1001 South State Street, Jerseyville, IL 62052 · Jersey County · (618) 498-6496
111 certified beds, about 56 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1983
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145465 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 24, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 45 health citations since September 2023, 13 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 7 fines totaling $399,920 in the last three years; the largest was $162,727, and the latest is dated April 24, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.65 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.40 of those hours.
64.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Helia Healthcare, an affiliated group of 13 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 45 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure nutritional interventions were in place to prevent weight loss for 1 of 3 residents (R40) reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 34. This failure resulted in R40 losing 13.6% body weight over four months which is significant and undesirable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately date a vial of Tuberculin solution to determine the expiration date. This has the potential to affect all 54 residents living in the facility. Findings Include:On 4/21/2026 at 2:14 PM the facility's medication room was observed with V3, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). An open, partially used multi-dose vial of Tuberculin (TB) Purified Protein Derivative Diluted/Aplisol 5TU/0.1mL noted in a House Stock bin in the medication refrigerator with no open date on the vial or medication box. V3 stated the vial is a stock vial of TB solution the facility uses, and she is unsure how long the vial has been open due to the vial not having an open date written on it. V3 stated once a vial is open, the vial should have the date it was opened written on it. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to store and prepare foods in a manner that prevents potential contamination. This has the potential to affect all 54 residents living in the Facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a system of surveillance designed to identify possible communicable diseases or infections before they can spread to other residents in the facility. This failure has potential to affect the 54 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to timely answer call lights for 2 of 2 (R7, R60) residents reviewed for resident rights in a sample of 34. Findings Include:1. R7's Undated Face Sheet documents R7 an admission date of 10/3/2025 and has a medical diagnosis including End Stage Renal Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Pain, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Unspecified injury of right forearm, and Acute pulmonary edema. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R7 is moderately cognitively impaired, is always incontinent of bladder and bowel, and requires substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, sitting to standing, and chair/bed to chair transfers. R7's Care Plan Edited 4/2/2026 documents Problem: R7 is at risk for skin breakdown or pressure ulcers related to decreased mobility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide food in a form to meet needs for 1 of 1 residents (R39) reviewed for nutritional services in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement protocols to optimize the treatment of infections by ensuring that residents who require an antibiotic are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic for 2 of 4 (R28, R37) residents investigated for infection control in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, and record reviews the facility failed to evaluate, implement and monitor effectiveness of fall interventions to prevent falls for 1 out of 3 residents (R2); reviewed for accident hazards/supervision/devices in a sample of 4. This failure resulted in R2 sustaining depressed skull, orbital, maxillary and temporal fractures, a scalp laceration, a subdural hematoma, a subarachnoid hematoma and an intraparenchymal hematoma of the brain.
Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to ensure its door alarms were loud enough to be heard from areas away from the 200 hall exit door and its outside gait latch was in working order to prevent elopement in 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for elopement in the sample of 4. This led to R2 eloping from the facility, which is located on a busy intersection and approximately 100 yards from an active railroad track. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 8/22/25, when R2 eloped from the facility. On 9/16/25 at 10:45 AM, V1, Administrator, and V2, DON, were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview and record review, the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 9/16/25 but remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its courtyard gait latch was in proper working order when reviewing for mechanical equipment in working order. This failure has the potential to affect all 50 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include:On 9/12/25 at 11:20 AM, V3, R2's Son, stated on that Friday 8/22/25, R2 had exited the facility without staff and he and V4, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) went outside to the fenced in courtyard and did not see her. A young lady called and stated the facility had a patient out on the road behind the facility. V3 stated the courtyard gate to the fenced in area outside the 200-hall door was not locked or latched. V3 stated when he asked about this, he was told that they could not lock/latch it because it was illegal because it could prevent residents from exiting in the event of a fire. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on Interview, and Record Review the facility failed to timely report and treat a change in condition for 1 (R3) of 3 residents reviewed for change in condition in the sample of 5. This resulted in R3 experiencing an increase in pain and not being seen by a physician and diagnosed with a pubic fracture for 8 days.
Inspectors wroteBased on Interview, and Record Review the facility failed to assure fall interventions were in place for 1 (R3) of 3 residents reviewed for falls in the sample of 5.
