Home / Colorado / Fort Collins
1000 E Stuart St., Fort Collins, CO 80525 · Larimer County · (970) 482-5712
120 certified beds, about 74 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1985
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 065221 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 30, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Colorado average is 8.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 53 health citations since December 2019, 8 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 5 fines totaling $48,875 in the last three years; the largest was $20,833, and the latest is dated February 9, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.47 hours per resident per day, against 3.72 across Colorado and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.72 of those hours.
74.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Colorado average 47.1%).
CMS links it to The Charly Bello Family, the Maze Family, the Swain Family, & Walter Myers, an affiliated group of 20 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 53 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility had a designated designated registered nurse (RN) acting as the director of nursing (DON). Specifically, the facility utilized the DON as a floor nurse and certified nurse aide (CNA) several times when the facility's average daily census was over 60 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review and observations the facility failed to ensure residents consistently received food that was palatable, attractive and at an appetizing temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents' food was palatable in temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, distributed and served under sanitary conditions in the two of two nourishment refrigerators. Specifically, the facility to ensure safe and appropriate food storage of food items in the nourishment refrigerators.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to employ an infection preventionist (IP) who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control which had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Specifically, the facility failed to employ an infection preventionist (IP) with specialized training in infection prevention and control.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate was not greater than five percent (%). Specifically, the facility had a medication error rate of 44%, which was 11 errors out of 25 total opportunities for error.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were properly stored, secured, and labeled in accordance with accepted professional standards for two of three medication carts. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure inhaler medications and ophthalmic solution were marked with the date when the medications were opened;-Ensure insulin was labeled with the date they were opened;-Ensure there were no loose pills in the medication cart; and,-Ensure that expired medications were disposed of properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure meals were served according to the resident's preferences on three of four units. Specifically, the facility failed to provide menus to residents in order for the residents to choose their meals and honor food preferences.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to honor resident choices for two (#5 and #54) of 18 residents reviewed out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #5 and Resident #54 received showers consistently according to the residents' preferences and plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#15) of 18 residents reviewed for abuse were kept free from abuse and neglect out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #15 from physical abuse by Resident #10.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#9) of eight residents out of 40 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure physician's orders for wound care were continued after a hospitalization for Resident #9; and,-Ensure Resident #9's wound was addressed in a timely manner by the wound care physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infectious diseases on four out of six hallwaysSpecifically, the facility failed to ensure blood sugar glucometers were disinfected appropriately between residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure that residents received adequate supervision and were kept free from elopement for one (#13) of three residents at risk for elopement out of 24 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #13 with the supervision necessary to prevent elopement. Resident #13 had severe cognitive impairments and was assessed to require supervision to substantial assistance from staff for most activities of daily living. He needed supervision to touching assistance to walk ten feet, had a history of wandering and exit-seeking, and was at high risk of falling. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors, affecting one (#11) of five residents out of 24 sample residents. Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of epilepsy (seizure disorder) and acute kidney failure that required dialysis three days a week. Resident #11 was prescribed phenobarbital (anti-seizure medication), valproic acid (anti-seizure medication), clobazam (anti-seizure medication) and Depakote (anti-seizure medication). From [DATE] to [DATE] the resident was hospitalized due to seizure activity. Within 24 hours the resident was sent back to the hospital for more seizure activity. While at the hospital, it was recommended to increase the clobazam to twice a day. The facility failed to administer the resident's anti-seizure medications consistently. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#4, #22, and #23) of six residents of 24 sample residents received food prepared in the form designed to meet their individual needs. Resident #4 diagnoses of dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase (difficulty swallowing), cerebral infarction (stroke), cognitive communication deficit, and unspecified dementia was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #4 had a physician's order for minced and moist diet texture (cannot bite off pieces of food but does have basic chewing ability). Resident #22 had diagnoses of dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, cognitive communication deficit, and other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness was admitted on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety. Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to identify and address concerns related to quality of life and quality of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide choices for preference of bathing schedule for one (#20) of five residents reviewed for self-determination out of 24 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #20 per his preference.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure two (#2 and #4) of 23 out of 24 sample residents were free from abuse and neglect. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 and Resident #4 were kept free from physical abuse from Resident #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, records review and interviews, the facility failed to adequately monitor the resident for unnecessary psychotropic medications needed to provide effective and person-centered care for one (#13) of three residents reviewed for use of psychotropic medication out of 24 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure the physician's order for Resident #13's as needed (PRN) lorazepam (antianxiety medication) was reevaluated and a rationale was provided by the physician to justify the continued use of the psychotropic medication beyond the 14-day limit; and,-Ensure behavior and side-effect monitoring were in place for Resident #13's lorazepam and Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure food in the dry storage area and the refrigerator were labeled appropriately; and, -Ensure a system was in place to ensure foods that were stored in the walk-in refrigerator maintained the correct temperature while the walk-in refrigerator was repaired.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (#1 and #4) of six residents reviewed for abuse out of seven sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure Resident #1 was kept free from physical abuse by Resident #2; and, -Ensure Resident #4 was kept free from sexual abuse by Resident #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#7) of seven residents reviewed for medication management were free from significant medication errors out of nine sample residents. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebrovascular disease (a condition that affects the blood vessels in the brain). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report alleged violations of physical abuse to the State Survey and Certification Agency in accordance with state law for two of three alleged abuse violations. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Submit a final report of the facility's investigation of a physical abuse allegation involving Resident #3 and Resident #4 to the State Agency timely; and,-Submit a final report of the facility's investigation of a physical abuse allegation involving Resident #5 and Resident #6 to the State Agency timely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Repair detached and soiled hallway ceiling tiles; -Repair improperly secured light fixtures; -Maintain swamp coolers in a safe, functional, and sanitary condition; and, -Repair sagging drywall caused by inadequate attachment to the supporting framing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#10 and #13) of five residents out of 11 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Protect Resident #10 from physical abuse by Resident #12; and, -Protect Resident #13 from verbal abuse by Resident #12.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for medication errors out of 11 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was administered antibiotic medications per physician's orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#13) of four residents investigated for abuse out of 13 sample residents was kept free from physical abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #13 from physical abuse by Resident #12.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two (#3 and #8) of five residents reviewed out of five sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3 and #8, who were dependent on staff for bathing, received their scheduled showers.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a choice of attending physician to residents. Specifically, the facility switched to a new provider group of attending physicians and did not notify all of the residents or provide choices.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident food was served palatable in taste, texture and temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen, main dining room, one of two nourishment rooms and one of two units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff performed hand hygiene and glassware was handled appropriately in the main dining room; -Ensure staff washed hands and changed single use gloves appropriately while plating and serving resident meals in the main kitchen; -Ensure food was labeled and dated and disposed of timely in one of two nourishment rooms; and, -Ensure food items on meal trays were covered during transport in the hallway during meal delivery to resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) for three (#15, #37 and #60) of seven residents reviewed for ADLs out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15, #37 and #60 received showers as scheduled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to promote and maintain the residents' dignity for two (#45 and #57) of two residents reviewed for dignity and respect out of 29 sample residents Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #45 was offered his breakfast and lunch in a timely manner; and, -Ensure staff knocked and identified themselves prior to entering Resident #57's room.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from significant medication errors for one (#1) of six residents of 29 sample residents reviewed for medication errors. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received all of his medications per the physician's orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#13) of three residents reviewed for ancillary services, such as dental services, out of 29 sample residents received routine dental care obtaining routine and 24-hour emergency dental care. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #13 with routine dental care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the laundry area was free from multiple environmental concerns.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one (#3) of three sample residents. Resident #3 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The resident was at a high risk for falls related to being unaware of safety needs, paralysis, deconditioning, poor communication/comprehension, vision/hearing problems, gait/balance problems and incontinence. The resident was a substantial maximum assist of one staff member when the resident was able to use the bedside transfer pole. If the resident was unable to use the transfer pole, the staff were to use two staff persons with a Hoyer (mechanical) lift for transfers. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#3) of five residents' call light system was functioning out of five sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3's room call light was functioning properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (#8 and #9) of three residents reviewed out of 11 sample residents for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) received appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her abilities. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide consistent showers for dependent Residents #8 and #9; and, -Provide regularly scheduled personal care to Resident #8.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to ensure residents' right to be free from abuse for three (#13, #206 and #103) of five residents investigated for abuse out of 40 sample residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 was free from verbal abuse and mental anguish. The resident was unable to speak for herself. The resident was observed, by staff, as crying and tearful following the allegation involving certified nurse aide (CNA) #10. Additional allegations of abuse were discovered during the investigation for CNA #10. A resident alleged CNA #10 yelled at other residents and verbally abused resident #102. In addition, the facility failed to ensure safety for Resident #206 and Resident #103 resulting in physical abuse. Cross-reference F610: Evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations for abuse were thoroughly investigated for one (#13) of five residents reviewed for abuse out of 40 sample residents. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate verbal abuse allegations and the staff person continued to work with residents. The facility failed to interview the appropriate staff proceeding the allegation of abuse. The facility failed to interview the appropriate residents under the care of certified nurse aide (CNA) #10. The facility failed to document an accurate array of events for the allegation of abuse for Resident #13. The facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of CNA #10's alleged verbal abuse which resulted in additional allegations of abuse made by multiple residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and services in a timely manner to prevent worsening of a pressure injury, for one (#99) of one resident reviewed for pressure injury out of 40 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to: -Document a thorough assessment of a newly identified pressure injury to the resident's left heel upon discovery; -Ensure Resident #99 received timely treatment for a pressure injury to the left heel; -Implement timely pressure reduction interventions for a newly identified pressure injury to the left heel; and -Notify the physician and responsible party timely of the pressure injury. The facility's failures led to the worsening of a pressure injury from a blister to an unstageable wound covered with black eschar.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for six out of seven resident hallways. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure a sanitary environment for resident hallways; -Clean up the dining room after an unknown resident urinated on the floor daily; and -Clean the air mattress cover for Resident #49.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming for four (#23, #13, #77 and #76) of seven residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #23, Resident #13, Resident #77 and Resident #76 received baths/showers according to the residents bathing schedule. Cross-reference:
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure the residents received the care and services they required as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently provide adequate nursing staff which considered the acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment, resident census and daily care and services required by the residents. Cross-reference: F677 activities of daily living services for dependent residents; F679 individualized activities; F686 pressure ulcer prevention and healing; F689 accident hazards; F698 dialysis care; and F690 incontinence care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored in one of two medication storage rooms and three of three medication carts. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Medication carts were kept clean, free from loose pills and debris; -Medications for different routes of administration were stored separately to prevent contamination; -Medication refrigerators were kept at acceptable storage temperatures and temperatures were monitored; -Expired medications were removed from the medication refrigerators in a timely manner; and -Medications were dated when opened in order for the staff to identify when the medications should be removed from service.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (#95) of one out of 27 sample residents reviewed for respiratory care and one of one washer and dryer reviewed for routine cleaning/sanitization. Specifically the facility failed to ensure the proper cleaning and storage of Resident #95s continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) equipment, and; to ensure the routine cleaning/sanitization, of a community washer and dryer, used by multiple residents on a daily basis, was completed after resident use.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for two (#99 and #95) of two residents reviewed out of 40 residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Develop a care plan for Resident #99 to prevent skin breakdown; and -Develop a care plan for Resident #95 related to the proper use and care of a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan for two (#67 and #99) of 27 out of 44 sample residents were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated to include: -Resident #67's vital sign requirements and shunt monitoring after dialysis; and -Resident #99's individualized activities. Cross-reference F698, failure to monitor Resident #67's access site for complications after dialysis; and F679, failure to provide individualized and meaningful activities for Resident #99
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a meaningful program of activities for one (#99) of three residents reviewed for activities of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement individualized approaches for activities for resident #99, a cognitively impaired resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for two (#206 and #67) of three residents investigated for accident hazards out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #206 received recommended interventions resulting in falls and ensure Resident #67 received required neuro checks.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure one (#76) of one residents reviewed out of 40 residents sampled received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible. Specifically, the facility failed to follow the bowel and bladder assessment for Resident #76, including toileting her every two hours and providing timely incontinent care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's goals and preferences for one (#67) of one out of 40 sample selected residents. Specifically, the facility did not obtain physician orders to monitor the resident's condition or access site (shunt) for complications after dialysis treatments. Cross-reference F657: Failure to ensure care plans were updated.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and interviews,, the facility failed to ensure one (#51) of 40 sample residents received food and fluids prepared in a form designed to meet her needs per physician orders, and the resident's care plan. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #51 was served mechanical soft meals instead of regular texture meals.
31 fire safety citations on file: 16 on April 30, 2026, 6 on April 2, 2024, 9 on December 19, 2019.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 9, 2026 | Fine | $20,833 |
| July 8, 2025 | Fine | $9,110 |
| December 19, 2023 | Fine | $8,347 |
| November 6, 2023 | Fine | $3,176 |
| October 17, 2023 | Fine | $7,409 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Colorado | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.47 | 3.72 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.05 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.24 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.50 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 74.4% | 47.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.0% | 44.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 3 |
CMS expects 3.90 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.63 on weekdays and 3.05 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.63 in April to June 2025 to 3.47 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.47 | 0.72 | 3.63 | 3.05 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 74 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.16 | 0.66 | 3.35 | 2.70 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 76 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.10 | 0.73 | 3.25 | 2.72 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 74 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.63 | 0.83 | 2.74 | 2.37 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 71 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Colorado, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.59 | 0.76 | 3.75 | 3.18 | 5.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.78 | $21.42 to $24.00 | 22,240 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $35.52 | $29.76 to $38.37 | 4,920 |
| Registered nurses | $48.20 | $40.67 to $52.37 | 54,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Colorado | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.8 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 3.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 29.2 | 13.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.4 | 20.0 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Creekside Village Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Colorado: 39 better, 8 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 12 eligible stays.
10.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Colorado: 3 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Colorado: 4 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 9 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Colorado65.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Colorado0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Colorado0.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Colorado99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CREEKSIDE VILLAGE REHABILITATION AND NURSING, LLC. CMS links this home to The Charly Bello Family, the Maze Family, the Swain Family, & Walter Myers, a group of 20 nursing homes averaging 1.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charly Bello Family Limited Partnership | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 09/01/2024 | |
| Maze Family Limited Partnership | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 09/01/2024 | |
| Mahrt, David | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Myers, Katie | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Myers, Walter | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Swain, Holly | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Swain, Jared | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Cottonwood Healthcare LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2024 | |
| Cecilia, Cosmo | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Roe, Sara | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Cecilia, Cosmo | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/17/2025 | |
| Reddy, Vikas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/23/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Colorado. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.