Find a nursing home

Home / Idaho / Lewiston

Lewiston Transitional Care of Cascadia

3315 8th Street, Lewiston, ID 83501 · Nez Perce County · (208) 743-9543

96 certified beds, about 66 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1972

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 135021 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 21, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Idaho average is 10.3, the national average 9.2).

None of its 20 health citations since January 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.51 hours per resident per day, against 4.04 across Idaho and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.42 of those hours.

48.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Idaho average 50.3%).

CMS links it to Cascadia Healthcare, an affiliated group of 47 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
15D
4E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
August 21, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the Food, Drug, Administration (FDA) Food Code, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff food and physical therapy ice packs were stored separately from resident food in a freezer, resident food was not dated correctly, and pest control measures were not followed. This was true for the 66 residents who consumed food stored and prepared by the facility. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination of food and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses.
  2. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to update a resident's care plan for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #54) reviewed for care plan accuracy. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if resident's care plan was not current for health care interventions.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to follow a dietary restriction related to a food allergy. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #14) whose medical record was reviewed for food allergies. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm or death related to anaphylaxis (a severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction) when staff failed to follow dietary restrictions related to food allergies.
  4. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's pain was effectively managed and treated. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for pain management. This deficient practice created the potential for harm should residents not receive effective pain management.
  5. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure significant medication errors were prevented. This was true for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for significant medication errors. This failed practice had the potential for harm if medications were not administered according to physicians orders.
  6. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection prevention standards were followed. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #40) whose intravenous (IV) medication administration was observed. This failure created the potential for harm if infectious pathogens (any organism that causes disease) were introduced to his peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC- a thin tube placed in a vein in the arm passed through to the large vessels near the heart).
June 13, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was not expired and the stove hood was cleaned in 1 of 1 kitchen. These deficiencies had the potential to affect 69 residents residing in the facility who consumed food prepared by the facility. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination of food and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses.
  2. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was updated to include a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #29) whose PASARR record was reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if residents' specialized services for mental health needs were not provided due to a lack of updated screening.
  3. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with bathing consistent with their needs. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure created the potential for residents to experience embarrassment, isolation, decreased sense of self-worth, and skin impairment due to a lack of personal hygiene.
January 9, 2020Standard inspection · 11 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 13, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records included an advanced directive, or documentation of an advanced directive being offered. This was true for 3 of 7 residents (#2, #50, and #52) whose records were reviewed for advanced directives. This failed practice created the potential for harm if residents' wishes regarding end of life or emergent care were not honored if they became incapacitated.
  2. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 13, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, manufacturer's instructions, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a vial of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (PPD- a solution that is injected under the skin and used to help diagnose tuberculosis) was discarded 30 days after the open date. This was true for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms reviewed for outdated medications. This failed practice had the potential to result in decreased potency of the PPD, resulting in a false tuberculosis (TB) test readings, and had the potential to affect all residents who resided on the A wing and received the PPD.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 13, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' room temperatures were maintained at a comfortable level. This was true for 2 of 17 residents (#41 and #46) whose environment was observed. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents became too cold or hot and it compromised their health status.
  4. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 13, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and resident representative and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure transfer notices were provided in writing to residents and their representatives. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for transfers. This created the potential for harm if residents were not made aware of or able to exercise their rights related to transfers.
  5. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 13, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident MDS assessments were accurate regarding falls and anticoagulant use. This was true for 2 of 16 residents (#36 and #57) whose MDS assessments were reviewed. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents received inappropriate care related to inaccurate MDS assessments.
  6. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 13, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure care conferences were held after each assessment, including the comprehensive and quarterly assessments. This was true for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #2) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures created the potential for harm if residents and/or their representative were not included in making decisions regarding residents' care, and if care was not provided or care decisions were made based on inaccurate information.
  7. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 13, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication was not left unattended at a resident's bedside. This was true for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #21) who were observed during medication pass. This failure created the potential for harm if residents did not ingest the medication as ordered by the physician resulting in a decrease or change in their health status.
  8. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 13, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to consistently implement a restorative nursing program (RNP). This was true for 1 of 3 residents (#36) reviewed for restorative nursing services. The failure created the potential for harm if residents experienced a decline in Range of Motion (ROM).
  9. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 13, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an as needed psychotropic medication had a physician evaluation or documented rationale when the medication order extended beyond 14 days . This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents experienced adverse effects from unnecessary psychotropic medications.
  10. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 13, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene during blood gluocse (BG) testing. This was true for 1 of 2 nurses (LPN #1) observed during medication pass, and had the potential to affect 2 of 6 residents (#3 and #10) observed during medication pass. This failed practice had the potential for harm due to cross contamination.
  11. C
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 13, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of daily staff posting, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the posted staffing information was maintained daily, and the posted information was in an easily readable format. This failure had the potential to effect the 65 residents living in the facility, their family members, and visitors who wanted to know the facility's staffing levels.

