What is Health Center at the Renaissance's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Health Center at the Renaissance 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Health Center at the Renaissance get at its last inspection?

5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on October 6, 2025. The Ohio average is 10.5.

Has Health Center at the Renaissance been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Health Center at the Renaissance accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Health Center at the Renaissance?

CMS lists 40 owners and managers. Legal business name: ELIZA JENNINGS INC.

Health Center at the Renaissance: Inspections & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on October 6, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).

Of 9 health citations since March 2020, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.30 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.

51.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

303/20

008/23

112/23

510/25

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 9 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

Potential for minimal harm

October 6, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations

G

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, hospital record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized fall prevention program/fall interventions to decrease Resident #2's risk of falls including falls with injury. This affected one resident (#2) of one resident reviewed for falls. The facility census was 82. Actual Harm occurred on 12/09/24 when Resident #2, who was at risk for falls and had a history of falls, sustained a left hip fracture without evidence the facility had implemented individualized and effective interventions to prevent the fall with fracture. The resident had sustained falls on 11/29/24 and 12/08/24 with the only intervention listed post fall was to remind the resident to call for assistance. [...]
D

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on resident record review, staff interviews, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and review of facility concern logs, a soft file investigation and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Residents #33 and #48 were free from verbal and physical abuse. This affected two residents (#33 and #48) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 82.
D

Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on resident record review, staff interviews, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of facility soft file investigation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an incident of alleged abuse to the State Agency. This affected one (Resident #48) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 82.
D

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide accommodation for a dependent resident's needs. This affected one (Resident #38) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 82.
D

Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given according to physician's orders, creating a medication error rate of 16.0 percent (%). This affected two residents (#29 and #32) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 82.

December 21, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.

F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and interviews, the facility did not ensure all residents were protected from misappropriation of resident funds by staff. This affected one resident of four residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 74.

August 3, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations

March 12, 2020Standard inspection · 3 citations

E

Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a variety of foods were offered for Resident #51 and Resident #85 and failed to ensure Resident #2, Resident #65 and Resident #80, who were ordered a pureed diet received the proper serving size of soup. This affected two residents (#51 and #85) of four residents reviewed for food concerns based on the menu and three residents (#2, #65 and #80) of three residents reviewed for pureed diets.
E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a sanitary food preparation area was maintained during tray/serving line of meals to prevent potential contamination and/or food borne illness. This had the potential to affect 44 residents (#1, #2, #4, #5, #7, #9, #12, #13, #14, #18, #20, #22, #24, #27, #28, #29, #31, #35, #37, #48, #49, #51, #52, #58, #61, #64, #65, #66, #68, #73, #74, #77, #79, #80, #81, #84, #88, #90, #91, #93, #293, #294, #295 and #296) of 45 residents who take foods by mouth, reside on the second floor and receive their meals from the pantry.
C

Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · deficient, provider has March 24, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure proper bed hold notices were provided as required upon resident transfers to the hospital. This affected two residents (#3 and #66) and had the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility.

Fire safety inspections

10 fire safety citations on file: 5 on October 6, 2025, 5 on August 3, 2023.

Every fire safety citation10 citations

F
Meet requirements for sections of health care facilities separated by fire resistive construction.

K 131 · October 6, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.

K 291 · October 6, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

K 363 · October 6, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · October 6, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.

K 923 · October 6, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.

K 211 · August 3, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · August 3, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · August 3, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.

K 511 · August 3, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · August 3, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Ohio	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	4.30	3.69	3.86
Registered nurses	0.61	0.64	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	3.91	3.28	3.42
Nurse aides	2.57
Licensed practical nurses	1.12
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	51.4%	48.7%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	15.4%	43.9%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 3.92 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.46 on weekdays and 3.91 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.10 in April to June 2025 to 4.30 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	4.30	0.61	4.46	3.91	7.7%	0 of 90	73
Oct to Dec 2025	4.33	0.61	4.44	4.06	8.5%	0 of 92	76
Jul to Sep 2025	4.06	0.55	4.13	3.88	8.8%	0 of 92	80
Apr to Jun 2025	4.10	0.60	4.21	3.83	15.3%	0 of 91	78
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026	3.64	0.60	3.80	3.24	4.6%	0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Ohio

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Ohio, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$18.76	$17.93 to $21.44	63,280
LPNs and LVNs	$29.78	$27.34 to $31.68	39,900
Registered nurses	$39.67	$38.08 to $47.61	143,730
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Ohio	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	8.9	5.3	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.4	0.2	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.4	0.5	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.1	3.2	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.2	1.2	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	9.0	6.1	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.0	3.4	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.6	8.8	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	31.6	24.9	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	9.4	12.9	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	0.8	1.7	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.6	1.8	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Health Center at the Renaissance's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (54.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

54.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 154 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 163 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 112 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

35.4% this home

Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 82 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.9% this home

Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 108 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

4.6% this home

Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 108 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

96.7% this home

Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: ELIZA JENNINGS INC.

