1850 Bowen St., Oshkosh, WI 54901 · Winnebago County · (920) 233-4011
110 certified beds, about 66 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1985
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 525299 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 5, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Wisconsin average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 30 health citations since February 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.39 hours per resident per day, against 4.21 across Wisconsin and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.74 of those hours.
59.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Wisconsin average 46.9%).
CMS links it to Eden Senior Care, an affiliated group of 21 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 residents (R) (R1, R18, R53, and R41) of 4 sampled residents received the necessary care and services to prevent pressuries injuries from developing or worsening and/or promote healing. R1 was admitted to the facility with stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. During wound care, Registered Nurse (RN)-H applied ointment to the wound bed of R1's stage 4 left buttock pressure injury with a soiled glove. R18's specialty air mattress was not turned on during an observation on 5/3/26. In addition, R18 did not have an order for the mattress and the setting wasn't indicated in R18's medical record. R53 and R41's specialty air mattresses were not set correctly.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screen was accurately completed and a Level II Screen was completed for 1 resident (R) (R8) of 7 sampled residents. R8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder and anxiety disorder and was prescribed antianxiety medication. The facility did not correctly identify R8's mental illness diagnoses or medication on a PASRR Level I Screen and did not submit for a Level II Screen.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure their bowel protocol was followed or daily weights were obtained for 2 residents (R) (R30 and R15) of 2 sampled residents. R30 went 4 days without a bowel movement. R30 was not offered medication to help promote a bowel movement on day 3 per facility protocol. R15 was not weighed daily in accordance with a physician's order.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R7 and R1) of 3 sampled residents received appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs). The facility did not ensure R7 and R1 received catheter care in a manner that decreased the risk for infection. R7's catheter bag and tubing were on the floor on multiple occasions. R1's uncovered catheter bag was also on the floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate administration of medication for 1 resident (R) (R15) of 6 sampled residents. R15 did not receive gabapentin (an anticonvulsant medication often used to treat pain) in a timely manner. In addition, R15 did not receive the correct dose on 5/1/26 after the physician changed the order on 4/30/26.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. Food was not sealed, labeled, or dated appropriately. Food temperatures were not consistently documented prior to meal service. Kitchen cookware was not stored properly. In addition, kitchen equipment and the floor were not in clean condition. The rehab unit refrigerator was not in clean condition and contained undated and expired resident food. Staff touched ready-to-eat food with soiled gloves during lunch service.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure meals were served timely. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 72 residents residing in the facility. On 11/25/25, the lunch meal was served late.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide meals according to prescribed diets for 3 residents (R) (R9, R10, and R11) of 3 sampled residents. R9, R10, and R11 had orders for a consistent carbohydrate diet. On 11/25/25, residents on consistent carbohydrate diets were supposed to receive a half slice of garlic toast. R9, R10, and R11 received a full slice of garlic toast.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R2 and R9) of 3 sampled residents received the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs). The facility did not initiate or transcribe an admission order to change R2's Foley catheter monthly and as needed. The facility did not initiate or transcribe a urology clinic order to change R9's Foley catheter monthly and as needed. In addition, R9 was not placed on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) despite having an indwelling medical device.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R2) of 1 sampled resident received timely laboratory services. The facility did not complete physician orders for R2 to prevent potential cancellation or delay of a medical procedure.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of neglect was thoroughly investigated for 1 resident (R) (R2) of 15 sampled residents. R2 alleged that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-H left R2 naked and without a gown on the 6/18/25 night shift. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe manner. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 71 residents residing in the facility. Holding temperatures were not completed for all items served.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 5 residents (R) (R121, R124, R127, R58, and R19) of 6 sampled residents observed during medication administration and the provision of care. During observations of medication administration and/or care for R121, R124, R127, and R58, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-D did not complete appropriate hand hygiene. Staff did not abide by enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when providing catheter care for R19.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents and their representatives (R) (R1 and R6) of 20 sampled residents were informed of care conferences. R1 and R6's representatives were not informed of R1 and R6's care conferences.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure written notification for a roommate was provided for 1 resident (R) (R6) of 2 sampled residents. R6 received a roommate on 3/20/25. R6's representative was not notified prior to the move.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a clean or home-like environment for 1 resident (R) (R41) of 20 sampled residents. R41's bedside tray table was not in a clean condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care plans were updated for 3 residents (R) (R41, R10, and R37). R41 had an order to float heels. R41's care plan was not updated with the order and R41's heels were not floated. R10 and R37 had a known conflict with each other. R10's and R37's care plans did not reflect the conflict and did not contain interventions for redirection or how to avoid altercations.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure range of motion exercises were completed in accordance with a range of motion program for 1 resident (R41) of 20 sampled residents. Documentation for R41's range of motion (ROM) program was not completed accurately and/or was not completed.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R56) of 5 sampled residents received influenza and COVID-19 vaccines as indicated. Upon admission to the facility, R56's Power of Attorney for Health Care (POAHC) signed a consent form for R56 to receive influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. The vaccines were not administered.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents on 3 of 3 units. Utility rooms on all 3 units contained dust, debris, stains, and an odor of bodily waste, In addition, Surveyor observed risks of cross-contamination.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Residents (R) (R14 and R18) of 7 residents observed during medication pass were assessed as able to safely and accurately self-administer medication. On 8/21/24, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-E left medication at R14 and R18's bedsides for R14 and R18 to self-administer. R14 and R18 did not have physician orders, self-administration of medication assessments, or care plans that indicated R14 and R18 could safely and accurately self-administer medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not implement policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse for 1 of 8 staff reviewed for background checks. The facility did not ensure a thorough and timely caregiver background check was completed for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-F.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate administration of medication for 1 Resident (R) (R2) of 8 sampled residents. On 2/24/24, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C gave R2 another resident's medication. Following the medication error, the facility did not ensure blood pressures were taken per the physician's order and provide education to LPN-C.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure medications were labeled and stored in accordance with manufacturers' recommendations for 3 Residents (R) (R12, R17, and R18) of 7 residents observed during medication pass. On 8/21/24, Registered Nurse (RN)-D left a medication cup that contained eleven medications on R12's bedside table while RN-D left the room to attend to another resident. During observations of medication administration, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-E administered open and undated medication to R17 and R18.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 2 Residents (R) (R12 and R13) of 7 residents observed during the administration of medication. On 8/21/24, Registered Nurse (RN)-D did not complete proper hand hygiene during medication administration for R12. In addition, RN-D did not wear gloves as ordered during the administration of methimazole (used to treat hyperthyroidism). On 8/21/24, RN-D did not complete proper hand hygiene during medication administration for R13.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure menu serving sizes were followed for protein, vegetable, and starch servings for mechanically altered (minced and moist) and regular consistency diets. This practice had the potential to affect 67 of 70 residents residing in the facility. During the lunch meal on 2/4/24, the facility served smaller serving portions than the lunch menu and diet tray cards indicated for 6 residents who received mechanically altered diets and 61 residents who received regular consistency diets.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and staff and resident interview, the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, home-like environment for 4 Residents (R) (R40, R46, R34, and R10) of 20 sampled residents with the potential to affect other residents who use common areas in the facility. During an observation of R40's room, Surveyor noted garbage, dried spills, and a urine odor. During an observation of R46's room, Surveyor noted dirt and debris on the floor. During an observation of R34's room, Surveyor noted debris on the floor. During an observation of R10's room, Surveyor noted food and debris on the floor and a urine odor. During an observation of the 100 wing activity room, Surveyor noted food, garbage, debris, and peeled wallpaper. During an observation of the 100 wing dining room, Surveyor noted garbage, debris, and structural damage to the walls and floors. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect multiple residents residing in the facility. The facility did not ensure proper methods to rapidly cool or document cooling temperatures of time/temperature control for safety food not held hot or not for consumption within 4 hours.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility did not provide appropriate care services for 1 Resident (R) (R48) of 2 sampled residents with an indwelling catheter. R48's uncovered catheter drainage bag was observed in direct contact with the floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate and safe administration of medication for 1 Resident (R) (R49) of 20 sampled residents. On 2/4/24, Surveyor observed medication left at R49's bedside. R49 did not have a self-administration of medication assessment or a physician's order to self-administer medication.
46 fire safety citations on file: 4 on May 5, 2026, 19 on March 26, 2025, 23 on February 6, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Wisconsin | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.39 | 4.21 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.74 | 0.99 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.07 | 3.77 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.07 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.58 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 59.8% | 46.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 47.1% | 39.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.71 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.52 on weekdays and 3.07 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.36 in April to June 2025 to 3.39 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.39 | 0.74 | 3.52 | 3.07 | 5.0% | 0 of 90 | 66 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.35 | 0.69 | 3.48 | 3.01 | 4.7% | 0 of 92 | 69 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.29 | 0.72 | 3.42 | 2.94 | 4.2% | 0 of 92 | 68 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.36 | 0.79 | 3.50 | 3.00 | 11.5% | 0 of 91 | 70 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Wisconsin, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 0.95 | 4.36 | 3.74 | 8.8% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.70 | $19.03 to $22.75 | 28,370 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.65 | $28.67 to $36.06 | 7,390 |
| Registered nurses | $45.93 | $39.39 to $49.33 | 68,060 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Wisconsin | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.9 | 16.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.3 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.8 | 18.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 5.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.1 | 15.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.1 | 23.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.6 | 15.5 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Edenbrook of Oshkosh's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (43.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
43.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Wisconsin: 52 better, 26 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.
12.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Wisconsin: 0 better, 6 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 71 eligible stays.
7.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Wisconsin: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 44 eligible stays.
50.0% this home
Median of homes: Wisconsin54.2% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
2.8% this home
Median of homes: Wisconsin0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 36 residents counted.
1.9% this home
Median of homes: Wisconsin2.2% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 36 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Wisconsin100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: NORTHPOINT NURSING AND REHAB LLC. CMS links this home to Eden Senior Care, a group of 21 nursing homes averaging 2.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feinstein, Dan | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 12% | 09/01/2017 |
| Lifsics, Channie | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 9% | 09/01/2017 |
| Polstein, Mordechai | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 16% | 09/01/2017 |
| Stesel, Maxim | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 45% | 09/01/2017 |
| Wendling, Carrie | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/01/2017 | |
| Polstein, Mordechai | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2017 | |
| Lifsics, Channie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2017 | |
| Mauer, Dovie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2017 | |
| Rice, Pamela | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Wisconsin. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.