Home / Connecticut / Stamford
710 Long Ridge Road, Stamford, CT 06902 · Western Ct County · (203) 329-4026
120 certified beds, about 116 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 075394 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 22, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Connecticut average is 13.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 28 health citations since August 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.76 hours per resident per day, against 3.73 across Connecticut and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.74 of those hours.
24.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Connecticut average 37.4%).
CMS links it to Civita Care Centers, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure an accident was reported timely when Resident #1 hit his/her hip during a transfer.
Inspectors wroteBased on tour of the kitchen, observations, review of facility policy and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that expired food items were discarded in a timely manner, dishwasher temperatures and sanitizing sink sanitizer concentrations were consistently recorded. The facility also failed to ensure the 3-bay sink was used appropriately, and clean dishes were stored in a sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interviews for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices (Resident #5), the facility failed to consistently provide a shower twice a week per the resident's preference.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation and staff interviews for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #73), the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from physical abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy review and staff interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #131) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of the cause of an unwitnessed fall with bruising per facility policy.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation facility policy and interview for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #128) reviewed for Hospitalization, the facility failed to provide a bed hold form to the resident/resident representative when resident was sent to the hospital and follow policy and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical review, review of policy and interview for the only resident reviewed for dementia (Resident #4), the facility failed to ensure staff initiated a care plan for a resident with dementia.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #61), the facility failed to ensure staff reported weight discrepancies.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to implement professional standards of care when Resident #1 was found unresponsive to determine if the episode was cardiac versus choking.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility documentation, job descriptions, and interviews for 7 of 8 units, the facility failed to ensure the environment was clean, maintained in good repair, and a in a homelike manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, facility policy and interview the facility failed to date and discard medications timely, failed to store treatment supplies according to facility policy, and failed to ensure medication refrigerators temperature logs were complete.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the facility policy, and interviews the facility failed to label and date food items and discard when appropriate, maintain a clean and sanitary environment, and have garbage cans stored or covered away from clean area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #73) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated with dignity during mealtime.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy review, and interviews for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #32 and 73) reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed to have clearly documented advance directive information according to facility policy.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse, the facility failed to protect Resident #19 from physical abuse with resulting injury by Resident #201, who had a history of wandering in and out of other residents' rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #201) who had a history of behaviors and wandering in other residents' rooms, the facility failed to immediately report to the state agency when Resident #201 wandered into Resident #19's room, an altercation ensued, and Resident #19 sustained a skin tear that required steri strips.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 1 resident (Resident #53) reviewed for psychotropic medications, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the resident's use of psychotropic medications and behaviors.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 1 resident (Resident #30), reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to ensure that the resident was invited to participate in a resident care conference.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 1 resident (Resident #53) reviewed for psychotropic medication, the facility failed to obtain a Valproic Acid Level as ordered by the Psychiatric APRN, and for 1 resident (Resident #401) reviewed for medications, the facility failed to administer a cancer medication according to the physician's order.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to implement interventions for a resident with an unplanned weight loss in a timely manner and for 2 residents (Resident #16 and 71) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure fluid intake and output were monitored according to professional standards and facility policy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 58) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #72) reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to document intake totals for a resident on a fluid restriction.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #53) who was receiving a psychotropic medication, the facility failed to identify and monitor specific target behaviors that the psychotropic medication was being used to treat.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #73) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure that the resident was evaluated for the need for assistive adaptive equipment.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #5 and 60) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the resident's transfer to the hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #16 and 71) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record reflected complete and accurate documentation related to fluid intake, for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #5) the facility failed to ensure that weights were documented in the resident's medical record, and for 1 resident (Resident #53) reviewed for psychotropic medication, the facility failed to ensure that the mental health diagnoses were added to the resident's clinical record and failed to ensure that the psychiatric notes reflected accurate documentation related to medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and interviews for one of five residents (Resident #29) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure the resident received medications in accordance with physicians' orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of five residents (Resident #29) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (prn) antianxiety medication was limited to 14 days, and the facility policy failed to identify as needed psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days.
5 fire safety citations on file: 4 on September 26, 2023, 1 on August 10, 2021.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Connecticut | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.76 | 3.73 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.35 | 3.37 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.13 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.89 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 24.7% | 37.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 38.9% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.93 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.93 on weekdays and 3.35 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.61 in April to June 2025 to 3.76 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.74 | 3.93 | 3.35 | 1.3% | 0 of 90 | 116 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.98 | 0.66 | 4.13 | 3.61 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 109 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.84 | 0.65 | 3.95 | 3.55 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 113 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.61 | 0.64 | 3.72 | 3.33 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 119 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Connecticut, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.66 | 0.61 | 3.80 | 3.31 | 6.0% | 1.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.53 | $20.14 to $22.68 | 21,380 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $35.43 | $32.05 to $36.94 | 8,540 |
| Registered nurses | $49.39 | $41.40 to $58.58 | 40,110 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Connecticut | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.6 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.5 | 16.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 4.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.7 | 17.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.2 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.0 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Civita Care Center at Long Ridge's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (50.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
50.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Connecticut: 75 better, 2 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 199 eligible stays.
13.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Connecticut: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 230 eligible stays.
8.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Connecticut: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 123 eligible stays.
45.6% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut58.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 90 residents counted.
0.9% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 112 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut1.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 112 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Connecticut100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: BH LONG RIDGE LLC. CMS links this home to Civita Care Centers, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ct6 Opco Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 10/01/2024 |
| Esnh LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2024 | |
| Jpnh LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2024 | |
| Pepper, Yehuda | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Schwarcz, Eli | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| 710 Long Ridge LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 10/01/2024 | |
| Schwarcz, Eli | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Pepper, Yehuda | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Antipuesto, Cris | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Pepper, Yehuda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| 710 Long Ridge LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/10/2025 | |
| Ct6 Opco Holdco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2024 | |
| Ct6 Propco Holdco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/10/2025 | |
| Esnh LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/15/2025 | |
| Everflow Healthcare LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/10/2025 | |
| Jpnh LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/15/2025 | |
| Sfnh LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/10/2025 | |
| Antipuesto, Cris | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/10/2025 | |
| Friedman, Samuel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Fusco, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/10/2025 | |
| Pepper, Yehuda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Schwarcz, Eli | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Templer, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Connecticut. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.