Find a nursing home

Home / Wisconsin / Seymour

Good Shepherd Services Ltd

607 Bronson Rd, Seymour, WI 54165 · Outagamie County · (920) 833-6856

50 certified beds, about 29 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 525509 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 29, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Wisconsin average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).

None of its 14 health citations since April 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.48 hours per resident per day, against 4.21 across Wisconsin and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.75 of those hours.

52.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Wisconsin average 46.9%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
12D
1E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
April 21, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 22, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act when an allegation of sexual abuse was not reported to local law enforcement or the State Agency (SA) for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents. On 4/15/26, R1 reported to Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-C that R1 was raped. Later that morning, R1 stated R1 was raped to Activities Director (AD)-D and Director of Nursing (DON)-B. The facility did not report the allegation of abuse to local law enforcement or the SA.
  2. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 22, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly and accurately investigated for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents. On 4/15/26, R1 reported to Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-C that R1 was raped. Later that morning, R1 stated R1 was raped to Activities Director (AD)-D and Director of Nursing (DON)-B. The facility did not ensure the allegation of abuse was thoroughly and accurately investigated
March 20, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 20, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to protect 3 residents (R) (R1, R2, and R4) of 12 sampled residents from physical abuse. On 12/4/25, R1 accused R2 of being in R1's home and aggressively grabbed R2's right wrist and squeezed it. R2 had bruising on the right hand and wrist. R1 had a bruise and skin tear on the left hand. On 12/9/25, R1 stuck R1's leg out to trip R4 and grabbed R4's right hand/wrist. R4 had two bruises on the right hand.
  2. D
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 20, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (R) (R5) of 12 sampled residents was free from misappropriation of property. R5 reported to staff on [DATE] that on the morning of [DATE], R5 and R5's responsible party (child) noticed $276.00, a McDonald's gift card, and a Starbucks gift card were missing from R5's walker. An agency staff admitted to taking the money and gift cards.
May 29, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 31 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not have a detailed flow diagram of the facility's water system that identified areas where Legionella could grow. The facility's infection control policies were incomplete and/or did not contain current information. R17 was on EBP due to the presence of non-intact skin after R17's percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (feeding tube via stomach) was removed. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-G and CNA-H did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE) during high-contact resident cares, including changing linens and shaving R17. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    F552 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 residents (R) (R6, R27, and R7) of 5 sampled residents had documentation that indicated the residents or their legal representatives were thoroughly informed in advance of the risks and benefits of prescribed psychotropic medication. R6 was prescribed diazepam (a benzodiazepine medication) for a diagnosis of anxiety. The facility did not obtain written consent from R6 for the medication. R27 was prescribed olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) for nausea and vomiting. The facility did not ensure a written consent form was thoroughly reviewed and completed with R27's Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC). R7 was prescribed lorazepam (an antianxiety medication), buspirone (an anxiolytic medication), and duloxetine (an antidepressant medication). [...]
  3. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R6 and R17) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization received the proper notice of transfer, reason for transfer, location of transfer, appeal rights, name and address with telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman plus notification of discharges/transfers to the Ombudsman. In addition, the facility did not ensure R6 and R17 received written information on the duration of the bed hold policy, the reserve bed payment policy, and the right to return to the facility. R6 was transferred to the Emergency Department (ED) on 5/16/25. R6 was not provided with a written transfer or bed hold notice. In addition, the facility did not notify the Ombudsman of R6's transfer. R17 was transferred to the hospital on 2/14/25. [...]
  4. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a care plan was revised for 1 resident (R) (R4) of 12 sampled residents. The facility did not revise R4's care plan to include a chronic wound that reopened on 5/25/25. R4's care plan also did not indicate R4 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP).
  5. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 29, 2025
    Inspectors wrote2. From 5/27/25 to 5/29/25, Surveyor reviewed R27's medical record. R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia with malignant neoplasm of the lung. R27's MDS assessment, dated 5/7/25, had a BIMS score of 5 out of 15 which indicated R27 had severe cognitive impairment. R27 had an activated Power of Attorney (POA). A care plan (initiated 1/31/25) indicated R27 was at high risk for falls. R27's medical record indicated R27 fell on 5/11/25, 5/15/25, and 5/18/25 with no noted injuries. R27's care plan did not contain new interventions following the falls. A fall risk assessment, dated 5/19/25, indicated R27 was a high fall risk. On 5/29/25 at 1:33 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA-A who indicated R27 should have had a new fall intervention added to R27's care plan following each fall. [...]
  6. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 resident (R) (R21) of 2 sampled residents. R21's oxygen was not turned on per R21's continuous oxygen order.
  7. C
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    F868 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the minimum required members of the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee met at least quarterly. This practice had the potential to affect all 31 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not have documentation that the minimum required members of the QAA committee met for quality assessment and assurance purposes on a quarterly basis.
April 11, 2024Standard inspection · 1 citation · risk-based survey (a shorter visit CMS gives only to higher performing homes)
  1. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide appropriate care and services for 1 resident (R) (R28) of 1 sampled resident with an indwelling catheter. On 4/10/24, Surveyor observed R28's catheter drainage bag in direct contact with a floor mat without a barrier to prevent infection.
April 19, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure an injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigated for 1 Resident (R) (R25) of 2 residents reviewed. The facility reported to the State Agency a concern involving a suspicious bruise on R25's face. The facility did not conduct a thorough investigation of the incident to rule out caregiver misconduct, did not re-educate staff on safety needs for R25 and did not update R25's care plan to help prevent the chance of further injury.
  2. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 8, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene for 2 Residents (R) (R16 and R25) of 4 residents observed during the provision of cares. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-F and CNA-G did not consistently perform appropriate hand hygiene during the provision of perineal care for R16. CNA-E did not consistently perform appropriate hand hygiene during the provision of perineal care for R25.