Inspectors wroteBased on Interview, and Record Review, the facility failed to provide progressive fall interventions and to complete a fall investigation for 1(R28) of 2 residents in the sample of 21. This failure resulted in R28 sustaining a displaced fracture of greater trochanter of left femur.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain monthly weights on 2 of 3 residents (R13, R41), reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 21. This failure resulted in R13 having a significant weight loss of 15.6% from 11/8/24 to 2/26/25.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored and distributed in a manner that prevents foodborne illness. This has the potential to affect all 48 residents living in the Facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to serve meals in a timely manner for 4 of 4 residents (R14, R29, R19, R32) reviewed for nutritional services in the sample of 21.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide access to a sink in a resident bathroom to maintain their independence for 1 of 3 residents (R34) reviewed for accommodation of needs in the sample of 21.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 2 of 2 residents (R15, R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 21.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse for 2 (R15, R42) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect and exploitation in the sample of 21.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to serve meals at a desirable temperature to 2 of 2 residents (R14, R41), reviewed for preferred temperature in the sample of 21.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure use of proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) for 2 of 3 isolated residents (R39, R42) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 21.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post it's licensed and unlicensed staffing that are responsible for resident care when reviewed for posted nurse staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observations, record review the facility failed to assess and monitor a Gastrostomy tube site for 1 of 2 residents (R2) reviewed for feeding tubes in a sample of 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from sexual abuse for 2 of 5 residents (R3, R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 15. This failure resulted in immediate jeopardy on 7/31/24 when the facility first identified the sexual behaviors between R3 and R4 and failed to put interventions in place to ensure every effort was taken to protect R3. This failure resulted in R4 displaying sexual behaviors towards R3, including fondling her breasts, placing his hand in her pants and R3 and R4 observed in R4's room, both with their pants and underwear down and R4 kneeling in front of R3. R3 and R4 have moderate cognitive impairment and the inability to consent to sexual relations. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision/monitoring to prevent an elopement for 1 of 6 residents (R5) reviewed for supervision to prevent elopement in the sample of 15. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on 9/20/24 when R5, eloped from the facility sometime after 3:00 AM and was found by a passerby at 6:20 AM and returned to the facility. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9/20/24, when R5 eloped from the facility sometime after 3:00 AM and was found by a passerby at 6:20 AM and was returned to the facility. On 10/9/24 at 12:35 PM, V1, Administrator, V2, DON (Director of Nurses), V25, BOM (Business Office Manager), and V26, Regional Director, were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate allegations of potential abuse to prevent further sexual abuse for 2 of 5 residents (R3, R4) reviewed for investigating/implementing interventions to prevent further abuse in the sample of 15. This failure resulted in R4 displaying sexual behaviors towards R3, including fondling her breasts, placing his hand in her pants and R3 and R4 observed in R4's room, both with their pants and underwear down and R4 kneeling in front of R3. R3 and R4 have moderate cognitive impairment and the inability to consent to sexual relations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse policy to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by a known male with sexual behaviors. This failure has the potential to affect all 47 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to have a sufficient number of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) working to ensure the needs of the residents were met. This failure has the potential to affect all 47 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report potential sexual abuse to the local police department and (State Agency) for 2 of 5 residents (R3, R4) reviewed for reporting of abuse allegations in the sample of 15.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a urinary tract infection (UTI) was addressed and monitored in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for urinary tract infections in the sample of 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a system to track and trend infections, failed to implement a system for testing for the spread of COVID-19, and failed to implement infection control procedures including isolation precautions and personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent the spread of COVID-19. These failures resulted in 23 residents developing COVID-19, including 5 residents (R37, R51, R207, R208, and R209) who expired after becoming positive with COVID-19. Two residents (R19, and R40), and one staff member (V27, Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) are currently positive with COVID-19. These failures have the potential to affect all 52 residents in the facility. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE], when R35 developed COVID-19 and the facility failed to conduct testing and surveillance to prevent the spread of COVID-19. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess/monitor, provide treatments as ordered, and provide pressure relief to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 of 2 residents (R30) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 52. This failure resulted in R30 developing two facility acquired unstageable pressure ulcers to R30's left and right heels, and a Stage II pressure ulcer to his buttocks.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide foot care, including providing current treatment and consulting with a Podiatrist for further treatment, for 1 of 1 resident (R31) reviewed for foot care in the sample of 52. This failure caused R31 to be in severe pain and have a severely reddened, swollen, and very tender fourth toe and/or foot for a long period of time.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to put progressive interventions in place and provide supervision to prevent falls for 2 of 3 residents (R30, R31) reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in R30 falling and sustaining a fractured hip, and R31 falling and sustaining a fractured arm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the meals recipe and use the proper scoop size to ensure residents are getting the proper amount of nutrition. This failure has the potential to affect all 52 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility failed to store food products in a manner to ensure food quality and avoid cross contamination. This failure has the potential to affect all 52 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) program and identify problems and implement interventions for issues identified. This failure has the potential to affect all 52 residents residing at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) activities, and identify problems and implement interventions for issues identified. This failure has the potential to affect all 52 residents residing at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a qualified individual(s) onsite, who is responsible for assessing, developing, implementing, monitoring, and managing the Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) to prevent and control infections in the facility. This has the potential to affect all 52 residents living in the Facility. The Findings Include: On 2/28/24 at 2:11 PM, a Infection Control Meeting was held with V2, Director of Nursing (DON), V3, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, and V16, Regional Nurse. V16 stated V3 is the facility's Infection Control Preventionist, but is not certified yet. On 3/5/24 at 9:57 AM, V3 stated, I have taken the infection control modules for certification, but have not taken the test yet, because I do not have the time. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and provide COVID vaccines or boosters. This failure has the potential to affect all 52 residents residing in the building.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide complete incontinent care for 1 of 3 residents (R15) reviewed for incontinent care in the sample of 52.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date multi-use insulin pens and vials for 3 of 5 residents (R7, R33, R36) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 52.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to assist with residents' Activities of Daily Living (Activities of Daily Living), including showers, grooming, and hygiene and answering call lights to meet residents' needs. This has the potential to affect all 52 residents living in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with bathing, grooming, and hygiene, for 5 of 5 residents (R3, R4, R5, R7, R8) reviewed for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) care in the sample of 11.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to post menus for all meals to be seen by residents and families. This has the potential to affect all 50 residents residing at the facility.
19 fire safety citations on file: 5 on April 24, 2026, 10 on February 28, 2025, 4 on March 11, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 24, 2026 | Fine | $35,770 |
| September 16, 2025 | Fine | $10,056 |
| September 16, 2025 | Fine | $16,575 |
| September 16, 2025 | Payment Denial | 38 days from October 6, 2025 |
| June 10, 2025 | Fine | $32,214 |
| February 28, 2025 | Fine | $61,789 |
| February 28, 2025 | Payment Denial | 17 days from March 25, 2025 |
| October 10, 2024 | Fine | $80,789 |
| October 10, 2024 | Payment Denial | 19 days from November 8, 2024 |
| March 11, 2024 | Fine | $162,727 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.65 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.40 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.43 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.83 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.43 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 64.9% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 57.1% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.19 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.75 on weekdays and 2.43 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.69 in April to June 2025 to 2.65 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.65 | 0.40 | 2.75 | 2.43 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 56 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.66 | 0.41 | 2.74 | 2.43 | 0.0% | 2 of 92 | 51 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.63 | 0.47 | 2.74 | 2.37 | 0.0% | 5 of 92 | 51 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.69 | 0.46 | 2.79 | 2.44 | 3.1% | 0 of 91 | 55 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.0 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.4 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 34.8 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.5 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.4 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.1 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.0 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Jerseyville Nsg & Rehab Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (60.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
60.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.
10.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 44 eligible stays.
7.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
61.9% this home
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HELIA HEALTHCARE OF JERSEYVILLE LLC. CMS links this home to Helia Healthcare, a group of 13 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miller, Stephen | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 100% | 03/01/2015 |
| Miller, Stephen | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/01/2015 | |
| Miller, Stephen | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2015 | |
| Mills, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.