What is Laurel View Village's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Laurel View Village 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Laurel View Village get at its last inspection?

7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 21, 2026. The Pennsylvania average is 10.

Has Laurel View Village been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Laurel View Village accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Laurel View Village?

CMS lists 80 owners and managers, and links the home to Friends Services for the Aging. Legal business name: ALLEGHENY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES, INC..

Laurel View Village: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 21, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).

None of its 18 health citations since May 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.04 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.92 of those hours.

54.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).

CMS links it to Friends Services for the Aging, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

305/24

704/25

105/25

705/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

15D

Potential for minimal harm

May 21, 2026Standard inspection · 7 citations

E

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 17).
D

Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.

F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications and that non-pharmacological interventions were implemented prior to initiation of an antipsychotic medication for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 10) for unnecessary medications.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 5).
D

Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, facility policies, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an assessment was completed by a professional (registered) nurse after a change in condition occurred for two out of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 2, 8).
D

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders regarding medication administration were followed for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 17, and 33).
D

Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.

F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that interventions were in place as ordered for two of 24 residents reviewed, a left palm guard to reduce contractures and pain and prevent skin breakdown (Resident 4) and a left hand towel roll to prevent contractures (Resident 33).
D

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment in the refrigerator for the storage of controlled drugs (medications with the potential to be abused) in one of two medication rooms reviewed.

May 28, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 30, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 3).

April 16, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations

E

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 2, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to bowel protocols for two of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 41) and failed to follow physician's orders for medication administration for one of 29 resident (Resident 27).
E

Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.

F867 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 2, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
D

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 2, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for four of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 15, 23, 28, 38).
D

Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.

F676 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 2, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that restorative nursing programs to maintain or improve physical abilities were provided as per the resident's plan of care for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 39).
D

Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 2, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper care for indwelling urinary catheters and failed to ensure that urinary output was measured and documented per facility policy for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 39) who had an indwelling urinary catheter.
D

Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 2, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that interventions to prevent weight loss were provided as recommended by the dietician for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 12).
D

Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.

F810 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 2, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff provided assistive devices to eat as ordered by the physician for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 23).

May 23, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations

D

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 24, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physicians orders were followed for two of 17 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 28).
D

Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 24, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for care of an indwelling urinary catheter for one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 30).
D

Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 24, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet as ordered for one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 51).

Fire safety inspections

2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 23, 2024.

Every fire safety citation2 citations

F
Meet requirements for sections of health care facilities separated by fire resistive construction.

K 131 · May 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · May 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Pennsylvania	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	5.04	3.89	3.86
Registered nurses	0.92	0.79	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	4.33	3.53	3.42
Nurse aides	2.92
Licensed practical nurses	1.20
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	54.1%	44.5%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	33.3%	39.9%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 3.88 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.32 on weekdays and 4.33 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.04 in April to June 2025 to 5.04 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	5.04	0.92	5.32	4.33	6.4%	0 of 90	57
Oct to Dec 2025	5.18	0.98	5.50	4.37	7.0%	0 of 92	53
Jul to Sep 2025	5.08	0.97	5.40	4.27	8.3%	0 of 92	52
Apr to Jun 2025	5.04	0.93	5.28	4.42	14.3%	0 of 91	52
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026	3.69	0.65	3.82	3.34	11.3%	0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program for its own hires (state list: PDE Approved NATCEP by County, as of March 1, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Laurel View Village CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Pennsylvania

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Pennsylvania, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$21.44	$18.88 to $22.52	67,740
LPNs and LVNs	$30.74	$29.02 to $35.01	38,260
Registered nurses	$46.36	$38.75 to $50.35	146,520
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Pennsylvania	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	14.4	16.8	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.0	0.7	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.8	1.4	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.8	3.1	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.5	1.4	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	20.2	17.0	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.6	4.8	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	10.6	17.7	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	19.9	22.5	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	2.9	9.5	12.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Laurel View Village's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (52.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

52.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 40 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 44 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

9.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 35 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

