Home / West Virginia / Ronceverte
979 Rocky Hill Road, Ronceverte, WV 24970 · Greenbrier County · (304) 645-7270
90 certified beds, about 89 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 515144 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 15, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the West Virginia average is 11.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 49 health citations since July 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $16,149 in the last three years; the largest was $16,149, and the latest is dated January 15, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.65 hours per resident per day, against 3.67 across West Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.76 of those hours.
45.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (West Virginia average 44.1%).
CMS links it to Communicare Health, an affiliated group of 110 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 49 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a physician order for a resident to receive nothing by mouth (NPO). Resident #95 was given a soft drink by a staff member which resulted in the resident immediately coughing. This failed practice had the potential for more than minimal harm to any resident with an (NPO) order for or an order for thickened liquids. Resident identifiers #95, #13, #33, #80, #87 and #51. Facility Census 90. The citation will be cited at past non-compliance. The immediate Jeopardy occurred on 05/01/25 and was corrected on 05/03/25. Findings Include:a) Resident #95A record review on 01/14/25 at 1:30 PM revealed Resident #95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #95 was admitted with diagnoses that included Cerebral Palsy and Autism. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents knew the location of the state inspection resultsThis was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 90. Findings Included:a) Resident Council Meeting: During the resident council meeting held on 01/13/26 at 2:00 PM Resident #16, #17, #30, #11, and #75 were in attendance and all had BIMS of 14 or higher. When the residents were asked if they knew the location of the survey results, the resident council president stated he was never told where they were located and all others were in agreement of that statement. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for resident's bathrooms and also for not resolving a grievance for missing clothing for a resident. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Rooms: #112, #204, #205, #207. Resident identifiers: #57, #21, #81, #12 and #5 Facility census: 90. a) Resident bathroom [ROOM NUMBER]: Upon facility entrance observation and walkthrough on 01/12/26 at 11:35AM, Resident #57's bathroom did not appear to have been cleaned and was observed to have dried brown spots on the floor around the base of the toilet and on the toilet seat. b) Resident bathroom [ROOM NUMBER]:On 01/12/26 at 12:05PM, during an interview with Resident # 21, in room [ROOM NUMBER], it was observed the bathroom did not appear to have been cleaned with yellow and brown spots on toilet seat. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections during meal service in the dining room. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long Term Care Facility Annual Survey. Resident identifier: #81, #58, and #61. Facility Census: 90.a) Resident #61 On 01/12/2026 1:15 PM During tray delivery and meal set up in Resident #61's room, It was observed that CNA #77 touched resident's brownie and his cornbread with her bare hands and also removed the straw from the package, touching both the end and the middle with her bare hands and placed it into the resident's drink. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was protected when leaving the building for outside appointments. The resident was transported in a hospital gown. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #5. Facility census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to secure and keep confidential residents personal and medical information. The facility failed to safeguard private information that was on display on a laptop on top of a medication cart and private information that was on display on a wall-mounted tablet on the 600 hallway. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifier: #67. Facility census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the right to file grievances anonymously and to know the location of where to file it, if they so choose. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This was true for Resident #16, #17, #30, #11, #71,#5, and #75. Facility Census: 90 Findings Included:a) Resident Council Meeting: b) Residential Council Meeting discussion:During Residential Council Meeting held on 01/13/26, at 2:00PM, Resident #'s 16, 17, 30, 11, 71, and 75 were in attendance with BIMS of 14 and higher. When asked if they knew they could file a grievance anonymously, they all stated they did not know that. They also stated they did not know where to file it if they had wanted to. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, document review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive proper assistive devices to maintain their hearing abilities. This failed practice was found true for (1) one out of (1) one residents reviewed for hearing. Resident identifier #76. Facility Census 90.a) Resident #76On 01/12/26 at 1205 PM it was noted that Resident #76 had difficulty hearing and was care planned as having hearing deficits. On 01/14/26 at 11:20 a.m., during an observation of Resident #76 with Employee #31 and Employee #32 that Resident #76 did not have their hearing aid in their right ear as ordered by the physician. Employee #32 asked the resident when was the last time they had worn their hearing aid and the resident replied that it had been a long time. Interviews with Employee #31 and #32 verified this observation at the time of discovery. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible regarding an unidentified creamy substance sitting in a medicine cup in the resident's bathroom. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: # 21. Facility Census: 90. Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible regarding an unidentified creamy substance sitting in a medicine cup in the resident's bathroom. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: # 21. Facility Census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the daily Nurse Staff Posting included the total number of hours worked. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and the potential to effect more than a limited number of residents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility Census 90. Findings Include: a) Nurse staff posting A review on 01/14/26 at 12:10 PM, of the Nurse staff posting on 01/14/26 at 12:10 PM revealed the postings for the following dates did not include the total number of hours worked: 11/27/25,11/28/25, 12/13/25, 12/14/25, 12/24/25, 12/25/25,01/02/26 and 01/03/26. During an interview on 01/14/26 at 12:49 PM, The Administrator stated, We switched to those forms sometime in September. The Administrator further confirmed that the new forms did not include total number of hours.
Inspectors wroteBased on records review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical records. This failed practice was found true for three (3) two out of three (3) residents reviewed. Resident identifiers: #96, #76 and #1. Facility Census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident Council and staff interview the facility failed to provide reasonable access to mail services to residents by not delivering mail on Saturday's. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 86. Findings Include: During a meeting with Resident Council on 02/06/24 at 10:30 AM the Resident Council made a complaint that the mail is not delivered on Saturdays. An interview on 02/06/24 at 11:11 AM, with Receptionist #(4) four confirmed The mail is delivered to the mailbox at the top of the road. Sometimes the mailman will bring mail into the facility, but if not activities will go get it. I sort the mail from the weekend on Monday's and give it to the Activity department to pass out to resident's.
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident Council, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to display the most recent State inspection in a readily accessible area frequented by residents. It was discovered the State inspection was placed too high for residents in a wheelchair to reach. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible when a medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census:
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards of practice. During the kitchen tour it was discovered the reach-in freezer floor was dirty and the ice machine was not draining properly. The deficient practice had the potential to affect any residents receiving nourishment from the kitchen. Facility census: 86.
Inspectors wrote, Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the completion of a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for residents with a newly added psychiatric diagnosis. This deficient practice had the potential to affect three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for the PASAAR care area. Resident identifiers: #62, #12 and #6. Facility census: 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for bladder incontinence and dehydration. Resident Identifiers: #86 and #111. Facility Census: 86 Findings Include: a) Resident #86 On 02/05/24 at 2:00 PM during an interview with the resident, she discussed her needs for bladder incontinence. On 02/06/24 at 01:57 PM a record review found documentation of 73 urinary episodes, she was incontinent 67 of the 73 episodes. Further review of the record found there was no comprehensive care plan in place for bladder incontinence. This was confirmed with the Director of Nursing on 02/06/24 at 2:20 PM. b) Resident #11 An observation on 02/05/24 at 3:19 PM revealed, Resident #11 had an IV in his hand. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to revise a person-centered care plan for a change in a resident's condition. This was true for one (1) of 23 care plans reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident #27 had a change in nutritional status which was not revised on the person centered care plan. Resident identifiers: #27. Facility census: 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident, staff interview the facility failed to assist a dependent Resident with activities of daily living (ADL's) in accordance with the Residents assessed needs for care. This is true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for ADL care. Resident Identifier: #240. Facility census: 86. Findings Include: a) Resident #240 showers On 02/05/24 at 12:12 PM, Resident #240 stated he hasn't received or been offered a shower or bath since his admission. A review of Resident #240's ADL documentation found; no showers documented. During an Interview on 02/06/24 at 11:09 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was no documentation that Resident #240 received showers. She stated, he should have been put on the shower list and been offered a shower before 02/05/24.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice had the potential to affect three (3) of 23 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey sample. The facility failed to follow physician's orders for Resident #12 and Resident #90. The facility also failed to complete neurological evaluations after an unwitnessed fall for Resident #240. Resident Identifiers: #12, #240, #90. Facility census: 23.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care of a resident with a tracheostomy within professional standards of care. The facility failed to follow the physician's order to always have a smaller size of trach tube at the bedside. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for the care area of tracheostomy. Resident Identifier: #68. Facility census: 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document specific behaviors to monitor the efficacy of psychotropic medications. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident Identifier: #12. Facility census: 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to serve a balanced meal. A resident was not served all items listed on the tray ticket. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for food. Resident identifier: #10. Facility census: 86. Findings Included: a) Resident #10 Review of the Menu for the lunch meal on 02/07/24 was homestyle meatloaf, au gratin potatoes, seasoned green peas, dinner roll, caramel apple upside down cake. An observation on 02/07/24 at 1:00 PM of lunch meal pass found Resident #10 was served meatloaf, peas, and caramel apple upside down cake. A review of Resident #10's tray ticket found dislikes: scalloped potatoes. During an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 02/07/24 at 1:07 PM verified Resident #10 was only served meatloaf, peas, and caramel apple upside down cake. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an assistive device to help a resident receive hydration. Resident #15 did not have a Kennedy cup as ordered. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition. Resident identifier: #15. Facility census: 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, the facility also failed to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering an Enhanced Barrier room. These failed practices had the potential to affect every resident currently residing in the facility. Resident Identifier: #5. Facility census: 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation for administration and dispensing of narcotic medication for three (3) of three (3) medication carts reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 85.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, family interview and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record. This is true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Consent during the complaint survey. Resident Identifiers: #32 and #80. Facility census: 85.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide and maintain infection prevention and control programs designed to provide a safe sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections in the facility. This facility failed to provide medication barriers during medication administration for one (1) resident. Resident identifiers: #26. Facility Census: 85.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and family interview the facility failed to notify Resident #46's representative in advance of care. The facility did not notify the Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) prior to administering vaccinations and for resident's change of condition and treatment of the shingles. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #46. Facility census: 85.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide information and/or offer the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) immunization per recommendation of the CDC in a timely manner. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents who currently resided in the facility. Facility census 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an appropriate infection control and surveillance program to prevent the development and transmission of Covid-19 during an active Covid-19 outbreak. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents currently residing in the facility. Resident identifiers: #84, #7, #73. Facility census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to offer immunization to all residents when a COVID-19 vaccine/booster was available. This was true for five (5) out of five (5) reviewed for immunization. Resident identifiers: #76, #8, #89, #35, and #26. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of three (3) discharged residents reviewed were care planned for their discharges to home. In addition the facility failed to ensure Resident #36 was care planned for a significant weight loss. Resident identifiers: #36, #92 and #93. Facility census: 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care for dependent residents to maintain personal hygiene. Resident identifier: #36. Facility census: 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to Resident #8 and failed to ensure residents #85 and #39 were properly evaluated for pain. This was found for three (3) of three (3) resident's reviewed for the care area of pain. Resident identifiers #8 and #85 and #39. Facility census:89. a) Resident #8 Resident #8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a car wreck which resulted in broken ribs and a fractured tibia. According to the medical record, the resident is alert and oriented and has capacity to make her own medical decisions. The resident was ordered Morphine Sulfate, oral tablet, 15 mg. give 1 tablet every 4 hours as needed (PRN) for pain. At 4:30 PM on 09/26/23, the resident stated her pain medicine did not come in from the pharmacy about 2 weeks ago. There was some kind of a mix up at the pharmacy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, policy review, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement an ongoing resident centered activities program designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This practice was found true for five (5) of five (5) Residents reviewed during the complaint survey process. Resident Identifiers: resident #28, Resident #53, Resident #70, Resident #11 and Resident #78. Facility Census: 90. Findings Included: a) Activity Calendars During the initial tour of the facility on 09/18/23 at 10:00 AM the Daily Activity Sheet posted outside the Main Dining Room (MDR) read as follows: -10:30 AM SFL(Strength for Life) exercise -2:00 PM Outdoor Social During an observation on 09/18/23 at 10:57 AM in the 400 Hall Lounge, where the group activities was to be held. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and family interview the facility failed to maintain an appropriate infection control program in order to maintain a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission Covid-19 during an active Covid-19 outbreak. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect all residents. Resident identifiers: #85, 58, #86, #13, #80. Facility census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and home like environment. The facility failed to maintain clean and sanitary wheelchair for Resident #89. The facility also failed to keep the residents' wheelchairs in good repair to maintain clean and sanitary equipment. Resident Identifiers: Resident #89, Resident #85, Resident #7 and Resident #11. Facility Census:90. Findings Included: a) Resident #89 During the initial tour of the facility on 09/18/23 at 9:56 AM Resident #89's wheelchair has a large amount of food built up on the seat, the wheels and on the foot rests. The left armrest missing material exposing the mesh lining. The arm rest could not be cleaned and sanitized. A review of the facility wheelchair cleaning schedule Resident # 89 wheelchair was scheduled to be cleaned on Fridays (09/15/23). No other documentation was provided. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #41 was provided care in a manner which preserved her dignity. Resident #41 was receiving medication in the facility hallway. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifiers:Resident #41. Facility Census: 90. Findings Included: a) Resident #41 A review of an undated facility policy titled Medication Administration read as follows. .II. Preparation .e. Provide for privacy/dignity . During a tour of the facility on 09/18/23 at 12:04 PM Resident # 41 was sitting in a gerichair on 500 hall. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #47 was assisting Resident #41 with her ice cream, when LPN #47 saw this surveyor, she began feeding her very fast and spilling the ice cream down Resident #41's chin and on her shirt. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview the facility failed to ensure diabetic medication was available and administered appropriately. This failed practice was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for insulin medication regimen. Resident identifier: #21. Facility census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide an ongoing assessment and oversight for hemodialysis treatments, that included communication with the dialysis center for monitoring the resident's condition prior to and after treatment. This failed practice was true for three (3) of (3) residents reviewed for dialysis services with the potential to affect only a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #20, #48, #84. Facility census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, label and date food in a sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility also failed to keep the outside grease trap free from debris so it could drain properly. This deficient practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 84. Findings Included: A facility policy Date Marking for Food Safety with a revision date 02/01/2019 stated (typed as written) .2. The food shall be clearly marked to indicate the date by which the food shall be consumed or discarded by. 3. The individual opening or preparing a food shall be responsible for date marking the food at the time the food is opened or prepared. 4. The marking system shall consist of a label containing the date of opening, and the date the item must be consumed or discarded. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement written policies to prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect of residents. Resident #14 made an allegation of abuse which was not reported to all the required State authorities as mandated by the facility policy. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the care area of abuse. Resident identifier: #14. Facility census: 83.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to all required State Authorities. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the care area of abuse. Resident identifier: #14. Facility census: 83.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interviews the facility failed to timely submit a correct discharge tracking Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #85. The MDS was inaccurate in the area of discharge status. This was true for one (1) of 23 sampled residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #85. Facility census: 83.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to implement the care plan in place for hemodialysis clamps at bedside. Resident identifier: #75 Facility Census #83 Findings Included: a) Resident #75 On 07/05/22 at 1:00 PM, during the initial interview phase of the survey it was observed that Resident #75 was a hemodialysis patient and has a right chest hemodialysis catheter. Observation found no hemodialysis catheter emergency clamps in his room. Record review of the care plan shows the Resident is to have the clamps at bedside and on the resident's person when he is self-mobile throughout the center. This was confirmed with Licensed Practical Nurse #96 on 07/05/22 at 2:50 PM. .
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Foley catheter tubing was securely anchored to prevent excessive tension on the catheter and to prevent inadvertent catheter removal or tissue injury from dislodging the catheter. This was true for one (1) out of three (3) residents reviewed for catheter and incontinence care. Resident Identifier: #2. Facility census 83.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide the necessary hemodialysis services consistent with professional standards of practice. This was true for one (1) of one (1) hemodialysis resident reviewed during this annual survey. Resident identifier: 75 Facility census:
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to remove expired medical supplies from the medication storage room in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility census: 83.
2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on February 7, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 15, 2026 | Fine | $16,149 |
| November 28, 2023 | Payment Denial | 55 days from January 13, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.65 | 3.67 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.02 | 3.17 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.07 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.81 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.7% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 38.9% | 42.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.84 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.90 on weekdays and 3.02 on weekends, 23% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.51 in April to June 2025 to 3.65 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.65 | 0.76 | 3.90 | 3.02 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 89 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.37 | 0.70 | 3.64 | 2.70 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 86 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.46 | 0.86 | 3.75 | 2.72 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 88 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.51 | 0.83 | 3.83 | 2.73 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 87 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| West Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 0.67 | 3.75 | 3.08 | 3.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.66 | $17.05 to $18.47 | 9,390 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $26.61 | $23.71 to $29.47 | 6,050 |
| Registered nurses | $38.52 | $32.77 to $47.97 | 23,430 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 14.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 4.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.2 | 15.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.5 | 13.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.4 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.3 | 11.3 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lewisburg Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (51.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
51.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · West Virginia: 9 better, 28 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 131 eligible stays.
10.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · West Virginia: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 108 eligible stays.
7.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · West Virginia: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 65 eligible stays.
72.1% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
2.1% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia1.2% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 96 residents counted.
1.0% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 96 residents counted.
96.7% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia97.6% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 61 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ROCKY HILL LEASING CO., LLC. CMS links this home to Communicare Health, a group of 110 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosedale Family Investment Company, Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2022 | |
| Rrw, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2022 | |
| Wilheim Family Investment Company, Inc. | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2022 | |
| Odenthal, Richard | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Health Care Facility Management, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/2022 | |
| Groves, Donna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Judy, Isaac | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Odenthal, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2017 | |
| Romeo, Dominic | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Stoltz, Charles | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Wilheim, Ronald | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Wood, Christopher | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Odenthal, Richard | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 11/10/2025 | |
| C.r. Stoltz Family Investment Company Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/21/2025 | |
| C.r. Stoltz Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/22/2025 | |
| I. Rosedale Family Investment Company Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/22/2025 | |
| R.s. Wilheim Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/22/2025 | |
| Ronald S Wilheim 2012 Spousal Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/22/2025 | |
| Judy, Isaac | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Wood, Christopher | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in West Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.