3921 N. Main Street, Baytown, TX 77521 · Harris County · (281) 422-9541
120 certified beds, about 72 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2000
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675849 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 7, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since September 2023, 6 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (5 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $29,243 in the last three years; the largest was $16,350, and the latest is dated July 22, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.90 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.39 of those hours.
30.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Focused Post Acute Care Partners, an affiliated group of 25 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received scheduled alprazolam on 7/15/26 and 7/16/26 and scheduled Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen/Norco on 7/7/26 at 12:00 p.m. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered by the physician and increased pain or anxiety.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure that medication was not left unattended at Resident #2's bedside on 7/21/26 at 9:43 a.m. This failure could place residents at risk for obtaining medications that were not ordered for them and potential adverse reactions or side effects.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, records review and interview, the facility failed to conduct initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 5 (Resident #4, # 10, #12, #51 and Resident #64) of 18 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessment. Resident #4, #10, #12's and #51's MDS did not reflect their lack of natural, broken\lose teeth in their oral cavity. Resident #64 was not assessed for her fall on 12/04/25. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care and services due to inaccurate assessments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I for residents with mental illness were provided with an accurate PASRR Level I for 1 (Resident #10) and) of 4 Residents reviewed for PASRR screening.-Resident #10 did not have an accurate and updated PASRR Level 1 assessment reflecting a diagnosis of mental illness. This failure could place residents with mental illness at risk of not receiving a PASRR Evaluation for individualized care, or special services to meet their needs
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #39, #23, and CR #1) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #39 was free from abuse when CR #1 hit her and made her cry on 3/7/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 was free from abuse when CR #1 screamed at her and made her cry on 1/16/24. These failures could place residents at risk for physical, mental, and psychosocial harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 28% based on 7 errors out of 25 opportunities which involved 3 of 8 residents (Residents #20, #44 and #16) and 2 of 5 staff (MA A and RN M) reviewed for medication administration. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA A did not crush and administer Potassium CL micro 10 mEQ ER (an extended-release medication, that should not be crushed, used to prevent or to treat low blood levels of potassium) and failed to ensure MA A administered the full dose of Clearlax 3350 (used to treat occasional constipation) to Resident #20 on 3/5/25. 2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to refer all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #35) reviewed for PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Services). The facility failed to ensure Resident #35 had a new level 1 PASRR screening completed with a new diagnosis of major depressive disorder and delusional disorders which were added on 4/2/24. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the needed PASRR services to meet their individual needs and could result in a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14's oxygen was not administered at 5 liters per minute on 3/4/25 and 3/6/25 instead of 2-4 liters per minute as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medications and treatments as ordered by the physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 (medication room refrigerator) of 1 medication refrigerators reviewed for pharmacy storage. The facility failed to maintain the medication refrigerator in the medication room between 36-46 degrees Fahrenheit per facility policy. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the desired therapeutic effect from their medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for one of one meal (lunch on 03/06/2025) reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for the lunch meal by leaving out the winter fruit cup, egg roll, or water for all diet types on 03/06/2025. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of dissatisfaction, poor intake, and/or weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure RN M wore appropriate PPE when administering IV medication to Resident #16 on 3/5/25, who was on enhanced barrier precautions (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes). This failure could place residents at risk of infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure at the time each resident was admitted , they had physician orders for immediate care for 1 (CR #1) of 5 residents reviewed for admission orders. -The facility failed to have physician orders for the use of a magnet device used when CR #1 was in respiratory distress on [DATE] and passed away at the facility. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE]. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan and in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (CR #1) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. -The facility failed to assess and provide treatment for CR #1's vagus nerve stimulator. On [DATE], facility staff used a magnet device when CR #1 was in respiratory distress and he passed away at the facility. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE]. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care for 1 (CR #1) of 5 residents reviewed for nursing services. -The facility failed to train nursing staff on how to use CR #1's magnet device. The magnet device was used on [DATE] when CR #1 was in respiratory distress and passed away at the facility. An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE]. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm and a scope of isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS for 1 of 4 quarters (Fiscal year 2023 for the third quarter April 01, 2023 to June 30, 2023) reviewed for administration. -The facility failed to submit accurate registered nurse hours for the following dates: 04/01/2023, 04/02/2023, 04/08/2023, 05/13/2023, 05/14/2023, 05/20/2023, and 06/25/2023. This failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program for 7 of 15 employees (LVN G, LVN H, CNA J, CNA K, CNA L, FSS, and Rehab Director) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure that quality assurance and performance improvement training was provided to LVN G, LVN H, CNA J, CNA K, CNA L, FSS, and Rehab Director. This failure could place staff and residents at risk for not being aware of facility programs, implementation, and monitoring.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. -The facility did not accurately document Resident #40's hospice services on the quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and to establish an accurate reconciliation of controlled drugs in sufficient detail for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) and 1 of 5 medication carts (nurse cart for hall 100) reviewed for pharmacy services, in that: The facility failed to verify the amount of lorazepam for Resident #1 in the refrigerated lock box. The facility failed to discard an insulin pen for Resident #39 that had an open date of 11/5/2023. These failures could place residents at risk for misappropriation, drug diversion and the unsafe administrator of medications and not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items, per facility policy, for 2 of 6 resident's (Resident #16 and 18) personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety -The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #16 did not contain a cup of peach cobbler with mold present. -The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #18 did not contain jello, vanilla pudding and salad dressing that were expired. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for 2 of 16 (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) rooms reviewed for pest control. -The facility failed to ensure room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] did not contain live roaches. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to an unsafe environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for 2 of 15 employees (LVN H and CNA K) new and existing staff reviewed for training. -The facility failed to ensure LVN H was trained on HIV, fall prevention, dementia, and restraint reduction annually and completed 2-hour quarterly trainings annually. -The facility failed to ensure CNA K was trained annually for restraint reduction. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being due to lack of staff training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide effective communications mandatory training for 2 of 15 employees (LVN H and CNA J) reviewed for training, in that: -The facility failed to ensure effective communication training was provided to LVN H annually. -The facility failed to ensure effective communication training was provided to CNA J on hire. This failure could place residents at risk of miscommunication and social isolation due to lack of staff training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents for 1 of 15 employees (LVN H) reviewed for training, in that: -The facility failed to ensure required education was provided on the rights of the resident and responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents was conducted by LVN H annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required annual or new hire Abuse training including all activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property, procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or the misappropriation of resident property, dementia management and resident abuse prevention for 1 of 15 employees (LVN H) reviewed for training. -The facility failed to ensure abuse training including activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property, procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or the misappropriation of resident property, Dementia management and resident abuse prevention was provided to the LVN H annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk abuse due to lack of staff training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective behavioral health training for 1 of 15 employees (FSS) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective behavioral health training was provided to the FSS on hire. This failure could place residents with behaviors at risk of not receiving care to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being due to lack of staff training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality of care for 1 (CR #1) of 5 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. -The facility failed to care plan and implement interventions to address CR #1's history of hallucinations, need for supervision, and behavioral interventions which resulted in CR #1 attempting suicide on 09/16/2023. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 09/20/2023 at 5:15 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 09/23/2023 at 1:19 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of actual harm that is not immediate due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (CR #1) of 5 residents reviewed for accident hazards and supervision. -The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for CR #1 to prevent harm from suicidal ideations and self-injurious behaviors that resulted in him cutting his arm and wrist with broken glass and being hospitalized . -The facility failed to care plan and put interventions in place for CR#1 when he admitted to the facility with history of hallucinations, need for behavioral monitoring for depression, and behavioral interventions to prevent suicidal attempts resulting in CR#1 cutting his arm and wrist. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 09/20/2023 at 5:15 p.m. [...]
5 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 7, 2026, 2 on March 6, 2025, 1 on December 13, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 22, 2026 | Fine | $16,350 |
| September 25, 2023 | Fine | $12,893 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.90 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.67 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.81 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.69 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 30.0% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 14.3% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.21 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.00 on weekdays and 2.67 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.83 in April to June 2025 to 2.90 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.90 | 0.39 | 3.00 | 2.67 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 72 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.83 | 0.40 | 2.94 | 2.57 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 70 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.75 | 0.32 | 2.86 | 2.45 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 70 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.83 | 0.38 | 2.96 | 2.49 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 67 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.1 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Focused Care at Burnet Bay's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
53.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.
10.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 20 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CHAMBERS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1. CMS links this home to Focused Post Acute Care Partners, a group of 25 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chambers County Public Hospital District No. 1 | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Abernathy, Mary | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Cooper, Kimberly | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/29/2024 | |
| Humphrey, Eric | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Legg, Stephen | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| McKenzie, Mark | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Newton, Elizabeth | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/22/2024 | |
| Tinnerman, Linda | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Turner, Leslie | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Cooper, Kimberly | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/29/2024 | |
| Newton, Elizabeth | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/22/2024 | |
| Chambers County Public Hospital District No. 1 | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Focused Post Acute Care Partners LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Focused Post Acute Care Partners Management, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Fpacp Burnet LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Conley, Shawn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| McKenzie, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Newton, Elizabeth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/22/2024 | |
| Strubbe, Loretta | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Watson, Tureko | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/18/2023 | |
| Focused Post Acute Care Partners LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/17/2025 | |
| Focused Post Acute Care Partners Management, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/17/2025 | |
| Fpacp Burnet LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/17/2025 | |
| Conley, Shawn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| McKenzie, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Strubbe, Loretta | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Wasserstein, Jerome | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2021 | |
| Watson, Tureko | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/18/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.