1400 West First Street, Wewoka, OK 74884 · Seminole County · (405) 257-3393
87 certified beds, about 63 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375303 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 5, 2026, inspectors cited 15 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 71 health citations since September 2023, 11 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (10 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $399,150 in the last three years; the largest was $155,928, and the latest is dated March 5, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.33 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.22 of those hours.
77.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 71 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteOn 02/25/26 at 3:03 p.m., an IJ situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to implement written policies and procedures for reporting, prohibiting, and preventing the misappropriation of Res #6's controlled narcotic medications. On 02/26/26 at 11:46 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of an IJ situation. On 02/26/26 at 12:05 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation and provided the IJ template. On 03/03/26 at 2:02 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. [...]
Inspectors wroteOn 02/26/26, an IJ situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to have effective administration who utilized its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility administration failed to:a. ensure residents' controlled medications were not misappropriated;b. establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation;c. ensure drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled; andd. report an allegation of misappropriation of controlled medications to law enforcement and the state survey agency. [...]
Inspectors wroteOn 02/25/26 at 3:03 p.m., an IJ situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to have an effective quality assurance program that acted on identified concerns and developed a plan of action to correct identified quality of care issues. On 02/26/26 at 3:26 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of an IJ situation. On 02/26/26 at 3:48 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation and the IJ template was provided. Administrator was educated on having an effective QAPI program that identifies and implements corrective action for quality-of-care issues that include but not limited to reporting allegations of misappropriation of controlled medications to the Oklahoma State Department of Health and Law Enforcement. Inservice completed by corporate administrator on 2/27/26QA Committee Review: [...]
Inspectors wroteOn 02/25/26, an IJ situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure controlled medications were not misappropriated for Res #2 and Res #6. On 02/26/26 at 11:25 am., the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of an IJ situation. On 02/26/26 at 11:57 a.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation and an IJ template was provided. On 03/03/26 at 2:02 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The facility's plan of removal showed a full audit of all controlled substances (all units and all shifts) was completed immediately by the on-sight nurse consultant. Law enforcement and physician were notified. [...]
Inspectors wroteOn 02/25/26, an IJ situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure a system was in place to reconcile controlled narcotic medications to prevent misappropriation of Res #2 and Res #6 controlled narcotic medications. On 02/26/26 at 3:24 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of an IJ situation. On 02/26/26 at 3:46 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation and the IJ template was provided. On 03/04/26 at 2:13 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The facility's plan of removal showed on 02/27/26 the administrator and DON were in-serviced by the corporate administrator regarding the facility's controlled-substance reconciliation system. The in-service included mandatory reporting and record keeping requirements. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time DON and ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours, seven days a week. The administrator identified 61 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dishes were air dried. The dietary manager identified 61 residents received dietary services from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the governing body failed to oversee the facility and coordinate with the facility administrator to ensure:a. residents were free from misappropriation of controlled medications;b. a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation;c. drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled;d. allegations of misappropriation of controlled medications were reported to law enforcement and the state survey agency; e. allegations of misappropriation of controlled medications were investigated per the facility's abuse prevention policy; andf. an effective quality assurance program that acted on identified concerns and developed a plan of action to correct identified quality of care issues. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. The administrator identified 61 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to transmit resident MDS assessments to CMS within 14 days of completion for 3 (#15, 26, and #28) of 16 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessments. The administrator identified 61 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record, review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 2 (#34 and #43) of 3 sampled residents observed receiving medications. The facility had 3 errors out of 26 opportunities resulting in a 11.54% error rate. The administrator identified 61 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an immediate written notice of discharge was provided to a hospital upon transfer for 1 (#24) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for unplanned discharges. The administrator identified 17 residents had been discharged in the last 30 days.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately code MDS data for 1 (#38) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The administrator identified 61 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clinical rationale from the physician was provided on a gradual dose reduction request for an antipsychotic and an antidepressant medication for 1 (#30) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The ADON identified 47 residents received psychotropic medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired medications/supplies were removed from the medication/supply room for 1 of 1 medication storage room observed. The administrator identified 61 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to protect residents from physical abuse for 3 (#1, 2, and #4) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 59 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. an abuse allegation was reported to the State Agency within two hours for 1 (#1); andb. a final report was submitted to the State Agency within five business days for 3 (#1, 2 and #3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 59 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteOn 09/03/25, a past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was determined to exist related to resident-to-resident abuse. An incident report form, submitted to OSDH on 08/14/25, showed on approximately 06/21/25, Resident #2 pushed Resident #1 down on the bed, laid on top of them, and tried to kiss them several times. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 71 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteOn [DATE], an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to prevent delay in care when Resident #11 was unresponsive. On [DATE] at 2:01 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation. On [DATE] at 2:07 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation and the IJ template was provided. On [DATE] at 5:39 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part,On [DATE], a review of all current residents' code status verified, and electronic records updated, and care plans updated. A list of all residents with current code status maintained at each nurse's station. [...]
