3231 N 61st Street, Kansas City, KS 66104 · Wyandotte County · (913) 299-1770
82 certified beds, about 62 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175281 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 20, 2025, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 61 health citations since April 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.48 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.46 of those hours.
52.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Life Care Centers of America, an affiliated group of 194 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 61 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 57 residents. The facility had one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to overflowing trash and food storage. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for food-borne illness.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 57 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement the core elements of antibiotic stewardship to ensure an effective infection prevention and control program including antibiotic stewardship for the residents of the facility.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with four reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to secure 44 E pressurized medical oxygen tanks in a safe, locked area, and out of reach of the eight cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents. The facility further failed to ensure R2's fall interventions were in place. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included:- On 08/18/25 at 07:56 AM, an inspection of the facility’s oxygen storage room revealed that the door was not secured. An inspection of the room revealed 44 full E-supplemental oxygen cylinders in the storage racks. The door had a keypad and did not lock when the door was shut. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 57 residents. The facility identified four medication carts. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to secure medication at the nurse's station. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unnecessary medication and administration errors.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with two reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs related to assistive devices. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)2's wheelchair foot pedals were utilized while being pushed. The facility additionally failed to ensure R43 had a way to communicate her needs due to her call lights being left out of reach. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with one reviewed for privacy. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to secure protected health information (PHI) for Resident (R) 31. This deficient practice placed R31 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being due to a lack of privacy. Findings Included: - On 08/18/25 at 07:39 AM, a walkthrough of the 100 Hall revealed an unattended nursing cart across the hallway from the nurse's station. An inspection of the cart revealed R2's PHI displayed on the cart. At 08/18/25 at 07:40 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H exited a room in the 100 Hall and locked the computer screen. On 08/20/25 at 11:01 AM, LN G stated the computer was to be locked when not attended by staff to protect health information. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with two residents reviewed for the discharge process. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a final summary of the resident's status at discharge for Resident (R) 64 and R1. This deficient practice placed R64 and R1 at risk of delayed care or uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that cleaning of her mouth was provided for Resident (R) 43, who required assistance from staff to complete the care. This deficient practice placed R43 at risk for complications, including discomfort related to poor personal hygiene.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with two residents reviewed for treatment/services to prevent/heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pressure-reducing measures were placed on Resident (R) 58's bilateral lower extremities to prevent pressure ulcers. This placed R58 at increased risk for pressure ulcer development. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with two residents reviewed for position and mobility. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 54 was given (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension) exercises to prevent contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) and help with R54's flaccid left hand. This deficient practice left R54 at risk for further decline and decreased range of motion or mobility.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 57 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities regarding the lack of monitoring antihypertensive (a class of medication used to treat high blood pressure) medications for Resident R10. These deficient practices placed these residents at risk for adverse medication effects and unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 57 residents. The sample included 14 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow the pharmacist's recommendation for the monitoring of antihypertensive (a class of medication used to treat high blood pressure) medications for Resident R10. These deficient practices placed these residents at risk for adverse medication effects and unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 57 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with five reviewed for immunization status. Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to offer or obtain informed declinations or a physician-documented contraindication for the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20 - vaccination for bacterial infections), and pneumococcal (type of bacterial infection) vaccination for Resident (R) 1, R7, and R29. This placed the residents at increased risk for complications related to pneumonia.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 66 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for elopement (when a cognitively impaired resident with little or poor safety awareness exited the facility without staff knowledge). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1 received adequate supervision and appropriate interventions to prevent R1 from exiting the facility. This placed R1 at risk for accidents or injuries.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included four residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately and thoroughly complete Minimum Data Sets (MDS) for Resident (R) 1. This placed the resident at risk for unidentified care needs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for dental services. Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to identify and respond to Resident (R)1's dental needs which resulted in tooth pain and untreated dental issues. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for pain and other complications related to dental issues.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 69 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to accommodate Resident (R) 1's need and preference for a transfer pole This placed R1 at risk of decreased mobility and impaired autonomy.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day seven days a week. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents with one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards related to the storage of food. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to food-borne illnesses and food safety concerns.