409 Neely Street, Atkinson, NE 68713 · Holt County · (402) 925-2875
61 certified beds, about 28 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 285177 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 10, 2026, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Nebraska average is 7.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 43 health citations since January 2024, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $22,653 in the last three years; the largest was $22,653, and the latest is dated January 10, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.44 hours per resident per day, against 3.98 across Nebraska and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.74 of those hours.
68.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Nebraska average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Good Samaritan Society, an affiliated group of 92 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 43 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(D)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect all facility residents who utilized a call device. This had the potential to effect all residents in the building. The facility census was 28.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(D)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure 8 hours of consecutive Registered Nurse (RN) coverage in a 24-hour period 7 days per week as required. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 28.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(I)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to implement their Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan to maintain a system to prevent repeat deficient practices including accidents, weight loss, sufficient staffing, unnecessary medications and Emergency Preparedness. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 28.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18 Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination as the staff failed to utilize the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-items such as gowns, gloves, masks, goggles, face shields, and foot coverings) when performing personal/catheter cares for Resident 7 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-use of PPE to reduce the transmission of multi drug-resistant organisms (MDRO- organisms resistant to at least one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) between residents) and to ensure ongoing surveillance of infections. The total sample size was 20 and the facility census was 28.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(D)(E)Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to obtain informed consent for the use of psychotropic medications and/or information for alternate treatment options for Residents 3, 6, 24, and 30. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 28.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(S) Based on observations, record review, and interviews; the failed to ensure Resident 7 was treated with respect and dignity during the provision of personal cares. The sample size was 1 and the facility census was 28.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(G) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure Resident's 6's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medications due to failure to monitor for potential side effects of a psychotropic medication. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 28.
Inspectors wroteLicensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.02(H)Based on record review and interview: the facility failed to report an allegation of potential staff to resident abuse and to send the results of an investigation to the State Agency within the required timeframes for Resident 7. The sample size was 2 and the facility census was 28.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(A)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of facility discharges for Residents 1 and 34. The sample size was 2 and the facility census was 28.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(iii) Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to address Resident 28's nutritional status and risk for weight loss on the resident's comprehensive plan of care and failed to involve Resident 12's legal guardian in the development of the resident's care plan. The total sample size was 20 and the facility census was 28.
Inspectors wroteLICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09(l)(i)(3) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to revise current fall interventions and/or develop new interventions to prevent ongoing falls for Resident 6. The sample size was 6 and the facility census was 28.
Inspectors wroteLICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09(J)(i)(1)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to implement nutritional interventions to address a weight loss for 1 (Resident 28) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 28.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure the daily staff posting had the required information. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 28.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on record reviews and interviews; the facility failed to notify Resident 1's practitioner of the residents increased lethargy, decreased appetite, lowered blood glucose levels and staff failure to administer insulin; and Resident 3 and 4's practitioner and/or responsible parties of ongoing falls. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 33. A. Review of the facility policy Notification of Change with a revision date of 12/23/2024 revealed the purpose of the policy was to identify when regulation required notifications to occur. [...]
Inspectors wroteLICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin and to submit an investigation to the State Agency within 5 working days for 1 (Resident 3) of 5 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 31.
Inspectors wroteLICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of potential abuse for Residents 1 and 2 and to report an allegation of potential abuse for Resident 2 within the required timeframe. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 31.
Inspectors wroteC. Review of Resident 16's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively impaired, had Diabetes, had a dementia diagnosis, and received substantial assistance with bathing. Review of Resident 16's Care Plan with a revision date of 12/27/24 revealed the resident had impaired cognitive function and confusion, self-care deficits and requested one bath weekly and needed staff assistance to bathe. Review of Resident 16's Bathing Records from December 1st, 2024, through January 15th, 2025, revealed the following: -Bathing occurred on the following days in December 2024: December 4th, 11th, and 18th. -Bathing occurred on the following days in January 2025: No documented baths as of January 2025. -There was no evidence of bathing from December 18th, 2024, and January 15th, 2025 (28 days). [...]