Inspectors wroteOn 09/09/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide necessary care and treatment for Resident #17 who had mental health disorders and threatened to harm themself and others. On 09/09/25 at 2:14 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation. On 09/09/25 at 2:27 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation and the IJ template was provided. On 09/09/25 at 5:19 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part,On 9/9/25, A review of all resident records was conducted to identify those with mental health disorders that may exhibit behaviors related to those disorders. All residents identified will have care plans updated to reflect mental health disorder/behavior. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a physician when a resident verbalized they would harm themself and others for 1 (#17) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The DON identified 71 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not touched sexually by another resident for 1 (#5) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The ADON identified 82 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteOn 05/12/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure a resident was free from abuse. On 05/12/25 at 3:59 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation. On 05/12/25 at 4:25 p.m., the administrator was notified of the immediate jeopardy situation. An immediate jeopardy template was provided to the administrator. On 05/13/25 at 2:41 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The facility plan of removal, read in part, Corrective Action: Plan of Removal On,5/12/2025, Resident #2 was placed on 1:1 continuous supervision until placement secured for inhouse treatment due to aggressive behaviors. 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by not: a. conducting a complete and thorough investigation; b. establishing coordination with QAPI; c. implementing new interventions designed to prevent reoccurrence; and d. implementing immediate one-on-one safety measures for 1 (#2) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 85 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 (#1) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 85 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteOn 04/17/25 at 2:22 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of and immediate jeopardy situation related to the facility's failure to provide supervision to prevent elopement from the facility. 1. Resident #26 had moderate impairment for decision making, was a fall risk, and ambulated with a wheel chair. A visitor notified the facility Resident #26 was walking down the road. A CNA went and picked up the resident and returned them to the facility. 2. Resident #30 was identified as being a high risk for elopement. Resident #30 was able to leave the facility without staff aware and was located walking down the state highway in a construction zone three miles from the facility by an off duty staff member and returned to the facility in the staff members vehicle. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest management program . The DON reported 81 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received notification when they were within $200 of the Medicaid resource limit of $2000 for 1 (#27) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for notifications of trust balances. The BOM identified 33 residents had money in the trust account.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, and sanitary home like environment during 3 of 3 observations. The DON reported 81 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent abuse for 1 (#31) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The DON stated 81 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a treatment cart was secured for 1 of 1 treatment cart observed. The DON identified 81 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to have a working call lights for 1 of 3 sampled shower rooms used by residents. The DON reported 81 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's chart was updated with a new antibiotic order for one (#15) of one resident sampled for antibiotics. The DON reported 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facilty failed to ensure the temperature log was maintained for the medication refrigerator in the medication room. The DON reported 73 residents resided in the facilty.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to update a fall care plan with interventions for one (#28) of one sampled resident reviewed for accidents. The DON identified 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure scheduled activities were conducted for residents. The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. a smoking assessment was completed for one (#3); and b. a resident did not receive a burn hole in their clothing due to not having enough space in the smoking area for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The administrator identified 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan included smoking for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately document the occurrence of adverse behaviors for one (#5) of four sampled residents whose TARs were reviewed for adverse behaviors. The administrator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to the notify the mental health physician following incidents of resident-to-resident abuse for two (#5 and #6) of two sampled residents receiving routine mental health services and reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse. The administrator identified there were 72 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess the occurrence of adverse behaviors on the comprehensive assessment for one (#5) of four sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed for adverse behaviors. The administrator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to update care plans with interventions to: a. protect vulnerable residents from abuse for two (#2 and #4), and b. prevent further potential abuse for one (#5) of seven sampled residents reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse. The administrator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time DON and ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours, seven days per week. The BOM identified 68 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain COVID-19 isolation procedures per policy for four (#3, 10, 11, and #12) of nine sampled residents reviewed for infection control. The BOM identified 68 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to designate an individual as the infection preventionist. The BOM identified 68 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a scheduled court hearing was attended for one (#3) of two sampled residents reviewed for choices. The BOM identified 68 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed as scheduled for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for bathing. The BOM identified 68 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for