3490 Humbert Road, Alton, IL 62002 · Madison County · (618) 465-2626
180 certified beds, about 160 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145651 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 25, 2024, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 53 health citations since December 2021, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 5 fines totaling $85,546 in the last three years; the largest was $51,610, and the latest is dated February 20, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.75 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.24 of those hours.
49.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Jenmax Group, an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 53 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition and holding diabetic medication for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for notifications in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure a resident with known diabetes received timely blood glucose monitoring per physician orders for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 4. This past non-compliance occurred from 10/25/25 to 10/28/25.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer subcutaneous insulin medication as ordered by a physician for 1 of 4 residents (R2) who had a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 with Hyperglycemia, reviewed for medication in the sample of 4. Findings Include:R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia and Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 with Hyperglycemia. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 was cognitively impaired and took insulin. R2's Care Plan initiated 9/15/25 documents R2 has the potential for high and low blood sugar related to diabetes mellitus. Care Plan interventions include diabetes medication and blood sugar checks as ordered by physician. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to implement a resident's bed mobility care plan and failed to have the proper number of staff were present to change the resident's position in bed as directed by the resident's facility-created care plan for 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for falls in the sample of 7. This failure resulted in R2 falling from R2's bed and sustaining a raised hematoma above the left eye, bruising below the left eye, bruising behind the left ear, bruising covering the left side of R2's neck and multiple bruises covering the left side of R2's face. Findings Include:R2's face sheet, dated 7/24/25, documented R2 has diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, chronic embolism, and thrombosis of left femoral vein, type 2 diabetes, vascular dementia, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide complete incontinent care to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) for 1 of 3 residents (R68) reviewed for incontinent care in a sample of 66.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to change an indwelling urinary catheter per Physician order and failed to perform urinary catheter care per Physician order for 2 of 3 (R1, R3) residents reviewed for quality of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse for 2 of 2 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's hospital discharge order and apply a wound vac and coordinate care for an abdominal wound for 1 (R2) of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care/treatment in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received a shower. The facility also failed to document residents who received a shower for 4 of 4 residents (R2, R4, R1, R3) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living care for dependent residents in a sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to uphold resident rights for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for resident rights in a sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to respond to call lights in a timely manner for 3 (R1, R3, and R7) of 7 residents reviewed for adequate and timely care in the sample of 8.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to update and have appropriate documentation regarding the Code Status/Advanced Directives for 2 of 3 residents (R3, R4) reviewed for Advanced Directives in the sample of 12. Utilizing the reasonable person concept, R3 made his advanced directive choices clear when updating his directive status in [DATE] to Do No Resuscitate (DNR) status. Due to the facility failure to correctly identify his DNR, R3 experienced life saving measures including intubation and extubation prior to expiring. The Findings Include: 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party prior to a transfer to an acute care facility for evaluation and treatment of a change in condition for 2 of 3 residents (R3, R4)) reviewed for hospitalization in the sample of 12. The Findings Include: 1. R3's Face Sheet, undated, documents R3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital on 8/16/24 with diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Respiratory Failure, Panlobular Emphysema, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Malnutrition, Schizophrenia, Hypertension (HTN), Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen, COVID-19, and Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT). R3's Care Plan, dated 7/25/24, documents R3 has a behavior problem related to threatening and cursing staff. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for one of 5 residents (R8) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 12.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure communication and continuity of care between the facility and dialysis center for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for dialysis in the sample of 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to operationalize their policy and procedures for testing and tracking COVID-19; wear appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment), clean multi-use equipment, and perform hand hygiene after resident encounter of a COVID-19 resident, and post signage indicating the Facility is in COVID-19 outbreak. This failure has the potential to affect all 126 residents living in the Facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to employ a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP) with specialized training needed to track Facility infections and prevent the spread of infectious diseases, including COVID-19. This has the potential to affect all 126 residents living in the Facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide the physician prescribed medication. There were 25 opportunities with 2 errors resulting in a 8% medication error rate. The errors involved R13 in the sample of 22.
Inspectors wroteBased on Interview and Record Review the facility failed to accommodate and inform 1 of 5 residents (R5) of change in shower schedule.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers for 4 of 4 residents (R2, R5, R6 and R17) in the sample of 21 reviewed for showers.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by a physician for 4 of 7 residents (R2, R5, R18 and R21) reviewed for physician visits in the sample of 21. 1. R2's face sheet, dated 6/27/24, documented that R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2's medical diagnosis sheet, dated 6/27/24, documented that R2 has the following diagnoses: cerebral ischemia, hypertension, history of cerebral infarction, depression, anxiety, muscle weakness, schizoaffective disorder, and need for assistance with personal care. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 3/15/24, documented R2 is cognitively intact. On 6/26/24 at 9:15 am R2 stated that she has only seen her Medical Doctor (V18) one time and that was when she was admitted about two years ago. R2 stated that the Physician Assistant comes to see her but that her doctor never does. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to sufficiently staff the facility to care for the resident needs, including Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), and answering call lights for 5 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5) reviewed for sufficient staffing in the sample of 7. This deficiency has the potential to affect all 131 residents living in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow through on a recommendation for a medication change for 1 of 11 residents (R2) reviewed for medications in the sample of 11.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to Administer Medications as ordered by the Physician for 1 of 11 residents (R11) reviewed for medications in the sample of 11.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide Therapeutic Diets as ordered by the Physician for two of three residents (R2 and R4) reviewed for Therapeutic Diets in a sample of 11. Findings Include: 1. On 4/23/2024 at 12:00PM, R4 received his lunch tray in his room. Observed his lunch to be a single serving of pasta and meat, (protein), and double portion of salad. R4's meal ticket documented, no specific diet order. On 4/18/2024 at 2:55PM, R4 face sheet revealed a diagnosis of sepsis, malignant neoplasm of rectum, history of antineoplastic chemotherapy; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to store food at appropriate temperatures and failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves while plating food to prevent potential food-borne illnesses. This has the potential to affect all 126 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Dementia, Abuse, and other training to ensure competency of nurse's aides. This failure had the potential to affect all 126 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide complete incontinent care and proper catheter care to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs) for 4 of 4 residents (R76, R85, R107, R108) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 59.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to document a date accessed/opened for multi-dose insulin injection pens for 4 of 4 residents (R12, R27, R122, R229) reviewed for medication labeling in the sample of 59.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection for 4 of 5 residents (R76, R85, R107, R108) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 59.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely complete the quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDSs) for 3 of 3 residents (R85, R87) reviewed for timely completion of MDS quarterly assessments in the sample of 59.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely turning and repositioning to prevent pressure ulcers for 3 of 6 residents (R85, R107, R279) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 59.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to secure cigarettes and lighters for 2 of 2 residents (R21, and R281) reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents in the sample of 59.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered with an error rate less than 5%. There were 30 opportunities with 2 errors observed which calculated to a medication error rate of 6.67%. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 nurses administering medications to one of 3 residents (R58) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 59.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain resident blood glucose levels, failed to administer medications, and failed to contact the Physician as ordered for 4 of 6 residents (R1, R8, R12, R13) reviewed for medication administration, in the sample of 13.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to a protect a resident from misappropriation of property by a staff member for 1 of 2 residents (R8) reviewed for theft, in the sample of 11. This failure resulted in $1100 being diverted from R8's bank account by staff causing R8 to be upset and deprived of money for her room and board.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate assist and supervision while turning a resident in bed for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for falls with injury in the sample of 14. This failure resulted in R2 rolling out of her bed during care and falling to the floor, sustaining a right hip fracture.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to place the call light within reach of residents for 2 of 5 residents (R76, R285) residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs in this sample of 57. This failure resulted in R285 feeling sad, horrible and unwanted. R285's Care Plan, dated 10/24/22, documents Resident is at risk for falls. The resident has balance or walking impairments., The resident has a history of falls., The resident experiences weakness., The resident has urinary incontinence which may create a wet floor and increase fall risk. It continues Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. R285's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents that R285 is cognitively intact. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide flavorful and palatable food. This failure has the ability to affect all 139 residents residing at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and cleanse soiled resident equipment 5 of 5 residents (R56, R63, R95, R127 and R235) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 57.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide complete incontinent care for 4 residents (R36, R56, R284, and R285) of 7 residents reviewed for incontinent care in the sample of 57.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain accountability of narcotic medication for 1 resident (R116) of 1 resident reviewed for misappropriation of property in the sample of 57.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers or bathing assist for 2 of 2 (R233 and R236) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living in a sample of 57.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations interview and record review the facility failed to implement interventions and transfer appropriately for 2 of 6 (R18, R283) residents reviewed for accidents and incidents in a sample of 57. This failure caused R283 to experience pain during transfer. 1. R283's Care Plan, dated 12/29/22, documents that Resident needs help transferring in and out of the bed or chair: It continues Transfer: the resident is not able to help with a transfer at all and will need the assistance of 2 staff and a (full body mechanical) lift to move from bed to chair and back. R283's MDS, dated [DATE], documents that R283 requires extensive assist of 2 people for transfers. On 1/3/2022 at 10:40 AM observed V17 transfer R283 into his wheelchair using the sit to stand mechanical lift. Once in chair V17 attempted to reposition R283. R283's right foot and lower leg was turned outward. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate water flushes and give medication as the physician had ordered for 1 of 1 (R107) resident reviewed for enteral feedings in a sample of 57.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain confidentiality/privacy of medical records for 4 of 4 residents (R20, R25, R53, and R183) reviewed for privacy in the sample of 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store medications in a locked area to prevent access to resident medications and ensure insulin is labeled upon opening for for 6 of 6 residents (R16, R20, R25, R53, R54 and R183), reviewed for labeling/storage of medications in the sample of 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate tracking for antibiotic stewardship surveillance to monitor for patterns and trends in infections and antibiotic use for 4 of 4 residents (R40, R47, R79 and R80) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within resident's reach for one of one residents (R25) reviewed for accommodation of need in the sample of 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer pressure ulcer treatments as ordered for 1 of 8 residents (R81) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer tube feeding as ordered for 1 of 2 residents (R77) reviewed for enteral feedings in a sample of 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff documented the narcotic medication counts correctly on the resident's narcotic medication count sheet for 3 of 3 residents (R21, R41, R46) reviewed for Pharmacy Procedures/Records in a sample of 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify residents on isolation precautions, by failing to place signage outside resident's doors for 2 of 2 residents (R236, R237), reviewed for infections control precautions in the sample of 46.
22 fire safety citations on file: 4 on March 25, 2024, 13 on January 11, 2023, 5 on December 17, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 20, 2024 | Fine | $2,659 |
| February 12, 2024 | Fine | $2,279 |
| January 25, 2024 | Fine | $24,440 |
| January 22, 2024 | Fine | $4,558 |
| September 29, 2023 | Fine | $51,610 |
| September 29, 2023 | Payment Denial | 9 days from October 21, 2023 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.75 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.24 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.51 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.76 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.74 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 49.6% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 37.5% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 5.56 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.84 on weekdays and 2.51 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.71 in April to June 2025 to 2.75 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.75 | 0.24 | 2.84 | 2.51 | 8.3% | 0 of 90 | 160 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.06 | 0.18 | 3.13 | 2.89 | 13.1% | 0 of 92 | 165 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.67 | 0.17 | 2.76 | 2.44 | 9.5% | 1 of 92 | 163 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.71 | 0.15 | 2.83 | 2.40 | 13.0% | 2 of 91 | 156 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.9 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.5 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.8 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.9 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.8 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for La Bella of Alton's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (57.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
57.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 145 eligible stays.
11.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 184 eligible stays.
8.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 68 eligible stays.
53.7% this home
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 67 residents counted.
1.9% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 104 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 104 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ALTON NURSING AND REHAB CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Jenmax Group, a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Il2 Opco Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/01/2023 |
| Jm SNF Member LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Il2 Opco Inv LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 60% | 12/01/2023 |
| Il2 Opco Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| 3490 Hunbert Road LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| 6277 Center Grove Road LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Ccg Barbados, LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Garfinkel, Akiva | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Garfinkel, Allan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Garfinkel, Allan | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| 6277 Center Grove Road LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Ccg Barbados, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Jenmax Holdings LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Blair, Billie Jo | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/03/2025 | |
| Dianati, Behfar | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Garfinkel, Akiva | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Garfinkel, Allan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| 6277 Center Grove Road LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Ccg Barbados, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/24/2025 | |
| Blair, Billie Jo | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/03/2025 | |
| Dianati, Behfar | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Garfinkel, Akiva | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Garfinkel, Allan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.