1200 West Canadian Avenue, Vinita, OK 74301 · Craig County · (918) 256-8768
146 certified beds, about 64 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2005
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375493 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 18, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 36 health citations since March 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $16,430 in the last three years; the largest was $16,430, and the latest is dated September 18, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.61 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.34 of those hours.
51.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 36 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a volunteer with adverse actions was not allowed to volunteer at the facility for 1 (Volunteer #1) of 1 sampled volunteer reviewed for adverse actions. The ADON identified seven volunteers performed services in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent elopement for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The ADON identified 11 residents at risk for elopement.
Inspectors wroteOn [DATE], an IJ was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure a resident who had chosen to have a full code status was provided CPR after a life threating medical emergency was discovered. On [DATE] CNA #1 found Res #3 in their room and unresponsive. CNA #1 reported the situation to LPN #1 who checked the blood pressure of the resident then told CNA #1 the resident was dead and to clean them up. CNA #1 stated no code had been called for Res #3 and no CPR had been attempted. On [DATE] at 12:02 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation. On [DATE] at 12:20 p.m., the DON was notified of the IJ situation and provided the IJ template. On [DATE] at 4:09 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure equipment in the kitchen was sanitized. The ADON reported 70 residents received meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that oxygen cylinders were stored securely. The ADON reported 19 residents utilized supplementary oxygen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to include a focus of wandering in a comprehensive care plan for one (#4) of two residents reviewed for wandering. The ADON identified two residents in the facility that wandered.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve foods at a palatable temperature from one of two kitchen service areas. The DON identified 40 residents who ate meals served from the satellite kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three substantive meals were served daily. The ADON reported 73 residents received meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the physical environment of the main kitchen and failed to serve cold foods in the satellite dining room in a sanitary manner. The DON identified 79 residents who ate meals prepared in the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents binding arbitration agreements that: a. informed the resident or their representative of their right not to sign the agreement as a condition of admission or continued care; and b. does contains an explicit acknowledged by the resident or their representative that they understood the provisions of the agreement; and c. does not include the name of a second nursing facility, in which the resident does not reside or is aware of, in the agreement for two (#50 and #63) of two sampled resident reviewed for arbitration agreements. The facility SSD stated 60 residents that resided in the facility had signed binding arbitration agreement.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assist a resident with their meal in a dignified manner for one (#10) of eight residents observed for dining. The DON identified three residents who required total assistance with meals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide education about advance directives and provide an opportunity for a resident to have or decline an advance directive for one (#63) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. A facility daily census report, dated 04/29/24, documented 73 residents resided at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide privacy for one (#44) of one resident observed to have a facility camera in their room. The DON identified there were two residents for which the facility had placed a camera in the residents' rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a baseline care plan for one (#219) of two residents sampled for baseline care plan. The administrator reported the census was 73.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the consulting pharmacist documented the correct dosage of a psychotropic medication on a request for dosage reduction for one (#11) of five residents whose clinical records were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The ADON identified 16 residents who received psychotropic medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a wound for one (# 219) of one resident sampled for wounds. The ADON identified seven residents in the facility with wounds.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to prevent a medication room door from being propped open by a chair and the medication room being open and unattended by appropriate staff. A facility daily census report, dated 04/29/24, documented 73 residents resided at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the lint screens were cleared as recommended for three of three dryers observed in the laundry room. The administrator reported the facility census was 73.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a nurse aide whose CPR certification did not include hands-on training and an in person skilled assessment, from providing chest compressions to a resident who was deemed by staff to require cardiopulmonary resuscitation for one (#1) of one sampled resident reviewed for quality of care. A midnight census report, dated [DATE], documented 72 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints for one (#7) of three residents reviewed for physical restraints. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 78 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to review and revise a care plan for two (#45 and #56) of 24 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Residents Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 78 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and obtain informed consent prior to installation of bedrails for three (#7, 35, #55) of three residents reviewed for bed rails. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 78 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. GDR declinations from the physician included a rationale for one (#6) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and b. GDR requests were reviewed by the physician for one (#21) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 78 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was less than 5% for two (#50, #56) of five residents observed during medication pass. A total of 26 opportunities were observed with three errors. Total error rate was (7.6%) The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 78 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. the kitchen was clean and maintained in good repair, b. food was stored in a sanitary manner, c. the kitchen was free of pest, and d. food products were properly labeled/identified. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 78 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program for three (#7, 35, #55) of three residents reviewed for bedrails. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 78 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, sanitary, homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure: a. a shower room was clean and in working order and b. the laundry was free of dirt and dust. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 78 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to equip corridors with firmly secured handrails on each side. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 78 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 78 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were discharged from Part A skilled services, had days remaining, and remained in the facility were issued SN ABN notices for two (#10 and #36) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility identified 28 residents who were discharged from part A skilled services with benefit days remaining in the previous six months.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a new serious mental disorder to the state for a level II PASRR evaluation for one (#15) of two residents sampled for PASRR screening and evaluations. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 78 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for diuretic use for one (#21) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 78 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one (#39) of five residents observed during med pass had an accurate medication reconciliation count. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 78 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor one (#56) of five sampled residents for uneccessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 14 residents were taking an antipsychotic medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure: a. medications were labeled and b. expired mediations were removed from the medication storage room. This had the potential to affect all 78 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated resident allergies for one (#17) of two residents reviewed for dining. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 76 residents received services from the kitchen.
16 fire safety citations on file: 4 on May 2, 2024, 9 on March 30, 2023, 3 on March 20, 2019.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 18, 2025 | Fine | $16,430 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.61 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.47 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.02 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.25 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 51.3% | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.06 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.67 on weekdays and 3.47 on weekends, 5% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.87 in April to June 2025 to 3.61 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.61 | 0.34 | 3.67 | 3.47 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 64 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.75 | 0.35 | 3.87 | 3.44 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 62 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.81 | 0.31 | 3.92 | 3.53 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 71 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.87 | 0.36 | 4.05 | 3.40 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 68 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.4 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.3 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.4 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.5 | 27.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.3 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Heartsworth Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (58.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
58.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 120 eligible stays.
13.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 134 eligible stays.
6.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 84 eligible stays.
58.3% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 60 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 86 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 86 residents counted.
97.8% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HEARTSWORTH OPERATIONS SNF LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rivers Edge Operations II LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/01/2023 |
| Oelbaum, Yitzchok | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 15% | 09/01/2023 |
| Aubrey, Christy | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Ganz, David | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Oelbaum, Yitzchok | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Ganz, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Oelbaum, Yitzchok | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.