1100 East Street Northeast, Miami, OK 74354 · Ottawa County · (918) 542-3335
82 certified beds, about 64 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 2000
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375388 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 14, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 42 health citations since June 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $15,928 in the last three years; the largest was $15,928, and the latest is dated August 14, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.65 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.34 of those hours.
42.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).
CMS links it to Oklahoma Nursing Homes, Ltd., an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 42 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident medication administration records and controlled drug count sheets accurately recorded the disposition of medications for 3 (#1, 7, and #8) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for medical record accuracy. The DON identified 19 residents at the facility were prescribed narcotics.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free from abuse for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents whose clinical records were reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 68 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to minimize the risk of spreading infection for 1 (#6) of 1 sampled resident exposed to COVID-19. The DON identified six residents and seven facility staff members who contracted COVID-19 since 12/01/25.
Inspectors wroteOn 09/08/25 an IJ situation was determined to exist related to involuntary seclusion for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for involuntary seclusion. Resident #1 was told they had to eat at a table in another room alone due to their behavior. On 09/09/25 at 2:15 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On 09/09/25 at 2:25 p.m., the facility administrator and the DON were notified of the IJ situation and provided a copy of the IJ template. On 09/09/25 at 5:30 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal read in part, At 2:57pm on 9/9/2025 the DON and Care plan coordinator met with resident #1. Advised resident #1 that beginning with evening meal on 9/9/2025 she would be offered 3 locations for her meals to be taken. [...]
Inspectors wroteOn 08/12/25 an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to pain management during wound care for 1 (#27) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for pain. On 08/13/25 at 1:00 p.m., the OSDH was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On 08/13/25 at 1:39 p.m., the facility administrator and DON were notified of the IJ situation and provided a copy of the IJ template. On 08/13/25 at 5:20 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the OSDH. The plan of removal read in part, a pain assessment was completed on Resident #27 at 3:00 p.m., on 08/13/25. PCP [primary care physician] for Resident #27 was contacted and a new order for Tramadol, an analgesic, was obtained. Staff will offer PRN [as needed] pain medication approximately 30 minutes prior to wound care. Care plan for Resident #27 will be updated accordingly. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to:ensure opened containers in the reach in refrigerator were properly labeled; andensure the top of the oven was free of grime and debris. The DON identified 65 residents received meals prepared in the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a facility assessment included residents with wounds and the training and competency required to treat wounds. The DON identified four residents with wounds resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure training was provided for staff on wound care. The DON identified four residents had wounds in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive was offered to 1 (#30) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for advance directives. The DON identified 69 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to notify of a room change for 1 (#3) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for notification of change. The DON identified 69 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure unnecessary psychotropic medications were not administered to 1 (#74) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 57 residents received psychotropic medications in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurses were competent in identifying and assessing pain during wound care for 1 (#27) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for wound care. The DON identified four residents had wounds in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide catheter care as ordered for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for catheter care. The DON reported the census was 67.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of medical records for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for catheter care. The DON reported the census was 67.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice of a room change for 1 (#4) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for room changes. The DON reported the census was 67.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide imaging services as ordered for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for imaging services. The DON reported the census was 67.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was performed during catheter care for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for catheter care. The DON identified five residents with catheters in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to: a. provide for the residents' dignity for three (#55, #4, and #50) of three residents observed for full visual privacy and for two (#50 and #26) of two residents observed with signage to always keep the residents' door open; and, b. provide enough dishware to allow for meals to be served without use of disposable containers and/or cutlery. The DON identified 73 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were not charged separately for services paid for by Medicare/Medicaid for one (Resident #174) of four residents who were charged room and board during covered periods of stay and for four (#8, #44, #55, and #174) of four residents charged for administrative supplies and whose monies were managed in the Resident Trust. The BOM identified 38 residents with funds in the Resident Trust.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure skin assessments were conducted for two (#42 and #3) and failed to ensure orders for intravenous care were obtained upon return from the hospital for one (#8) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for quality of care. The DON identified 73 residents who resided in the facility and one resident with intravenous access.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide routine catheter care for one (Resident #2) of one resident whose records were reviewed for catheter care. The DON identified three residents with catheters in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who received psychotropic medications were monitored for behaviors and side effects for three (#3, 44, and #28) of five residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 22 residents who received antipsychotic medications and 53 residents who received psychotropic medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. medications were secured for one (North hall) of three medication/treatment carts observed; b. medications were dated when opened for three (North hall, North hall main, and the treatment cart); and c. medications were not expired for one of one medication rooms observed. The DON identified five medication/treatment carts in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond in an amount to cover the facility trust. The business office manager identified 38 residents in the facility trust. The surety bond, dated 10/07/22, documented the bond to cover the balance of the trust was in the amount of $90,000.00. The April 2024 bank statement documented the daily balance on 04/03/24 was $91,136.92 and on 04/09/24 the daily balance was $91,773.92. The May 2024 bank statement documented the daily balance on 05/03/24 was $92,755.93 and on 05/10/24 the daily balance was $92,739.71. The June 2024 bank statement documented the daily balance on 06/03/24 was $97,106.92 and on 06/10/24 the daily balance was $95,842.14. On 07/19/24 at 9:38 a.m., the administrator stated they thought the trust was around $70,000.00 and did not realize the trust had such a high balance. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a privacy curtain to allow for full visual privacy for two (#4 and #55) of two residents whose rooms were observed for a privacy curtains. The DON identified 73 residents resided in the facility. On 07/19/24 at 2:26 p.m., there was privacy curtain present for resident #4. On 07/19/24 at 2:30 p.m., the resident stated there had never been a curtain, and they would like to have one for visual privacy from their two roommates. On 07/19/24 at 2:44 p.m., CNA # 2 stated if resident #4 received incontinent care they pulled both curtains around the two roommates and shut the door. The CNA stated there was not a curtain to pull to provide full visual privacy for Resident #4. 2. Resident #55 had diagnoses which included dysphagia. On 07/15/24 at 10:30 a.m., Resident #55 stated they had episodes of incontinence. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised for one (#8) of 16 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 73 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent unnecessary weight loss for one (#33) of one resident reviewed for weight loss. The DON identified 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed after dialysis treatments for one (#64) of one resident reviewed for pre/post dialysis assessments. The DON reported four residents in the facility received dialysis treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of significant weight loss for one (#33) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for nutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to post the required staffing information. The DON identified 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician orders for one (#42) of seven sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 73 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen environment, maintain a sanitary dish machine, and store foods according to professional standards of practice. The DON identified 71 residents who ate meals prepared in the kitchen. An invoice, dated 06/12/24, documented the ice machine was cleaned and the water filter replaced by a contracted company. On 07/15/24 at 7:50 a.m., the following observations were made in the kitchen: - four flies buzzing about and landing on food preparation tables, cookware, and dishware. - two ceiling vents positioned over food preparation tables were covered with a layer grease, dust, and debris. - an open one gallon bottle of apple juice in the refrigerator with no open date; - an open 20 ounce bottle of Pepsi and a 20 ounce bottle of Coke in the refrigerator with no open dates or names; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. Maintain an infection control program for enhanced barrier precautions by donning gowns prior to catheter care or wound care for two (#8 and #2) of two resident who received catheter care and/or wound care; and b. ensure catheter tubing and dignity bags were maintained in a manner to prevent cross contamination for one (#8) of two sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The DON identified three residents with indwelling urinary catheters. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physical environment was maintained in good repair. The Nursing Manager identified 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for one (#1) of five residents reviewed for care plans. The DON identified 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. provide pressure ulcer care as ordered by the physician, b. complete weekly wound observations and measurements and, c. document refusals in the nursing notes. The Nursing Manager identified 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was functioning in one of six occupied resident rooms reviewed for call light functionality. The administrator reported the census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain safe water temperatures on the main hall for two (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) of nine rooms reviewed for safe water temperatures. The maintenance supervisor identified 27 residents who resided on the main hall.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was clean and sanitary. The DON identified 60 residents who received ice from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were periodically reviewed for changes for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form identified 63 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a notice of transfer to one (#25) of three resident reviewed for discharges. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form identified 63 residents who resided in the facility. An incident note, dated 04/14/23 at 9:07 p.m., documented the resident #25 had been transferred to a hospital following a fall. On 06/21/23 at 1:58 p.m., the administrator was asked if resident #25 or their family had been given a written notice of transfer for the resident's hospitalization which began on 04/14/23. The administrator replied no written notice was given but the family had been contacted over the telephone.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility had not provided a bed hold policy to one (#25) of three residents reviewed for discharges. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form identified 63 residents who resided in the facility. An incident note, dated 04/14/23 at 9:07 p.m., documented resident #25 had been transferred to a hospital following a fall. On 06/21/23 at 1:58 p.m., the administrator was asked if resident #25 or the family had been provided a copy of the bed hold policy on or after 04/14/23 when they were transferred to a hospital. The administrator replied the resident nor the family had be given the policy for that hospitalization.
1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on February 3, 2020.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 14, 2025 | Fine | $15,928 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.65 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.42 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.62 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.69 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.4% | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 2.70 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.75 on weekdays and 3.42 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 21.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.61 in April to June 2025 to 3.65 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.65 | 0.34 | 3.75 | 3.42 | 21.0% | 0 of 90 | 64 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.81 | 0.34 | 3.98 | 3.37 | 21.9% | 0 of 92 | 66 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.78 | 0.32 | 3.90 | 3.49 | 18.2% | 0 of 92 | 67 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.61 | 0.33 | 3.79 | 3.18 | 10.7% | 0 of 91 | 67 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.9 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.2 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.6 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 31.4 | 27.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.1 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.8 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.6 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Miami Nursing Center, LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (44.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
44.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.
10.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 55 eligible stays.
7.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
56.4% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 39 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MIAMI NURSING CENTER, LLC. CMS links this home to Oklahoma Nursing Homes, Ltd., a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cheek Farmer Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 8% | 02/08/2023 |
| Steven R. Tubbs Revocable Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 14% | 02/08/2023 |
| Cheek, Barnie | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 02/08/2023 |
| Estep, Patsy | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 6% | 01/01/2022 |
| Haskins, Lloyd | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 6% | 02/08/2023 |
| McGrew, Justin | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 6% | 07/18/2012 |
| McGrew, Justin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Sandra Cheek Farmer Trust | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Steven R. Tubbs Revocable Trust | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.