What is Jerome Home's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Jerome Home 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Jerome Home get at its last inspection?

11 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 10, 2025. The Connecticut average is 13.4.

Does Jerome Home accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Jerome Home?

CMS lists 6 owners and managers. Legal business name: JEROME HOME.

Jerome Home: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 10, 2025, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Connecticut average is 13.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 21 health citations since January 2020, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years; the largest was $8,018, and the latest is dated December 3, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.68 hours per resident per day, against 3.73 across Connecticut and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.11 of those hours.

34.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Connecticut average 37.4%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

301/20

501/23

112/24

1102/25

107/25

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

15D

Potential for minimal harm

July 25, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 26, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #3) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a comprehensive individualized fall care plan with interventions when identified as a high risk for falls.

February 10, 2025Standard inspection · 11 citations

E

Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.

F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on a tour of the Dietary Department, interviews and facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure foods were at appropriate temperatures for palatability.
D

Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, review of the clinical record, and facility policy for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #343) reviewed for transmission-based precautions, the facility failed to notify the social worker, physician, and psychiatrist after a suicidal ideation statement was made, per the facility policy.
D

Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).

F603 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #35), reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a resident exposed to a communicable illness was free to exit their room when wearing appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).
D

Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #10), reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that an injury of unknown source was reported to the state agency.
D

Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #10), reviewed for abuse the facility failed to ensure a complete investigation and summary were completed for a resident with an injury of unknown source.
D

Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, review of the clinical records and facility policy for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #343) reviewed for transmission-based precautions, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan included statements/behaviors of homicidal ideation that were made prior to admission.
D

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #53) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure floor mats were in place per the physician's order.
D

Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.

F742 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, review of the clinical records and facility policy for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #343) reviewed for transmission-based precautions, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for a resident who displayed psychosocial behaviors.
D

Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.

F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #53) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the pharmacist failed to identify irregularities for a resident receiving an antipsychotic (psychotic disorder) medication.
D

Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.

F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policies for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #53) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to monitor behaviors for residents receiving psychotropic (drugs that affect the brain and nervous system) medications and for Resident #53, the facility failed to conduct an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment (test for abnormal movement) for a resident receiving an antipsychotic (psychotic disorder) medication.
B

Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews for 2 of 6 common areas, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment for two large vents on the North and East units.

December 3, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation

G

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 24, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and policies, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who required staff assistance of one (1) when ambulating, the facility failed to utilize a gait belt when ambulating Resident #1 resulting in a fall and left lower leg fractures.

January 31, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations

D

Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents for (Resident # 11) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident physical mistreatment to the overseeing state agency within required two hours after the suspected time of the abuse.
D

Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents, resident (Resident # 11) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to prevent further potential abuse following a report of staff to resident physical mistreatment.
D

Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.

F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 31, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #58 ) reviewed for positioning and mobility, the facility failed to complete a recommended Occupational Therapy (OT) or Physical Therapy (PT) evaluation after a quarterly therapy screen.
D

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 23, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for two of four sanitizing solutions in the kitchen, the facility failed to maintain the sanitizing solutions at sanitary levels.
B

Post nurse staffing information every day.

F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's posted staffing, observation and interviews, the facility failed to record an accurate resident census and number of direct care staff that was available for residents in the facility for and public view.

January 28, 2020Standard inspection · 3 citations

G

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation and interview for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #89) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to appropriately utilize adaptive equipment which caused the hot liquid to spill resulting in a burn on the resident's leg, and for 1 nourishment kitchenette, the facility failed to ensure chemicals were stored in a locked cabinet and away from resident access.
E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews the facility failed to maintain sanitizing solutions at appropriate levels.
D

Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.

F685 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #4) reviewed for communication and sensory, the facility failed to provide timely follow when the resident lost his/her hearing aids.

Fire safety inspections

5 fire safety citations on file: 2 on February 10, 2025, 3 on January 31, 2023.

