120 Sykes Street, Groton, NY 13073 · Tompkins County · (607) 898-5876
80 certified beds, about 69 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1982
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335658 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 6, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 26 health citations since February 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $132,948 in the last three years; the largest was $132,948, and the latest is dated December 4, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.86 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.
62.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #11) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #11 had multiple incidents of physical and verbal behaviors directed toward others and interventions to protect other residents from abuse by Resident #11 were not implemented.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification survey the facility failed to ensure they assessed residents using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services not less frequently than once every three months for twenty-one (21) of twenty-one (21) residents (Residents #5, #6, #8, #12, #16, #19, #24 #29, #30, #31, #35, #53,#54, #56, #58, #59, #63, #65, #67, #69, #72) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #5, #6, #8, #12, #16, #19, #24 #29, #30, #31, #35, #53, #56, #58, #59, #63, #65, #67, #69, and #72's Minimum Data Set assessments were completed later than fourteen days after the Assessment Reference Date (the final day of the observation period to gather information about a resident's condition when completing the assessment).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for two (2) of two (2) meals reviewed (lunch meals on 02/05/2026 and 02/06/2026); seven (7) of seven (7) anonymous residents; and one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #63). Specifically, food was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures during the lunch meals on 02/05/2026 and 02/06/2026; seven (7) anonymous residents during a resident council meeting and Resident #63 stated the food did not taste good and was cold.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one (1) of one (1) main kitchen. Specifically, the main kitchen dishwasher's water temperature was not maintained at the vendor recommended level.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not provide the appropriate liability and appeal notices to Medicare beneficiaries for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #33) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #33 remained in the facility after discontinuation of Medicare Part A services, and the facility did not provide the resident with a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-10055) as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of resident assessments reflective of the resident's status during the observation period of the Minimum Data Det assessment for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #5 and #48) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #5's 12/12/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment did not include the use of oxygen or a noninvasive mechanical ventilator; and Resident #48's 11/10/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment inaccurately documented the resident was rarely understood and had moderate cognitive impairment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice and the resident's physician orders for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #5) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #5 used a continuous positive airway pressure machine (delivers a continuous flow of air to open the airway) and oxygen that were not included on the care plan or the Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool); and the resident had an unclean continuous positive airway pressure mask.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and extended surveys conducted 11/21/2024-12/4/2024, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained free of accident hazards 2 of 2 resident units (First and Second Floors). Specifically, hot water temperatures in resident sinks and common shower rooms on the First and Second Floors exceeded temperatures of the 110 degree Fahrenheit standard. This resulted in no actual harm with likelihood of serious harm, serious injury, serious impairment, or death that is Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care for all 70 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and extended surveys conducted 11/21/2024-12/4/2024, the facility failed to ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails to ensure there was no gap between the bed rail and mattress wide enough to entrap a resident's head or body for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #2, #14, #29, #33, and #46) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #2's bed was against the wall, with one bed rail and no bracket to hold the mattress in place (mattresses with bedrails should have a bracket or device to hold the mattress on the frame and in place. This is the component that keeps the mattress snugly against the rail. The bracket could be a strap around the end. or an actual raised metal bar. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00322525 and NY00322126) surveys conducted 11/21/2024-12/4/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #30) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #30 experienced a decline in physical mobility and developed an unstageable pressure wound (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered with non-viable tissue) and cellulitis to their heel. There was no documented evidence that preventative measures were implemented to prevent skin breakdown when the resident's mobility declined. Additionally, the resident's heels were observed resting directly on the mattress, their mattress was deflated, and the resident was not provided with timely incontinence care. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00359606) surveys conducted 11/7/2024-12/4/2024, the facility did not ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 2 nursing units. Specifically, there was no hot water in the facility from 10/29/2024-11/8/2024. Additionally, resident's or resident representatives were not immediatley notified of the lack of hot water.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 11/21/2024-12/4/2024 the facility did not store, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #34) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #34's food was handled directly by staff without the use of gloves. In the main kitchen foods in the kitchen walk-in cooler were not properly labeled; floors had debris and uncleanable surfaces; there were unclean surfaces and equipment; walls were in disrepair; and the dishwasher sanitizer was not maintained at the vendor recommended level.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00359606) conducted 11/7/2024, and the recertification and extended surveys conducted 11/21/2024-12/4/2024, the facility did not ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, administration failed to ensure that residents received appropriate quality of care by allowing the following deficient practices to exist, placing residents at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death, F 689 Accident Hazards and F 700 Bedrails; failed to ensure policies and procedures were properly identified, communicated, and consistently implemented; was not aware of the extent of the deficient practices cited; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 11/21/2024-12/4/2024, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 3 of 4 medications carts (First Floor 1-2 and 3-4 carts and Second Floor 3-4 cart), and 2 of 3 medication rooms (First Floor medication room and Second Floor Omnicell room). Specifically, the First Floor medication room refrigerator temperatures were not consistently monitored; medications in First Floor carts 1-2 and 3-4 were expired; the First Floor room refrigerator had unlabeled multidose vial medications; and the Omnicell (medication storage tower) medication room and the First Floor 1-2 and Second Floor 3-4 medications carts were unlocked.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification and extended survey conducted [DATE]-[DATE], the facility did not ensure an effective training program for all new and existing staff was developed, implemented, and maintained based on the facility assessment for 4 of 5 staff (Licensed Practical Nurses #13, #16, #39, and #43) reviewed Specifically, there was no documented evidence Licensed Practical Nurses #13, #16, #39, and #43 had general orientation and required training in accordance with the facility assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews during the recertification survey conducted 11/21/2024-12/4/2024, the facility did not ensure a private space for monthly Resident Council Meetings. Specifically, 5 of 5 anonymous residents present at the resident group meeting stated the facility arranged monthly Resident Council meetings in the first floor dining room where uninvited staff were also present.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 11/21/2024-12/4/2024, the facility did not provide the appropriate liability and appeal notices to Medicare beneficiaries for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #28, #38, and #223) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #28 and #38 remained in the facility after discontinuation of Medicare Part A services with benefits remaining and the facility did not provide timely Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-10123) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-10055) as required; and Resident #223 was discharged from the facility and was not provided timely Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-10123) as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 11/21/2024-12/4/2024, the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #31) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #31 did not have an individualized person-centered care plan that addressed dementia with behavioral symptoms or use of psychotropic medications (medications used to treat mood disorders).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 11/21/2024-12/4/2024, the facility did not ensure ongoing provision of programs to support each resident and their choices of activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #35) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #35 was not provided meaningful activities that met their interests and preferences. Additionally, Resident #35's room was not personalized with preferred activity items, such as a television or radio.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00356968) surveys conducted 11/21/2024-12/4/2024, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #16, #17, and #30) reviewed; and for 1 of 2 emergency carts (Second Floor dining room emergency cart) reviewed. Specifically, the emergency cart in the dining room on the Second Floor was not checked daily to ensure emergency supplies were available; Resident #30 had a discontinued anti-fungal cream administered by Certified Nurse Aide #34; Resident #16 had three separate orders for as needed acetaminophen (Tylenol, pain reliever/fever reducer); [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 11/21/2024-12/4/2024, the facility did not ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for staff, visitors, and residents on 1 of 2 units (First Floor), and 1 of 1 resident (Resident #30) reviewed. Specifically, the large shower room on the first floor had a strong smell of feces, the bathroom located in the main hallway by the administrative office had a strong smell of urine, and Resident #30 was observed in a wheelchair that was in disrepair.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews during the recertification survey conducted 11/21/2024-12/4/2024, the facility did not ensure residents exercised their rights as a citizen or resident of the United States for 70 of 70 residents residing in the facility. Specifically, mail was not delivered to residents on Saturdays, thereby denying all residents the same rights provided to other citizens and residents of the community. Additionally, 2 of 5 anonymous residents present at the resident group meeting stated their mail was opened prior to it being delivered to them.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 11/21/2024-12/4/2024, the facility did not ensure a process was in place for residents to have their grievances addressed appropriately for 70 of 70 residents residing in the facility. Specifically, information on how to file a grievance and grievance forms were not available to the residents and an official grievance officer was not identified. Additionally, 5 of 5 anonymous residents present at the resident group meeting stated they did not know who the grievance officer was or how to file a grievance.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 2/21/23-2/24/23, the facility failed to ensure assessment of residents using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) not less frequently than once every 3 months for 35 of 65 residents (Residents #1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52, and 57) reviewed for resident assessments. Specifically, Residents #1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52, and 57 had Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments that were completed later than 14 days following the Assessment Reference Date (ARD).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted from 2/21/23-2/24/23, the facility failed to ensure results of the most recent Federal/State survey and Advocate Agency Information were posted in a place readily accessible to residents, family members and legal representatives of residents for 2 of 7 anonymous residents in attendance at the Resident Council meeting. Specifically, the results of the most recent recertification survey, the New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH) Nursing Home complaint hotline, and Ombudsman contact information were not posted in a location that would allow individuals access without having to ask to see them. This is evidenced by: The facility policy Your Rights and Protections as a Nursing Home Resident dated 8/1/21documented residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect per federal law. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted 2/21/23-2/24/23 the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one isolated area in the main kitchen (the walk in cooler). Specifically, the flooring of the main kitchen's walk in cooler was not smooth and easily cleanable as required.
54 fire safety citations on file: 18 on February 6, 2026, 23 on December 4, 2024, 13 on February 24, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| December 4, 2024 | Fine | $132,948 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.86 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.52 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.15 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.14 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.20 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 62.8% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.61 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.14 on weekdays and 3.15 on weekends, 24% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 12.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.26 in April to June 2025 to 3.86 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.86 | 0.52 | 4.14 | 3.15 | 12.1% | 0 of 90 | 69 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.61 | 0.40 | 3.78 | 3.18 | 10.7% | 0 of 92 | 75 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.56 | 0.35 | 3.77 | 3.02 | 11.5% | 0 of 92 | 72 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.26 | 0.32 | 3.52 | 2.61 | 17.1% | 2 of 91 | 81 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.4 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.4 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 27.3 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 31.4 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.2 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Groton Community Health Care Ctr Res Care Fac's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (48.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
48.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 130 eligible stays.
9.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 132 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 93 eligible stays.
55.8% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 52 residents counted.
1.4% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 70 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 70 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GROTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bloodgood, Mary Ellen | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Duso, Matt | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Haukenes, Elaine | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Smith, Michael | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Wannal, Jean | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Wissink, David | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Patel, Darshan | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Deptula, Patrick | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Williams, Richard | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Bloodgood, Mary Ellen | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Duso, Matt | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Haukenes, Elaine | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Shurtleff, Lee | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Smith, Michael | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Wannal, Jean | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Wissink, David | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Deptula, Patrick | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Shurtleff, Lee | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Wissink, David | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Williams, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/13/2024 | |
| Bloodgood, Mary Ellen | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Duso, Matt | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Haukenes, Elaine | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Shurtleff, Lee | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Smith, Michael | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Wannal, Jean | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Wissink, David | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Deptula, Patrick | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Patel, Darshan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Williams, Richard | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.