What is Grove Nursing Center's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Grove Nursing Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Grove Nursing Center get at its last inspection?

7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 4, 2026. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.

Has Grove Nursing Center been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Grove Nursing Center accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Grove Nursing Center?

CMS lists 17 owners and managers, and links the home to Phoenix Healthcare. Legal business name: PHOENIX HEALTHCARE LLC.

Grove Nursing Center: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 4, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 17 health citations since June 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.98 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.

41.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).

CMS links it to Phoenix Healthcare, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

506/23

507/24

706/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

10D

Potential for minimal harm

June 4, 2026Standard inspection · 7 citations

E

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 8, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate respiratory services were provided for 2 (Resident #16 and Resident #34) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory services. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16's supplemental oxygen use was consistently documented in their medical record and failed to ensure Resident #34's Non-Invasive Ventilator (NIV) settings and supplemental oxygen use were reflected in the resident's electronic medical record
E

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 8, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, facility policy review, and review of manufacturer package insert, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were discarded from 2 (400 and 500 Hall medication carts) of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage.
E

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 8, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observation, interview, facility document review, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections when staff failed to do the following:- Ensure hand hygiene was completed between residents, which affected 3 (Resident #62, Resident #67 and Resident #21) of 5 residents observed during meal service.- Clean and store respiratory equipment for 2 (Resident #34 and Resident #16) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care.- Ensure the emergency cart was clean and suction tips were not open and exposed for 1 of 1 emergency carts observed.
D

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 8, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to treat residents in a manner that maintained or enhanced the resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality for 2 (Resident #15 and Resident #46) of 2 residents reviewed for dignity.
D

Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 8, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #22) of 2 residents who had medications at their bedside and were assessed by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) to determine if they were clinically appropriate and safe to self-administer their medications.
D

Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 8, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident room was in good repair and homelike, which affected 2 (Resident #65 and Resident #66) of 4 residents reviewed for environmental concerns.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 8, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure they developed and implemented comprehensive person-centered care plans for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 resident reviewed for hospice services and 1 (Resident #34) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care.

July 17, 2024Standard inspection · 5 citations

E

Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed provide residents or their representatives a written notice of transfer or discharge prior to residents departing the facility for two (#28 and #49) of three sampled resident reviewed for transfer and discharges. A Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form, dated 07/14/24, documented 58 resident resided in the facility.
E

Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.

F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. alternatives to the use of bed rails were attempted prior to the use of bed rails; b. bed rails were inspected for proper fit and condition prior to use of the bed rails; c. residents and their representatives were educated on the risks and benefits of bed rails prior to the use of bed rails; and d. informed consent from the resident or their legal representative was obtained prior to attaching a bed rails to the bed for three (#19, 28, and #49) of four sampled resident reviewed for accident hazards. The Administrator identified 25 resident that had bed rails attached to their beds.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for one (#53) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The [NAME] reported the census was 57.
D

Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.

F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident being administered Furosemide (a diuretic medication) was monitored for electrolyte levels for one (#28) of five sampled resident reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON stated 12 residents residing at the facilty had been prescribed diuretics.
D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a CNA (certified nurse aide) changed gloves and cleaned their hand between dirty and clean surfaces for one (#19) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers.

June 22, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations

E

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent falls for one (#3) of three residents sampled for falls. The facility failed to conduct a root cause analysis, consistently implement interventions to prevent recurrence, and evaluate interventions for effectiveness for a resident who had frequent falls. The Resident Census and Conditions of Resident report documented 45 residents resided in the facility. A Managing Falls and Fall Risk policy, revised December 2007, read in part, .based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. [...]
E

Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% for one (#25) of five residents observed during medication pass. A total of 25 opportunities were observed with two errors. Total error rate was 8%. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 45 residents resided in the facility.
D

Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were completed within 48 hours for one (#47) of 12 sampled residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 45 residents resided in the facility.
D

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide baths/showers as scheduled for one (#47) of twelve sampled residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 45 residents resided in the facility.
D

Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer medications per physician order for one (#25) of five residents sampled for medication administration. The Resident Census and Conditions of Resident report documented 45 residents resided in the facility.

