5615 Seminole Avenue, Lynchburg, VA 24502 · Lynchburg City County · (434) 239-2657
180 certified beds, about 163 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1977
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495105 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 12, 2024, inspectors cited 29 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 62 health citations since September 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.82 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.45 of those hours.
68.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Lifeworks Rehab, an affiliated group of 64 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 62 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility documentation reviews, staff interviews and observations, the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate record of the narcotic count record for on-coming and off-going staff for two out of nine medication carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop a care plan for one of two residents in a survey sample. The Findings Include: Resident #1 (R1) did not have a care plan for noncompliance to medications, treatments, hygiene, and incontinence care. R1diagnoses include paraplegia, osteomyelitis, urinary tract infection, indwelling catheter, and MRSA (methicillin-resistant-Staphylococcus aureus. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a significant change dated 7/24/25 and indicated R1 was cognitively intact. Review of R1's clinical record including medication administration records, treatment administration record, nursing progress notes, physician progress notes, and activity of daily living (ADL) tool indicated R1 was refusing care and treatments, and medications at times. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care regarding skin assessments for one of two residents in the survey sample (Resident #2).
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician for one of two residents in the survey sample (Resident #2)
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for one of two residents in a survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices during dressing changes for one of two residents in the survey sample (Resident #2).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party of a change in condition for one of four residents in the survey sample (Resident #3).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a clean, homelike room environment for one of four residents in the survey sample (Resident #3).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of quality for one of four residents in the survey sample (Resident #3).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a complete and accurate clinical record for one of four residents in the survey sample (Resident #3).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement a bed safety program for the entire facility affecting all residents residing on 3 of 3 units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to accommodate the resident's preference to dine in the dining room affecting multiple residents on three of three units.
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide Residents with quarterly statements of their trust account/bank accounts and failed to allow residents to readily access their trust funds, affecting all 140 residents with trust accounts.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for four of thirty-three residents in the survey sample (Residents #49, #66, #30 and #131).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for five of thirty-three residents in the survey sample (Residents #66, #159, #99, #149, and #92).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, resident interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentations the facility staff failed to provide trauma informed care for six residents, (Resident #30-R30, Resident #39-R39, Resident #105-R105, Resident #134-R134, Resident #149-R149 and Resident #367-R367) out of a survey sample of 33 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide a therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician for four residents (Resident #139, #55, #9, and #30), in a survey sample of 33 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner from the main kitchen and on one of three units (West unit).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain effective pest control.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to distribute meals in a manner to maintain and enhance a residents dignity affecting several residents on one of three units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents dignity was upheld for one resident, (Resident #99 - R99) in a survey sample of 33 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to issue an ABN (Advanced Beneficiary Notice) to one resident (Resident #107-R107) in a survey sample of three residents reviewed for such notices.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide a homelike environment and clean medical equipment for resident use, affecting two residents (Resident #99- R99 and Resident #55- R55) in a survey sample of 33 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state survey agency and other officials as required for an incident involving two residents (Resident #14 - R14 and Resident #99 - R99) in a survey sample of 33 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive resident-centered care plan for one resident (Resident #49-R49) in a survey sample of 33 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for three of 33 residents in the survey sample. (Residents #268, #134, #49).
Inspectors wrote2. For resident #92 (R92), the facility staff failed to provide activities to meet the psychosocial well-being of the resident and in accordance with resident preferences. On 9/9/24 at approximately 11:45 p.m., the surveyor was approached by a certified nursing assistant (CNA #3) who reported for the surveyor to not enter a room [which the CNA identified as R92's room]. CNA #3 reported the resident had behaviors and could be extremely combative. On 9/9/24 at approximately 12:30 p.m., R92 was observed in his room. It was noted that the room was dark, the curtains were pulled, no lights were on, and the resident was sitting in a wheelchair in the middle of the room. The room was noted to be empty with no personal possessions, no television, no radio, no books, magazines or other things for the resident to do to occupy his time. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement interventions for care/treatment of pressure ulcer for one of 33 residents in the survey sample (Resident #268).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide services to maintain good foot health of two residents (resident #49-R49 and resident #30-R30) in a survey sample of 33 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement interventions for a resident with contractures, to prevent the worsening of contractures for one resident (Resident #49-R49) in a survey sample of 33 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure suction was in place for respiratory care of a tracheostomy for one of 33 residents, Resident #159 (R159).
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered dialysis services and failed to share/communicate care provided during a dialysis treatment for one of thirty-three residents (Resident #2).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to attempt alternatives prior to implementing the use of bed rails for one resident (Resident #49-R49) in a survey sample of 33 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication was available for administration for one of thirty-three residents in the survey sample (Resident #79).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to label an insulin pen when opened on one of three units (West unit).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and clinical record the facility staff failed to provide food in accordance with the menu for one, (Resident #39, R39) out of 33 residents in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, and staff interviews the facility staff failed to provide food preferences for one of 33 residents. Resident # 69 (R69) was not provided side salads as requested.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a complete and accurate clinical record for three of thirty-three residents in the survey sample (Resident #268, #30 and #149).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to provide a negative urinalysis prior to removing contact isolation for one resident, Resident #134 (R134) in a survey sample of 33 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure resident identifiable information was not released to the public for 41 of 42 residents in the survey sample, Residents 1- 41.
Inspectors wrote9. Resident #32 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, hypertension, colon cancer, muscle weakness, unspecified psychosis, major depression disorder, anemia, dysphasia, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and Parkinson's disease. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] was the admission assessment and assessed Resident #32 as moderately impaired for daily decision making with a score of 9 out of 15. On [DATE], Resident #32's clinical record was reviewed. Observed on the physician's order summary was the following order: obtain weekly weight. Order Status: Active. Order Date: [DATE] Observed on the care plans was the following: Nutrition risk r/t (related to) colon cancer/tx (treatment), hx (history) overweight. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician in a timely manner of medication (Hydrocodone) not given per order, for one of thirteen residents, Resident #201.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 5 of 38 Residents, (Resident #10, #23, #133, and #71). Resident #10's care plan was not reviewed and revised regarding hospice services, enhanced droplet precautions, and diabetes mellitus. Resident #23's care plan was not reviewed and revised regarding the resolution of pressure ulcers. Resident #133's care plan did not include hospice services. Resident #86's care plan was not reviewed and revised to include hospice admission and the use of geri-sleeves. Resident #71's care plan was not revised with problems, goals and interventions regarding pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for two of 13 residents, Resident # 201 and Resident # 210. Resident #201 did not receive Hydrocodone three times per day as ordered by the physician because it was not available for administration. Resident # 210 was not administered Ofloxacin three times a day as ordered, and once a day as ordered.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate minimum data set (MDS) for one of 38 residents in the survey sample. An admission MDS for Resident #56 had an inaccurate assessment of the resident's dental issues.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, complaint investigation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed for three of 38 residents in the survey sample (Residents # 80, 88 and 127), to provide routine foot care. Residents # 80, 88 and 127 had elongated toenails with clearly visible debris under the great toes on their left and right feet.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of ten residents was administered oxygen as ordered by the physician, Resident #106.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, document review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure expired vaccine was not available for administration on one of 3 units: East unit. A bag containing seven expired vials of Afluria, an influenza vaccine, was in a thermal container in the medication room refrigerator.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, and staff interview the facility staff failed to honor food preferences for one of 38 residents in the survey sample: Resident # 18.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for two of 38 residents (Resident #285 and Resident #71). Resident #285's clinical record contained another resident's Covid-19 vaccination record, and Resident #71 had an incomplete treatment record for pressure ulcer dressing changes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility policy review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices during meal tray distribution on one of three nursing units. Staff members on the South wing failed to don gowns and gloves when serving meal trays to residents on droplet precautions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for 4 of 39 residents in the survey sample. A physician ordered knee brace for Resident # 86 was not applied per order; fluid restriction for Resident # 408 was not implemented as ordered; TED hose (compression stockings) were not applied as ordered for Resident # 143; and medications were not administered per physician's orders for Resident #355.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement interventions for the prevention of pressure ulcers for one of 39 residents in the survey sample. Resident #121, with a recent history of pressure ulcers on both heels, did not have dressings, topical treatment and protective booties applied for 10 consecutive days as required by physician orders and the care plan for pressure ulcer prevention.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide restorative nursing services for one of 39 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement interventions for fall and injury prevention for one of 39 residents in the survey sample. Resident #112's fall mats were not implemented for over a month following an unwitnessed fall from his bed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a dignified dining experience on one of three dining areas. During breakfast in the East unit restorative dining room, facility staff stood over residents while feeding them and fed them without initiating any conversation.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to implement the care plan (CP) for Resident # 86 for restorative services, and failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care (CCP) for Resident # 408's fluid restriction.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for two of 39 residents in the survey sample. Resident #112's care plan was not revised to include use of fall mats and an air mattress. Resident #69's care plan was not revised regarding a healed pressure ulcer.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and resident record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for oxygen administration for 2 of 39 resdients in the survey sample, Residents #46 and #114. The Findings Include: 1. Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #46 included: Congestive heart failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and sleep apnea. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/17/19. Resident #46 was assessed as being cognitively intact. On 09/16/19 at 9:12 AM, Resident # 46 was interviewed. During the interview Resident #46 was asked if staff change out oxygen tubing and asked to observed oxygen concentrator. Resident #46 stated that staff do change the oxygen tubing. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess one of 39 residents (Resident #112) for entrapment risks prior to use of bed rails with a specialty mattress.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene during meal assistance in one of three dining rooms (East unit restorative).
9 fire safety citations on file: 6 on September 12, 2024, 1 on July 1, 2021, 2 on September 17, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.82 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.45 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.53 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.49 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.89 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 68.0% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 64.0% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 4.48 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.94 on weekdays and 3.53 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 32.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.64 in April to June 2025 to 3.82 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.82 | 0.45 | 3.94 | 3.53 | 32.9% | 0 of 90 | 163 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.43 | 0.56 | 3.48 | 3.30 | 37.6% | 0 of 92 | 169 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.41 | 0.56 | 3.57 | 2.99 | 20.8% | 0 of 92 | 161 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.64 | 0.47 | 3.85 | 3.11 | 19.2% | 0 of 91 | 159 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.9 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.9 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.6 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.1 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.4 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lynchburg Health & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 111 eligible stays.
12.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 125 eligible stays.
7.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 76 eligible stays.
46.3% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 41 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 64 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 64 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LYNCHBURG CARE CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Lifeworks Rehab, a group of 64 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynchburg Holdings I LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/28/2021 |
| Ak 2003 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Al 2003 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Charles 1994 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Golden 2017 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Golden 2017 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Matt 2002 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Matt 2002 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Nathan 5604 & Family LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Nathan 5604 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Nathan 5604 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Sas 1998 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Saul 2012 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Silverstone East LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Flynn, Kennedy | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/13/2023 | |
| Rybst Central Manager LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/28/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.