two (#2 and #4) of four sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 76 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse allegations. The administrator identified 76 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported within 2 hours to OSDH for one (#3) of four sampled residents reviewed for allegations of abuse. The administrator identified 76 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained to promote food safety and sanitation. The DM identified 74 residents who received services from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. The BOM identified 74 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medical appointment was completed for one (#1) of two sampled residents reviewed for quality of care. The BOM identified 74 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable, attractive, and at appetizing temperatures for two of two meal services observed. The DM identified 74 residents who received services from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage containers in the food preparation area were covered with lids. The DM identified 74 residents who received services from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for one of one meal service observed. The BOM identified 74 residents who received services from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed as scheduled for three (#1, 3 and #6) of three sampled residents reviewed for assistance with ADLs. The DON identified 67 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and served at the appropriate temperature. The ADON identified 67 residents who received meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a urology consult was completed in a timely manner per physician order for one (#3) of four sampled residents reviewed for social services. The DON identified 67 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to serve, store, and prepare food in a sanitary manner for the residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were not served with plastic ware and disposable plates. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/14/23 , documented 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to a complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure competent/sufficient dietary staff to prepare and serve meals for the residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and served at the appropriate temperature. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served timely for the residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 73 residents resided in the facility. The report documented two residents received nutrition via tube feeding.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to establish, maintain, and implement an infection control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to: a. identify what type of PPE was required related to the type of isolation residents required. b. follow their COVID-19 infection control policy. c. to implement their Legionnaires prevention policy. d. to identify a resident with an MDRO on admission and implement appropriate infection control measures to prevent the spread. e. to track and trend infections since May of 2023. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the state was notified of a new serious mental illness for one (#46) of four residents reviewed for PASRR completion. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 50 residents received antipsychotic medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the OHCA was notified of residents with serious mental illnesses for two (#19 and #51) of four sampled residents reviewed for PASRR evaluations. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 50 residents received antipsychotic medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent reoccurrence of falls and update the resident's plan of care for one (#6) of two sampled residents reviewed for falls. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. the consultant pharmacist addressed a possible reduction of psychotropic medications annually for one (#25), b. irregularities noted by the pharmacist was sent to the attending physician for review for one (#25), c. they responded to a physician approved pharmacist request for one (#51), and d. the primary care provider provided a rational for not attempting a reduction of a medication for one (#25) of five sampled residents whose medications were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to have an adequate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication (Haloperidol) for one (#6) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 50 residents received antipsychotic medication.
12 fire safety citations on file: 8 on March 5, 2026, 2 on December 12, 2024, 2 on September 20, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 5, 2026 | Fine | $140,140 |
| August 16, 2025 | Fine | $103,082 |
| August 16, 2025 | Payment Denial | 13 days from September 13, 2025 |
| April 21, 2025 | Fine | $155,928 |
| May 23, 2024 | Payment Denial | 5 days from August 23, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.33 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.22 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.12 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.16 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.95 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 77.0% | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 80.0% | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 2.42 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.41 on weekdays and 3.12 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.19 in April to June 2025 to 3.33 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.22 | 3.41 | 3.12 | 2.9% | 12 of 90 | 63 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.73 | 0.17 | 3.85 | 3.42 | 0.0% | 7 of 92 | 57 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.23 | 0.10 | 3.36 | 2.90 | 7.7% | 18 of 92 | 74 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.19 | 0.09 | 3.27 | 2.96 | 13.2% | 10 of 91 | 84 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.9 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 69.9 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.7 | 27.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.7 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Wewoka Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 19 eligible stays.
10.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 46 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 19 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SPRINGHILL HEALTHCARE, LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montgomery, Aubrey | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 100% | 03/01/2021 |
| Montgomery, Aubrey | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2021 | |
| Montgomery, Aubrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2021 | |
| Montgomery, Aubrey | Limited partnership interest | Individual | 03/01/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.