Home / New Jersey / Park Ridge
120 Noyes Drive, Park Ridge, NJ 07656 · Bergen County · (201) 505-1777
210 certified beds, about 184 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 315438 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 10, 2025, inspectors cited 22 health deficiencies (the New Jersey average is 8.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 32 health citations since June 2021, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $133,120 in the last three years; the largest was $133,120, and the latest is dated January 10, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.27 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across New Jersey and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.
52.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New Jersey average 39.7%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 32 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteCOMPLAINT #2720685 Based on interviews, review of medical records, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Resident's Representative of a change in condition for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed (Resident #183). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 6/10/26 at 1:08 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #183's closed hybrid (paper and electronic) medical record. A review of Resident #183's admission record or face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; dementia (an umbrella term for a decline in mental ability that is severe enough to interfere with everyday life) and hypertension (high blood pressure). [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #2611374Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility provided documentation, the facility failed to follow appropriate tuberculosis (TB) testing and documentation for 3 of 3 residents, Residents #1, #2, and #3 according to the standard of clinical practice and facility's policies. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: [...]
Inspectors wroteNJ#2578488Based on interview, review of medical record, and other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to; a.) ensure skin conditions and impairments were addressed appropriately, b.) obtain and follow physician order for skin impairments, c.) document reason as to why the order was not followed, and c.) ensure Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) documented provided care to the resident, for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #3 reviewed for quality of care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #: NJ2611374 and NJ2621276Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) follow the care plan and appropriate safety precautions to provide a two person assist with bed mobility to prevent a fall incident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #2) and b) follow a resident's plan of care for two person assist with use of Hoyer lift transfer to ensure safety, for a resident who had a limited physical mobility related to right hemiplegia, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #1). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 10/23/25 at 9:19 AM, Surveyor #1 (S #1) requested from the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) a list of residents with falls in the last six months. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) identify, assess, and implement interventions for a resident (Resident #35) with an unplanned significant weight loss of 7 pounds (lbs) or 5.1% in one month and 25.2 lbs or 25.71% significant weight loss in six months from 4/12/24 through 10/7/24, b.) identify, assess, and implement interventions for a resident (Resident #92) with a significant weight loss of 14 lbs. or 10.03% in one month for 48 days; c.) identify, assess, and implement interventions for a resident (Resident #3) with a significant weight loss of 18 lbs. or 13.4% in one month; d.) obtain, record, and monitor weights in accordance with physician's orders; e.) obtain re-weights to verify a significant weight change; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 1/6/25 at 11:16 am, the surveyor in the presence of the Assistant Food Service Director (AFSD) observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. The surveyor observed in storage container 5 open bags of bread: 1 gluten free bread, 1 whole wheat bread, 2 rye breads, and 1 white bread all were missing open and use by labels. The AFSD could not state why the opened bags of bread were missing labels but acknowledged all opened items need to have an open and use by label. 2. The surveyor observed in dry storage room [ROOM NUMBER], one 6 pound (lb.) 10 ounce (oz) can of fruit mix with a large dent. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medication per manufacturer specifications and standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified in 3 of 4 medication carts and 2 of 2 refrigerators observed on the 2nd and 3rd floors of the facility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) received at least 12 hours of mandatory in-service training for 4 of 5 CNA education reviewed (CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #3, and CNA #4). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/9/25 at 1:26 PM, the surveyor reviewed the provided in-service education for five randomly selected CNAs for the 2024 year, which revealed the following: CNA #1 with a date of hire (doh) on 11/15/21, had 1 hour and 50 minutes of in-service training from date of hire anniversary dates. CNA #2 with a doh on 7/15/23, had 5 hours and 55 minutes of in-service training from date of hire anniversary dates. CNA #3 with a doh on 11/2/23, had 8 hours and 20 minutes of education from date of hire anniversary dates. CNA #3 was on leave between 9/16/24 to 11/11/24. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility-provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a.) meals were consistently provided in a dignified and homelike manner. The deficient practice was observed in the recreation dining area for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #103 & #147). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical records (EMR) for Resident #103 and Resident #147. Resident #103: The admission Record (AR; an admission summary), revealed that the resident was admitted with diagnoses which included but are not limited to, type 2 diabetes and essential hypertension (also called primary hypertension, or idiopathic hypertension) is a form of hypertension without an identifiable physiologic cause). [...]
