440 Minot Ave, Auburn, ME 04210 · Androscoggin County · (207) 784-3573
109 certified beds, about 100 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 205063 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 9, 2025, inspectors cited 19 health deficiencies (the Maine average is 10.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 54 health citations since February 2022, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $15,317 in the last three years; the largest was $15,317, and the latest is dated May 9, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.79 hours per resident per day, against 4.34 across Maine and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.78 of those hours.
55.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Maine average 46.7%).
CMS links it to Senior Lifestyle, an affiliated group of 4 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 54 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure clearly visible signage was posted at the facility entrance to alert visitors of an active respiratory outbreak one of one day of survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, interviews, and observation, it was determined the Facility has violated a Residents right to be free from discrimination, coercion, and interference as evidenced by the facility's refusal to readmit him/her when ready for discharge because of the resident's known behavior issues for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint investigation (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for an as needed (PRN) anti-psychotic contained a duration/stop date and failed to ensure the physician evaluated a resident and wrote a new physician order to renew the PRN anti-psychotic medication every 14 days, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint investigation (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain written informed consent for use of psychotropic medications for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #1 and #2), and failed to obtain written informed consent for the use of opioid medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2). In addition, the facility failed to monitor and document targeted behaviors to support the use of psychotropic medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint investigation (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide safety and supervision when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA#1) left a resident (#1) unattended in a bed with an air mattress, in the high position, and Resident #1 subsequently fell out of bed. This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation. On [DATE] the Department of Licensing and Certification received a facility reported incident indicating on [DATE] at 11:30 a.m., Resident #1 had sustained a fall from bed and was transferred to the Emergency Department. Review of the clinical record for Resident #1 revealed diagnoses which included Multiple Sclerosis, Muscle Weakness, and Stage III Pressure Ulcer of the Sacral region. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0., dated on [DATE], indicated Resident #1 had impairment of both lower extremities and one upper extremity. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on the facility assessment, record review, interviews, and the facility policy statement the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff that includes training to meet the resident's behavioral health care needs for 6 of 8 employee files reviewed, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8. A review of the Facility Assessment for 2025, stated its facility resident profile includes residents admitted with psychiatric/mood conditions which is 35-65% of the facility's' population. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement a resident's care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls with injury (Resident #1). On 7/20/25 the Department of Licensing and Certification received notification of a facility reported incident which stated on 7/19/25 at 11:30 a.m., Resident #1 had sustained a fall from bed and was transferred to the Emergency Department. A review of the clinical record for Resident #1 revealed diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Muscle Weakness, and Stage III Pressure Ulcer of the Sacral Region. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0., dated on 6/26/25, indicated Resident #1 had impairment of both lower extremities and one upper extremity. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for transfers and required substantial to maximum assistance by 2 staff for bed mobility and personal hygiene. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on water temperature observations, water temperature log reviews, interviews, and review of facility's Water Temps[temperatures] policy the facility failed to identify hazards in a resident's environment and implement interventions to prevent potential accidents/injuries by ensuring that hot water temperatures, accessible to residents did not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit on 3 of 4 units ([NAME], [NAME] and [NAME]) for 1 of 5 days of survey (5/5/25). The failure of the facility to ensure that hot water temperatures accessible to residents did not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit created the potential for residents to be scalded/burned by the domestic hot water. This created an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation for residents. In addition, the facility failed to provide supervision, a protective apron, and ensure safety for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #45).
Inspectors wrote12. Resident #59 was admitted in April of 2022. A review of the entire electronic and paper medical record lacked evidence that the facility offered or provided the resident and/or resident representative with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive. 13. Resident #83 was admitted in August of 2024. A review of the entire electronic and paper medical record lacked evidence that the facility offered or provided the resident and/or resident representative with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative was provided with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive for 13 of 14 residents reviewed (Residents #3, 6, 24, 29, 45, 47, 54, 59, 77, 81, 83, 88, 204, 206).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 4 of 4 units (Belfast, [NAME], [NAME] and [NAME]) for 2 of 2 facility tours(5/5/25 and 5/9/25).
Inspectors wrote2. Resident #3's clinical record contained a Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 2/6/25. Further review of Resident #3's record revealed that the last IDT meeting were held on 3/12/2025 and lacked evidence that an IDT meeting was held within 7 days following the latest MDS assessment. 3. Resident #19's clinical record contained a Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 4/14/25. Further review of Resident #19's record revealed that the last IDT meeting were held on 5/6/2025 and lacked evidence that an IDT meeting was held within 7 days following the latest MDS assessment. 4. Resident #24's clinical record contained a Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 3/22/25. Further review of Resident #24's record revealed that the last IDT meeting were held on 4/17/2025 and lacked evidence that an IDT meeting was held within 7 days following the latest MDS assessment. 5. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for urine collection for urinalysis/culture a week prior to surgery for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #24). Additionally, the facility failed to adequately assess and monitor a resident after an unwitnessed fall for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #77).
Inspectors wroteBased on performance evaluation reviews and interview, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations at least every 12 months for 5 of 5 sampled employees (Certified Nursing Assistant #1 [CNA1], CNA2, CNA3, CNA4, CNA5).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of the facility's Dish Machine Temperature Monitoring policy/procedure, the facility's Refrigerator and Freezer Monitoring Standard policy/procedure and the facility's Food Preparation -Food Storage policy/procedure, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for the ice machine, ceiling tiles, ceiling vents, fans, walls and floors; failed to ensure kitchen staff with facial hair wore facial protection; failed to ensure foods were dated in the reach in refrigerator; and failed to ensure the ice machine was properly installed to prevent backflow as required by the Maine State Plumbing Code requirements to prevent food contamination for 1 of 1 kitchen tour. (4/28/25)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living care. (Resident #67)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility's Quality Assurance Committee failed to ensure that the Plan of Correction for identified deficiencies from the Annual Long Term Care Survey Process for Federal Recertification, dated 5/9/25, were effective. The Federal citations F684 and F812 were cited again during the re-visit for the Annual Long Term Care Recertification Survey, completed 6/30/25.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff received mandatory training on it's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI), which included the staff's role and communication with the program, for 5 of 5 employee files reviewed (Certified Nurse Assistant #1 [CNA1], CNA2, CNA3, CNA4, CNA5).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to create a homelike environment and promote each resident's dignity and respect on 1 of 4 units ([NAME]) for the evening meal for 1 of 5 days of survey (5/5/25).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a specialized mental health diagnosis, whose stay went beyond the expected 30 days, had been referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for Pre-admission Screening & Resident Review Level II (PASRR) evaluation and determination for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #78)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for baseline care plans (Resident #4).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was developed in the area of smoking (Resident #45) and respiratory needs (Resident #78) for 2 of 28 sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to respiratory care for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident #23 and #78)
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who requires dialysis receives such services, consistent with the professional standards of practice in the areas of monitoring a dialysis fistula and assessing and monitoring a resident before and after dialysis treatments for 1 of 1 resident receiving dialysis (#21).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and review of facility Resident Self-Administration of Medication - Skilled policy/procedure, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly and that the facility failed to obtain physician orders and complete a safety assessment for a medication observed located at a resident's bedside, for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #24). The facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly in a refrigerator for 1 of 3 medication storage refrigerators ([NAME] Unit).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a garbage storage area and in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests for one trash dumpster and for an area outside the back kitchen door for 1 of 5 days of survey (5/5/25).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to help prevent the development and spread of infection related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for intravenous medication administration (Resident #206).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately maintain maintenance and housekeeping services necessary to maintain the facility in good repair and sanitary conditions for 2 of 4 units ([NAME] Unit and [NAME] Unit) for 2 of 2 environmental tours (1/22/25).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and staffing reviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care staff were scheduled and on duty to meet the needs of residents that reside in the facility. This has the potential to affect all residents needing assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to linen handling for 2 of 2 observations ([NAME] Unit and [NAME] Unit) for 1 of 1 day of survey. (1/22/25)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner that maintains each resident's dignity and respect when staff failed knock on the resident's door and announce who they were before they entered the resident's room for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #4).