Has Green Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Ltd been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Green Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Ltd accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Green Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Ltd?

CMS lists 15 owners and managers, and links the home to Vrc Management. Legal business name: GREEN VILLAGE SKILLED NURSING & REHABILITATION, LTD..

Green Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Ltd, Akron OH

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 28, 2025, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).

None of its 15 health citations since October 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.60 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.74 of those hours.

60.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).

CMS links it to Vrc Management, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

310/19

010/22

106/24

107/24

1004/25

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

13D

Potential for minimal harm

April 28, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 10 citations

F

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to have test strips at the three-sink manual dishwash area to test for proper sanitation levels. This had the potential to affect all 59 of 59 residents receiving dietary services.
E

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin pens were only used for one resident and failed to follow infection control precautions for Resident #32 and #73. This affected Resident #5, Resident #32, and Resident #73 with the potential to affect five residents (#42, #70, #71, #72, and #73) who resided on the 100 hall. The facility census was 59.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 and Resident #18's comprehensive care plans included all goals and interventions needed to meet the residents' total care needs. This affected two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #18) of 27 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans.
D

Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the care plan for Resident #4 was updated with new fall interventions after a fall with injury. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of two residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 59.
D

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received assistance with baths and showers per preferences or the care plan. This affected one resident (Resident #2) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 59.
D

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #66's nicotine patch was administered as ordered. This affected one residents (Resident #66) of five residents reviewed for quality of care.
D

Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #65's care needs were addressed related to a urine sample and the results of the urine analysis were properly followed up on. This affected one resident (Resident #65) of two residents reviewed for bowel and bladder continence.
D

Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to timely and accurately address and monitor significant weight loss. This affected one resident (#40) of four residents (#40, #47, #48, and #55) reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 59.
D

Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.

F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #18 pain medications had proper indications for use, their pain was re-evaluated after administration of analgesics, and had interventions in place to ensure effective monitoring for adverse effects of opioid use. This affected one Resident (Resident #18) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 59.
D

Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer medications with an error rate of under 5%. Two medication errors out of 29 opportunities for error, creating a total medication error rate of 6.9%. This affected two (Resident #5 and #11) of five residents observed for medication administration.

July 23, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.

F808 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 2, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately provide the physician ordered thickened liquid diet to Resident #2. This affected one resident (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for food/nutrition. The facility identified three residents (#2, #4, and #58) who were prescribed thickened liquids. The facility census was 61.

June 13, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 6, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, observation, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was used for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This affected one resident (Resident #49) out of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 58.

October 13, 2022Standard inspection · 0 citations

October 31, 2019Standard inspection · 3 citations

D

Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2's advance directives and physician orders accurately reflected the resident's code status. This affected one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for hospice.
D

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment for Resident #3 was accurate for dental and Resident #20 for life expectancy. This effected two of 20 residents whose comprehensive assessments were reviewed. The facility census was 46.
D

Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.

F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared according to the facility recipe and best practice guidelines. This affected four (Residents #2, #8, #19 and #22) of four residents the facility identified as requiring pureed meals. Facility census was 46.

Fire safety inspections

7 fire safety citations on file: 4 on April 28, 2025, 1 on October 13, 2022, 2 on October 31, 2019.

Every fire safety citation7 citations

F
Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.

K 223 · April 28, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Provide properly protected cooking facilities.

K 324 · April 28, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.

K 511 · April 28, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.

K 711 · April 28, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · October 13, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.

K 222 · October 31, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

K 363 · October 31, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Ohio	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	3.60	3.69	3.86
Registered nurses	0.74	0.64	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	3.40	3.28	3.42
Nurse aides	1.94
Licensed practical nurses	0.91
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	60.9%	48.7%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	44.4%	43.9%	42.9%
Administrators who left	1

CMS expects 4.28 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.68 on weekdays and 3.40 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.44 in April to June 2025 to 3.60 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	3.60	0.74	3.68	3.40	0.0%	0 of 90	63
Oct to Dec 2025	3.13	0.72	3.30	2.69	0.0%	0 of 92	63
Jul to Sep 2025	3.14	0.66	3.31	2.71	0.0%	0 of 92	61
Apr to Jun 2025	3.44	0.67	3.62	2.98	0.0%	0 of 91	62
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026	3.64	0.60	3.80	3.24	4.6%	0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Ohio

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Ohio, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$18.76	$17.93 to $21.44	63,280
LPNs and LVNs	$29.78	$27.34 to $31.68	39,900
Registered nurses	$39.67	$38.08 to $47.61	143,730
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Ohio	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.7	5.3	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.2	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.5	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.2	3.2	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.2	1.2	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.2	6.1	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.9	3.4	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.8	8.8	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	37.0	24.9	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	2.4	12.9	12.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Green Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Ltd's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (66.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

66.8% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 143 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 138 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 88 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

48.2% this home

Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 56 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.3% this home

Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 79 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 79 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

97.7% this home

Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: GREEN VILLAGE SKILLED NURSING & REHABILITATION, LTD.. CMS links this home to Vrc Management, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 4.8 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Since
Fanego, Ana	Direct ownership interest	Individual	07/22/2010
Francus, Andrew	Direct ownership interest	Individual	09/01/2014
Francus, David	Direct ownership interest	Individual	09/01/2014
Francus, Michael	Direct ownership interest	Individual	09/01/2014
Francus, Rebecca	Direct ownership interest	Individual	09/01/2014
Vrc Management, Inc.	Operational/managerial control	Organization	01/01/2014
Francus, Michael	Operational/managerial control	Individual	09/01/2014
Meiser, Kelly	Operational/managerial control	Individual	12/12/2022
Vrc Management, Inc.	Adp of the SNF	Organization	01/27/2025
Fanego, Ana	Adp of the SNF	Individual	07/22/2010
Francus, Andrew	Adp of the SNF	Individual	09/01/2014
Francus, David	Adp of the SNF	Individual	09/01/2014
Francus, Michael	Adp of the SNF	Individual	09/01/2014
Francus, Rebecca	Adp of the SNF	Individual	09/01/2014
Meiser, Kelly	Adp of the SNF	Individual	12/12/2022

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 28, 2025: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 28, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 28, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 28, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Pebble Creek Healthcare Center
Akron, 0.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
St. Luke Lutheran Community-Portage Lakes
Akron, 2.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 24 citations
Pleasant View Health Care Center
Barberton, 5.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 12 citations
Barberton Post Acute
Barberton, 5.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 19 citations
The Pavilion at Canal Fulton for Nursing and Rehab
Canal Fulton, 7.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 17 citations
Chapel Hill Community
Canal Fulton, 7.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 30 citations
The Colony Healthcare Center
Tallmadge, 7.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 46 citations
Divine Rehabilitation and Nursing at Canal Pointe
Akron, 8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 50 citations

Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Ohio Department of Health, Nursing Homes and Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Ohio Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-800-282-1206. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Ohio Long-Term Care Quality Navigator (Ohio Department of Aging), where Ohio publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Green Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Ltd's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Green Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Ltd 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Green Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Ltd get at its last inspection?: 10 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 28, 2025. The Ohio average is 10.5.
Has Green Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Ltd been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Green Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Ltd accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Green Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Ltd?: CMS lists 15 owners and managers, and links the home to Vrc Management. Legal business name: GREEN VILLAGE SKILLED NURSING & REHABILITATION, LTD..

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.