1181 Hwy 19, Slaughter, LA 70777 · East Feliciana County · (225) 306-0030
128 certified beds, about 117 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 195258 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 10, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 34 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $48,357 in the last three years; the largest was $39,247, and the latest is dated June 12, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.20 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.14 of those hours.
46.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Louisiana average 47.6%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 34 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance with ADLs received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (#23) of 2 residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to trim and clean Resident #23's fingernails. Review of the facility's policy dated 02/2025 and titled, Fingernails/Toenails, Care of, revealed the following, in part:Policy: To promote cleanlinessPurpose: The purpose of this procedure is to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections. General Guidelines1. Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming. Review of the Resident #23's Medical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure, and Depression. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 of 1 (#102) residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility failed to ensure:1. The enteral feeding flush bag was appropriately labeled with an opened date and time; and2. The enteral feeding pump was on and running continuously in accordance with physician orders. Review of Resident #102's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Gastrostomy, Dysphagia, Disturbances of Salivary Secretion, and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease. Review of Resident #102's current Physician Orders revealed, in part, the following: Order date: 08/19/2025 - Enteral Feed Order: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received necessary respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (#39 and #68) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure:1. Resident #39's Oxygen tubing was labeled with the date last changed on her portable oxygen tank.2. Resident #39's portable oxygen tank administered the appropriate amount of oxygen in accordance with physician orders.3. Resident #68's pre-filled water reservoir was labeled with the date last changed. Review of the facility's policy with a revision date of 03/2025 and titled Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) revealed the following in part: General Guidelines 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure medication rooms were free of expired medications / supplements for 1 (MR2) of 2 medication rooms reviewed. There were 119 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to be free from neglect for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents reviewed for neglect. S3CNA and S4CNA neglected Resident #1 when they failed to verify Resident #1's transfer status prior to transferring Resident #1, who required mechanical lift for transfer. This deficient practice resulted in actual physical harm on 05/13/2025 at approximately 12:30 p.m., when S3CNA and S4CNA transferred Resident #1, who required a mechanical lift, by using a draw sheet without verifying what type of transfer assistance Resident #1 required. Following the transfer, Resident #1 yelled out in pain and an x-ray of the left shoulder was ordered. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation involving neglect was reported to the State Survey Agency in the required timeframe for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents reviewed for neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) residents reviewed in the sample. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was transferred properly using the mechanical lift with two person assistance.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents reviewed. This was evidenced by the facility failing to ensure Resident #2's Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan was accurately updated to reflect his current Physician's Orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure expired medications were not available for administration to residents on 1 (Med Cart 1) of 4 (Med Cart 1, 2, 3, and 4) medication carts observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 3 (#35, #107, and #271) of 3 (#35, #107, and #271) residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff implemented appropriate EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) for Resident #107 and #271); and 2. Staff used proper hand hygiene during wound care for Resident #107, 3. Staff used proper infection control technique when providing catheter care for Resident #35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1(#50) of 24 residents reviewed in the final sample. The facility failed to ensure Resident #50's urinal was emptied in a timely manner prior to meals being served in the resident's room.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 1(#28) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28 was free from physical abuse by Resident #100.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an identified mental health diagnosis was referred for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II evaluation as required for 1 (#11) of 3 (#6, #11, and #92) residents reviewed for PASRR.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided by the facility met professional standards of quality by failing to ensure nursing staff did not leave medications at bedside for 1 (#82) of 24 residents reviewed in final sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle were labeled for 1 (#2) of 2 (#2 and #75) residents reviewed for oxygen therapy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 121 residents who were served meals from the facility's kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all surveys during the 3 preceding years, including complaint surveys since the last annual survey, were accessible for residents, family members, legal representatives, and the public's review.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 (#1) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to ensure an effective system was in place for staff to identify whether a resident was out of the facility on pass or missing, which resulted in Resident #1 being left outside overnight without required care. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 08/26/2024 at 5:44 p.m., when Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident who required extensive assistance, self-propelled outside the facility without staff knowledge. From 5:44 p.m. until the next morning at 8:15 a.m., staff assumed the resident was out of the facility on pass with family. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent state agencies and advocacy groups, such as the State Survey Agency and a statement as to how a resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal nursing facility regulation. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 123 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation of video surveillance, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations involving neglect were reported to the state survey agency within twenty four hours after the allegations were made for 1 (#1) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) residents reviewed for neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for risk of entrapment from bed rails and obtain informed consent for bed rails for 1 (#1) of 6 (#1, #R4, #R5, #R6, #R7, and #R8) residents identified for having bed rails in use.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet quality professional standards for 1 (#4) of 3 (#2, #3, and #4) residents reviewed for falls. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was assessed via neurological assessments following unwitnessed falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute foods under sanitary conditions. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Food was properly sealed and dated after opening; 2. Presence of expired food intended for use; and 3. Dietary staff wore a beard restraint while preparing food. There were a total of 109 out of 112 facility residents who were provided meals and beverages from the facility's kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to implement and monitor appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. The facility failed to ensure: 1. CNA staff documented fall intervention tasks for 3 (#F52, #RF3 and #RF4) of 3 (#F52, #RF3 and #RF4) sampled residents reviewed for falls; and 2. Residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 (#F267) of 3 (#F89, #RF4 and #F267) residents reviewed for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to document and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances for 3 of 3 (#85, #90, and #267) residents reviewed for grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility had eight consecutive hours per day of registered nurse coverage for 13 days (01/01/2023, 01/07/2023, 01/14/2023, 01/15/2023, 01/21/2023, 01/22/2023, 01/28/2023, 01/29/2023, 02/04/2023, 02/11/2023, 02/12/2023, 02/25/2023, 06/08/2023) of 181 days (01/01/2023 - 06/30/2023) reviewed for registered nurse hours. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 112 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% by having a medication error rate of 6.9% during the medication administration observation. A total of 29 opportunities were observed, which included 2 medication errors for 2 (#46 and #67) of 6 (#10, #39, #46, #64, #67, and #267) resident's observed during medication pass. This failed practice had the potential to affect any of the 112 residents currently residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free of significant medication errors for 3 (#51, #89, and #267) of 8 (#10, #39, #46, #51, #64, #67, #89, and #267) residents reviewed for medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that drugs were stored and labeled properly in accordance with current accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Expired medications were not available for administration to residents in Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER] and Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER]; 2. Medications were labeled with an open date for medication on Carts A, B, C, and D; and 3. Medication Cart B was locked when unattended.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 3 (#F52, #RF3 and #RF4) of 3 (#F52, #RF3 and #RF4) sampled residents reviewed for falls. The facility failed to accurately document residents' fall intervention tasks every shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 4 (Resident #10, Resident #39, Resident #46, and Resident #67) residents observed for blood glucose monitoring.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue treatment, and to formulate an advanced directive was properly reflected in the resident's record. The facility failed to ensure all records regarding code status consistently reflected the residents wishes for 1 (#7) of 41 residents investigated for code status in the initial pool process .
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 (#52) of 4 (#11, #52, #90, and #100) residents reviewed for falls. The facility failed to ensure staff monitored Resident #52 every 90 minutes after a fall.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#90) of 3 (#13, #81, and #90) residents reviewed for activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for nail care.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 12, 2025 | Fine | $9,110 |
| September 5, 2024 | Fine | $39,247 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.20 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.14 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.74 | 3.21 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.13 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.94 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 46.0% | 47.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 0.0% | 41.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.30 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.39 on weekdays and 2.74 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.25 in April to June 2025 to 3.20 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.20 | 0.14 | 3.39 | 2.74 | 1.0% | 0 of 90 | 117 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.25 | 0.17 | 3.46 | 2.73 | 2.2% | 0 of 92 | 119 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.22 | 0.11 | 3.42 | 2.72 | 1.4% | 0 of 92 | 120 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.25 | 0.11 | 3.46 | 2.71 | 1.0% | 0 of 91 | 120 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Louisiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.26 | 3.86 | 3.10 | 3.6% | 0.9% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $14.67 | $13.97 to $16.87 | 20,690 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.63 | $23.87 to $29.43 | 17,600 |
| Registered nurses | $38.57 | $33.19 to $45.00 | 48,970 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.6 | 17.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.6 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 3.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.4 | 17.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.7 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.5 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.6 | 28.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.7 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Grace Nursing Home's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
53.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.
10.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 75 eligible stays.
6.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 42 eligible stays.
57.1% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
2.3% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
6.2% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GRACE NURSING HOME INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stott, Jodie | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 12/04/2009 |
| Stott, Martin | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 12/04/2009 |
| Jones, Ruby | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 11/17/2009 | |
| Stott, Jodie | Corporate director | Individual | 12/04/2009 | |
| Stott, Martin | Corporate director | Individual | 03/02/2016 | |
| Widner, Donna | Corporate director | Individual | 12/04/2009 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.