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment was free from the potential risk of serious accidents/tripping hazards relating to loose, unsecured linoleum flooring that had pulled up along an edge and is not secure for 1 of 4 units ([NAME] unit [core 1]) for 1 of 1 day of survey. (1/22/25) Finding On 1/22/25 at 11:27 a.m., 2 surveyors observed in the center of [NAME] unit (core 1) an approximately 2 foot by 1 foot area of linoleum flooring missing and the edges were coming up causing a trip hazard. At his time, in an interview, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #6) stated that the desk that had been here had been removed and she confirmed that the linoleum was coming up and it was a trip hazard accident hazard. Additionally, she stated that there are ambulatory residents on the unit. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and a sample lunch test tray, the facility failed to ensure the food served from the kitchen was monitored throughout the meal service to ensure foods were maintained at adequate and proper hot temperatures to ensure palatable food for meals. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the residents nutritional needs/diets were assessed and identified before receiving meals from the kitchen. This has the potential to affect all residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in good repair and in a sanitary condition for 3 of 4 Units ([NAME] Place, [NAME] Place and [NAME] Place) and the Laundry room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain respiratory equipment consistent with the facility's Respiratory Therapy instructions for 3 of 3 residents reviewed that were receiving respiratory services (#22, #21, #26).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and interviews, facility failed to adequately date and properly dispose of open medications according to manufacturer specifications and failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the supply available for use on 3 of 4 units observed (Belfast Place, [NAME] Place and [NAME] Place).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, the facility failed to serve and store food in a sanitary manner on 3 of 5 survey days. Also the facility failed to keep accurate and complete temperature logs in the main kitchen and unit kitchens.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to help prevent cross contamination and/or development of infection by maintaining a safe and sanitary environment related to personal toileting items, Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) and linen handling for 3 of 5 days of survey on 3 of 4 units. ([NAME] Place, [NAME] Place and [NAME] Place)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner that maintains each resident's dignity and respect when staff failed to serve all residents seated at the same table at the same time for 1 of 4 meals observed (2/5/24 lunch).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to make reasonable accommodations to bed side rails and a bed extender for 1 of 1 resident (#449) reviewed for accommodations on 3 of 5 days of survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form was provided at least two days prior to end of Skilled services for 2 of 4 residents whose Medicare Part A Skilled services were discontinued (Residents #66 and #450). In addition, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) form 10055, which included appeal rights and liability of payment was provided at least two days prior to a resident's last covered day and with the correct date of services ending for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#91, #349 and #450) whose Medicare Part A services were discontinued.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's privacy during his stay on the [NAME] Unit. (Resident #302).
Inspectors wroteBased in interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of medication diversion for 1 of 1 misappropriation of medication allegation investigated.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue a bed hold notice which included the daily bed hold cost, to a resident, known family member or legal representative for 1 of 4 sampled residents who had been transferred to the hospital (#55).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure documentation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in the clinical record for 1 of 1 residents sampled from a list of residents on EBP. ( #56 )
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan by an interdisciplinary team (IDT), that included, to the extent possible, participation of the resident and/or his/her representative, Resident #67) and the facility failed to ensure a care plan was updated in the areas of Activities of Daily Living for Resident (#10) to increase independent activity/mobility for 2 of 36 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation, failed to determine that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained, failed to ensure that two people who are authorized to administer medications signed the Shift Count page indicating that they counted all controlled substances at the change of shift for multiple shifts between 1/15/24 through 2/6/24 and failed to ensure that the nurse receiving a pharmacy delivery of controlled substance had two signatures confirming entry to bound book for 1 of 1 deliveries reviewed on 1 of 4 units ([NAME] Place).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to assist the resident in obtaining routine and emergency dental care within 3 days, after lost of dentures for 1 of 1 resident revewed for dental (#3).