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to meet the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) needs for Resident 20 and the bathing needs for Resident's 3, 11, 16 and 24. The sample size was 20 with a census of 31.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to develop new interventions and/or revise current interventions to prevent ongoing falls for Residents 182 and 26. The sample size was 4 and the facility census was 31.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(J)(i)(1) Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to revise nutritional interventions and/or develop new interventions to address ongoing weight loss for 1 (Resident 14) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 31.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(A) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure a documented rationale for the use of an anti-depressant for Resident 4. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 31.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement hand hygiene at appropriate intervals and utilize Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in a manner to prevent the potential spread of infection for Resident 15. The sample size was 16 and the facility census was 31.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(A) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to offer Resident 16 the recommended Pneumococcal vaccines in accordance with facility policy and Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 31.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04 Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to have staff adequate to meet the bathing needs of residents, respond in a timely fashion to call lights and to meet the housekeeping needs of residents. The sample size was 6 and the facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19 Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of the resident's rooms and bathrooms and to maintain a safe and odor free environment. This affected 12 (rooms 98, 99, 103, 104, 105, 106, 205, 300, 301, 305, 306 and 309) out of 33 resident rooms. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) (i)(1) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bathing assistance for 4 (Residents 1, 2, 4, and 5) of 6 sampled residents who were dependent with bathing. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(4) Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 3) of 6 sampled residents call light was accessible. The facility census was 33. A. Review of the facility policy Call Light with a revision date of 7/29/24 revealed the facility ensured residents always had a method for calling for assistance and prompt answering of call lights. Review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated comprehensive assessment used to develop resident care plans) dated 9/16/24 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was dependent for dressing, all hygiene, bathing, and transfers. The resident's urinary continence was not rated due to the presence of a catheter. [...]
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure the resident's family or responsible party were notified of orders, appointments, and/or procedures for 1 (Resident 1) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iv)(1) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure potential infection/complication with Resident 3's urinary catheter (tube used to drain urine from the bladder and collected in a sterile closed system drainage bag). The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18 Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to implement an ongoing system for tracking antibiotic use to identify trends in infections for 1 (Resident 1) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to notify Resident 22's physician, Resident 29's responsible party and physician, and Resident 2's responsible party of a change in condition. The sample size was 3 residents. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D8b Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to identify and implement measures to prevent a significant weight loss and notify the provider for 1 (Resident 29) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteD. Review of a facility investigation report dated 12/4/23 related to a fall incident for Resident 5 revealed the following: -12/3/23 at 5:45 AM, staff were assisting the resident to the bathroom. The resident stood from the toilet to transfer into the wheelchair, the resident's knee buckled, and staff then lowered the resident to the floor. -12/3/23 at 7:30 AM the resident complained of left knee pain and had increased swelling to the knee. -12/3/23 at 1:30 PM the resident continued to complaint of left lower leg pain and was unable to bear weight on the leg. -12/4/23 at 10:00 AM the resident's knee was swollen, and the resident was unable to bend the left knee. The physician was notified, and the resident was sent for an x-ray. The resident was admitted to the hospital with a fracture of the femur, fibula and the fifth toe of the left leg/foot. [...]
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09B Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated assessed used to develop resident care plans) to reflect the resident's status at the time of the assessment regarding nutritional approaches for Residents 10, 2, 84, and 16 and medication use for Resident 17. The sample size was 17 and the facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to: 1) obtain orders for management of a blood glucose monitoring device and to ensure assessments and ongoing monitoring were completed for wound care and blood glucose levels for Resident 184; 2) reposition Resident 16 in accordance with the plan of care to prevent the potential for skin breakdown; and 3) follow physician orders regarding fluid restriction and weight monitoring for Resident 5. The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(21) Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 16's dignity was maintained by not putting pants on the resident when staff assisted [gender] to dress for the day. The sample size was 1 and the facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-00605(8) Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to evaluate the use of a seatbelt as a restraint for 1 (Resident 84) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09A Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure a new PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review- a tool used to ensure residents receive the care they require for mental illness) had been completed after a diagnosis of mental illness was identified for 2 (Residents 2 and 29) out of 2 reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D2b Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to provide assessment and monitoring of a pressure ulcer to ensure healing for Resident 84. The sample size was 1 and the census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04 Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care nursing staff were available to answer call lights in a timely manner for Resident 26. The sample size was 17 and the facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications related to long term use of an antibiotic medication for Resident 10. The antibiotic did not specify a duration and had no supporting documentation for clinical use based on laboratory results. The sample size was 1 and the facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 16) of 5 sampled residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic (a type of psychoactive medication which alters chemicals in the brain to affect changes in behavior, mood and emotion) medications related to 1) as needed anti-psychotic and anti-anxiety medications without a specified duration, 2) no evidence of ongoing evaluations completed by the physician, and 3) a diagnosis not indicated for an anti-psychotic medication. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteLicensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17B Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to implement transmission-based precautions to prevent the potential for cross contamination as staff failed to initiate contact precautions for Resident 84 when the resident returned from the hospital with a diagnosis of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA-a type of staph infection which is difficult to treat due to resistance to many antibiotics). The total sample size was 17 and the facility census was 33.
