1902 Grace Street, Lynchburg, VA 24504 · Lynchburg City County · (434) 947-5100
130 certified beds, about 120 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495112 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on October 2, 2024, inspectors cited 28 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 54 health citations since January 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $76,681 in the last three years; the largest was $76,681, and the latest is dated October 2, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.38 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.62 of those hours.
65.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Hill Valley Healthcare, an affiliated group of 43 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 54 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide effective pest control on two of three nursing units (unit 2 and unit 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide written notice of a room change for one of eleven residents in the survey sample (Resident #3).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, clinical record review and review of the facility's policy titled, Personal Property the facility staff failed to provide tracking of the resident's personal property for one of eleven residents in the survey sample (Resident #4). This failure contributed to the loss or theft of several articles of clothing belonging to the resident.
Inspectors wrote2a. For Resident #111 (R111), the facility staff failed to follow a physician's order regarding notification of the medical provider when the resident's blood sugar was below 70 and above 400. On 12/9/24, in the afternoon, a clinical record review was conducted of R111's chart. This review revealed that R111 had a physician order with the Humalog sliding scale insulin order that indicated to notify the MD [medical doctor] if the blood sugar was 70 or below, or greater than 400. According to the medication administration record, R111 had multiple instances of her blood sugar exceeding 400 and there was no indication that the doctor was made aware. On 12/1/24, at 4:30 p.m., the blood glucose level was 445. On 12/3/24, the resident's blood sugar readings were 459, 525, 408. On 12/6/24, the blood sugar was recorded as having been 500 and 435. On 12/7/24, the resident's blood sugar at 7:30 a. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to properly store insulin on three out of five medication carts inspected.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to knock on the door of resident rooms prior to entering on one unit of three units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for two resident's, Resident #103 (R103) and Resident #107 (R107), in a survey sample of 21 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care regarding medication administration for one resident, Resident #115 (R115) out of a survey of 21 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care to one resident (Resident #102- R102) in a survey sample of 21 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide a physician ordered therapeutic diet for one resident (Resident #108-R108) in a survey sample of 21 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide oxygen at the physician ordered rate for two residents, Resident #115 (R115) and Resident #117 (R117) out of a survey of 21 residents and failed to store the respiratory equipment to prevent contamination for one resident, R115 out of a survey of 21 residents.
Inspectors wrote2. For resident #111 (R111), the hydrocortisone tablet was not available for administration as ordered by the doctor. On 12/9/24, a clinical record review was conducted. According to the physician order dated 8/21/24, that remained an active order. The order read, Hydrocortisone Tablet 10 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for adrenal insufficiency. According to the nursing progress notes, R111 was not given a dose on 12/3/24 and 12/4/24, because the medication was not available. On 12/3/24 at 10:09 p.m., the administration note read, on order, not in Omnicell, pharm notified pervious shift per nurse [sic]. The nursing note dated 12/4/24 at 12:12 p.m., read, Medication not given, contacted pharmacy and medication will be delivered this evening. NP notified, no new orders. Resident is aware. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to assist one resident, Resident #121 (R121) out of a survey of 21 residents, with transportation arrangements to an appointment with radiology services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow the resident food preference for two residents, Resident #103 (R103) and Resident #106 (R106), in a survey sample of 21 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one resident (Resident #111- R111) in a survey sample of 21 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff observation, staff interviews, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to follow infection control standards on one of three units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide interventions for the prevention and/or treatment of pressure ulcers for two residents (Resident #15- R15 and Resident #24-R24) in a survey sample of 29 residents. The facility staff also failed to identify a pressure ulcer until at an advanced stage (stage III) for one resident- R15, which was harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for five residents (Resident #78, Resident #70, Resident #83, Resident #15, and Resident #106), in a survey sample of 29 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, resident interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to provide activity of daily living (ADL) care for three residents (Resident #13 (R13), Resident #43 (R43) and Resident #56 (R56)) of 29 residents in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for seven of twenty-nine residents in the survey sample (Residents #20, #24, #56, #70, #27, #76 and #78).
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for three residents (Resident #27-R27, resident #83-R83, and resident #76-R76), in a survey sample of 29 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to properly store insulins on four out of five medication carts inspected.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices for one resident (Resident #106- R106). The facility also failed to develop and implement an infection control program and failed to respond to a COVID outbreak in accordance with the guidance from the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC), which involved two staff (registered nurse #6 (RN #6) and certified nursing assistant #2 (CNA #2) but had the potential to affect numerous residents on 2 of 2 nursing units.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide credible evidence of an antibiotic stewardship program, having the potential to affect residents on 3 of 3 units.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide education and offer pneumonia immunizations, to 4 of 5 residents (resident #2-R2, Resident #24-R24, Resident #13-R13, and resident #70-R70) sampled for immunizations.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide education and offer COVID immunizations, to 3 of 5 residents (Resident #2-R2, Resident #24-R24, and Resident #13-R13) sampled for immunizations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to have an alternate means for residents to communicate with staff after an extended call bell outage affecting residents on two of three nursing units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program ensure the facility is free of pests affecting 2 of 3 resident care units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respect for privacy for one of twenty-nine residents in the survey sample (Resident #44).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete a SNF ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice) for 2 residents in a survey sample of 3 residents (Resident #316, Resident #317, Resident # 318) reviewed for Beneficiary Notifications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews and resident interviews, the facility staff failed to uphold the resident's right to privacy with regards to mail and failed to provide timely mail delivery for residents on 3 of 3 units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a homelike environment for two residents (resident #70-R70 and resident #78-R78) in a survey sample of 29 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to accurately complete a pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) to identify if a level II evaluation was warranted for one resident (resident #90-R90) in a survey sample of 29 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one resident (resident #5- R5) in a survey sample of 29 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care for three of twenty-nine residents in the survey sample (Residents #53, #68 and #166).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities for one resident (Resident#43, R43) in a survey sample of 29 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer a therapeutic diet for one resident (Resident #56, R56) out of a survey sample of 29 residents.
