2221 North Rosemont Boulevard, Tucson, AZ 85712 · Pima County · (520) 881-2323
94 certified beds, about 77 residents a day · Non profit - Other · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 035016 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 23, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Arizona average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 43 health citations since September 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.90 hours per resident per day, against 3.98 across Arizona and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.39 of those hours.
68.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arizona average 45.1%).
CMS links it to Pollak Holdings, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 43 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one out of three samples residents (#1) remained free from self-harm by failing to immediately assess, report, investigate, and implement protective interventions after staff observed injuries. The deficient practice could delay in identification of resident's suicide attempt and could place residents at risk for continued self harm, serous injury or death. Findings Include:Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness, reduced mobility, gout, depression, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility investigation review, and review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into neglect involving one of the three sampled residents (#1). The deficient practice could lead to failure in preventing further potential neglect. Findings Include: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness, reduced mobility, gout, depression, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. A care plan dated February 9, 2026, identified communication impairment related to hearing deficit and included interventions for communication support, safety monitoring and cognitive observation. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility documentation and policies, the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident (#54) to be free from physical abuse by another resident (#13). The deficient practice could result in further physical abuse of residents when appropriate actions are not taken. Findings Include:-Regarding Resident #13 (alleged perpetrator):Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. The care plan dated October 2, 2025, revealed that the resident has a behavior problem of making sexually inappropriate comments to female staff and persistent yelling out, verbal and physical aggression toward staff during care related to Dementia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility documentation and policies, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #99) was provided adequate supervision and interventions to prevent a preventable fall. The deficient practice places residents at risk for falls with serious injury. Findings Include:Resident # 99 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the most recent admission on [DATE]. The resident has diagnoses that consist of: type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, other acute osteomyelitis, right ankle and foot, spinal stenosis, cervical region, major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified Bipolar disorder, current episode depressed, severe, without psychotic features. Acquired absence of the left leg below the knee. Morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, facility documentation, and review of facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure that enhanced barrier precautions(EBP) were followed during wound care for one resident(#6). The deficient practice could result in the spread of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1) was free from abuse by staff members (Staff #163 and Staff #202). The deficient practice could result in other residents being abused.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #4) was free from abuse by another staff member & another resident (Staff #201 and Resident #5). The deficient practice could result in other residents being abused.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, interviews, and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to implement their policies and procedures on resident protection, abuse reporting and investigation of an allegation of verbal and physical abuse for one resident (#1) by another resident (#2). The deficient practice resulted in further abuse of resident #1
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, interviews, and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure allegations of verbal and physical abuse of one resident (#1) by another resident (#2) was reported to the State Agency (SA) and Adult Protective Services (APS). The deficient practice could result in abuse not investigated and resident not protected from further abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, interviews and review of facility documentation, policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure allegations of verbal and physical abuse of one resident (#1) by another resident (#2) were thoroughly investigated and appropriate corrective actions were taken. The deficient practice could result in resident not protected from further abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff and family interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan for one resident (#2) was revised with interventions to address the resident's verbal and physical aggression towards other residents. The deficient practice could result in resident not meeting their needs according to their comprehensive assessment. Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder. schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type and other idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy. Review of the care plan dated October 17, 2024, revealed resident was dependent on staff and family for all emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record reviews, interviews, and a review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to take steps to remove or reduce Resident #2's exposure to a known behavioral trigger. As a result, Resident #2 continued to be exposed to the trigger, leading to aggressive behaviors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record reviews, interviews, and a review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan that addressed resident compatibility and environmental triggers for Resident #1. As a result, the facility failed to provide an environment that supported Resident #1's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Resident #1 continued to be exposed as a known behavioral trigger for Resident #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, facility documentation and postings, the facility failed to ensure the assistant administrator was duly appointed by the governing board. The deficient practice could contribute to actions, inactions or decisions regarding facility deficiencies, as related to attaining or maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on a closed clinical record review, interviews, facility documentation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that abnormal respiratory rates for resident #7 were monitored and that a change in condition was relayed to the physician. The deficient practice could result in resident injury if abnormal vitals are neglected.