kitchen or food stored in the two resident hall refrigerators.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was developed to drive quality assurance (QA) measures which addressed resident care and safety, quality of life, and resident choice. This failure had the potential to affect all 92 residents who currently live in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy related to the screening component. The facility failed to ensure references were checked prior to employment for five of 10 employees whose employee files were reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation (including tasting of food served on a requested test tray), interview, record review, recipe review and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food that was hot and/or well-seasoned to six of six sampled residents reviewed for food palatability (Resident (R) 21, 73, R39, R13, R89, and R9).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and review of information from ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the facility failed to have an adequate water management program designed to prevent the spread of infection. The facility's water management program was incomplete and was not consistent with current ASHRAE Guidelines, which call for specific design and maintenance procedures related to the potential exposure of Legionnaire's disease (a serious pneumonia infection) within a healthcare facility. This failure created a potential to affect 24 facility residents, who were over the age of 65, of a total census of 92.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the bathrooms on the 300-unit were clean and in good repair. This failure affected 23 residents' rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]B, 303A, 301B, 301A, 302B, 302A, 304B, 304A, 306B, 306A, 308A, 308B, 307A, 307B, 305B, 305A, 310A, 310B, 312A, 312B, 311B, 311A and 309A). Additionally, shower rooms on two units (200 Hall and 500 Hall) were in disrepair with black substance on the tile and walls. The facility census was 92.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for one (Resident (R) 201) of 64 sampled residents. R201 was identified with bruising to the breast with no witnessed/verified etiology; however, the facility failed to immediately report the injury to the State Survey Agency (SSA).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer to the resident and/or the resident's representative for two (Resident (R)198 and R68) of two sampled residents reviewed for facility-initiated transfers. The facility failed to provide the required written transfer notice, which includes information about the reason, date, and location of the transfer, as well as information on how to appeal the transfer, when the facility initiated a transfer to the hospital for R198 and R68.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility after a facility-initiated transfer to a hospital for behavior assessment for one (Resident (R) 198) of two sampled residents reviewed for facility-initiated transfers.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R) 28) of six residents reviewed for nutrition had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The facility failed to code that the resident experienced a significant weight loss, based on a 10% weight loss in six months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to make a referral for a Level II Preadmission admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) evaluation after a resident experienced a change in mental health status and was newly diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. The failure to ensure the required PASARR screening and review was completed affected one (Resident (R) 80) of two sampled residents reviewed for PASARR Level II evaluations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised for one (Resident (R) 59) of 64 sampled residents so that the care plan accurately reflected the resident's health status. In addition, the facility failed to invite R21 to her quarterly care conference. This failure created an increased risk for the resident to receive care and services not appropriate for their current clinical condition and/or in accordance with their preferences.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and job description review, the facility failed to provide care that met professional standards of practice for one (Resident (R) 200) of 64 sampled residents. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 acted outside the LPN's scope of practice and removed a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) without competency. This failure placed Resident (R) 200) a risk for poor quality care and complications related to the removal of the PICC line.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the proper storage for vials of insulin for three residents (Resident (R) 36, R65, and R90) on two medication carts observed. The use of expired insulin, which was available in the medication carts, creates the potential for decreased medication efficacy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the room for one (Resident (R) 87) of 64 sampled residents was equipped with a functioning call light that was accessible to the resident. This failure had the potential to result in a delayed response to the needs of the resident.
15 fire safety citations on file: 4 on March 29, 2026, 4 on August 28, 2024, 7 on March 16, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 28, 2024 | Fine | $69,934 |
| February 20, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| February 12, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| January 22, 2024 | Fine | $13,674 |
| January 8, 2024 | Fine | $3,798 |
| January 2, 2024 | Fine | $3,176 |
| December 11, 2023 | Fine | $7,409 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.08 | 3.56 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.30 | 0.50 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.83 | 3.10 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.08 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.70 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 52.7% | 46.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 83.3% | 44.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 5.11 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.18 on weekdays and 2.83 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.18 in April to June 2025 to 3.08 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.08 | 0.30 | 3.18 | 2.83 | 0.9% | 0 of 90 | 89 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.07 | 0.29 | 3.17 | 2.82 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 86 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.10 | 0.25 | 3.23 | 2.78 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 86 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.18 | 0.16 | 3.39 | 2.67 | 0.8% | 6 of 91 | 82 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Georgia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.50 | 0.46 | 3.68 | 3.03 | 3.3% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.12 | $17.06 to $20.66 | 43,440 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.82 | $25.43 to $33.99 | 21,060 |
| Registered nurses | $44.98 | $38.02 to $51.12 | 100,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 34.6 | 15.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 32.0 | 15.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 32.5 | 19.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.8 | 25.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.8 | 11.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Calhoun Crossing of Journey LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (41.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
41.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Georgia: 49 better, 27 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Georgia: 2 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 87 eligible stays.
8.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Georgia: 0 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 48 eligible stays.
48.0% this home
Median of homes: Georgia46.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.
1.3% this home
Median of homes: Georgia0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 75 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Georgia2.2% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 75 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Georgia97.4% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CALHOUN CROSSING OF JOURNEY LLC. CMS links this home to Journey Healthcare, a group of 33 nursing homes averaging 1.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journey Ox of Ga LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| 3 Bees Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Ajoj Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Bees Family Irrevocable Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Blue Ocean Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Journey Ox Ga Healthcare Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Shasam Family Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Shasam Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| McGuinness, Bernard | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| McGuinness, Bernard | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Journey Ox Ga Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Bilbo, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/20/2024 | |
| Brown, Kimberly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Conrad, Cameron | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Foco, Andrea | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Frinks, Terence | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Johnson, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Jones, Antonio | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/18/2024 | |
| McGuinness, Bernard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Omara, Jody | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Price, Heather | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Sillings, Nikki | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/13/2025 | |
| Trammell, Matthew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Washington, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Williams, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| McGuinness, Bernard | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/28/2025 | |
| Journey Ox Ga Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Summit Calhoun LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Bilbo, Richard | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/20/2024 | |
| Brown, Kimberly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Conrad, Cameron | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Foco, Andrea | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Frinks, Terence | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Johnson, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Jones, Antonio | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/18/2024 | |
| McGuinness, Bernard | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Omara, Jody | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Price, Heather | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Sillings, Nikki | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/13/2025 | |
| Trammell, Matthew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Washington, Richard | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Williams, Daniel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Georgia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.