Find a nursing home

Home / Wisconsin / Milwaukee

Eastcastle Pl Bradford Ter Conv Ctr

2505 E Bradford Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53211 · Milwaukee County · (414) 963-6151

40 certified beds, about 42 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967

Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 525085 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 18, 2026, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Wisconsin average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).

Of 16 health citations since August 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 14 fines totaling $90,278 in the last three years; the largest was $14,814, and the latest is dated February 20, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.13 hours per resident per day, against 4.21 across Wisconsin and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.12 of those hours.

53.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Wisconsin average 46.9%).

CMS links it to Life Care Services, an affiliated group of 43 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
13D
1E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
February 18, 2026Standard inspection · 13 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure residents with pressure injuries received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent pressure injuries from developing for 1 (R38) of 4 residents reviewed with pressure injuries. R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was at risk for the development of pressure injuries. R38's admission assessment does not indicate R38 has pressure injuries. Hospital discharge paperwork dated 12/5/25 does not indicate R38 had pressure injuries or had treatment orders for pressure injuries. On 12/7/25 a registered nurse documents a list of skin concerns including scabbed areas on R38's bilateral heels. These areas are not comprehensively assessed. [...]
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure food was served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.* The 5th floor kitchen server for lunch was observed. The Cook-E used gloves for multiple tasks, including handling ready-to-eat foods. The food thermometer had a tethered string that was not maintained to prevent food contamination. This had the potential to affect all 20 residents on the 5th floor.
  3. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 1 resident received the necessary assessment to self-administer medications. On 2/16/26 at 9:44 a.m. Surveyor interviewed R2. Surveyor observed an Advair inhaler on the table beside the bed. Surveyor asked R2 if she uses the inhaler independently. R2 stated she does and has been using that inhaler for many years. Surveyor asked R2 if the nurses leave the inhaler in R2 possession and R2 stated yes. Surveyor reviewed R2 assessments, and a self-administration of medications assessment was not completed.
  4. D
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident with psychotropic medications was comprehensively assessed for their use. This was observed with 1 (R38) of 5 resident medication reviews.* R38 was admitted [DATE] with Duloxetine (antidepressant), Bupropion (antidepressant) and Trazadone (antidepressant). The diagnosis for Duloxetine is for depression, Bupropion for dysthymia and Trazadone for insomnia. The medical record does not have documentation of a comprehensive assessment for the use of these medications.
  5. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility did not document additional assessments for the Care Area Assessment (CAA) triggered by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment information. This would include a summary of the information to complete a comprehensive assessment. This was observed with 3 (R38, R23, and R62) of 12 resident reviews. * R38 had an admission MDS assessment completed on 12/12/25. The MDS triggered CAAs for Falls, Pressure Injury, Psychotropic Drug Use, Psychosocial Well-Being and Behavioral Symptoms. The CAAs did not have an additional assessment summary analyzing the MDS data and need for an individualized care plan. * R23 had a Significant Change in Status (SCS) MDS assessment completed on 11/19/25. The MDS triggered a CAA for Falls. The CAA did not have an additional assessment summary analyzing the MDS data and need for an individualized care plan. [...]
  6. D
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R52) of 12 residents reviewed received a completed Minimum Data Set (MDS). R52 was discharged to the hospital on 9/10/25 due to a change in condition. A discharge MDS was not completed.
  7. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 12 residents reviewed received an accurate comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. R2 was admitted on [DATE] and the admission MDS dated [DATE] assess R2 with the need for tracheostomy care. Surveyor notes R2 does not have a tracheostomy.