25 fire safety citations on file: 2 on February 10, 2026, 16 on January 15, 2025, 7 on January 10, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 10, 2024 | Fine | $22,653 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Nebraska | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.44 | 3.98 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.21 | 3.48 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.87 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.83 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 68.3% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.0% | 44.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.39 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.53 on weekdays and 3.21 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.54 in April to June 2025 to 3.44 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.44 | 0.74 | 3.53 | 3.21 | 0.1% | 2 of 90 | 28 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.40 | 0.69 | 3.49 | 3.19 | 0.1% | 3 of 92 | 32 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.33 | 0.61 | 3.48 | 2.94 | 0.8% | 4 of 92 | 34 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.54 | 0.80 | 3.71 | 3.12 | 0.0% | 1 of 91 | 33 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Nebraska, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.66 | 4.21 | 3.53 | 7.1% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebraska, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.23 | $18.29 to $22.31 | 16,450 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.13 | $28.41 to $34.55 | 4,580 |
| Registered nurses | $40.74 | $38.09 to $47.90 | 24,720 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Nebraska | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 37.0 | 19.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.2 | 18.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 4.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.3 | 20.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.0 | 20.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.3 | 11.4 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Good Samaritan Society - Atkinson's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (35.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
35.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Nebraska: 17 better, 24 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.
10.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Nebraska: 2 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 45 eligible stays.
7.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Nebraska: 2 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 29 eligible stays.
58.1% this home
Median of homes: Nebraska50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Nebraska0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Nebraska2.2% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Nebraska100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY. CMS links this home to Good Samaritan Society, a group of 92 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanford | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2019 |
| The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2019 |
| Brown, George | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Dykhouse, Dana | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Engbrecht, Wesley | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Gassen, William | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Gulsvig, Neil | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Herseth Sandlin, Stephanie | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Lundeen, Mark | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| McCausland, Maureen | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Molbert, Lauris | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| North, Andrew | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Schieffer, Kevin | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Shulkin, David | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Teiken, Brent | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Ventling-Herrmann, Marnie | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Wenzel, Thomas | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Fluit, Joel | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2022 | |
| Gassen, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Olson, Nicholas | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/08/2024 | |
| Schema, Nathan | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Dtn Staffing Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/02/2024 | |
| Focusone Solutions | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/04/2024 | |
| Grape Tree Medical Staffing LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/13/2018 | |
| Sanford | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2019 | |
| The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2019 | |
| Middleton, Aimee | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/27/2022 | |
| Morrison, Tony | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Olson, Nicholas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/08/2024 | |
| Ptacek, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2018 | |
| Sandgren, Deeandra | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/16/2023 | |
| Sigler, Kristy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/06/2023 | |
| Fluit, Joel | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 11/03/2025 | |
| Dtn Staffing Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/16/2025 | |
| Focusone Solutions | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/07/2025 | |
| Grape Tree Medical Staffing LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/16/2025 | |
| Pharmerica Corporation | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2025 | |
| Sanford | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/15/2025 | |
| The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2019 | |
| Brown, George | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Dykhouse, Dana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Engbrecht, Wesley | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Fluit, Joel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2022 | |
| Gassen, William | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Gulsvig, Neil | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Herseth Sandlin, Stephanie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Lundeen, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| McCausland, Maureen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Middleton, Aimee | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/27/2022 | |
| Molbert, Lauris | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Morrison, Tony | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| North, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Olson, Nicholas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/08/2024 | |
| Ptacek, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2018 | |
| Sandgren, Deeandra | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/16/2023 | |
| Schema, Nathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Schieffer, Kevin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Shulkin, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Sigler, Kristy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/06/2023 | |
| Teiken, Brent | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Ventling-Herrmann, Marnie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Wenzel, Thomas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Nebraska. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.