Fire safety inspections

10 fire safety citations on file: 4 on May 29, 2025, 4 on April 11, 2024, 2 on April 19, 2023.

Every fire safety citation10 citations
  1. F
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · May 29, 2025 · deficient, provider has
  2. F
    Meet requirements for outpatient facilities located next to inpatient facilities separated by fire resistive construction.
    K 132 · May 29, 2025 · deficient, provider has
  3. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · May 29, 2025 · deficient, provider has
  4. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · May 29, 2025 · deficient, provider has
  5. F
    Provide family notifications of emergency plan.
    E 35 · April 11, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · April 11, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · April 11, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
    K 341 · April 11, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Meet other general requirements that are deficient.
    K 300 · April 19, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. D
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · April 19, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeWisconsinUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.484.213.86
Registered nurses0.750.990.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.733.773.42
Nurse aides2.74
Licensed practical nurses0.99
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)52.9%46.9%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover63.6%39.7%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.18 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.78 on weekdays and 3.73 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 10.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.21 in April to June 2025 to 4.48 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.480.754.783.73 10.8%1 of 9029
Oct to Dec 20254.190.794.403.66 8.7%0 of 9230
Jul to Sep 20254.450.904.743.68 1.6%0 of 9230
Apr to Jun 20254.210.974.533.42 5.9%0 of 9133
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Wisconsin, Jan to Mar 20264.190.954.363.748.8%0.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Wisconsin

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Wisconsin, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$21.70$19.03 to $22.7528,370
LPNs and LVNs$30.65$28.67 to $36.067,390
Registered nurses$45.93$39.39 to $49.3368,060
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Good Shepherd Services Ltd. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeWisconsinUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.116.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.22.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.03.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.65.04.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
25.415.815.4

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Good Shepherd Services Ltd's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (57.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

57.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Wisconsin: 52 better, 26 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 30 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.9% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Wisconsin: 0 better, 6 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 29 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · Wisconsin: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 13 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Wisconsin54.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Wisconsin0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Wisconsin2.2% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Wisconsin100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: GOOD SHEPHERD HOME, LTD.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Katch, JeanManaging control - governing bodyIndividual12/31/2024
McClone, KarlaManaging control - governing bodyIndividual04/01/2024
Rickert, LisaManaging control - governing bodyIndividual04/01/2022
Schroeder, ToddManaging control - governing bodyIndividual12/31/2024
Walters, JoelManaging control - governing bodyIndividual04/01/2022
Zahn, JoyceManaging control - governing bodyIndividual12/31/2024
Gilliam, DawnCorporate directorIndividual03/16/2025
Katch, JeanCorporate directorIndividual12/31/2024
McClone, KarlaCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2024
Rickert, LisaCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2022
Schroeder, ToddCorporate directorIndividual12/31/2024
Walters, JoelCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2022
Zahn, JoyceCorporate directorIndividual12/31/2024
Rickert, LisaCorporate officerIndividual04/01/2022
Schroeder, ToddCorporate officerIndividual12/31/2024
Wipfli LLPOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/13/1987
Hartig, DonaldOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/22/2021
Katch, JeanOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/31/2024
McClone, KarlaOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2024
Piehl, CaylaOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/29/2024
Rickert, LisaOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2022
Schroeder, ToddOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/31/2024
Walters, JoelOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2022
Zahn, JoyceOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/31/2024
Wipfli LLPAdp of the SNFOrganization04/24/2025
Gilliam, DawnAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2006
Hartig, DonaldAdp of the SNFIndividual04/16/2025
Piehl, CaylaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/29/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 21, 2026: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 29, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 29, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 29, 2025: "Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.73 hours per resident per day, below the Wisconsin average of 3.77.

Other nursing homes nearby

Wisconsin contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Wisconsin. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Good Shepherd Services Ltd's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Good Shepherd Services Ltd 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Good Shepherd Services Ltd get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 29, 2025. The Wisconsin average is 9.5.
Has Good Shepherd Services Ltd been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Good Shepherd Services Ltd accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Good Shepherd Services Ltd?
CMS lists 28 owners and managers. Legal business name: GOOD SHEPHERD HOME, LTD.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection