Find a nursing home

Home / Oklahoma / Okemah

Colonial Park Manor

600 West Frontage Road, Okemah, OK 74859 · Okfuskee County · (405) 786-2266

80 certified beds, about 72 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375327 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 16, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 12 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.65 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.44 of those hours.

34.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 12 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
6D
1E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
1C
July 16, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    F585 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 14, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a grievance policy, appoint a grievance official, and maintain documentation of the results of all grievances. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all 68 residents who currently resided in the facility.
  2. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 14, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, facility policy review, and review of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidance, the facility failed to ensure all staff were fit-tested for N95 respirator masks (masks used to protect residents and staff from the transfer of microorganisms that can cause infectious disease) prior to initial use and at least annually thereafter. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 68 residents who resided in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter bag was not directly on the floor for 1 (Resident #64) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for catheter use.
  3. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 14, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) accurately reflected the presence of a serious mental illness diagnosis for 1 (Resident #10) of 1 resident reviewed for PASARR requirements.
  4. C
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 14, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure daily staff postings included the resident census on 3 of 3 days that daily staff postings were observed. In addition, the facility failed to maintain the posted daily nurse staffing data for 18 of 18 months.
  5. B
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 14, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure beneficiary notices were completed with resident name and services provided for informed decision making for 3 (Residents #72, #77, and #78) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices.
March 26, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control measures were used: a. when transporting clean linens/laundry; b. when providing catheter care for 1 (#25) of 3 sampled residents who were reviewed for catheter care; and c. to devise and implement a plan to prevent the growth of and monitor for Legionella in the facility. The DON identified 68 residents who resided at the facility, four residents with catheters, and one resident with pressure ulcers.
  2. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurate for 2 (#67 and #42) of 2 sampled residents who were reviewed for hospice services. The DON identified five residents who received hospice services.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan included the use of assist bars/side rails for 1 (#28) of 19 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 68 residents who resided in the facility.
  4. D
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments for entrapment were completed and informed consent was obtained for the use of assist bars/side rails for 1 (#28) of 1 sampled resident who was reviewed for the use of assist bars/side rails. The DON identified 14 residents who utilized assist bars/side rails in the facility.
  5. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. monitor the temperature of the medication storage room for 1 of 2 medication rooms observed; b. ensure medications were secured for 2 of 6 medication/treatment carts observed; and c. ensure glucose test strips were dated when opened for 2 of 6 medication/treatment carts observed. The DON identified two medication rooms and six medication/treatment carts in the facility.
  6. D
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    F909 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure regular inspections of beds and bed rails were completed to identify areas of possible entrapment for 1 (#28) of 1 sampled resident who was reviewed for assist bars/side rails. The DON identified 14 residents who utilized assist bars/bed rails.
November 30, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to perform fall assessments after falls and initiate interventions to help prevent falls for one (#36) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls. The administrator identified 70 residents residing in the facility.

Fire safety inspections

12 fire safety citations on file: 4 on July 16, 2026, 5 on March 26, 2025, 3 on November 30, 2023.

Every fire safety citation12 citations
  1. F
    Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.
    K 911 · July 16, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Meet other general requirements.
    K 100 · July 16, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · July 16, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · July 16, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
    K 347 · March 26, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Ensure that corridors are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.
    K 362 · March 26, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · March 26, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · March 26, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · March 26, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · November 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · November 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. C
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · November 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.653.793.86
Registered nurses0.440.340.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.453.443.42
Nurse aides2.63
Licensed practical nurses0.57
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)34.8%55.5%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover33.3%53.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.06 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.73 on weekdays and 3.45 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.72 in April to June 2025 to 3.65 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.650.443.733.45 1.0%0 of 9072
Oct to Dec 20253.680.433.803.38 1.3%0 of 9270
Jul to Sep 20253.820.423.933.55 1.9%0 of 9270
Apr to Jun 20253.720.333.823.47 0.7%0 of 9170
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 20263.790.323.943.422.2%1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Oklahoma

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Oklahoma, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$17.27$15.82 to $18.3919,410
LPNs and LVNs$28.04$24.06 to $29.8411,540
Registered nurses$39.87$37.19 to $47.5538,270
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
24.813.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.91.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.62.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.64.73.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.41.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
25.213.714.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.94.74.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
20.417.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
27.327.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
8.216.612.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.82.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.33.01.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Colonial Park Manor's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (55.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

55.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 38 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 49 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

68.6% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

2.0% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

4.3% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: COLONIAL PARK MANOR LLC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Colonial Park Manor LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%07/01/2015
The Charles Edward Simmons Revocable Trust Dated April 01, 20155% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization33%07/01/2015
The Cynthia Denise Majors Revocable Trust Date December 17, 20125% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization33%07/01/2015
The Donna Renee Simmons Revocable Trust Dated December 17, 20125% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization33%07/01/2015
Simmons, DonnaOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2015

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2026: "PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities"
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 26, 2025: "Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail."

Other nursing homes nearby

Oklahoma contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Colonial Park Manor's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Colonial Park Manor 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Colonial Park Manor get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 16, 2026. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.
Has Colonial Park Manor been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Colonial Park Manor accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Colonial Park Manor?
CMS lists 5 owners and managers. Legal business name: COLONIAL PARK MANOR LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection