2202 W Oak Ave, Plant City, FL 33563 · Hillsborough County · (813) 754-3761
120 certified beds, about 106 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105029 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 27, 2025, inspectors cited 19 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 37 health citations since August 2021, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $111,183 in the last three years; the largest was $111,183, and the latest is dated April 16, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.90 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.47 of those hours.
47.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Senior Health South, an affiliated group of 8 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 37 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to coordinate an outside medical appointment for one resident (#1) out of three residents reviewed for medical appointments.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient kitchen staff for four out of eight days reviewed. Findings Included:During an observation on 08/24/2025 at 9:23 a.m., three staff members Staff P, Cook, Staff Q, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Staff R, Dietary Aide were observed in the kitchen area. Review of the punch detail report for dietary staff for 07/24/2025 thru 08/25/2025 revealed:08/24/2025 one cook and one dietary aide clocked in for the morning shift.08/22/2025 one cook and one dietary aide clocked in for the afternoon shift.08/18/2025 one cook and one dietary aide clocked in for the afternoon shift.08/17/2025 one cook and one dietary aide clocked in for the afternoon shift. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment in the kitchen related to undated, unlabeled food items, properly disposing of food items, and following hand hygiene practices for staff. Findings Included: On 8/24/2025 at 9:21 a.m., an initial tour of the facility’s kitchen revealed Staff P, Cook, preparing breakfast plates, and Staff Q, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) plating trays. Food trays on a meal cart were observed with Styrofoam containers. A three compartment sink behind the cook side of the meal service line was observed with dirty pots and pans. On the sink was a bag of boiled eggs and bags of pancakes. Clean plate covers next to an open trashcan near the dish washing area. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to update the facility-wide assessment to determine emergency plans, staff competencies needed for care of residents with different types of acuities and specific staffing needs for each shift. Findings Included: Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed there was not a section for emergency plans, staff competencies needed for care of residents with different types of acuities and specific staffing needs for each shift. During an interview on 08/27/2025 at 12:30 p.m., the Staffing Coordinator stated she staffs the facility daily to meet the needs of the residents based off of the daily census. She was unsure what the facility assessment was. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to implement an effective Infection Control program related to ensuring meal carts were closed when unattended not offering residents hand hygiene prior to meals on one (100-high) of 4 hallways and two dining rooms observed, failed to remove red-stained towel from under one (#114) of one dialysis resident, failed to ensure sharps container was managed in a manner promoting safety, and failed to ensure one of one laundry room was clean.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to implement its protocol for antibiotic use and failed to monitor actual antibiotic use. On review, the monitoring was not completed for four months. A review of the Antibiotic Stewardship Book on 8/27/25 at 1:40 P.M. revealed the antibiotic surveillance for August 2025 was missing. A review of May, June, and July 2025 revealed the surveillance forms are incomplete. The forms did not have the required information based on policy. The forms contained spaces for required documentation to be completed. The book did not contain mapping of infections throughout the building for months May 2025 through August 2025. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/27/25 at 2:25 P.M. was conducted. She said she is the facility's dedicated Infection Preventionist. She said the Antibiotic Stewardship Policy is reviewed annually. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a building in good repair, related to cleanliness, holes in walls, bio growth and unpainted walls in two wings (100 East, 200 East) of the four facility wings toured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide activities on three out of four days observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the Influenza vaccine annually and offered the Pneumococcal Vaccine for four (Resident #3, #88, #110, and #119) of five residents sampled. Review of Resident #3, #88, and #119 records showed the resident was not offered the Influenza Vaccine. Review of Resident #110 records showed the resident was offered the Influenza Vaccine and no documentation that indicated the resident received the Influenza Vaccine. Review of Resident #88 and #119 records showed the resident was not offered the Pneumococcal Vaccine. Review of Resident #3 records showed the resident was offered the Pneumococcal Vaccine and no documentation that indicated the resident received the Pneumococcal Vaccine. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/27/2025 at 2:25 P.M. was conducted. [...]
Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the COVID Vaccine for three (Resident #3, #88, and #119) of five residents sampled. Review of Resident #3 records showed the resident was not offered the COVID Vaccine. Review of Resident #88 and #119 records showed the resident was offered the COVID Vaccine and no documentation that indicated the resident received the COVID Vaccine. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/27/2025 at 2:25 P.M. was conducted. She said she is the facility's dedicated Infection Preventionist. She said she is waiting on a new code from Florida Shots. She said she hasn't checked any of the residents' immunization status. She said her expectation is the residents are offered Influenza, Pneumonia, and COVID vaccine every 5 years. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the grievance process was followed for one resident (#45) and Resident Council members out of three residents reviewed for grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to complete a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for one resident (#3) and failed to ensure the accuracy of a Level I PASRR for one resident (#4) out of thirty-five initial pool residents. On 8/24/25 at 12:25 p.m. Resident #3 was observed lying in bed, with eyes closed and rhythmically breathing. Review of Resident #3’s admission Record showed the resident had been admitted on [DATE]. The record included diagnoses not limited to unspecified bipolar disorder, unspecified insomnia, and unspecified depression. Review of Resident #3’s PASRR dated 7/11/25 revealed it was completed at this facility and showed the resident had diagnoses of bipolar disorder, depressive disorder, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to provide nail care for two residents (#97 and #45) out of five residents sampled for activities of daily living.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance out of the bed for one dependent resident (#127) out of four residents sampled. On 08/24/2025 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #127 was observed lying down in bed with her call light within reach. She said staff will not assist her on the toilet whenever she asked them. On 08/24/2025 at 1:00 p.m., and on 08/24/2025 at 11:00 a.m., Resident #127 was observed lying down in bed. She said she has not been able to go to activities because staff will not get her up. Review of Resident #127's admission Record revealed Resident #127 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, multiple sites, unspecified fracture of right femur, sequela, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to assess and obtain podiatry services for one (#114) of one resident sampled for foot care and podiatry needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to initiate care plan interventions related to the placement and functioning of an electronic wander device for one (#97) of one resident sampled and to ensure staff followed protocol when a door alarm system alerted of an issue.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as body weight for two (Resident #3 and #28) of three residents sampled. Review of Resident #28s admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and included diagnoses not limited to Muscle Wasting and Atrophy not elsewhere classified multiple sites, Iron Deficiency Anemia, Oropharyngeal Phase Dysphagia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Depression. Review of Resident #28s weight summary showed on 4/3/25 the resident weighed 233.6# via mechanical lift, on 5/14/25 the resident weighed 224# via mechanical lift, a weight loss of 9.6#s and weight loss of 4.11%, and on 8/12/25 the resident weighed 198.2# via mechanical lift, a total weight loss of 35.4# and a total weight loss of 15.15% since admission. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the intravenous catheter dressing for one (#97) of one resident sampled for catheter dressing was changed per professional standards and per facility expectation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to post the Daily Nursing Staffing form appropriately. Findings Included: During an observation on 08/24/2025 at 9:00 a.m., the Daily Nursing Staffing form was located on the wall near the reception area. The date on the form was 08/21/2025. (Photographic Evidence Obtained)During multiple observations from 08/24/2025 thru 08/27/2025 revealed the Daily Nursing Staffing form was not posted on the 2nd floor. During an interview on 08/27/2025 at 12:30 p.m., Staffing Coordinator stated the daily nursing staffing form is only posted at the entrance. The supervisor is responsible for updating and posting the form on the weekends. During an Interview on 08/27/2025 at 2:06 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated the daily nursing staffing form is only posted up front. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less that 5.00%. Thirty medication administration opportunities were observed and two errors were identified for one (#17) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 6.67% medication error rate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews with the nursing staff, Nursing Home Administrator, the Director of Nursing, the resident's primary care physician, and review of the resident's medical record and facility policies, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by not ensuring one resident (#2) of three residents dependent upon staff to feed at meal times, was provided supervision and services related to the resident's difficulty swallowing and history of cerebral infarction and dementia. The facility staff failed to ensure the safety of Resident #2; on 3/27/2025 at approximately 5:15 p.m., Resident #2 was provided a covered food tray in the resident's room by facility staff. Resident #2 consumed a portion of her dinner meal unsupervised and without assistance. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews with the nursing staff, Nursing Home Administrator, the Director of Nursing, the resident's primary care physician, and review of the resident's medical record and facility policies, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to provide supervision and assistance during meals for one resident (#2) of three residents dependent upon staff to feed at meal times, related to the resident's difficulty swallowing and history of cerebral infarction and dementia. The facility staff failed to ensure the safety of Resident #2; on 3/27/2025 at approximately 5:15 p.m., Resident #2 was provided a covered food tray in the resident's room by facility staff. Resident #2 consumed a portion of her dinner meal unsupervised and without assistance in accordance with the plan of care. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews with the nursing staff, Nursing Home Administrator, the Director of Nursing, the resident's primary care physician, and review of the resident's medical record and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#2) of three residents dependent upon staff to feed at meal times, was provided supervision and services related to the resident's difficulty swallowing and history of cerebral infarction and dementia. The facility staff failed to ensure the safety of Resident #2; on 3/27/2025 at approximately 5:15 p.m., Resident #2 was provided a covered food tray in the resident's room by facility staff. Resident #2 consumed a portion of her dinner meal unsupervised and without assistance. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen as evidenced by dust attached to the wall above the coffee pot and plate covers, the outside of the oven appeared to have dried grease collected on it, and inside the one of one ice machine contained black biogrowth.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services related to wound care including following standard infection control practices for 4 (#5, #6, #7, #24) of 4 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to arrange and provide transportation to medical appointments for 2 out of 4 sampled residents (#11 and #14).
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medical record of two (#1 and #10) of 4 residents was complete and contained accurately documented incidents requiring a transfer to an higher level of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure food items in the walk-in refrigerator were labeled, dated, and discarded when expired. The failed practice had the potential to effect 108 of 110 residents who received food from the facility's kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident dignity for residents who require assistance while eating their meals for two (Residents #45 and #307)) of 48 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy titled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Level II upon a new qualifying mental health diagnosis for five (Resident #10, #40, #80, #78, and #30) of thirty-two residents sampled for PASARR Level II.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure resident areas and shower equipment were clean, maintained and sanitized during four of four days observed (8/3/2021, 8/4/2021, 8/5/2021, and 8/6/2021), in three community shower rooms (1st floor 100 Unit, two on 2nd floor 200 Unit) of four community shower rooms, one dining room (main) of two dining rooms, and one smoking porch of one smoking porch. It was determined that 1. a constant water drip from the ceiling was pooling and flowing down the main hallway (100 Unit); 2. shower room chairs, walls, and water nozzles were observed with black biogrowth (where); 3. the main dining room was observed with ceiling vents caked with black and gray dust/debris; and 4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews the facility failed to maintain the kitchen and kitchen equipment were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner during two of two days observed (8/3/21 & 8/6/21) related to heavy black biogrowth and dust debris observed on two of two large air return vents and a motor housing with plastic venting, positioned directly above food items in one of one walk in refrigerators.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#161) was not able to self-administer medications by one staff member (C ) leaving the resident without ensuring the resident took the nine medications, and without returning during a medication pass out of a total of thirty-eight sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#47) out of 9 sampled vulnerable residents was free from a physical restraint which could not be self-released. There was no medical symptom identified as the basis of the need for the restraint, and the facility failed to ensure that monitoring and evaluation for the continued use of the physical restraint was ongoing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to monitoring and providing assistance for eating for one resident (#160) of thirty-eight sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide needed treatment and services related to a leakage of a suprapubic tube for one resident (#64) out of 9 residents receiving catheter care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure that suction canisters were changed consistent with the physician order for two residents (#64 and #101) out of four sample residents reviewed for tracheostomy care/tracheal suction.
22 fire safety citations on file: 7 on August 27, 2025, 10 on July 19, 2023, 5 on August 6, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 16, 2025 | Fine | $111,183 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.90 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.47 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.88 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.87 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.56 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 47.1% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 55.6% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.54 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.91 on weekdays and 2.88 on weekends, 1% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.14 in April to June 2025 to 2.90 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.90 | 0.47 | 2.91 | 2.88 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 106 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.16 | 0.49 | 3.20 | 3.08 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 107 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.15 | 0.42 | 3.17 | 3.10 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 114 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.14 | 0.35 | 3.17 | 3.06 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 113 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.5 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.0 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.1 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.6 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.9 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.6 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Community Convalescent Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
47.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 88 eligible stays.
10.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 108 eligible stays.
8.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 54 eligible stays.
47.6% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 63 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 111 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 111 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LTCSP PLANT CITY, LLC. CMS links this home to Senior Health South, a group of 8 nursing homes averaging 1.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Health South Ex LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/20/2000 |
| Senior Health Properties South, Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/31/2013 | |
| Depiano, Rich | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2012 | |
| Jaffe, Howard | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2012 | |
| Mullen, Ann | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2012 | |
| Richmond, Penny | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2012 | |
| Consulting Support Services, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/28/2011 | |
| Eleus Health Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2009 | |
| Facility Support Company, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/13/2010 | |
| Kane Financial Services, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/06/2012 | |
| Giesler, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/14/2014 | |
| Rogers, Donna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/19/2019 | |
| Consulting Support Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/09/2025 | |
| Eleus Health Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/09/2025 | |
| Facility Support Company, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/21/2025 | |
| Kane Financial Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/21/2025 | |
| Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2005 | |
| Select Rehabilitation, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/19/2016 | |
| Senior Health South Ex LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/08/2025 | |
| Giesler, Richard | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2014 | |
| Rogers, Donna | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/19/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Florida inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.