Inspectors wroteCOMPLAINT #NJ172916 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain residents' environment in a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike surrounding for 3 of 35 residents reviewed, Resident #2, #121 and #109. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/8/25 at 9:59 AM, the surveyor and the 3 [NAME] Unit Manager (UM) observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]-D Resident #2 sitting on the wheelchair (w/c), privacy curtain was missing, and a black, portable fan on top of the bedside table was on with a large amount of dust accumulation on the front grill. The surveyor and UM observed 411-W Resident #121 sitting on the w/c. The surveyor and the UM observed in the room [ROOM NUMBER] the broken shade by the window; the bottom part of the two overbed tables with splattered white substances; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit the completed Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care within fourteen days as required for 2 of 3 residents, Residents #110 and #155 reviewed for system selected for MDS over 120 days, and 1 of 38 residents, Resident #589, in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (combination of paper and electronic) medical records of Resident #110 and revealed: The admission Record (AR; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, in accordance with federal guidelines for 4 of 38 residents, (Residents #38, #118, #176, and #188), reviewed for accuracy for MDS coding. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the latest version of the MDS 3.0 Manual (updated October 2024), Chapter 1, page 1-5, revealed .An accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources, some of which are mandated by regulations. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plans (CP) for 1 of 35 residents reviewed (Resident #118). This deficient practice was identified by the following: On 1/6/25 at 12:03 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #118 in bed, with eyes closed. The surveyor further observed the resident using an air mattress (a specialized mattress that is used to prevent or treat pressure injuries). The surveyor reviewed Resident #118's hybrid (computer and paper chart) medical records. The admission Record reflected that Resident #118 was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses which included but not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Acute Kidney Failure. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on the interview, record review, and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents who were discharged to the community had a discharge order, discharge summary, and care plan. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 residents, Residents #110 and #176, reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (combination of paper and electronic) medical records of Resident #110 and revealed: The admission Record (AR; an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, muscle weakness, essential (primary) hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure that's not the result of a medical condition), and adjustment disorder with depressed mood. [...]
Inspectors wroteREPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, review of medical record, and other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure skin conditions were addressed by professional standards by failing to: a.) document a surgical wound on the admission assessment, obtain a physician order to assess, document and monitor the surgical site, develop a care plan which addressed the surgical site and ensure surgical follow up for the removal of the staples for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #119, reviewed for skin impairment and b.) failed to set the air mattress (AM) (a specialized mattress that is used to prevent or treat pressure injuries) to reflect the weight of Resident #118 to ensure proper support and comfort. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review and review of other pertinent facility provided documentation, the facility failed to ensure that a new intervention was implemented and documented in the resident's care plan after a resident's fall, in order to prevent any additional falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #26). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/6/25 at 11:57 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #26 seated in a wheelchair (w/c) in the resident's room. The surveyor observed that Resident #26's bed had one side against the wall and was in the low position. The surveyor did not observe a floor mat in the room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, the facility failed to: a.) obtain an order and develop a care plan that included interventions for a resident that had an indwelling catheter and was placed on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) based on current professional standards of practice for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for urinary catheter care or urinary tract infection (UTI), Residents #40 and #115 and b.) ensure an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag and tubing did not touch the floor for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #289, reviewed for urinary catheter. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/6/25 at 12:03 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #40 seated in a wheelchair in the resident's room, had a urinary catheter that was in a blue privacy bag. [...]
Inspectors wroteREPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a Physician's Order in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 residents, Resident #58 and Resident #105), reviewed for respiratory care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) complete the Hemodialysis Communication Record, pre dialysis and/or post dialysis treatment for 7 of 16 days and b.) ensure a resident was placed on a fluid restriction as recommended by the dialysis center or documented the reason the recommendation was not followed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis, Resident #76. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/6/25 at 11:43 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #76 who was seated in a wheelchair in the resident's room. Resident #76 stated that they received dialysis services 3 times a week. The surveyor asked Resident #76 if they were on a fluid restriction. Resident #76 stated yes. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the responsible physician supervising the care of residents conducted face-to-face visits and wrote progress notes at least once every sixty days from September 2023 through December 2024 according to the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 38 residents, Resident #187 was reviewed for physician visits and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the closed hybrid (paper and electronic) medical records of Resident #187 and revealed: Resident#187's admission Record (or face sheet; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the daily report of licensed nurses, certified nursing assistant staffing, and the resident census was posted at the beginning of the current shift for 2 of 5 days during the survey. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/6/25 at 11:03 AM, upon entry to the facility, Surveyor #1 observed a Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report (NHRCSR) posted at the front desk by the main entrance. The NHRCSR posted was dated 12/16/24, for the [7:00 AM to 3:00 PM] day shift. There was no NHRCSR for 1/6/25 posted. On 1/7/25 at 8:29 AM, upon entry to the facility, Surveyor #2 observed a NHRSCR posted at the front desk by the main entrance. The NHRCSR posted was dated 1/5/25 for the day shift. There was no NHRCSR for 1/7/25 posted. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure bedtime (HS) snacks were offered. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #124, Resident #53, Resident #140, Resident #70, Resident #189) during the Resident Council group meeting and was evidenced by the following: On 1/7/25 at 12:49 PM, the surveyor conducted a resident group meeting with five residents who were alert and oriented and were selected by the facility to attend the group meeting. All five residents at the group meeting stated that the HS snacks were not offered. All five residents also stated they would like to have a HS snack. The surveyor reviewed the Resident Council meeting minutes in the last 3 months from October 2024 through December 2024. The minutes did not address HS snacks. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) follow appropriate hand hygiene and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) practices for 4 of 11 staff (3 Housekeepers and 1 Certified Nursing Aide) and b.) ensure nebulizer machine was properly stored and follow appropriate infection control practices to prevent the potential spread of infection in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, standards of clinical practice, and the facility's policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CDC Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers dated 02/27/24 revealed: Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications: [...]