Fire safety inspections

11 fire safety citations on file: 3 on June 13, 2024, 8 on January 9, 2020.

Every fire safety citation11 citations
  1. F
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Implement emergency and standby power systems.
    E 41 · January 9, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · January 9, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · January 9, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · January 9, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · January 9, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · January 9, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. D
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · January 9, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. D
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · January 9, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeIdahoUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.514.043.86
Registered nurses0.420.860.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.103.493.42
Nurse aides2.36
Licensed practical nurses0.73
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)48.1%50.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover55.6%40.9%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 4.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.67 on weekdays and 3.10 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 12.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.52 in April to June 2025 to 3.51 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.510.423.673.10 12.5%0 of 9066
Oct to Dec 20253.280.393.422.93 12.1%0 of 9265
Jul to Sep 20253.470.503.643.06 9.3%0 of 9266
Apr to Jun 20253.520.583.732.97 9.8%0 of 9165
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Idaho, Jan to Mar 20263.900.804.113.374.9%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Idaho

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Idaho, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.58$17.45 to $22.237,910
LPNs and LVNs$30.67$28.04 to $35.601,880
Registered nurses$44.45$38.90 to $49.1916,880
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Lewiston Transitional Care of Cascadia. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeIdahoUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.015.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.20.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.62.01.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.93.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.91.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.916.114.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.33.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
29.720.115.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.117.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
21.112.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.21.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.01.71.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lewiston Transitional Care of Cascadia's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

46.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Idaho: 18 better, 3 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 164 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Idaho: 3 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 158 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Idaho: 1 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 104 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

53.3% this home

Median of homes: Idaho62.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 90 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Idaho0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 115 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.8% this home

Median of homes: Idaho1.1% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 115 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

94.1% this home

Median of homes: Idaho98.1% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: LEWISTON OF CASCADIA LLC. CMS links this home to Cascadia Healthcare, a group of 47 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Cascadia Idaho Operations LLCDirect ownership interestOrganization02/01/2022
Cascadia Hc Group LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/05/2025
Cascadia Healthcare LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization02/01/2022
Cascadia Holdco LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/05/2025
Hammond, OwenIndirect ownership interestIndividual10/01/2017
Laforte, StephenIndirect ownership interestIndividual06/05/2025
Nelson, TimothyIndirect ownership interestIndividual06/05/2025
Timberline Ctre Tenant LLC5% or greater security interestOrganization06/05/2025
White Oak Healthcare Finance LLC5% or greater security interestOrganization08/11/2022
Cascadia Services LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/23/2025
Hammond, OwenOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2017
Laforte, StephenOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/05/2025
McKay, BreannaOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2017
Nelson, TimothyOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/05/2025
Rudolph, JohnOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/04/2025
Cascadia Services LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/23/2025
Timberline Ctre Tenant LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization06/05/2025
McKay, BreannaAdp of the SNFIndividual06/19/2025
Rudolph, JohnAdp of the SNFIndividual07/11/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2025: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2025: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 9, 2020: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.10 hours per resident per day, below the Idaho average of 3.49.

Other nursing homes nearby

Idaho contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Idaho. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Lewiston Transitional Care of Cascadia's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Lewiston Transitional Care of Cascadia 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Lewiston Transitional Care of Cascadia get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 21, 2025. The Idaho average is 10.3.
Has Lewiston Transitional Care of Cascadia been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Lewiston Transitional Care of Cascadia accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Lewiston Transitional Care of Cascadia?
CMS lists 19 owners and managers, and links the home to Cascadia Healthcare. Legal business name: LEWISTON OF CASCADIA LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection