Home / Oklahoma / Midwest City
2900 Parklawn Drive, Midwest City, OK 73110 · Oklahoma County · (405) 737-6601
116 certified beds, about 60 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375098 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 10, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 36 health citations since October 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $4,017 in the last three years; the largest was $4,017, and the latest is dated April 19, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.71 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.32 of those hours.
64.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).
CMS links it to Emerald Healthcare, an affiliated group of 14 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 36 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to the grievance procedure and file an anonymous grievance. The DON identified 61 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to:a. develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan, andb. include the resident and/or representative for care planning for 1 (#3) of 11 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The administrator identified 61 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for 1 (#6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The DON identified two residents at high risk for elopement.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer intravenous medication as ordered for 1 (#2) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The DON identified 61 residents resided in the facility and one resident received intravenous medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide laboratory services as ordered by a physician for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for laboratory services. The DON identified 61 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were coded accurately for 4 (#19, 23, 25 and #69) of 17 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The administrator reported 68 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a smoking care plan for 2 (#19 and 25) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for smoking. The DON identified six smokers resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to evaluate residents for smoking safely for 2 (#19 and #25) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for smoking. The DON reported six residents were smokers.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure No smoking/Oxygen in use signs were posted for 3 (#19, 175, and #176) of 3 residents sampled for respiratory care. The administrator reported 68 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to use the required PPE for residents on enhanced barrier precautions for 2 (#31 and #50) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for infection control. The DON reported 68 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to have a call system available for resident use in one of three shower rooms observed. The DON reported 68 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the exterior building was maintained in good repair. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an order for pain medication was submitted to the pharmacy in a timely manner for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for having pain medications ordered in a timely manner. The administrator identified 65 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. incident reports involving residents were accessible to the SA for two (#1 and #7); and b. resident records were complete and accurate for two (#1 and #7) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls. The wound care nurse identified 57 residents resided in the facility. The Incidents by Incident Type reports, dated 11/14/24, documented 30 residents experienced a fall for the months of September, October, and November 2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide evidence a resident representative was notified after the resident experienced a fall for one (#7) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls. The wound care nurse identified 57 residents resided in the facility. The Incidents by Incident Type reports, dated 11/14/24, documented 30 residents experienced a fall for the months of September, October, and November 2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's critical post discharge medical equipment was ordered and received in a timely manner for one (#1) of two sampled residents whose discharge planning process was reviewed. The DON identified 65 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medications and treatments in a timely manner for two (#4 and #5) of six residents reviewed for receiving medications and treatments for scabies. The DON identified 65 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer treatment as ordered for one (#5) of six sampled residents reviewed for receiving medication or treatment for scabies. The DON identified 65 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff notified the physician of a resident with an ongoing rash and no treatment prescribed for one (#6) of six residents reviewed for infection control. The Administrator identified 59 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their infection control policy for surveillance of scabies for four (#3, 4, 5 and #36) of six sampled residents reviewed for infection control. The Administrator identified 59 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for three (#4, 13, and #14) of four sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 63 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered: a. for one (#9) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications; and b. for one (#48) of five sampled residents observed during medication pass. The DON identified 64 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant medication error did not occur for one (#9) of five sampled residents for unnecessary medication regimen review. The DON identified 64 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. the ice machine was in sanitary condition in accordance with professional standards for food safety and service for one of two ice machines observed; and b. food was handled under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food safety and service for one of one kitchen observations. The DON identified 63 residents received nutritional services from the kitchen in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete pre-employment screening for history of abuse and neglect per their abuse policy for one (housekeeping and laundry supervisor) of five employee files reviewed. The current employee list, undated, documented 97 facility employees.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nutrition via tube feeding was administered as ordered for one (#55) of five sampled residents observed during medication pass. The DON identified 64 residents resided in the facility and two residents received their nutrition through tube feeding.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. A total of 25 opportunities were observed with two errors. The total medication error rate was 8%. The DON identified 64 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received a therapeutic diet as ordered for one (#163) of two sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The DON identified 64 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received their bath/shower per schedule for two (#3 and #7) of three sampled residents reviewed for bathing. The ADON identified 54 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on oberservation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure: a. proper storage and labeling for food-handling practices; and b. ice and coffee machines were in sanitary conditions with accordance to professional standards for food safety and service.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure background checks were conducted for one (CNA#1) of five sampled employees reviewed for background checks. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/11/22, documented 66 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was bathed as scheduled for one (#22) of one sampled resident reviewed for ADLs. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/11/22, documented 66 residents resided in the facility and eight residents were dependent for bathing.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed to obtain weights three times weekly for one (#31) of one sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/11/22, documented 66 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. The medication error rate was 7.41 percent. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/11/22, documented 66 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were secured for one of one treatment/medication cart observed unlocked. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/11/22, documented 66 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on oberservation and interview, the facility failed to maintain mechanical and electrical equipment in safe operating condition.
11 fire safety citations on file: 3 on April 10, 2025, 1 on December 13, 2023, 7 on October 13, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 19, 2024 | Fine | $4,017 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.71 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.45 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.30 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.09 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 64.4% | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 57.1% | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.37 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.81 on weekdays and 3.45 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.75 in April to June 2025 to 3.71 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.71 | 0.32 | 3.81 | 3.45 | 0.3% | 0 of 90 | 60 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.71 | 0.33 | 3.81 | 3.45 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 61 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.79 | 0.31 | 3.91 | 3.50 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 63 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.75 | 0.33 | 3.78 | 3.67 | 1.1% | 0 of 91 | 65 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.0 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.7 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.4 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.1 | 27.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.5 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Emerald Care Center Midwest's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
53.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 206 eligible stays.
11.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 236 eligible stays.
7.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 128 eligible stays.
26.4% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
1.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 97 residents counted.
6.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 97 residents counted.
98.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GARDEN MANOR REHAB AND NURSING OF MIDWEST CITY LLC. CMS links this home to Emerald Healthcare, a group of 14 nursing homes averaging 1.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chickiestrong Midwest City LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 5% | 03/17/2017 |
| Chafetz, Yisroel | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 20% | 03/17/2017 |
| Gamzeh, David | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 19% | 03/17/2017 |
| Glatzer, Akiva | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 19% | 03/17/2017 |
| Walden, Jacob | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 17% | 03/17/2017 |
| Bankers Trust Company | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Bates, Marilyn | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/17/2017 | |
| Smith, Susan | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/17/2017 | |
| Gamzeh, David | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/17/2017 | |
| Glatzer, Akiva | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/17/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.