139 Moran Lake Road, Ne, Rome, GA 30161 · Floyd County · (706) 378-3383
100 certified beds, about 85 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2008
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 115720 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 9, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Georgia average is 5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 10 health citations since October 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.68 hours per resident per day, against 3.56 across Georgia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.46 of those hours.
33.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Georgia average 46.0%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 10 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in one of two nourishment refrigerators (South unit) were labeled, dated when opened, and not expired. This failure placed the residents on the South unit at risk for transmission of foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure written notice to the resident or representative of the transfer to the hospital included a statement of the appeal rights, information on how to file an appeal, and appeals contact information for two of four residents (Resident (R) 91 and R79) reviewed for hospitalization in a sample of 23 residents. This failure created the potential for a lack of understanding of appeal rights should the resident not be permitted to return or disagree with the reason for transfer, potentially causing confusion or distress upon transfer.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, comfortable environment in the clean linen room, the overflow Linen Room, the Biohazard Room, and the South Hall Medication Room were maintained in an clean, orderly, and sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Routine Cleaning and Disinfection, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment in the North and South hallways, resident rooms for four of 24 sampled residents (Resident (R)3, R4, R20, and R5), resident shower rooms, resident equipment for five of 24 sampled Rs (R22, R25, R24, R15, and R21), and the main dining room were maintained in a safe, clean, comfortable and clutter-free manner to create a homelike environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure expired insulin pens and insulin vials were removed from two of four medication carts (South Hall long and South Hall short) reviewed. In addition, the facility failed to ensure two of two medication room refrigerators (North Hall and South Hall) were locked and the schedule II lock box (containing narcotics that have a high incidence of abuse) were affixed to shelving, as required. This failure had the potential of medication diversion to residents, staff or visitors, and residents receiving ineffective medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided nail care for one of four residents (Resident (R) 3) observed for the provision of ADL (activities of daily living) care out of a total sample of 24 residents resulting in dirty, long, and jagged nails.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to supervise one of one (Resident (R)1) of 24 sampled residents at risk for elopement, resulting in R1 eloping from the facility. The failure had the potential to cause harm to R1 while out of the facility unaccompanied.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled, Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program, the facility failed to refer one of 29 residents (R) (R61) for a pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) Level II screening. The deficient practice had the potential to place R61 at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility failed to follow the care plan related to correctly administering the physician ordered rate of oxygen (O2) for two of 15 residents (R) (R41 and R47) receiving O2 therapy. Additionally, the facility failed to follow the care plan related to cleaning the O2 filter on the O2 concentrator (machine that converts room air into oxygen) per physician's orders for two of 15 residents (R32 and R61) receiving O2 therapy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, Oxygen Administration and Oxygen Concentrator, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner for two of 15 residents (R) (R32 and R61) receiving oxygen therapy. In addition, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) was administered according to physician orders for two of 15 residents (R41 and R47) receiving oxygen therapy. The deficient practices could potentially place the resident at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life.
10 fire safety citations on file: 3 on January 9, 2026, 5 on August 18, 2024, 2 on October 21, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.68 | 3.56 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.67 | 3.10 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.41 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.81 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 33.3% | 46.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 27.3% | 44.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.29 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.08 on weekdays and 2.67 on weekends, 35% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.55 in April to June 2025 to 3.68 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.46 | 4.08 | 2.67 | 3.8% | 0 of 90 | 85 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.53 | 0.44 | 3.83 | 2.75 | 2.5% | 0 of 92 | 88 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.57 | 0.47 | 3.90 | 2.73 | 1.9% | 0 of 92 | 90 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.55 | 0.46 | 3.90 | 2.68 | 2.5% | 0 of 91 | 92 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Georgia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.50 | 0.46 | 3.68 | 3.03 | 3.3% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.12 | $17.06 to $20.66 | 43,440 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.82 | $25.43 to $33.99 | 21,060 |
| Registered nurses | $44.98 | $38.02 to $51.12 | 100,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.1 | 15.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.0 | 15.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 29.1 | 19.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.5 | 25.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.1 | 11.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Evergreen Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (37.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
37.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Georgia: 49 better, 27 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 30 eligible stays.
10.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Georgia: 2 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 69 eligible stays.
6.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Georgia: 0 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 46 eligible stays.
37.7% this home
Median of homes: Georgia46.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 53 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Georgia0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 77 residents counted.
8.7% this home
Median of homes: Georgia2.2% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 77 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Georgia97.4% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: DUKE EQUITIES LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prince Equities LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/04/2019 |
| Landers, Lisa | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/16/2019 | |
| Landers, Lisa | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/16/2019 | |
| Prince Equities LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/16/2019 | |
| Landers, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/16/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Georgia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.