762 N Dan Jones Rd, Avon, IN 46123 · Hendricks County · (317) 495-7200
171 certified beds, about 137 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2011
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155792 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 16, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 36 health citations since August 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.47 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.57 of those hours.
38.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to American Senior Communities, an affiliated group of 90 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 36 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete discharge plan for a resident with diabetes and a wound from the facility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident B).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) (infection control measures requiring staff to wear gowns and gloves during high-contact care) were utilized during a dressing change for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident D).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet resident's preferences for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident 82).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective communication with a hospice agency resulting in a delay in treatment for a resident who had a dislocated hip for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospice communication (Resident 94).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a newly admitted resident, received meals prepared and served in accordance with the physician-ordered diet requirements, resulting in a significant weight loss of 6.38 percent within approximately 30 days for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 151).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff monitored a Gastrointestinal Tube (Gtube) (a feeding tube inserted through the belly directly into the stomach) feeding pump appropriately and ensured the resident received appropriate medications and positioning related to the Gtube for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Gtube management (Resident 74).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all medications were stored and dated properly and all medication labels were fully intact displaying the entire prescription in medication carts for 2 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from the potential for accidents when a protective cap for a bedframe end-piece was missing which resulted in actual harm when a resident (Resident B) sustained an 18 centimeter (cm) long by 5 cm wide avulsion skin tear which required 6 sutures for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident D) with chronic Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) and a nephrostomy tube (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the kidney to drain urine directly into a collection bag) had accurate medical orders and was receiving perineal care regularly for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for bowl and bladder concerns.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach for 4 of 8 residents reviewed for call lights (Resident 25, 50, 52, and 72).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and dated for 3 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medications (Resident 47, 49, 56, 83, 86, 106, 112, and 278).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a resident's, (Resident 102) change of condition after a fall when he experienced break through pain and a decline in his ability to perform activities of daily living for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for notification of change of condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure information reported on the Minimum Date Set (MDS) was accurate for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Resident 61).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a care plan for the use of Seroquel (an antipsychotic) medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident 43).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, (Resident 102), who had diagnoses of dementia and an intellectual disability was adequately assessed for breakthrough pain and change of condition after a fall resulting in a delay of treatment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for change of condition, and failed to ensure a resident with pain after a fall was sent to the hospital without delay after x-ray results confirmed a fracture for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for change of condition (Resident 40).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications were not left unsupervised in a resident's room for 1 of 1 random observation (Resident 49) and failed to implement fall prevention interventions for a resident (Resident 37) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to initiate a pharmacy recommendation for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy requests (Resident 13).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure lab specimens were obtained immediately with symptoms of urinary tract infection and laboratory results were reviewed in a timely manner for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter to prevent urinary tract infection for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident F). This deficient practice resulted in a delay of treatment and the resident developed urosepsis with acute kidney failure with a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and died.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, (Resident E) received treatments and services in accordance with his guardian's wishes. This deficient practice had the potential to effect 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the family/representative for a resident, (Resident F) was notified of a change in condition related to an acute urinary tract infection (UTI) which resulted in urosepsis-associated acute kidney injury/failure, (SA-AKI) and had a systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to update a skin care plan for a resident with skin breakdown for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident D).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's legal guardian participated and agreed to the changes in the resident's plan of care and treatment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident E).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to document the results of glucometer (blood sugar) results for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident D).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided to a dependent resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) (daily tasks related to resident care and hygiene) (Resident D).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately promote continuity of care and communication within the resident's care plan, to maintain resident safety, and safeguard against adverse events for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for care plans (Resident C).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error by not following the manufacture administration guidelines for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident C).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a nothing by mouth (NPO) order for a resident with dietary restriction to ensure the resident was not given oral intake for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for gastric tube feedings (Resident C).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's call lights were in reach for 5 of 24 residents reviewed for call lights. (Resident 9, 74, 31, 17, and 54)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for a Foley catheter (a flexible tube inserted through the urethra and into the bladder to drain urine) securement device was in place for a resident (Resident 126), failed to honor resident preferences to have a leg bag in place for two residents (Resident 126 and 21), and failed to ensure residents catheter tubing and drainage bags were positioned correctly for 5 residents (Residents 126, 21, 76, 41 and 94) for 5 of 7 residents reviewed for bowel & bladder.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the three-compartment sink had sufficient chemicals to disinfection items washed, chef assistant (CA) had his moustache covered, and did not touch his eyeglasses while serving resident lunches and washed his hands correctly before returning to serve on the lunch line again. The facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) while assisting a resident with did not contaminate her hands for 1 of 2 observed. (Resident 15)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident, (Resident 138) had the right for his physician to be notified of an alteration of his medication administration, when a blood pressure medication was withheld due to parameters that were not ordered for his medication, and the facility failed to ensure a resident, (Resident 115) had the right for his physician to be notified of elevated blood sugar levels, as ordered, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for change of condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was initiated and implemented to prevent the worsening of contractures for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for mobility/range of motion/positioning (Resident 42).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a nebulizer mask was covered and nasal cannula (NC) tubing was observed disconnected from the oxygen concentrator for 2 for 8 residents observed. (Resident 29 and 69)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow up with the pharmacy to ensure a resident (Resident 138) received medications as ordered by his physician for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin labels were consistent with the physician's orders (Residents 82 and 241) and to ensure an insulin opened date was legible (Resident 53) for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for insulin storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure glucometers (device for measuring blood sugar) were cleaned according to the package instructions on the disinfecting wipe for 2 of 2 residents observed for glucometer cleaning. (Resident 82 and 241)
10 fire safety citations on file: 6 on December 16, 2025, 2 on October 7, 2024, 2 on August 31, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.47 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.02 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.08 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.83 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 38.5% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 38.1% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.49 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.65 on weekdays and 3.02 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.44 in April to June 2025 to 3.47 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.47 | 0.57 | 3.65 | 3.02 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 137 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.46 | 0.58 | 3.61 | 3.07 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 136 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.52 | 0.67 | 3.70 | 3.08 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 132 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.44 | 0.57 | 3.63 | 2.96 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 131 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.9 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.8 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Countryside Meadows's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (55.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
55.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 116 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 136 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 80 eligible stays.
65.5% this home
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 55 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 75 residents counted.
0.8% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 75 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: THE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY. CMS links this home to American Senior Communities, a group of 90 nursing homes averaging 3.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drummer, Carl | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Hanify, Thomas | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Horn, Brenda | Corporate director | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Lazard, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 01/29/2021 | |
| Mantravadi, Geeta | Corporate director | Individual | 07/21/2021 | |
| Payne, Monica | Corporate director | Individual | 08/09/2021 | |
| Babcock, Paul | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/30/2020 | |
| Caine, Virginia | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/10/1994 | |
| Harris, Lisa | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/22/2003 | |
| American Senior Communities LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2012 | |
| Ahmad, Ayaz | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/05/2025 | |
| Dice, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Elliott, Tiffany | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/02/2022 | |
| Rauch, Karsen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/03/2024 | |
| Shane, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Van Camp, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| American Senior Communities LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/29/2026 | |
| Ahmad, Ayaz | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/29/2026 | |
| Dice, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Rauch, Karsen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/29/2026 | |
| Shane, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Van Camp, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.