  8. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 1 (R38) of 12 sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans.*R38's baseline care plan was not thoroughly completed as every section of R38's baseline care plan was not completed. Findings Include:The facility did not provide a baseline care plan policy and procedure for review. [...]
  9. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not complete neurological (neuro) checks in accordance with policy and procedure for 1 (R38) of 4 residents reviewed for unwitnessed falls.*R38 did not receive neurological checks in accordance with facility's policy and procedure for 1 of 3 unwitnessed falls. Findings Include:The facility's Falls policy and procedure revised 12/25 documents:2. In addition, the nurse shall assess and document/report the following:e. [...]
  10. D
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    F685 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident (R23) with hearing and vision impairment received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing abilities.*Surveyor observed R23 to not be wearing R23's bilateral hearing aids and glasses during the survey process. Findings Include:The facility's Hearing Impaired Resident, Care of policy and procedure revised 2/18 documents:Policy Statement:Staff will assist hearing impaired residents to main effective communication with clinicians, caregivers, other residents and visitors. Policy Interpretation and Implementation:3. Staff will assist residents with care and maintenance of hearing devices.4. Staff will help residents who have lost or damaged hearing devices in obtaining services to replace the devices.j. Evaluate resident's adaptive needs and progress at regular intervals. [...]
  11. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 (R23, R38 and R62) of 4 sampled residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent and be free of accidents. * On 2/2/26 R23 was evaluated by physical therapy, after the facility risk management team determined R23 was doing better, to assess changing R23's transfer status from the use of a mechanical lift to being transferred with a sit to stand or through a stand-pivot transfer. Following the evaluation R23 was upgraded to transfer with the assist of two staff using a sit to stand. R23's power of attorney for healthcare was not consulted with or notified of this change in care for R23. [...]
  12. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R6) of 3 residents observed during medication pass received medications without errors or that the medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater. The medication error rate was 33.33%.*On 2/17/26 at 9:00 a.m., Surveyor observed R6 receive his medications through his G (gastrointestinal) tube. Surveyor observed RN (Registered Nurse)- F dispense R6's morning medications into individual medication cups and then crush them individually. RN-F instilled all the medications at the same time without water flushes in between each medication.
  13. C
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interviews, the facility did not ensure the required nurse staff posting information was posted. The facility did not document the total amount of hours for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs). This had the potential to affect all 39 residents in the facility.
July 15, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 1 facility reported incidents reviewed for an allegation of misappropriation, was reported to the local law enforcement agency.*On 6/26/25, facility staff was made aware of R1's missing narcotic pain medication. The facility did not report the incident to local law enforcement.
November 27, 2024Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility did not ensure the call light was within reach for 1 (R290) of 12 residents reviewed. *R290 was observed in R290's room without a call light within reach.
  2. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility did not ensure staff followed infection control procedures for 3 (R13, R22 and R290) of 12 residents sampled. * Wound care preformed for R13- staff did not follow standard of practice for hand hygiene in between glove changes and did not sanitize scissors for wound treatment. *R290 noted to be on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), staff member observed not following standards of practice while providing high contact, incontinence care. *Incontinence cares observed for R22, staff member observed not changing soiled gloves and did not perform hand hygiene prior to applying lotion to R22.
August 31, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

