Home / California / San Francisco
Laurel Heights Community Care
2740 California St., San Francisco, CA 94115 · San Francisco County · (415) 567-3133
32 certified beds, about 30 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare since 2011
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555869 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 31, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 24 health citations since December 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years; the largest was $8,018, and the latest is dated April 19, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.09 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.43 of those hours.
14.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
July 31, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary condition was met for food storage in the kitchen when there was a slight dent on a can of Hunt's Tomato Sauce in the storage room. This failure was likely to result in putting residents at risk for foodborne illness (diseases caused by consuming contaminated food or drink). During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/27/25 at 11:52 AM with Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS) in the storage room in the kitchen, there was a dent on the can of Hunt's Tomato Sauce on a shelf. The can indicated, . BEST BY OCT (October) 17 2026 . NET WT (Weight) 15 OZ (an abbreviation for ounce, a unit of weight or fluid volume) (425g (gram, a unit of mass in the metric system, equal to one thousandth of a kilogram)) . DSS stated, the can should not have the dent and he needed to throw it away. [...]
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment in collaboration with the Interdisciplinary (professional disciplines, as appropriate, will work together to provide the greatest benefit to the resident) Team (IDT) and hospice provider for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 29) receiving hospice services. The deficient practice resulted in the potential for unmet physical, emotional and psychosocial needs, and lack of coordination between the facility and hospice. [...]
- D Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written agreement with the hospice that defined the services to be provided, respective responsibilities, and established a process for communication and collaboration for one of three sampled residents (Resident 29). This deficient practice resulted in the potential for compromised quality of care due to lack of defined roles, responsibilities and communication between the facility and hospice provider for all residents receiving hospice services. During a review of facility's clinical document titled admission Record, dated 7/24/2025, admission record, indicated, resident 29 was admitted on [DATE], and is a Medicare and Medi-Cal beneficiary. [...]
- B Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure in two (resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) of 14 residents' rooms met the required minimum of 80 square feet (sq ft) per resident. This failure has the potential for residents to not to have enough appropriate space for the provision of care or daily living. During an observation on 7/27/2025 at 10:00 AM, in the course of the initial tour of the facility conducted on the first-floor room [ROOM NUMBER] were occupied by three beds divided by curtains two residents, room [ROOM NUMBER] were occupied by three beds with three residents, with curtains to divide each bed. During an interview on 7/28/25 at 10:20 AM, Resident 24 in Room14, Resident was asked how the space was in their room. Resident 24 stated, I am okay staying with this room, I don't have any issue sharing it to my two neighbors. [...]
May 8, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable fall for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 fell from the mechanical lift device (also known as Hoyer lift, a device that helps caregivers lift and transfer residents from one place to another) while being transferred by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 from his bed to recliner. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a head trauma (injury that occurs when there is a direct or indirect blow to the head), which led to hospitalization and subsequent death.
April 19, 2024Standard inspection · 16 citations
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to: 1. Comply with Federal regulations related to the oversight of food service operations when the facility did not have a full-time dietitian and the requirements were not met as specified in established standards (California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 1265.4) for food service managers which required, employment of a full-time, qualified dietetic supervisor when the dietitian was not full time. The lack of a qualified, competent, full-time supervisor resulted in staff not having adequate supervision, training, and knowledge to carry out Food and Nutrition Services in a safe and sanitary manner. 2. Ensure the Registered Dietitian (RD) provided sufficient consultation to the Food and Nutrition Services department. [...]
- F Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff competency for: 1. Calibrating food thermometers; 2. Cooldown procedures for Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) food (food which requires time and temperature monitoring to prevent the growth of harmful bacteria); 3. Procedures for monitoring dishmachine temperature and sanitizer strength; 4. Temperature monitoring for trayline food; 5. Temperature monitoring for food storage coolers; 6. Manual dishwashing using the two-compartment sink; and 7. Testing sanitizer strength used for food contact surfaces. The failure to ensure staff competency regarding required and/or performed tasks had the potential to result in contamination of food and/or utensils and equipment leading to illness caused by pathogens (harmful organisms) for 27 residents who received food from the kitchen.
- F Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to follow the planned menu. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate and/or inappropriate nutrients served to residents leading to nutrient related medical complications for 27 residents who received food from the kitchen.
- F Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to serve food that was flavorful and at a palatable temperature. This failure had the potential for decreased food intake leading to nutrient related complications for 27 residents who received food from the kitchen.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to serve food in a safe and sanitary manner when: 1. Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS; food which requires time and temperature monitoring to prevent the growth of harmful bacteria) foods were not monitored for cool down; 2. Raw meat was stored directly next to produce; 3. Different types of thawing meat were commingled; 4. Stored and ready to use utensils and equipment were not clean and/or in poor condition; a. Two of two food processors; b. Seven of seven cutting boards; c. A variety of cooking tools and equipment stored in drawers and on shelving; 5. Wood shelving, cabinets, and drawers had peeling paint and/or built-up residue and grime; 6. TCS food was not discarded by storage recommendations; 7. A storage container holding coffee was not cleaned before refilling; and 8. A freezer gasket was not maintained clean. [...]
- E Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) that require dialysis (mechanical removal of wastes and excess fluids from the body) receive services as consistent with professional standards of practice when there was no ongoing communication between the nursing home and the dialysis facility. This failure had the potential to result in misinformation that may negatively affect patient care.
- E Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate texture of pureed food was served to residents. This failure had the potential for residents to aspirate (breath in fluid into the lungs which can cause choking, aspiration pneumonia, and/or death) while consuming food for 10 residents with a prescribed a pureed diet.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control measures when: 1. The urine drainage bag of Resident 131 was touching the floor. 2. Staff did not perform hand hygiene (a way of cleaning one's hands that substantially reduces harmful microorganisms on the hands) in between clean and dirty tasks. 3. Staff did not sanitize Resident 9's call light after picking it up from the floor and prior to placing it on Resident 9's bed. 4. Staff did not perform hand hygiene after handling dirty linens. These failures placed Resident 131 at risk for transmission of infectious organisms from the floor to the urinary tract and had the potential for spread of germs in the facility.
- E Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of living space for each resident, in two of 14 resident rooms (resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]). This failure had the potential to prevent staff from providing the necessary care and services to the residents, and it could potentially prevent the residents from having enough space for their personal belongings.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs when: On 4/15/24 at 10:15 AM Resident 9's call light was found on the floor and was not plugged in the wall socket. This failure created an un-individualized care and an environment that promotes neglect. Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of, goods or services that a resident(s) require but the facility fails to provide them to the resident(s) resulting in, or may result in, physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress.
- D Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment and failed to monitor weight weekly for one of two sampled residents (Resident 26) after Resident 26 had an unplanned, significant weight gain of 9.4% in February 2024. This failure had the potential for Resident 26 to not receive necessary treatment and care to related to the unplanned, significant weight variance, leading to medical related complications.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan (CP) for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 26) when Resident 26's care plan did not include the physician's order to use heel protectors (devices designed for the heel of the foot that help remove the pressure from the heels and prevent and treat pressure ulcers [breakdown of skin integrity due to pressure]). This failure resulted in the care plan not accurately reflecting individualized, person-centered intervention necessary to meet the care needs of Resident 26.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care to prevent pressure ulcer for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 26) when the physician's order to apply bilateral heel protectors was not carried out. This failure placed Resident 26 at risk to develop pressure injuries.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 131) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) when there was no side effect (also known as adverse reactions, are unwanted undesirable effects that are possibly related to a drug) monitoring for the use of Trazodone (a medication used to treat depression [a constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest, which stops a person from doing normal activities] or help with sleep problems). This failure had the potential to place Resident 131 at risk for unrecognized side effects associated with the use of Trazodone that could cause harm to resident.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Aspart insulin bottle was dated when first opened when: On 4/15/24, an Aspart insulin bottle was found not dated when first opened for use. This practice of either advertently or inadvertently not dating the insulin bottle or vial when first opened will put the resident's health at risk by receiving an expired medication or an insulin that is not potent. It can potentially cause more elevation of the resident's blood sugar resulting to organ damage and/or death.
- D Keep all essential equipment working safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain one of three food refrigerators free of significant ice build-up. This failure had the potential to affect the quality and safety of food stored inside the refrigerator.
December 9, 2021Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide six of 31 residents with 80 square feet of usable space in two resident rooms, rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. This failure had a potential to result in residents tripping and falling while trying to move throughout the rooms, and prevent staff from providing the necessary care and services to the residents. It could also potentially prevent the residents from having enough space for their belongings. During the meeting on 12/08/21, at 11: 30 a. m.,with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated, she attended the Resident Council meetings every month. She stated, No resident raised issues regarding lack of enough space in their rooms, during the last three Resident Council meetings. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to honor the rights and dignity of one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 16), when the resident, who required assistance to eat, was fed her lunch by a standing CNA 1 (Certified Nurse Assistant). The facility's failure to treat the resident with dignity decreased the resident's quality of life.
- D Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu plan for the designated week, 12/5/21. This failure had the potential to cause loss of appetite and boredom with food repetition.
Fire safety inspections
12 fire safety citations on file: 2 on July 31, 2025, 5 on April 19, 2024, 5 on December 9, 2021.
Every fire safety citation12 citations
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- E Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Have elevators that firefighters can control in the event of a fire.
- D Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
- D Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Ensure that corridors are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 19, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.09 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.43 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.99 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.85 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.82 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 14.3% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.36 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.14 on weekdays and 3.99 on weekends, 4% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.94 in April to June 2025 to 4.09 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.09 | 0.43 | 4.14 | 3.99 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 30 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.00 | 0.40 | 4.02 | 3.94 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 30 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.16 | 0.41 | 4.22 | 4.00 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 28 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.94 | 0.40 | 3.99 | 3.80 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 31 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.1 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.3 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: JC CARE INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jc Care Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/01/2014 |
| Chalich, John | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 11/01/2014 |
| Chalich, Tanya | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 11/01/2014 |
| Chalich, John | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2014 | |
| Chalich, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2014 | |
| Chalich, Tanya | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2014 | |
| Chalich, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2014 | |
| Dimacali, Eufemia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/11/2023 | |
| Langner, Mikael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2026 | |
| Chalich, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2014 | |
| Chalich, Tanya | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2014 | |
| Dimacali, Eufemia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/11/2023 | |
| Langner, Mikael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on July 31, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- Can we see a resident room, a shower room and the dining room on this visit?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 31, 2025: "Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 31, 2025: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 8, 2024: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.99 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Pacific Heights Transitional Care Center San Francisco, 0.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Victorian Post Acute San Francisco, 0.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Sequoias San Francisco Convalescent Hospital San Francisco, 0.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Central Gardens Post Acute San Francisco, 0.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- San Francisco Health Care San Francisco, 0.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Hayes Convalescent Hospital San Francisco, 0.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- San Francisco Towers San Francisco, 1.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- St. Anne's Home San Francisco, 1.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 17 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Laurel Heights Community Care's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Laurel Heights Community Care 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Laurel Heights Community Care get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 31, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
- Has Laurel Heights Community Care been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years.
- Does Laurel Heights Community Care accept Medicaid?
- CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
- Who owns Laurel Heights Community Care?
- CMS lists 13 owners and managers. Legal business name: JC CARE INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.