Coral Bay at Pensacola, LLC
600 W Gregory St., Pensacola, FL 32502 · Escambia County · (850) 437-3131
210 certified beds, about 181 residents a day · For profit - Partnership · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 106051 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 19, 2026, inspectors cited 18 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 30 health citations since May 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $108,665 in the last three years; the largest was $108,665, and the latest is dated January 15, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.78 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.56 of those hours.
46.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
205/23
110/23
609/24
106/25
1801/26
202/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
27D
3E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
February 12, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- E Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record accurately reflected the resident condition for 3 out of 3 resident records reviewed (Resident #1, #2, #9).
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the protection of residents' personal privacy and confidentiality of medical information due to staff utilizing personal cellular phones to take photographs and videos of residents for the purpose of communicating clinical concerns to the facility's Nurse Practitioner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for personal privacy (Resident #2).
January 19, 2026Standard inspection · 18 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observations, interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent the spread of infections by not performing hand hygiene during wound care for 5 of 5 residents observed for proper infection control. (Residents #32, #53, #15, #17, #144)
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained by failing to provide appropriate clothing 1 of 6 resident reviewed for dignity (Resident #106).
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to exercise their rights for care and services regarding scheduled daily routines and failed to provide appropriate therapy or restorative services to improve mobility and strength for 1 of 14 resident reviewed for right to self determination. (Resident #123)
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate privacy while personal care was being administered by a staff member for 1 of 7 resident reviewed for personal privacy (Resident #62).
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store resident care equipment in a sanitary manner in 2 of 7 sampled resident rooms observed. (Rooms 306, 308)
- D Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a grievance protocol to properly identify, investigate, and resolve grievances for 1 of 6 resident reviewed for grievances (Resident #123).
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased upon interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to protect residents from abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident #205)
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to immediately identify and timely report an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 of 3 residents sampled for abuse. (Resident #205)
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported to the State Survey Agency, Law Enforcement, and Adult Protective Services within two hours of the allegation, and failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted of the allegation to protect residents for 1of 1 residents reviewed for mandated reporting (Resident #205)
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data (MDS) Assessment accurately coded to reflect active diagnoses for 1 of 4 residents sampled for resident assessments. (Resident # 205)
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, policy reviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for 3 of 58 residents sampled. (Residents #10, #17, #181)
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care and services for 2 out 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #123 and Resident #108).
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for a resident with limited range of motion to prevent further decline of range of motion for 1 of 7 resident reviewed for range of motion (Resident #132).
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free of potential hazards for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents (Resident #160). Additionally, the facility failed to assess for safe smoking practices for 1 of 47 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #78).
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate care, in accordance with current standards of care, to prevent complications of tube feeding for 1 of 3 residents sampled for tube feeding. (Resident #181)
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored under sanitary conditions when staff stored a personal, unlabeled insulin pen inside 1 of 3 resident accessible nourishment refrigerators. This practice had the potential to contaminate food items and expose residents to unsafe substances.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide an accurate and complete documentation for 2 of 35 residents sampled for medical record review (Resident #5 and #17).
- D Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen cylinders were stored in a safe and secure manner in 1 of 4 designated oxygen storage rooms (3rd floor oxygen storage room). This had the potential to cause fire and hazardous conditions for all 187 residents at the facility.
June 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and comprehensive care plan for 1 of 4 residents sampled. (Resident #1)
September 12, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assessed and determined if a resident was capable of self-administration of medications prior to allowing 1 of 37 sampled residents to self-administer medications. (Resident #171)
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide nail care to dependent residents for 1 of 10 residents sampled for activities of daily living (ADL). (Resident #12)
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards and facility policy for 1 of 1 resident sampled for non-pressure related skin conditions. (Resident #123)
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to appropriately monitor physician ordered magnesium levels for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident #78)
- D Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly during the initial and follow-up tour of the facility's kitchen and garbage collection bins located outside the facility.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, review of the electronic medical record (EMR), and the facilities policy on Isolation-Initiating Transmission Based Precautions (TBP), the facility failed to implement TBP for Resident #8, diagnosed with extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) urinary tract infection (UTI).
October 26, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Provide enough space and equipment to meet each resident's needs
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure linen supplies were readily available for resident care on 3 of the 4 patient floors.
May 25, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention measures intended to help prevent transmission of disease and infections for 1 of 1 residents on isolation precautions. (Resident #146)
- D Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a functional restroom emergency call system for resident use in 1 of 33 sampled resident rooms. (room [ROOM NUMBER])
Fire safety inspections
7 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 19, 2026, 3 on September 12, 2024, 2 on May 25, 2023.
Every fire safety citation7 citations
- L Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- L Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Have properly sized and located compartments to protect residents from smoke.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 15, 2026 | Fine | $108,665 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.78 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.56 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.33 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.33 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.90 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 46.4% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 34.8% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.31 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.96 on weekdays and 3.33 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.62 in April to June 2025 to 3.78 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.78 | 0.55 | 3.96 | 3.33 | 2.6% | 0 of 90 | 181 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.62 | 0.52 | 3.77 | 3.22 | 2.0% | 0 of 92 | 190 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.85 | 0.55 | 4.03 | 3.37 | 1.8% | 0 of 92 | 193 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.62 | 0.51 | 3.83 | 3.11 | 2.1% | 0 of 91 | 196 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.9 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.8 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.0 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.7 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: CORAL BAY AT PENSACOLA LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coral Bay Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/01/2022 |
| Jek Irrv Tr II | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 24% | 09/01/2022 |
| Nmj Irrv Tr II | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 22% | 09/01/2022 |
| Bamberger, Joshua | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 24% | 09/01/2024 |
| Ganzweig, Shabsi | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 6% | 09/01/2024 |
| Zytman, Shmuel | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 24% | 09/01/2022 |
| Denapoles, Christopher | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Vinson, Tammilyn | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Kerem Health LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Bamberger, Joshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Denapoles, Christopher | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Ganzweig, Shabsi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Vinson, Tammilyn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Zytman, Shmuel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Coral Bay Realty Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Coral Bay Rehab Realty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/19/2025 | |
| Jek Irrv Tr II | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Kerem Health LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Nmj Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/02/2025 | |
| Nmj Irrv Tr II | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Samba Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Bamberger, Joshua | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Bamberger, Rochel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Breitowitz, Rachel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Denapoles, Christopher | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Ganzweig, Shabsi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Jakobovits, Nathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Kagan, Jeffrey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Vinson, Tammilyn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Zytman, Shmuel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on February 12, 2026: "Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on January 19, 2026: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on February 12, 2026: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 19, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.33 hours per resident per day, below the Florida average of 3.49.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Arabella Health & Wellness of Pensacola Pensacola, 1.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Gulf Valor Rehabilitation by Harborview Pensacola, 2.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 8 citations
- Havens at Pensacola, the Pensacola, 3.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- Pensacola Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Pensacola, 4.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center Pensacola, 5.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Life Care Center of Pensacola Pensacola, 6.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 3 citations
- Bay Breeze Rehabilitation by Harborview Gulf Breeze, 6.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- Olive Branch Health and Rehabilitation Center Pensacola, 6.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 4 citations
Florida contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, Long Term Care Services Unit, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Florida Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-888-831-0404. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: FloridaHealthFinder, where Florida publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Coral Bay at Pensacola, LLC's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Coral Bay at Pensacola, LLC 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Coral Bay at Pensacola, LLC get at its last inspection?
- 18 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 19, 2026. The Florida average is 7.1.
- Has Coral Bay at Pensacola, LLC been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $108,665 in the last three years.
- Does Coral Bay at Pensacola, LLC accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Coral Bay at Pensacola, LLC?
- CMS lists 30 owners and managers. Legal business name: CORAL BAY AT PENSACOLA LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.