Inspectors wroteREPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident call devices were within reach of the residents for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #79). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/8/2025 at 9:21 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #79 lying in bed with the call bell tied to the right side rails out of the resident's reach. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1) stated that the call device should be within the resident's reach. On 1/8/25 at 12:36 PM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid medical record (paper and electronic) of Resident #79, which revealed the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #NJ172916 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment in 1 of 1 laundry room in accordance with the facility procedures. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/10/25 at 8:40 AM, Surveyor #1 (S#1) toured the laundry area on the 1st floor and there were four staff. The surveyor observed the folding area for personal clothing with two personal cellphones on top of the clean folded clothing and there was a radio/cassette recorder on top of the clean folded linens and incontinent pads (cloth). On that same date and time, during the tour with the Housekeeping Aide (HA), the surveyor observed used gloves on top of personal clothing washer, white gown, face towel, linen on the floor next to a big washer. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to notify CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) and receive authorization for a change in facility name in accordance with 42 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 424.516. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to 42 CFR 424.516 Additional provider and supplier requirements for enrolling and maintaining active enrollment status in the Medicare Program: (a) Certifying compliance. CMS enrolls and maintains an active enrollment status for a provider or supplier when that provider or supplier certifies that it meets, and continues to meet, and CMS verifies that it meets, and continues to meet, all of the following requirements: (1) Compliance with title XVIII of the Act and applicable Medicare regulations. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the accurate code status was documented and available for reference for two of 27 sampled residents (Resident (R)23 and R40). This deficient practice could result in not following the specific resident wishes documented in the advanced directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to assess and document lower extremity edema for one of one resident (Resident (R) 90) reviewed for edema out of 27 sample residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer oxygen as ordered by the physician and failed to document the administration of oxygen for one of one (Resident (R16) reviewed for oxygen out of 27 sample residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a call was functioning for one of six residents (Resident R) 90) reviewed for environment out of 27 sample residents.
Inspectors wroteC#NJ00145520 Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) promptly notify the physician of a change in condition and provide timely service; b.) monitor and document the change of condition; c.) document the assessment of a Registered Nurse; and d.) ensure that staff were aware of the physician's written transfer order. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #223) reviewed for hospitalization, according to the standards of clinical practice. Resident #223 was hospitalized on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Stroke [Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) occurs when the blood supply to part of the brain is interrupted or reduced, preventing brain tissue from getting oxygen and nutrients; This is a medical emergency, and prompt treatment is crucial]. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) appropriate infection control practices were followed in accordance with the Center for Disease Control guidance (CDC) and facility guidelines for 1 of 4 housekeeping staff observed on 1 of 3 nursing units; b.) store an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag to prevent the transmission of infection for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #40) reviewed for catheter care; and c.) follow appropriate infection control practices for the administration of medications for 1 of 3 nurses during the medication observation pass. The evidence was as follows: According to the U.S. [...]
20 fire safety citations on file: 9 on January 10, 2025, 8 on August 31, 2023, 3 on June 30, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 10, 2025 | Fine | $133,120 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.27 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.97 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.87 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.87 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 52.7% | 39.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 38.1% | 37.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.76 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.39 on weekdays and 2.97 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 40.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.07 in April to June 2025 to 3.27 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.27 | 0.52 | 3.39 | 2.97 | 40.1% | 0 of 90 | 184 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.29 | 0.53 | 3.42 | 2.97 | 32.4% | 0 of 92 | 180 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.20 | 0.52 | 3.34 | 2.86 | 30.9% | 0 of 92 | 179 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.07 | 0.54 | 3.22 | 2.71 | 22.7% | 0 of 91 | 181 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New Jersey, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.59 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.6% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.52 | $21.13 to $23.44 | 32,400 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.13 | $32.16 to $38.45 | 17,410 |
| Registered nurses | $51.20 | $47.94 to $61.41 | 92,680 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.7 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.4 | 8.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.2 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.2 | 12.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.2 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.0 | 8.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Family of Caring at Park Ridge LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (54.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
54.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New Jersey: 130 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 369 eligible stays.
10.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New Jersey: 2 better, 8 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 363 eligible stays.
6.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New Jersey: 3 better, 13 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 265 eligible stays.
64.4% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey68.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 233 residents counted.
0.9% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 317 residents counted.
2.8% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey1.7% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 317 residents counted.
98.7% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 148 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in New Jersey. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.