6 fire safety citations on file: 3 on February 18, 2026, 3 on November 27, 2024.

Every fire safety citation6 citations
  1. E
    Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.
    K 911 · February 18, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · February 18, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · February 18, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
    E 13 · November 27, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · November 27, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. C
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · November 27, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
February 20, 2024Fine $4,938
February 12, 2024Fine $4,938
January 22, 2024Fine $14,814
January 8, 2024Fine $4,938
January 2, 2024Fine $4,587
December 11, 2023Fine $13,762
November 20, 2023Fine $4,587
November 13, 2023Fine $4,587
November 6, 2023Fine $4,587
October 30, 2023Fine $4,587
October 23, 2023Fine $4,545
October 17, 2023Fine $4,587
October 10, 2023Fine $4,235
September 18, 2023Fine $10,586

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeWisconsinUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.134.213.86
Registered nurses1.120.990.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.483.773.42
Nurse aides3.15
Licensed practical nurses0.87
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)53.2%46.9%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover25.0%39.7%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.74 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.40 on weekdays and 4.48 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 14.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.27 in April to June 2025 to 5.13 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.131.125.404.48 14.5%0 of 9042
Oct to Dec 20254.910.845.134.35 14.2%0 of 9245
Jul to Sep 20255.160.955.394.59 12.8%0 of 9240
Apr to Jun 20255.271.015.484.72 13.2%0 of 9140
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Wisconsin, Jan to Mar 20264.190.954.363.748.8%0.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Wisconsin

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Wisconsin, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$21.70$19.03 to $22.7528,370
LPNs and LVNs$30.65$28.67 to $36.067,390
Registered nurses$45.93$39.39 to $49.3368,060
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeWisconsinUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.516.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.22.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.62.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.03.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.41.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.65.04.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.415.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
19.823.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
22.115.512.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Eastcastle Pl Bradford Ter Conv Ctr's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (58.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

58.0% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Wisconsin: 52 better, 26 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 136 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Wisconsin: 0 better, 6 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 139 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Wisconsin: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 76 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

55.2% this home

Median of homes: Wisconsin54.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 87 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.0% this home

Median of homes: Wisconsin0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 98 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Wisconsin2.2% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 98 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Wisconsin100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 68 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: EASTCASTLE PLACE, INC. CMS links this home to Life Care Services, a group of 43 nursing homes averaging 4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Bremer Bank National Association5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization05/05/2022
Old National Bank5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization05/01/2022
Bremer Bank National Association5% or greater security interestOrganization05/05/2022
Old National Bank5% or greater security interestOrganization05/01/2022
Harris, BrookeManaging control - governing bodyIndividual11/16/2025
Ramanujam, SandeepManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/01/2022
Becker, LaurieCorporate directorIndividual06/28/2024
Beer, AlexanderCorporate directorIndividual01/28/2025
Bissonnette, JulieCorporate directorIndividual10/26/2021
Lange, GeorgeCorporate directorIndividual03/24/2015
Marek, GeorgeCorporate directorIndividual10/25/2016
Normington, HavilahCorporate directorIndividual06/26/2018
O'Donnell, NancyCorporate directorIndividual11/18/2022
Reilly, DennisCorporate directorIndividual10/22/2024
Rodgers, KarenCorporate directorIndividual10/22/2024
Tice, BarbaraCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2013
Tillmar, KatherineCorporate directorIndividual10/25/2022
Williamson, JoanneCorporate directorIndividual06/28/2023
Becker, LaurieCorporate officerIndividual10/22/2024
Bissonnette, JulieCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2025
Jeglum, BonnieCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2023
Marek, GeorgeCorporate officerIndividual06/22/2021
O'Donnell, NancyCorporate officerIndividual10/25/2016
Williamson, JoanneCorporate officerIndividual10/22/2024
Life Care Services LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/01/2012
Harris, BrookeOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/16/2025
Ramanujam, SandeepOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2022
Sitzberger, BradleyOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/13/2006
Life Care Services LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/17/2025
Harris, BrookeAdp of the SNFIndividual11/16/2025
Ramanujam, SandeepAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2022

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 18, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 18, 2026: "Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 18, 2026: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
  4. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 18, 2026: "Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Wisconsin contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Wisconsin. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Eastcastle Pl Bradford Ter Conv Ctr's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Eastcastle Pl Bradford Ter Conv Ctr 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Eastcastle Pl Bradford Ter Conv Ctr get at its last inspection?
13 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 18, 2026. The Wisconsin average is 9.5.
Has Eastcastle Pl Bradford Ter Conv Ctr been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 14 fines totaling $90,278 in the last three years.
Does Eastcastle Pl Bradford Ter Conv Ctr accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Eastcastle Pl Bradford Ter Conv Ctr?
CMS lists 31 owners and managers, and links the home to Life Care Services. Legal business name: EASTCASTLE PLACE, INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection