What is Ingleside at King Farm's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Ingleside at King Farm 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Ingleside at King Farm get at its last inspection?

4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 31, 2026. The Maryland average is 17.

Has Ingleside at King Farm been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Ingleside at King Farm accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Ingleside at King Farm?

CMS lists 44 owners and managers, and links the home to Ingleside Engaged Living. Legal business name: KING FARM PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, INC..

Ingleside at King Farm: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 31, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Maryland average is 17, the national average 9.2).

None of its 19 health citations since December 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.28 hours per resident per day, against 3.87 across Maryland and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.27 of those hours.

14.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Maryland average 40.2%).

CMS links it to Ingleside Engaged Living, an affiliated group of 2 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

012/20

1502/25

403/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

17D

Potential for minimal harm

March 31, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations

E

Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.

F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff and the public. This was evident during the initial kitchen tour of the annual survey.
D

Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.

F712 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on a medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that residents were seen by an attending provider at least every 60 days. This was evident for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 resident reviewed for hospice care.
D

Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.

F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that attending physicians reviewed and acted on Irregularities identified by the pharmacist in a timely manner. This was evident for one (Resident #4) of 5 Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
D

Keep all essential equipment working safely.

F908 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in proper operating conditions. This was evident for 2 of 2 pieces of equipment reviewed during the annual survey.

February 19, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 15 citations

F

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a manner that maintained professional standards of food service safety. This practice had the potential to affect all residents who eat the food prepared in the facility's kitchen.
D

Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a homelike environment as evidenced of marring on the wall behinds residents' beds. This deficient practice was evidenced in 3 (Resident #4, #11, #28) of 6 resident rooms entered during the medication administration assessment conducted during the survey.
D

Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

F604 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it

Inspectors wroteBased on the review of a facility reported incident and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of physical restraints. This was evident for 1 (MD00182052) out of 4 facility reported incidents reviewed during the annual and complaint survey. The facility implemented corrective measures following this incident and prior to the start of this Survey. The facilities plan and actions were verified during this survey, therefore this deficiency was found to be past noncompliance with a compliance date of 8/15/2022.
D

Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of a facility reported incident (FRI) and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin within 2 hours and submit the results of the investigation within 5 days as required to the Office of Health Care Quality. This was evident for 1 (MD00210330) out of 4 Facility Reported Incidents (FRI's) reviewed during the survey.
D

Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.

F622 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to include the resident care plan with the required documentation during a transfer. This was evident for 1 (Resident #35) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization.
D

Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the ombudsman when a resident was transferred to the hospital, and provide written notification of transfer and to ensure the resident and the responsible representative were provided a copy. This was evident for 2 (Resident #35 and #37) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization.
D

Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.

F624 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document the orientation and preparation of a resident upon a transfer. This was evident for 1 (Resident #35) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization.
D

Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and medical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the bed hold policy upon transfer. This was evident for 2 (Resident #35 and #37) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization.
D

Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident centered care plan had been revised to meet the needs of the resident in response to current interventions. This was evident for 1 (Resident #4) out of 2 residents investigated for communication/sensory during the survey.
D

Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure services provided maintained professional standards of practice regarding resident weights. This was evident for 2 (Resident #7 and #21) of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition.
D

Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.

F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the staff completed a competency required to care for resident's effectively. This was evident for 1 (Resident #8) of 5 staff records reviewed for training during the Medicare/Medicaid survey.
D

Post nurse staffing information every day.

F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to update the staffing sheets on the units after the staffing schedule changed. This was evident for 2 of 2 units in the Long-Term Care Wing.
D

Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined that the facility's pharmacy failed to administer a prescribed supplement with a dosage. This was evident for 1 (Resident #19) of 5 resident medication administration observations during survey.
D

Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.

F790 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure a resident received routine dental care. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #15) reviewed for dental services during the survey.
D

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure a resident's medical record included all documentation related to dental treatment, and beneficiary notification documentation was correctly completed. This was evident for 1 (Resident #15) of 1 resident reviewed for dental services, and 2 (Resident #189 and #190) of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification during the survey.

December 9, 2020Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

13 fire safety citations on file: 9 on March 31, 2026, 4 on February 19, 2025.

Every fire safety citation13 citations

F
Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).

E 4 · March 31, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · March 31, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · March 31, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.

K 712 · March 31, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.

K 914 · March 31, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · March 31, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.

K 223 · March 31, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Construct fire resistant interior walls.

K 331 · March 31, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

K 363 · March 31, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.

K 347 · February 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · February 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.

K 923 · February 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

K 363 · February 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Maryland	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	5.28	3.87	3.86
Registered nurses	1.27	0.84	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	4.98	3.47	3.42
Nurse aides	3.09
Licensed practical nurses	0.92
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	14.9%	40.2%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	9.1%	38.7%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 3.44 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.40 on weekdays and 4.98 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.65 in April to June 2025 to 5.28 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	5.28	1.27	5.40	4.98	0.0%	0 of 90	36
Oct to Dec 2025	5.45	1.25	5.59	5.08	0.0%	0 of 92	33
Jul to Sep 2025	5.03	1.15	5.18	4.65	0.0%	0 of 92	34
Apr to Jun 2025	5.65	1.29	5.74	5.42	2.0%	0 of 91	32
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Maryland, Jan to Mar 2026	3.73	0.74	3.88	3.34	8.0%	0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Maryland