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that resident #16 was provided with assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) to maintain personal hygiene. Failure to meet this requirement could lead to issues with skin integrity and impairing resident dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was reported in a timely manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that a thorough investigation was conducted for resident #21.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that abuse policies were implemented for two resident to resident abuse incidents, one involving resident (#222) and(#169); and the other involving residents (#223) and (#49). This deficient practice could result in further instances of resident to resident abuse. -Regarding Residents #222 and #169 -Resident #222 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that resident #222 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated intact cognitive impairment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that an incident involving abuse between resident (#222) and resident (#169) was reported accurately and in a timely manner, and, that an investigation of an allegation of abuse is reported within five (5) working days for two residents (#223 & #49). The deficient practice could result in further incidents of resident to resident abuse and allegations of abuse not being reported to the SA timely and accurately. Regarding Resident #222 and Resident #169: -Resident #222 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly discard expired medication in the medication room. this deficient practice could result in expired medication to be administered to residents against professional standards. During a medication admission observation conducted on [DATE] at 7:10a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN/Staff #64), a controlled substance (Lyrica) had an unseal capsule taped behind the medication blister pack. The RN stated that it is not part of the facility best practice to have taped medication behind the medication blister pack during this observation. A follow up interview was conducted on [DATE] at 10:48 a.m with the Registered Nurse (RN/Staff #64) who stated that the risk of having medication taped back onto the blister pack can contaminate the medication. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored under sanitary conditions that maintained freshness in the kitchen and nourishment refrigerators. The deficient practice could result in potential foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the facilities policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (resident #2) was informed of the risks and benefits of and had consented to the usage of a psychotropic medication. This deficient practice could result in further violations of resident rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (#222) was free from abuse by another resident (#169). This deficient practice could result in further incidents of resident to resident abuse. -Resident #222 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A care plan revised on October 22, 2021 revealed a focus related to a history of behavior problems with an intervention to place her in a secured memory care unit and administer medications as ordered. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#2) with a diagnosis of a serious mental illness was referred to the appropriate state-designated mental health or intellectual disability authority for review. The deficient practice could result in necessary specialized services not being provided in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan with interventions was developed for one resident (#225). This deficient practice could result in further care plan's not being updated timely in accordance with professional standards. Resident #225 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was later re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including COPD, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and history of falling. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS also revealed that the resident was taking an anticoagulant medication. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and observation of current facility practice, the facility failed to ensure nutritional status was assessed and managed in accordance with facility policy for one resident (#60). The deficient practice could result in a decline in nutritional status being missed and untreated for other residents. Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, muscle weakness (generalized), and essential hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident had no cognitive impairments. The MDS also revealed the resident had no issues with swallowing or chewing food, and no weight loss or weight gain had been noted. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure one resident (# 32) received dialysis care consistent with professional standards. This deficient practice could result in residents not being provided with necessary treatment in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, personnel record review, facility assessment review, and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure 2 out of 6 sampled nursing staff (staff #6 and #82) possessed the competencies and skills needed to care for residents' needs. The deficient practice could result in delayed care and inadequate care for residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, closed record review and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a sampled resident (#219) received behavioral health services when resident reported concerns and grievances to staff for one of one sampled resident. This deficient practice can result in lasting emotional disturbance for the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation, staff interview, policy review, the facility failed to ensure to include procedures that medication were recorded accurate to professional standard of care. During an observation on October 14, 2024 at 7:25AM on Unit Golding medication cart the Narcotic Count Sheet sheet revealed that there were days where Out-Going Nurse signature was missing with an In-coming nurse signature missing. The record was not recorded properly in the the following days for: September 5, 2024 at 10:00 PM - 06:00 AM September 6, 2024 at 10:00 PM - 6:00 AM October 22, 2024 at 10:00 PM - 6:00 AM October 24, 2024 at 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM October 24.2024 at 10:00 PM - 6:00 AM An interview was conducted on October 14, 2024 at 7:25AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/Staff # 76). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews, and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to reduce or discontinue anticoagulant therapy for Resident #325 in the presence of adverse consequences. This deficient practice can result in harm related to unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5%. The medication error rate was 6.9%. The deficient practice could result in additional medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of policy and procedures the facility failed to ensure that one of one sampled residents (#32) was free from significant medication errors. The deficient practice could result in residents receiving unnecessary medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation, staff interview, policy review, the facility failed to ensure that glucometer controls were consistently completed. During an observation on October 23, 2024 at 12:41 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN/staff #82) on Unit Rich with medication Cart 2 the Quality Control Record sheet had revealed that glucometer controls were not consistently completed. An interview was conducted on October 23, 2024 at 1:00 p.m. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON/Staff #94). The ADON stated that glucometer quality controls were not consistently completed. An Interview was conducted on October 23, 2024 at 1:02 p.m. with the a Register Nurse (RN/Staff#112) The RN stated that the glucometer controls were not consistently completed on the following days in September 2024: 14,15,19,21,22, 26,27,28 and 29. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, interviews, and review of policy, the facility failed to appropriately implement their enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) program on two residents (#38 and #64). This deficient practice can result in harmful transmission of pathogens to other residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and facility documentation, policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure 3 residents (#5, 24, 40) were free from preventable falls. The deficient practice put the residents at increased risks for serious injury and harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#60) was allowed to return to the facility following hospitalization. This deficient practice could result in unsafe discharges for future residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and policy, the facility failed to ensure multiple food items were stored in accordance with professional standards and wet cleaning rags were not left on the top of counters or carts. The deficient practice could result in placing residents at risk for food-borne illnesses.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, facility documentation, policy and procedures, the facility failed to act upon grievances voiced during resident council meetings. The facility census was 73. The deficient practice could result in residents' concerns, views, grievances or recommendations not being considered or acted upon.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#21) was appropriately transferred using a mechanical lift. The deficient practice could result in preventable accidents such as falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that one agency staff (#81) had appropriate competency and skill sets necessary to transfer one resident (#21) using a sit to stand lift. The deficient practice could result in resident injury and staff not having the skills to provide the care the resident needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered according to physician ordered parameters for one resident (#67). The deficient practice could result in residents receiving unnecessary medication and adverse side effects.
18 fire safety citations on file: 1 on January 23, 2026, 13 on October 24, 2024, 4 on September 28, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Arizona | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.90 | 3.98 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.39 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.55 | 3.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.17 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.34 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 68.0% | 45.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.0% | 43.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.52 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.04 on weekdays and 3.55 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 4.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.94 in April to June 2025 to 3.90 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.90 | 0.39 | 4.04 | 3.55 | 4.9% | 0 of 90 | 77 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.84 | 0.39 | 3.94 | 3.58 | 11.7% | 0 of 92 | 76 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.77 | 0.34 | 3.88 | 3.49 | 17.1% | 0 of 92 | 81 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.94 | 0.55 | 4.06 | 3.63 | 11.4% | 0 of 91 | 77 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Arizona, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.87 | 0.63 | 4.05 | 3.43 | 3.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.53 | $18.43 to $22.42 | 20,320 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $37.05 | $32.10 to $39.36 | 6,530 |
| Registered nurses | $47.84 | $39.33 to $52.20 | 73,150 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Arizona | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 10.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.7 | 12.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.9 | 10.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.8 | 23.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.6 | 10.4 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Handmaker Home for the Aging's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (57.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
57.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Arizona: 74 better, 1 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 95 eligible stays.
10.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Arizona: 4 better, 1 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 114 eligible stays.
8.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Arizona: 6 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 71 eligible stays.
75.0% this home
Median of homes: Arizona69.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 48 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Arizona0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 73 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Arizona0.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 73 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Arizona95.1% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HANDMAKER JEWISH SERVICES FOR THE AGING. CMS links this home to Pollak Holdings, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 1.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ash, Bruce | Corporate director | Individual | 02/22/2021 | |
| Wexler, Allison | Corporate director | Individual | 09/21/2014 | |
| Bregman, Philip | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/21/2014 | |
| Kohn, Brian | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/22/2021 | |
| Pollak, Elie | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/19/2021 | |
| Wissinger, Travis | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/19/2021 | |
| Handmaker Jewish Services for the Aging | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/18/2024 | |
| Bastiampillai, Nicholas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/31/2021 | |
| Dorf, Rachel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/19/2021 | |
| Gooding, Emerson | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/30/2025 | |
| Pollak, Elie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/19/2021 | |
| Handmaker Jewish Services for the Aging | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/18/2024 | |
| Bastiampillai, Nicholas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/15/2025 | |
| Gooding, Emerson | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/16/2025 | |
| Pollak, Elie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/19/2021 | |
| Wissinger, Travis | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/19/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Arizona. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.