Inspectors wrote3. For resident #90- R90, the facility staff failed to maintain the nebulizer mask in a manner to prevent contamination to prevent infection. On [DATE] at 11:26 a.m., R90 was observed in his room having a nebulizer treatment being administered via a mask. The mask nor tubing were dated as to when they were last changed. On [DATE] at approximately 4:02 p.m., R90 was visited in his room. The nebulizer mask was observed open to air and not in a bag. On [DATE] at 3:03 p.m., R90 was again visited in the room. It was noted that the nebulizer mask was laying in the floor at the bedside. On [DATE] at 3:16 p.m., an interview was conducted with licensed practical nurse #4 (LPN #4). LPN #4 was asked about nebulizers and the storage of them. LPN #4 stated they are to be stored in a bag and are changed nightly and dated. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to assist one resident, Resident #121 (R121) out of a survey of 21 residents, with transportation arrangements to an appointment with radiology services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to arrange for routine dental services for one resident (resident #5-R5) in a survey sample of 29 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow the resident food preference for two residents, Resident #103 (R103) and Resident #106 (R106), in a survey sample of 21 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for 3 residents (Resident #13, R13, Resident #78, R78, and Resident #53, R53) in a survey sample of 29 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain resident beds in operating condition for one resident (Resident #78-R78) in a survey sample of 29 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for one of 6 residents in the survey sample: Resident # 4. Resident # 4 was ordered to have 3 showers a week, but received bed baths.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one of six residents in the survey sample (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored correctly for one of 6 residents in the survey sample. Resident #5's (R5) inhaler medication was at the bedside. The Findings Include: Diagnoses for R5 included: Respiratory failure, dysphagia, and kidney disease. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/5/23, in which Resident #5 was assessed with moderately cognitive impairment. On 10/10/23 at 10:30 AM, during an initial tour of the facility, R5 was observed laying in bed. During a conversation with R5, it was noted that an inhaler labeled Trelegy 100/62.5 mcg [micrograms] was sitting on the bed side table. When asked about the medication, R5 verbalized uncertainty why the medication was in the room. [...]
Inspectors wrote2. Resident #384 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, including but not limited to: Acute chronic anemia, chronic kidney disease, heart failure and hypercalcemia. Due to her recent admission an MDS (minimum data set) had not been completed. A Nursing admission Assessment Comprehensive dated 10/11/2021 contained the following information under the cognitive section: .Short Term Memory of-seems/appears to recall after 5 minutes .Usually Understood-difficulty finding words or finishing thoughts .Unclear Speech-slurred mumbled words .Usually Understands-may miss some part/intent of message . Her admission nursing not dated 10/12/2021 at 2:56 a.m., described Resident #384 as alert with confusion. Initial tour of the third floor of the facility was conducted on 10/12/2021 beginning at approximately 10:30 a.m. At approximately 11:05 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to dispose of expired IV (intravenous) antibiotic medication which was available for administration, in one of four medication rooms, Unit 1.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, facility staff failed to store and prepare food properly in the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, facility staff failed to prepare, store and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. Facility staff failed to obtain initial food temperatures before plating food for resident consumption on the first floor and the cook failed to wear a cover over his beard while preparing and serving food. Two quart-size containers of V8 juice and two pint-size containers of cranberry juice were noted open and not dated in the refrigerator.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to give advance notice of a care plan meeting for two of 22 residents in the survey sample. Residents #39 and #60 were not given advance notice of their most recent care plan meeting and stated they had not been invited to the meeting.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to discontinue an order for PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication for one of 22 residents in the survey sample. Resident #43 had a physician's order for PRN (as needed) Lorazepam for more than 14 days without a stop date reflected.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide written notification of a hospital transfer for two of 22 residents in the survey sample: Residents # 80 and # 23. 1. The facility staff failed to provide written documentation to Resident # 80 of a transfer to the hospital. 2. The facility staff failed to provide written documentation to Resident # 23 of a transfer to the hospital.
24 fire safety citations on file: 8 on October 2, 2024, 13 on October 13, 2021, 3 on January 16, 2019.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 2, 2024 | Fine | $76,681 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.38 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.07 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.03 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.73 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 65.6% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 74.1% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 3 |
CMS expects 4.06 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.50 on weekdays and 3.07 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 29.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.42 in April to June 2025 to 3.38 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.38 | 0.62 | 3.50 | 3.07 | 29.5% | 0 of 90 | 120 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.33 | 0.63 | 3.46 | 3.01 | 24.6% | 0 of 92 | 118 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.28 | 0.57 | 3.44 | 2.89 | 17.4% | 0 of 92 | 114 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.42 | 0.64 | 3.58 | 3.01 | 18.9% | 0 of 91 | 103 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.2 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.3 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.2 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.8 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Guggenheimer Health and Rehab Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (58.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
58.8% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 237 eligible stays.
12.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 251 eligible stays.
7.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 123 eligible stays.
52.5% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 61 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 107 residents counted.
6.8% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 107 residents counted.
92.5% this home
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 53 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: DIAMOND HILL SNF OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Hill Valley Healthcare, a group of 43 nursing homes averaging 1.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diamond Hill SNF Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/01/2021 |
| Timberlake Operations Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/01/2021 |
| Martin, Kristi | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 11/01/2021 | |
| Idels, Shimon | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2021 | |
| Hvh Timberlake Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.