12200 Strausser St. Nw, Canal Fulton, OH 44614 · Stark County · (330) 854-4177
80 certified beds, about 75 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1980
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365494 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 24, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 30 health citations since December 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.89 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.44 of those hours.
44.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to United Church Homes, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #9 was assessed following a reported incident in which the resident acquired bruising on her forehead. This finding affected one (Resident #9) of three residents reviewed for quality of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was consistent communication between the facility and the dialysis center regarding Resident #48's health information and hemodialysis treatments. This affected one resident (Resident #48) out of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 75.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to administering Resident #13's as needed anti-anxiety medication. This finding affected one (Resident #13) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions during Resident #38's wound care. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #38) out of three residents reviewed for transmission based precautions. The facility census was 75. Findings Include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed admission date 03/11/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to fracture of right shoulder, dislocation of right shoulder, dementia, and depression. Review of Resident #38's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 required assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL) tasks and required a sling to be worn on the right arm/shoulder related to a fractured right shoulder. [...]
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on a facility self-reported incident (SRI) review, medical record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident narcotic medication was not misappropriated by a staff member. This affected two (Resident #23 and #73) of two residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands during the passing of the meal trays, failed to ensure the cleanliness of kitchen areas and timely and proper disposal of outdated/expired foods and failed to ensure dish machine temperatures were monitored to prevent contamination and/or food borne illness. This had the potential to affect 71 of 71 residents who received meal trays from the kitchen. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized activity program to meet the total care needs of all residents. This affected five residents (#28, #51, #56, #57 and #171) of nine residents reviewed for activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain sufficient levels of staffing to ensure adequate supervision was provided to residents during meal service on the memory care unit. This affected nine residents (#1, #2, #6, #28, #33, #56, #64, #171 and #172) of 16 residents on the Memory Care Unit (Willow).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the facility menu, review of the facility spreadsheet, review of facility policy and procedure and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all residents on the Lakeside unit and [NAME] unit were served the correct/proper serving size of meat during the lunch meal on 10/31/22. This affected 11 residents (#1, #6, #25, #32, #33, #42, #45, #49, #57, #61 and #171) of the 28 residents on the Lakeside and [NAME] units. The facility census was 72.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #171's urinary catheter drainage bag was properly covered to promote the dignity of the resident. This affected one resident (#171) of three residents reviewed for dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #24 was positioned properly in bed and had her meal tray placed within reach to allow the resident to eat in a timely manner following meal tray delivery. This affected one resident (#24) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #171 was provided privacy during personal (catheter) care. This affected one resident (#171) of one resident reviewed for privacy.
Inspectors wrote2. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/05/19 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, progressive supranuclear ophthalmoplegia, palliative care, dementia in other diseases pseudobulbar affect, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, psychotic disorder with hallucination due to known physiological condition (dated 08/13/20), dysarthria and anarthria, cognitive communication deficit, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed no evidence a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed following the addition of the 08/13/20 diagnosis of psychotic disorder with hallucination due to a known physiological condition. Review of the 08/06/22 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 revealed the resident was noted to be moderately cognitively impaired. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #10, who required staff assistance for activities of daily living, received adequate and proper assistance with meals. This affected one resident (#10) of 22 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #19, who required staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) care received adequate urinary/urostomy catheter care to prevent urine odors and to promptly identify symptoms of a urinary tract infection. This affected one resident (#19) of three residents reviewed for dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #57 was provided a physician ordered weight loss supplement, failed to ensure the resident was provided the appropriate serving size of meat during the lunch meal on 10/31/22 and failed to ensure the resident was provided adequate and timely assistance with eating. This affected one resident (#57) of eight residents reviewed for food and nutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide emergency dental services when Resident #51 had a broken tooth. This affected one resident (#51) of one reviewed for dental services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #56 received food items in bite sized pieces as ordered and beverages/drinks per his preference. This affected one resident (#54) of six residents reviewed for nutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to properly store medication in the [NAME] unit medication cart, [NAME] unit medication cart, and [NAME] unit medication cart. This affected nine residents (#26, #35,#43, #46, #56 #61 #62, #74, #83) and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 87. Findings Include: 1. Observation on 12/12/19 at 10:50 A.M. of the [NAME] unit medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #544 revealed a bottle of artificial tears eye drops not dated when opened for Resident #26, a bottle of artificial tears eye drops not dated when opened for Resident #74, a vial of Humalog insulin not dated when opened for Resident #62, and a vial of Lantus insulin not dated when opened for Resident #35. Interview on 12/12/19 at 10:55 A.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #55 received his preferred number of showers per week. This affected one resident (#55) of one resident reviewed for choices.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were in place for Resident #62, Resident #64 and Resident #233. This affected three residents (#622, #64 and #233) of three residents reviewed for advanced directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #22's responsible party was contacted timely to discuss dental options and services available for the resident. This affected one resident (#22) of 24 residents reviewed for notification.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice form (SNFABN) to Resident #44 as required. This affected one resident (#44) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to effectively implement their abuse policy and procedure to ensure injuries of unknown origin involving Resident #19 were thoroughly investigated and reported to the State agency. This affected one resident (#19) of one resident reviewed for accidents and injuries of unknown origin.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure injuries of unknown origin involving Resident #19 were reported to the State agency as required. This affected one resident (#19) of one resident reviewed for accidents and injuries of unknown origin.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to accurately code the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment related to antibiotic use for Resident #1 and pressure ulcers for Resident #32. This affected two residents (#1 and #32) of 22 residents whose MDS 3.0 assessments were reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained and as needed diuretic medications were administered as ordered by the physician to ensure the appropriate treatment for Resident #36 who had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure. This affected one resident (#36) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received thickened liquids as ordered and Resident #6, #20, #42 and #46 received nutritional supplements as ordered to promote optimal nutrition. This affected five residents (#1, #6, #20, #42 and #46) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition and hydration.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #36, who received as needed anxiolytic medications had proper physician documentation for an indication for use. This affected one resident (#36) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #54 received therapy services as ordered after a hospitalization. This affected one resident (#54) of 18 residents reviewed for orders during the annual survey.
15 fire safety citations on file: 5 on April 24, 2025, 2 on November 7, 2022, 8 on December 12, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.89 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.44 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.40 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.23 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.22 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 44.4% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.66 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.08 on weekdays and 3.40 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.68 in April to June 2025 to 3.89 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.89 | 0.44 | 4.08 | 3.40 | 6.0% | 0 of 90 | 75 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.79 | 0.51 | 4.00 | 3.26 | 8.8% | 0 of 92 | 77 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.61 | 0.38 | 3.82 | 3.09 | 11.4% | 0 of 92 | 77 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.68 | 0.48 | 3.87 | 3.22 | 15.1% | 0 of 91 | 74 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.5 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.8 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.2 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.8 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.0 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Chapel Hill Community's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (44.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
44.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.
11.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 29 eligible stays.
7.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.
40.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 27 residents counted.
3.1% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 27 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: UNITED CHURCH HOMES, INC.. CMS links this home to United Church Homes, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 3.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Church Homes, Inc. | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2000 |
| Bailey, Peter | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Bates, Trevor | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2017 | |
| Benjamin, Pamela | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Black, Geoffrey | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2016 | |
| D'agostino, Joanna | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Graham, George | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Hawes-Saunders, Ro Nita | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Henry, James | Corporate director | Individual | 12/31/2014 | |
| James, Jill | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Long-Higgins, David | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2018 | |
| Sandman, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Ulrich, Karl | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Williams, Stephanie | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Winfrey, Lapearl | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2020 | |
| Naderhoff, Judith | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Young, Kenneth | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| United Church Homes, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2000 | |
| Baughman, Cheryl | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/26/1990 | |
| Bills, Ashley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/26/2022 | |
| Bollinger, Nathan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/31/2023 | |
| Brubaker, Tamra | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/19/2022 | |
| Cannone, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/06/2012 | |
| Covalesky, Jenna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/22/2017 | |
| Cuenot, Jordan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/02/2024 | |
| Durbin, Debra | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/08/2022 | |
| Dye, Marc | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/26/2014 | |
| Eusanio, Vincent | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/31/2025 | |
| Farrell, Laura | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/26/1996 | |
| Horning, Brianna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/28/2020 | |
| Hurwitz, Gloria | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/07/2013 | |
| Juersivich, Holly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/18/2020 | |
| Kelley, Megan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Kerr, Joshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/17/2020 | |
| Klenzman, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| Long-Higgins, Elizabeth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/02/2022 | |
| Maghes, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/24/2025 | |
| Miller, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/04/2017 | |
| Naderhoff, Judith | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Siatta, Elizabeth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/13/2025 | |
| Slutz, Scott | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2016 | |
| Spitznagel, Teresa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| Thompson, Tracy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/24/2014 | |
| Tillman, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/21/2020 | |
| Young, Kenneth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| United Church Homes, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2000 | |
| Cannone, Daniel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/06/2012 | |
| Kerr, Joshua | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/02/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.