Inspectors wroteBased on Medical Record review, menu review and interviews Resident (#302), Assistant Dietary Manager, and Charge Nurse on Belfast Unity, the facility diet ordered for Resident 302 with increased protein requirement.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure documentation for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in the clinical record for 1 of 1 residents sampled from a list of residents on EBP. (#56 )
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program which includes, at a minimum, training on abuse, resident rights and dementia management by failing to ensure that 5 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA) employed, completed the required annual training (CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #3, CNA #4 and CNA #5).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing information in a prominent place readily accessible and visible to all residents and all visitors for 5 of 5 days of survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was developed for the risk of wandering/elopement for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for wandering. (#41)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, the facility's Dishwasher Temperature Log review, the facility's Dish Machine Use policy and the facility's Sanitation Policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for the ice machine, fans, the dishwasher hood, shelving, ceiling tiles, ceiling air vents, the food slicer, the standing mixer and the walk-in refrigerator. Additionally, The facility also failed to date, label and/or seal foods in a reach-in freezer, in two reach-in refrigerators and in the walk-in refrigerator. Further, the facility failed to monitor the dishwasher rinse cycle temperatures for 1 of 1 kitchen tours on 1 of 3 days of survey (2/7/22).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program which includes, at a minimum, training on abuse, neglect, and dementia management by failing to ensure that 2 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) reviewed for in-service training completed the required training.
52 fire safety citations on file: 30 on May 9, 2025, 4 on February 9, 2024, 18 on February 9, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2025 | Fine | $15,317 |
| May 9, 2025 | Payment Denial | 82 days from June 12, 2025 |
| March 26, 2024 | Payment Denial | 7 days from June 26, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Maine | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.79 | 4.34 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.78 | 1.05 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.42 | 3.92 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.49 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.53 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 55.0% | 46.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 65.4% | 40.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.56 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.94 on weekdays and 3.42 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 21.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.91 in April to June 2025 to 3.79 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.78 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 21.2% | 0 of 90 | 100 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.87 | 0.78 | 3.96 | 3.62 | 16.1% | 0 of 92 | 88 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.91 | 0.93 | 4.10 | 3.43 | 5.7% | 0 of 92 | 86 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.91 | 0.83 | 4.08 | 3.47 | 4.7% | 0 of 91 | 99 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Maine, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.35 | 1.06 | 4.52 | 3.95 | 9.2% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maine, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.63 | $21.25 to $24.13 | 8,540 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $35.19 | $30.54 to $37.22 | 760 |
| Registered nurses | $41.82 | $38.41 to $48.78 | 16,540 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Maine | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.4 | 24.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 4.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.0 | 25.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.5 | 20.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.5 | 20.8 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.0 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Clover Health Care's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (44.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
44.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Maine: 16 better, 2 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 114 eligible stays.
9.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Maine: 1 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 122 eligible stays.
6.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Maine: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 72 eligible stays.
52.0% this home
Median of homes: Maine55.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.
1.7% this home
Median of homes: Maine0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 58 residents counted.
5.2% this home
Median of homes: Maine3.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 58 residents counted.
91.4% this home
Median of homes: Maine97.2% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: VOP AUBURN LLC. CMS links this home to Senior Lifestyle, a group of 4 nursing homes averaging 3.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vop Sls Holdco, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/01/2025 |
| Arhc Trs Holdco, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Fmr LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| J.p. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Ventas, Inc. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Vtr Property Sectors, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Vtr Trs Holdco, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Baker, Dana | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Cummings, Christian | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Fry, Brian | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Wood, Brian | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Cummings, Christian | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| K&k Lifestyle Associates | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Senior Lifestyle Holding Company | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Senior Lifestyle Management Holdings LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Slh Maine Manager, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Levy, Stephen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Smith, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Stevenson, Megan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Wood, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Zaslavsky, Andrei | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Kaplan, William | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 01/15/2026 | |
| Klutznick, James | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 01/15/2026 | |
| Blackrock Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Fmr LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| J.p. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| K&k Lifestyle Associates | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Nationwide Health Properties, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Senior Lifestyle Holding Company | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Senior Lifestyle Management Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Slh Maine Manager, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| State Street Corporation | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Vanguard Group Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Ventas, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2025 | |
| Baker, Dana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Cummings, Christian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Fry, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Levy, Stephen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Smith, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Stevenson, Megan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Wood, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Zaslavsky, Andrei | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Maine. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.