68.0% this home

Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

14.2% this home

Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: ALLEGHENY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES, INC.. CMS links this home to Friends Services for the Aging, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 4.6 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Since
Allegheny Christian Ministries, Inc.	Direct ownership interest	Organization	07/19/1983
Baxter, Gerald	Indirect ownership interest	Individual	01/01/2017
Borkow, Mary	Indirect ownership interest	Individual	01/01/2017
Clark, Jodi	Indirect ownership interest	Individual	01/01/2022
Hoffman, Christopher	Indirect ownership interest	Individual	01/01/2024
Lester, Blaine	Indirect ownership interest	Individual	01/25/2023
McGee, David	Indirect ownership interest	Individual	01/31/2019
Sawyer, Mark	Indirect ownership interest	Individual	01/31/2019
Shoemaker, Charles	Indirect ownership interest	Individual	02/01/2011
Speigle, Harlan	Indirect ownership interest	Individual	02/14/2025
Thomas, Barry	Indirect ownership interest	Individual	02/01/2011
Vizzini, James	Indirect ownership interest	Individual	03/01/2024
First Commonwealth Bank	5% or greater mortgage interest	Organization	11/01/2008
Baxter, Gerald	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/01/2017
Borkow, Mary	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/01/2017
Clark, Jodi	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/01/2022
Hoffman, Christopher	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/01/2024
Lester, Blaine	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/25/2023
McGee, David	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/31/2019
Sawyer, Mark	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/31/2019
Shoemaker, Charles	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/01/2011
Speigle, Harlan	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/14/2025
Stevens, Michael	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/01/2011
Thomas, Barry	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/01/2011
Vizzini, James	Managing control - governing body	Individual	03/01/2024
Gray, Patrick	Corporate director	Individual	02/18/2019
Mock, Timothy	Corporate officer	Individual	11/30/2018
Baker Tilly Us LLP	Operational/managerial control	Organization	06/27/2022
Benchmark Therapies, Inc.	Operational/managerial control	Organization	04/01/2020
Friends Services for the Aging	Operational/managerial control	Organization	07/01/2018
Gray Medical Associates	Operational/managerial control	Organization	03/01/2019
Rkl LLP	Operational/managerial control	Organization	12/16/2024
Statimate Systems, Inc.	Operational/managerial control	Organization	04/14/2022
Unidine Corporation	Operational/managerial control	Organization	07/01/2021
Christ, Rebecca	Operational/managerial control	Individual	01/27/2020
Homyak, Megan	Operational/managerial control	Individual	06/29/2020
Mock, Timothy	Operational/managerial control	Individual	11/30/2018
Repko-Brehm, Holly	Operational/managerial control	Individual	08/21/2023
Rizzo, Angela	Operational/managerial control	Individual	02/01/2019
Snyder, Amanda	Operational/managerial control	Individual	01/07/2019
Wachter, Rachel	Operational/managerial control	Individual	04/27/2020
Baxter, Gerald	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2017
Borkow, Mary	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2017
Clark, Jodi	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2022
Hoffman, Christopher	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2024
Lester, Blaine	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	01/25/2023
McGee, David	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	01/31/2019
Sawyer, Mark	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	01/31/2019
Shoemaker, Charles	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	02/01/2011
Speigle, Harlan	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	02/14/2025
Stevens, Michael	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	02/01/2011
Thomas, Barry	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	02/01/2011
Vizzini, James	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	03/01/2024
Allegheny Christian Ministries, Inc.	Adp of the SNF	Organization	07/19/1983
Baker Tilly Us LLP	Adp of the SNF	Organization	09/18/2025
Benchmark Therapies, Inc.	Adp of the SNF	Organization	09/18/2025
First Commonwealth Bank	Adp of the SNF	Organization	09/18/2025
Friends Services for the Aging	Adp of the SNF	Organization	09/18/2025
Gray Medical Associates	Adp of the SNF	Organization	09/18/2025
Rkl LLP	Adp of the SNF	Organization	09/18/2025
Statimate Systems, Inc.	Adp of the SNF	Organization	09/18/2025
Unidine Corporation	Adp of the SNF	Organization	09/18/2025
Baxter, Gerald	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2017
Borkow, Mary	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2017
Christ, Rebecca	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/27/2020
Clark, Jodi	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2022
Gray, Patrick	Adp of the SNF	Individual	02/18/2019
Hoffman, Christopher	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2024
Homyak, Megan	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/01/2021
Lester, Blaine	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/25/2023
McGee, David	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/31/2019
Mock, Timothy	Adp of the SNF	Individual	11/30/2018
Repko-Brehm, Holly	Adp of the SNF	Individual	08/21/2023
Sawyer, Mark	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/31/2019
Shoemaker, Charles	Adp of the SNF	Individual	02/01/2011
Speigle, Harlan	Adp of the SNF	Individual	02/14/2025
Stevens, Michael	Adp of the SNF	Individual	02/01/2011
Thomas, Barry	Adp of the SNF	Individual	02/01/2011
Vizzini, James	Adp of the SNF	Individual	03/01/2024
Wachter, Rachel	Adp of the SNF	Individual	04/27/2020

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."

Other nursing homes nearby

Concordia at Arbutus Park
Johnstown, 2.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 27 citations
Windber Woods Senior Living & Rehabilitation Ctr
Windber, 3.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 50 citations
Quality Life Services - Westmont
Johnstown, 4.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 30 citations
Richland Nursing and Rehab
Johnstown, 4.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 37 citations
Heritage Ridge Senior Living at Johnstown
Johnstown, 4.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 68 citations
Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center Tcu
Johnstown, 5.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 5 citations
Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab Center
Johnstown, 5.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 75 citations
Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation, LLC
Portage, 15 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 62 citations

Assisted living and personal care homes in Davidsville

Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.

Laurel View Village
Davidsville, 0.2 mi · licensed for 107 · personal care home
Concordia at Arbutus Park
Johnstown, 2.7 mi · licensed for 40 · personal care home
Windber Woods Senior Living & Rehabilitation Center
Windber, 3.2 mi · licensed for 60 · personal care home
Harmony House Manor
Johnstown, 3.7 mi · licensed for 84 · personal care home
Richland Woods Al
Johnstown, 4.2 mi · licensed for 70 · assisted living residence

Assisted living and personal care homes in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Pennsylvania Department of Health, Division of Nursing Care Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Pennsylvania Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Department of Aging, 717-783-8975. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Pennsylvania Department of Health Nursing Care Facility Locator, where Pennsylvania publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Laurel View Village's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Laurel View Village 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Laurel View Village get at its last inspection?: 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 21, 2026. The Pennsylvania average is 10.
Has Laurel View Village been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Laurel View Village accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Laurel View Village?: CMS lists 80 owners and managers, and links the home to Friends Services for the Aging. Legal business name: ALLEGHENY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES, INC..

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.