Name	Role	Type	Share	Since
Eliza Jennings Senior Care Network	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	100%	10/04/1989
Fletcher, Richard	Managing control - governing body	Individual		07/01/1991
Fodor, Alayne	Managing control - governing body	Individual		07/08/2010
Fox, Richard	Managing control - governing body	Individual		05/03/2021
Hartney, Margaret	Managing control - governing body	Individual		07/01/2023
Krassen, Glenn	Managing control - governing body	Individual		02/07/2013
Rogerson, James	Managing control - governing body	Individual		02/03/2021
Scanlon, Patricia	Managing control - governing body	Individual		11/04/2024
Sereda, Sheryl	Managing control - governing body	Individual		07/01/2023
Shrock, Terrie	Managing control - governing body	Individual		07/01/1991
Stoner, John	Managing control - governing body	Individual		07/01/2023
Tracy, Allen	Managing control - governing body	Individual		07/11/2018
Weigle, Fred	Managing control - governing body	Individual		02/07/2008
Weitzel, Margaret	Managing control - governing body	Individual		06/03/2010
Young, Hilton	Managing control - governing body	Individual		05/03/2021
Boyson, Richard	Corporate officer	Individual		05/18/2015
Gray, Michael	Corporate officer	Individual		07/01/2019
Griveas, Jennifer	Corporate officer	Individual		07/10/2017
Shields, Kathleen	Corporate officer	Individual		10/04/1989
Eliza Jennings Senior Care Network	Operational/managerial control	Organization		10/04/1989
Brenner, Silvia	Operational/managerial control	Individual		11/27/2000
Cardone, Suzanne	Operational/managerial control	Individual		10/21/2015
Gray, Michael	Operational/managerial control	Individual		07/01/2019
Gregg, Brian	Operational/managerial control	Individual		05/21/1985
Johnson, Kathleen	Operational/managerial control	Individual		11/28/2022
Pochatek, Shannon	Operational/managerial control	Individual		03/01/2024
Poore, Suzanne	Operational/managerial control	Individual		05/07/2012
Ritchie, Amanda	Operational/managerial control	Individual		07/01/2020
Skerda, Sandra	Operational/managerial control	Individual		07/01/2015
Stocker, Katalin	Operational/managerial control	Individual		07/01/2024
Healthpro Parent Holdings LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		11/01/2014
Intelycare Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization		03/01/2020
Twomagnets LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		03/01/2020
Boyson, Richard	Adp of the SNF	Individual		05/18/2015
Elbadawy, Emad	Adp of the SNF	Individual		08/01/2018
Gray, Michael	Adp of the SNF	Individual		07/01/2019
Poore, Suzanne	Adp of the SNF	Individual		05/07/2012
Ritchie, Amanda	Adp of the SNF	Individual		07/10/2025
Shields, Kathleen	Adp of the SNF	Individual		07/01/2007
Stocker, Katalin	Adp of the SNF	Individual		07/01/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on October 6, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 6, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 12, 2020: "Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on October 6, 2025: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."

Other nursing homes nearby

Village of the Falls
Olmsted Falls, 1.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 4 citations
Joshua Tree Care Center
North Olmsted, 1.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 11 citations
Riverview Pointe Care Center
Olmsted Falls, 2.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 6 citations
O'Neill Healthcare North Olmsted
North Olmsted, 2.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 20 citations
Berea Center
Berea, 3.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 5 citations
Northwestern Healthcare Center
Berea, 3.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 33 citations
Crocker Pointe Health and Rehabilitation
Westlake, 3.2 mi · not rated · 0 citations
Brookdale Westlake Village
Westlake, 3.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 9 citations

Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Ohio Department of Health, Nursing Homes and Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Ohio Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-800-282-1206. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Ohio Long-Term Care Quality Navigator (Ohio Department of Aging), where Ohio publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Health Center at the Renaissance's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Health Center at the Renaissance 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Health Center at the Renaissance get at its last inspection?: 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on October 6, 2025. The Ohio average is 10.5.
Has Health Center at the Renaissance been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Health Center at the Renaissance accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Health Center at the Renaissance?: CMS lists 40 owners and managers. Legal business name: ELIZA JENNINGS INC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.