375 S 11th St., Clinton, IN 47842 · Vermillion County · (765) 832-2491
100 certified beds, about 73 residents a day · Government - City/county · Medicare and Medicaid since 1988
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155319 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 11, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
None of its 15 health citations since June 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.50 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.66 of those hours.
50.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to American Senior Communities, an affiliated group of 90 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had effective pain management for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pain management (Resident 43).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medication according to physician orders and held medications without a physician order for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 6).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication prescription label matched the physician's order for 1 of 35 medication administrations observed (Resident 28).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an influenza vaccination was offered or administered to 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered medication was administered and documented appropriately for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration assessment had been completed for a resident who was observed to self-administer her medications for 1 or 1 random observation (Resident 15).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were completed timely for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for care plan meetings (Residents 12 and 24).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) followed proper standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care (Resident 218).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication storage areas were free from personal drinks, and failed to ensure expired medication was disposed of (Resident 38) for 2 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper food handling for 1 of 2 dining observations and failed to ensure proper handwashing for 3 of 3 dining observations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were addressed in a dignified manner for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Residents 18, 30, and 10). Findings Include: 1. During the lunch meal observation, on 5/30/23 at 12:20 p.m., Resident 18 was sitting at the lunch table and was being assisted with eating by Activity Assistant 5. Activity Assistant 5 addressed Resident 18 as Mama. She asked Resident 18, Mama, would you like to take a bite? Activity Assistant 5 proceeded to assist the Resident 18 with eating and asked, Mama, would you like to take a drink? Resident 18's record was reviewed on 6/1/23 at 10:00 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL, activities related to personal care) were completed for 4 of 24 residents reviewed for ADL care (Residents 57, 15, 34, and 38).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document, report, and address a skin condition on a resident for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for skin conditions (Resident 28).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter (a semi-flexible plastic tube with one end inserted into the bladder) which is attached to a urinary drainage bag did not touch the floor and staff failed to follow the proper procedure for changing a urinary drainage leg bag (a urinary drainage device attached to the resident's leg) to a standard urinary drainage bag for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for catheter care (Resident 55).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed and initiated for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 22 and 25).
5 fire safety citations on file: 3 on August 11, 2025, 1 on August 16, 2024, 1 on June 6, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.50 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.01 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.99 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.85 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.0% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 22.2% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.80 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.70 on weekdays and 3.01 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.33 in April to June 2025 to 3.50 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.50 | 0.66 | 3.70 | 3.01 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 73 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.17 | 0.59 | 3.36 | 2.70 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.14 | 0.57 | 3.32 | 2.69 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 72 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.33 | 0.58 | 3.51 | 2.89 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 71 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.4 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.0 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 40.5 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.7 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Clinton Gardens's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (50.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
50.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 81 eligible stays.
12.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 98 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 58 eligible stays.
65.1% this home
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
1.6% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 63 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 63 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: THE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY. CMS links this home to American Senior Communities, a group of 90 nursing homes averaging 3.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drummer, Carl | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Hanify, Thomas | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Horn, Brenda | Corporate director | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Lazard, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 01/29/2021 | |
| Mantravadi, Geeta | Corporate director | Individual | 07/21/2021 | |
| Payne, Monica | Corporate director | Individual | 08/09/2021 | |
| Babcock, Paul | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/30/2020 | |
| Caine, Virginia | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/10/1994 | |
| Harris, Lisa | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/22/2003 | |
| American Senior Communities LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2003 | |
| Brewer, Angela | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/16/2014 | |
| Dice, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Pupilli, Tamara | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/08/2019 | |
| Van Camp, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| American Senior Communities LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/23/2026 | |
| Brewer, Angela | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/23/2026 | |
| Dice, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Van Camp, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.