Every fire safety citation5 citations

D
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · February 10, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.

K 712 · February 10, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Provide properly protected cooking facilities.

K 324 · January 31, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have an alternate power supply for its alarm system.

K 344 · January 31, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have proper fire barriers, ventilation and signs for the transfilling of oxygen.

K 927 · January 31, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

Date	Penalty	Amount or length
December 3, 2024	Fine	$8,018

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Connecticut	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	5.68	3.73	3.86
Registered nurses	1.11	0.69	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	5.00	3.37	3.42
Nurse aides	3.46
Licensed practical nurses	1.11
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	34.8%	37.4%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	26.9%	38.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 4.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.95 on weekdays and 5.00 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.55 in April to June 2025 to 5.68 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	5.68	1.11	5.95	5.00	0.4%	0 of 90	89
Oct to Dec 2025	5.71	1.05	6.04	4.87	0.8%	0 of 92	89
Jul to Sep 2025	5.56	1.01	5.87	4.76	0.2%	0 of 92	90
Apr to Jun 2025	5.55	1.00	5.86	4.78	0.7%	0 of 91	91
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Connecticut, Jan to Mar 2026	3.66	0.61	3.80	3.31	6.0%	1.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Connecticut

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Connecticut, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$21.53	$20.14 to $22.68	21,380
LPNs and LVNs	$35.43	$32.05 to $36.94	8,540
Registered nurses	$49.39	$41.40 to $58.58	40,110
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Connecticut	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	11.3	17.9	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.7	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.4	1.5	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.5	3.5	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.8	1.5	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	10.7	16.4	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.1	4.0	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.6	17.8	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	20.4	24.3	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	7.5	10.8	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.4	2.1	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	0.9	1.5	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Jerome Home's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (63.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

63.2% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Connecticut: 75 better, 2 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 180 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

8.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Connecticut: 0 better, 3 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 200 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

5.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Connecticut: 0 better, 2 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 108 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

63.2% this home

Median of homes: Connecticut58.9% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 87 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.0% this home

Median of homes: Connecticut0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 103 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Connecticut1.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 103 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Connecticut100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: JEROME HOME.

Name	Role	Type	Since
Gertz, Linda	W-2 managing employee	Individual	10/04/2006
Daigle, Daniel	Corporate director	Individual	01/29/2015
Mazadorian, Harry	Corporate director	Individual	07/01/2004
Moriarty, Justine	Corporate director	Individual	01/29/2015
Sittambalam, Earle	Corporate director	Individual	01/29/2015
Toombs, Lori	Corporate director	Individual	11/23/2014

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on February 10, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on February 10, 2025: "Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room)."
Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 10, 2025: "Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature."
When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 25, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."

Other nursing homes nearby

Monsignor Bojnowski Manor, Inc
New Britain, 1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 38 citations
Grandview Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
New Britain, 1 mi · not rated · 71 citations
Ledgecrest Health Care Center
Kensington, 2.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 28 citations
Apple Rehab Farmington Valley
Plainville, 3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 39 citations
Civita Care Center at Newington
Newington, 3.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 55 citations
Bel-Air Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
Newington, 3.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 47 citations
Autumn Lake Healthcare at New Britain
New Britain, 3.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 25 citations
Amberwoods of Farmington
Farmington, 4.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 38 citations

Connecticut contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Connecticut. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Connecticut Department of Public Health, Facility Licensing and Investigations Section, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Connecticut Long Term Care Ombudsman Program, 860-424-5200. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Connecticut DPH Nursing Home Site, survey findings by facility, where Connecticut publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Jerome Home's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Jerome Home 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Jerome Home get at its last inspection?: 11 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 10, 2025. The Connecticut average is 13.4.
Has Jerome Home been fined?: Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years.
Does Jerome Home accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Jerome Home?: CMS lists 6 owners and managers. Legal business name: JEROME HOME.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.