Fire safety inspections

3 fire safety citations on file: 1 on July 17, 2024, 2 on June 22, 2023.

Every fire safety citation3 citations

E
Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.

K 374 · July 17, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.

K 712 · June 22, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

K 363 · June 22, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Oklahoma	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	3.98	3.79	3.86
Registered nurses	0.61	0.34	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	4.17	3.44	3.42
Nurse aides	2.60
Licensed practical nurses	0.77
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	41.1%	55.5%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	33.3%	53.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	3

CMS expects 3.09 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.91 on weekdays and 4.17 on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.74 in April to June 2025 to 3.98 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	3.98	0.61	3.91	4.17	0.0%	0 of 90	56
Oct to Dec 2025	4.66	0.72	4.68	4.60	0.0%	0 of 92	49
Jul to Sep 2025	4.53	0.68	4.41	4.82	0.0%	0 of 92	51
Apr to Jun 2025	4.74	0.65	4.72	4.78	0.0%	0 of 91	50
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026	3.79	0.32	3.94	3.42	2.2%	1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Oklahoma

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Oklahoma, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$17.27	$15.82 to $18.39	19,410
LPNs and LVNs	$28.04	$24.06 to $29.84	11,540
Registered nurses	$39.87	$37.19 to $47.55	38,270
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Oklahoma	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	15.8	13.6	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.1	1.9	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.0	2.8	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	9.6	4.7	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.1	1.8	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	10.9	13.7	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.5	4.7	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.3	17.5	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	26.6	27.3	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	20.2	16.6	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.2	2.3	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.7	3.0	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Grove Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (62.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

62.1% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 160 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 161 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 121 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

44.8% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 87 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

2.6% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 116 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.8% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 116 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

98.6% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 71 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: PHOENIX HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to Phoenix Healthcare, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Since
Phoenix Healthcare LLC	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	09/29/2004
Cain, Larry	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Individual	09/29/2004
Forvis Mazars LLP	Operational/managerial control	Organization	10/14/2004
Phoenix Healthcare LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization	09/29/2004
Phoenix Rehab LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization	09/29/2004
Carbajal, Jill	Operational/managerial control	Individual	03/01/2018
Floyd, Shanna	Operational/managerial control	Individual	06/14/2010
Grimes, Jamie	Operational/managerial control	Individual	08/23/2021
Schauf, Kyle	Operational/managerial control	Individual	05/01/2021
Young, Cathy	Operational/managerial control	Individual	04/24/2009
Forvis Mazars LLP	Adp of the SNF	Organization	06/20/2025
Midwest Land & Investment Company	Adp of the SNF	Organization	11/01/2005
Phoenix Healthcare LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization	06/27/2025
Floyd, Shanna	Adp of the SNF	Individual	06/14/2010
Grimes, Jamie	Adp of the SNF	Individual	06/26/2025
Schauf, Kyle	Adp of the SNF	Individual	06/26/2025
Young, Cathy	Adp of the SNF	Individual	04/24/2009

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 4, 2026: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 4, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 4, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 4, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 3 administrators who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Grand Lake Villa
Grove, 0.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 15 citations
Betty Ann Nursing Center
Grove, 1.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 32 citations
Monroe Manor
Jay, 10.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 19 citations
Maple Healthcare and Rehab
Fairland, 12.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 50 citations
McDonald County Living Center
Anderson, 20 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 15 citations
Miami Nursing Center, LLC
Miami, 20 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 42 citations
Seneca Nursing
Seneca, 20.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 35 citations
Heartsworth Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation
Vinita, 21.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 36 citations

Oklahoma contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Long Term Care Service, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Oklahoma Long-Term Care Ombudsman, Office of the Attorney General, 1-800-211-2116. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: OSDH Long Term Care Surveys search, where Oklahoma publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Grove Nursing Center's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Grove Nursing Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Grove Nursing Center get at its last inspection?: 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 4, 2026. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.
Has Grove Nursing Center been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Grove Nursing Center accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Grove Nursing Center?: CMS lists 17 owners and managers, and links the home to Phoenix Healthcare. Legal business name: PHOENIX HEALTHCARE LLC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.