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Maryland, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.79	$18.46 to $22.00	27,720
LPNs and LVNs	$35.89	$31.40 to $38.30	9,560
Registered nurses	$47.98	$40.26 to $51.61	52,910
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Maryland	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	34.5	20.4	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.1	0.5	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.8	1.5	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.8	2.4	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.4	1.1	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	18.7	22.2	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.5	5.9	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	23.3	13.8	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	16.6	21.0	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	5.8	9.8	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	0.7	1.3	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	0.2	1.2	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Ingleside at King Farm's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (59.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

59.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Maryland: 90 better, 29 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 118 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Maryland: 0 better, 41 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 115 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

8.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Maryland: 5 better, 6 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 78 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

82.6% this home

Median of homes: Maryland61.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Maryland0.4% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 56 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

1.4% this home

Median of homes: Maryland2.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 56 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Maryland98.1% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 36 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: KING FARM PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, INC.. CMS links this home to Ingleside Engaged Living, a group of 2 nursing homes averaging 5 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Since
Bartels, Bruce	Corporate director	Individual	03/04/2015
Boardman, Donald	Corporate director	Individual	01/01/2024
Cecchine, Margaret	Corporate director	Individual	04/01/2023
Cox, Sally	Corporate director	Individual	01/01/2018
Gleckman, Howard	Corporate director	Individual	01/01/2024
Hauge, Jennifer	Corporate director	Individual	01/01/2022
Johnson, Gregg	Corporate director	Individual	01/01/2021
Katz, Ruth	Corporate director	Individual	01/01/2024
Kearney, Jonathan	Corporate director	Individual	02/01/2025
Kreutzer, John	Corporate director	Individual	01/01/2018
Kuhn, Nancy	Corporate director	Individual	10/07/2015
Magidson, Phillip	Corporate director	Individual	01/01/2023
Massey, Nathaniel	Corporate director	Individual	01/01/2025
Ortiz, Elizabeth	Corporate director	Individual	01/01/2025
Wagner, Steven	Corporate director	Individual	01/01/2017
Alley, Traci	Corporate officer	Individual	08/02/2021
Delovska-Trajkova, Dusanka	Corporate officer	Individual	01/01/2013
Mour, Christine	Corporate officer	Individual	08/24/2015
O'Connor, Lynn	Corporate officer	Individual	07/01/2010
Silverbloom Consulting, LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization	11/01/2021
Westminster Ingleside King Farm Retirement Communities Inc	Operational/managerial control	Organization	06/01/2011
Adeniyi-Oladapo, Morinatu Ajibike	Operational/managerial control	Individual	05/31/2022
Bryant, Kenya	Operational/managerial control	Individual	08/01/2022
Green, Lynn	Operational/managerial control	Individual	03/14/2024
Liwanag, Maria	Operational/managerial control	Individual	03/05/2024
Massetti, Amanda	Operational/managerial control	Individual	04/11/2020
Stalnaker, Tish	Operational/managerial control	Individual	01/04/2016
Baker Tilly Advisory Group LP	Adp of the SNF	Organization	01/01/2015
Baker Tilly Us LLP	Adp of the SNF	Organization	01/01/2015
Flagship Rehabilitation, Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization	09/01/2010
Marsh & McLennan Companies	Adp of the SNF	Organization	10/01/2023
Richter and Associates	Adp of the SNF	Organization	11/10/2015
Silverbloom Consulting, LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization	12/16/2025
Spring Healthcare Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization	12/01/2024
Westminster Ingleside King Farm Retirement Communities Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization	12/22/2025
Adeniyi-Oladapo, Morinatu Ajibike	Adp of the SNF	Individual	05/31/2022
Bryant, Kenya	Adp of the SNF	Individual	08/01/2022
Green, Lynn	Adp of the SNF	Individual	03/14/2024
Liwanag, Maria	Adp of the SNF	Individual	03/05/2024
Massetti, Amanda	Adp of the SNF	Individual	04/11/2020
Sharma, Sandeep	Adp of the SNF	Individual	12/04/2025
Stalnaker, Tish	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/04/2016
Tesfay, Akbert	Adp of the SNF	Individual	12/05/2023
Thomas, Deborah	Adp of the SNF	Individual	07/20/2020

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on February 19, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 31, 2026: "Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits."
When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 19, 2025: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
Can we see a resident room, a shower room and the dining room on this visit?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 31, 2026: "Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public."

Other nursing homes nearby

Shady Grove Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Rockville, 1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 90 citations
Collingswood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
Rockville, 1.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 74 citations
Sterling Care Rockville Nursing
Rockville, 2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 42 citations
The Village at Rockville
Rockville, 2.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 40 citations
Wilson Health Care Center
Gaithersburg, 2.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 28 citations
Potomac Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare
Rockville, 2.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 46 citations
Montgomery Village Care Center
Gaithersburg, 4.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 21 citations
Hebrew Home of Greater Washington
Rockville, 5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 31 citations

Maryland contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Maryland. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Maryland Department of Health, Office of Health Care Quality, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Maryland Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Maryland Department of Aging, 800-243-3425. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Maryland Health Care Commission, Maryland Quality Reporting, Nursing Homes, where Maryland publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Ingleside at King Farm's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Ingleside at King Farm 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Ingleside at King Farm get at its last inspection?: 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 31, 2026. The Maryland average is 17.
Has Ingleside at King Farm been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Ingleside at King Farm accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Ingleside at King Farm?: CMS lists 44 owners and managers, and links the home to Ingleside Engaged Living. Legal business name: KING FARM PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, INC..

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.