Home / Pennsylvania / Johnstown
100 Woodmont Road, Johnstown, PA 15905 · Cambria County · (814) 255-1488
120 certified beds, about 93 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395812 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 8, 2026, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
None of its 75 health citations since September 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.30 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.
56.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Saber Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 126 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 75 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of policies, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to readmit a resident after his 15 day Medicaid bed-hold expired for one of ten residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the sanitation of the kitchen regarding thermal coffee mugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that recommendations from a wound consultant were reviewed with the attending physician for two of 12 residents reviewed (Resident 1 and Resident 11).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care for pressure ulcers in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that recommendations from a wound consultant were reviewed with the attending physician for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident 9) who had pressure ulcers, and by failing to ensure that recommendations from a wound consultant were reviewed with the attending physician and initiated timely for a resident with a worsening pressure ulcer (Resident 11).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, clinical records, and information provided by the facility, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a thorough investigation was completed into the resident's and their family member's concern for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 102).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for two of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 6 and 10).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff served the appropriate planned portion sizes, and failed to follow their pre-approved planned menu and recipes.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at safe and appetizing temperatures.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of garbage in two of two outside dumpsters.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical record reviews, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident dignity for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 92).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, as well as observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident with self determination to have a room move for one of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 85).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs regarding medications for one of 36 residents (Resident 4) and regarding indwelling urinary catheters for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 13).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 6).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 6, 39).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Resident Council/Food Committee meeting minutes, as well as resident, staff interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to make ongoing efforts to resolve grievances presented by the Resident Council/Food Committee.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of The Pennsylvania Code, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a registered nurse assessment was completed with a change in condition for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and Resident Council/Food Committee meeting minutes, as well as observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at proper temperatures.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for peripherally-inserted central catheter catheters (PICC-long, thin tube inserted into a vein to deliver fluids or medication) for one of nine residents reviewed (Residents 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, and clinical records, as well as observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff provided assistive devices to drink in accordance with the speech therapist's recommendations and/or physician's orders for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 8).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' clinical records were complete and accurately documented for two of nine residents reviewed (Residents 2, 9).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was served under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify a provider's order for treatments for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment was in safe operating condition in the facility's kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's representative was notified about a change in condition for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 1). This was cited as past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in care needs for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with the services necessary to maintain good oral hygiene at bedtime for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 2, 5, 6).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or the resident's responsible party was given the opportunity to participate timely in the development and implementation of a person-centered care plan for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for two of six residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for 35 of 79 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 6, 8, 11, 14, 16, 17, 22, 23, 24, 27, 29, 32, 34, 35, 36, 42, 43, 44, 47, 58, 60, 61, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 74, 75, 83, 84, 85, 86, 93).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required timeframe for 37 of 79 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 12, 13, 15, 18, 20, 21, 27, 28, 31, 33, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 45, 48, 51, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 67, 68, 72, 73, 76, 78, 82, 85).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, resident interviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dependent residents were provided with the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene, by failing to provide showers as scheduled for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 5).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's weight was obtained and documented as per facility policy for a resident with tube feedings for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 1) and failed to ensure that residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, by failing to ensure timely intervention for weight loss for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 62). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's written menus, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items that were palatable.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the dignity of one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 97).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of a fall to rule out neglect and/or abuse for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 39).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for five of 79 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 33, 39, 49, 88).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized preferences regarding Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Parkinson's Disease, or dementia for two of 79 residents reviewed (Residents 62, 68).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for three of 79 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 39, 72).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 7).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to safely transfer one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 39) who required assistance from staff for transfers.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that there was timely physician notification and intervention for a significant weight loss for residents with a tube feed (surgically implanted tube for artificial feeding) for two of 79 residents reviewed (Residents 66, 78).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen therapy for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 5).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, a pharmacy delivery schedule, a list of emergency medications kept at the facility, and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pain management for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 62).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed annually, based on hire dates, for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 3, Nurse Aide 4, Nurse Aide 5).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 76 residents reviewed (Resident 89).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to respond timely to a pharmacy recommendation for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 72).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of manufacturer's direction for use, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was in safe operating condition in the facility's main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident, responsible party, and Ombudsman, in writing, regarding the reason for hospitalization for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 24).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that appropriate parties were notified about the facility's bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for one of 79 residents reviewed (Resident 24).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of written menus and the residents' meal ticket, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, homelike environment for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for medication and failed to conduct neurological checks per policy after a fall for one of nine residents (Resident 4) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the call bell system was in full working order for the residents on the North hall.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for the care of a Peripherally Inserted Venous Catheter (PICC a type of long-term intravenous catheters) for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's baseline care plan (includes the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident) was developed and implemented to include information regarding the resident's immediate care needs for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate the resident's preference for a shower for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical records, and shower schedules, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers and/or showers as scheduled for three of eight residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 6).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required time frame for seven of 34 residents reviewed (Residents 18, 21, 51, 54, 56, 59, 61).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or responsible party was notified about the facility's bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 30).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan included resident-specific information necessary to properly care for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 74).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs of residents for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care was provided to residents in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to clarify a physician's order for fluid restriction for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 58).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for enteral feedings (feeding through a tube inserted directly into the stomach) were followed for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 62).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of manufacturer's instructions and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that keys to the medication room were secured, failed to label multidose vials of tuberculin (solution used to detect tuberculosis infection), and failed to label multi-dose inhalers with the date they were opened in two of two medication carts reviewed (East cart and North cart).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that safe transfer equipment and techniques were used for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 6) who required the use of a mechanical lift for transfers.
15 fire safety citations on file: 2 on December 12, 2024, 13 on January 18, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.30 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.52 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.88 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.87 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.91 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 56.2% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 64.7% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.07 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.47 on weekdays and 2.88 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 15.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.50 in April to June 2025 to 3.30 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.30 | 0.52 | 3.47 | 2.88 | 15.6% | 0 of 90 | 93 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.36 | 0.55 | 3.50 | 3.01 | 10.6% | 0 of 92 | 88 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.50 | 0.64 | 3.61 | 3.22 | 9.7% | 0 of 92 | 88 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.50 | 0.62 | 3.59 | 3.28 | 18.9% | 0 of 91 | 85 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.2 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.0 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.1 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.3 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 23 eligible stays.
10.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 30 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 19 eligible stays.
50.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 40 residents counted.
9.4% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 39 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HILLTOP HEIGHTS HEALTH & REHAB CENTER, LLC. CMS links this home to Saber Healthcare Group, a group of 126 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volpe, Benjamin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Saber Governance LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Shg Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Bobitski, Nicole | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/08/2024 | |
| Gjurich, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/16/2024 | |
| Benjamin N. Volpe Family Dynasty Trust (dated December 29, 2020) | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Bnv Dynasty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Decanted William I. Weisberg Family Dynasty Trust (dated Sept 30, 2020 | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Hilltop Heights Re Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/30/2023 | |
| Lument Real Estate Capital LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Rkl LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Saber Governance LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Saber Healthcare Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Western Pa Mt LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/16/2026 | |
| Wiw Dynasty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Bobitski, Nicole | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/08/2024 | |
| Gjurich, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/16/2024 | |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Roscoe, Brandon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.