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control standards were followed related to the implementation of procedures to monitor and prevent Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium that can cause pneumonia in vulnerable populations) or other opportunistic waterborne pathogens, failed to ensure sanitary storage of respiratory equipment, failed to ensure adequate laundry temperatures for laundry including laundry from residents with infectious disease and on transmission-based precautions and failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene between resident car. The facility further failed to ensure appropriate disposal of filled red biohazard boxes and failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist tracked and trended infections within the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement the core elements of antibiotic stewardship to ensure an effective infection prevention and control program including antibiotic stewardship for the residents of the facility.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents were provided a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This placed the residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and impaired safety and comfort for the affected residents.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent weekend activities. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and boredom.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a certified activity professional. This placed the affected residents at risk for decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with one resident reviewed for accidents and/or hazards. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to secure hazardous materials when the facility failed to ensure a Sharps container (bin to place used needles and lancets) mounted on the side of a cart and stored in the hallway had a lid to prevent residents from reaching into the container. This deficient practice placed the 19 cognitively impaired independently mobile residents at risk for preventable injuries and accidents. The facility additionally failed to ensure R53's portable urinal was within reach resulting in a non-injury fall. This deficient practice placed R53 at risk for preventable falls and injuries. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 67 residents. The Facility had four medication carts and two medication rooms. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the safe storage and handling of Resident (R)55's insulin medication (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood). This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for diversion and ineffective medication regimen. Findings Included: - On 01/02/24 at 07:35 AM a walkthrough of the facility's South Hall revealed a treatment cart by the nurse's station. An inspection of the treatment cart revealed unsecured insulin medication stored in plastic bins on top of the cart. The plastic bins contained four insulin glargine (long-acting insulin medication) auto-injector pens that belonged to R55. At 07:38 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated she just left the area briefly to put her coat up. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with two reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Residents (R) R13 and R24 were treated in a dignified manner. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with two reviewed for accommodation of needs-related activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to identify and correct environmental challenges to Resident (R) 42's mobility. The facility additionally failed to provide R65 a call light in his room. This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for a decline in ADLs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five residents reviewed for nutrition. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to notify Resident (R)13's physician and representative regarding a weight loss and/or change in health condition. This placed R13 at risk for continued weight loss and malnutrition due to delayed physician and representative involvement.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide written notification to the long-term care ombudsman (LTCO) for Resident (R) 28 and R6. The facility failed to provide notice of transfer as soon as practicable to R6 or their representative. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between the facility and resident/family and possible missed opportunities for healthcare service for R28 and R6.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with 17 reviewed for care plan revisions. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to revise Resident (R)42's care plan to reflect the use of his personal knee braces. This deficient practice placed R42 at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R42's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS- a progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), morbid obesity (severely overweight), sleep apnea (a disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations), and coronary atherosclerosis (mineral build-up on the walls of the heart's blood vessels). [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with four reviewed for maintaining activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary level of assistance for Resident (R)65 during mealtime to maintain his abilities. This deficient practice placed R65 at risk for impaired nutrition and a decline in his ADL. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wrote- R46's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), chronic pain, and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of five which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R46 required extensive assistance from one staff member for activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS documented R46 required supervision for bathing during the observation period. The Quarterly MDS dated 12/08/23 documented a BIMS score of zero which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R46 required partial/moderate assistance with bathing during the observation period. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 with two reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)60's low air-loss mattress pump was set up to his appropriate weight requirements and failed to provide wound care per R60's ordered treatment. The facility additionally failed to assess R8's pressure wounds upon admission. This deficient practice placed R60 and R8 at risk for complications related to skin breakdown and pressure ulcers. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with one reviewed for bowel and bladder management. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to assess ongoing patterns of incontinence to establish bowel and bladder patterns in order to identify measures to maintain or improve Resident (R)53's incontinence. This deficient practice placed R53 at risk for complications related to incontinence.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to complete weekly weight monitoring as ordered by the physician for Resident (R)60 and failed to weigh R13 weekly upon admission per acceptable standards of practice. This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for complications related to weight loss. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R60's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), and osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow). A review of R60's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on 12/08/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with two reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain and store Resident (R)42's continuous positive airway pressure device (CPAP - ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep airway open during sleep) equipment in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice placed R42 at risk for complications related to respiratory infections. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with two residents reviewed for hemodialysis (a procedure using a machine to remove excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to monitor Resident (R) 55's access site for signs of infection, and bleeding, and failed to obtain communication from the dialysis center and assess post-dialysis. These deficient practices placed R55 at risk of potential adverse outcomes and physical complications related to dialysis.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the lack of blood pressure and pulse monitoring for Resident (R)32 before administration of Cozaar (an antihypertensive medication used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure) as ordered by the physician. The facility failed to ensure the CP identified and reported R28's blood pressure and pulse lacked monitoring as the physician ordered. The CP did not identify and report R55 was on an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication which lacked an appropriate indication for use or the required physician documentation. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 32's physician-ordered blood pressure and pulse were monitored prior to the administration of Cozaar (an antihypertensive medication used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure). The facility failed to ensure R28's blood pressure and pulse were monitored as the physician ordered. This deficient practice placed R32 and R28 at risk for unnecessary medications and possible adverse side effects.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat a mental disorder characterized by gross impairment in reality testing) for Resident (R)55, who had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, or behavior) medications and related complications.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when Resident (R) 24 received twice the physician-ordered dose of Eliquis (medication used to thin the blood) from 11/30/23 to 01/02/24. The deficient practice placed R24 at risk for adverse effects including bleeding related to the medication error. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted daily. The facility further failed to maintain the posted daily nurse staffing data for a minimum of 18 months.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents with one resident sampled for stasis ulcers (a wound on the leg or ankle caused by abnormal or damaged veins). Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to adequately assess and identify Resident (R)27's risk for skin injuries and place specialized interventions to prevent development of skin complications. The facility further failed to provide the physician ordered wound treatments for R27 when the facility consistently omitted the primary dressing component from R27's daily wound care order and omitted the topical agent as prescribed. Subsequently, R27's wound deteriorated, became infected, and required surgical repair.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident's rights and dignity were respected by staff when Resident (R)6 was not offered to eat in the dining room at meals, and staff failed to provide drinks and meals to all residents at the table when meals were served to R17, R205, and five unidentified resident at the table; staff placed clothing protectors on residents from behind without asking the resident if they wanted one; and staff failed to provide privacy while providing cares for R21, which left these residents at risk for decreased self-esteem and decreased self-worth.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified at census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents with 16 residents was reviewed for comprehensive care planning. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement comprehensive care plans for Residents (R)30, R44, R49, R13, and R205. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for not receiving proper cares/assistance in a timely manner. -The electronic medical record (EMR) indicated the following diagnosis for R30: muscle weakness, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). hypertensive heart disease (chronic high blood pressure), insomnia (difficulty falling asleep), traumatic brain injury (TBI), constipation, and abnormalities of gait and coordination. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents with 11 reviewed for bathing. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing per the residents' preferences and bathing schedules for Residents (R) 30, R44, R49, R225, R6, R17, R27, R39 and R45. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene and impaired psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: -The electronic medical record (EMR) indicated the following diagnosis for R30: muscle weakness, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). hypertensive heart disease (chronic high blood pressure), insomnia (difficulty falling asleep), traumatic brain injury (TBI), constipation, and abnormalities of gait and coordination. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents and three medication carts. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to properly date five individual insulin (a hormone which regulates blood sugar) pens in one of the three medication carts. This deficient practice left the residents being administered these insulins at risk for adverse consequences or less effective medication treatment.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and clean wound field when providing wound care for R3, failed to ensure that facility staff properly dated, stored and cleaned supplemental oxygen (O2) equipment for resident (R)6, R23, and R49, failed to ensure that facility staff did proper hand hygiene while passing meal trays to residents, failed to ensure that facility staff properly transported clean laundry to residents, and failed to ensure that staff sanitized/cleaned a mechanical lift (a machine that assists in the transfer of a resident) after use. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for increased infection and transmission of communicable disease.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified at census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents. One resident was sampled for reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident (R)13's call light was within reach and able to call for assistance with personal cares. This deficient practice left R13 vulnerable for not receiving proper cares/assistance in a timely manner.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53. The sample included 16 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for Individuals with Mental disorders and Individuals with Intellectual Disability was completed for Resident (R) 42. This placed the resident at risk for decreased or inadequate care and services related to his mental health diagnoses and intellectual disabilities.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents; three residents reviewed for activities. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to consistently provide activities for Resident (R) 205, R6, and R17. This deficient practice had the risk for a decline in physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and independence.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents; three residents sampled for pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) review. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure prevention of cross-contamination during wound care for Resident (R) 3 and failed to ensure heel protectors were worn at all times as ordered for R21 who had a history of heel wounds. This deficient practice had the risk for prolonged wound healing, development or worsening of wounds, and unwarranted physical complications for R3 and R21.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53. The sample included 16 residents with two residents reviewed for elopement. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for Resident (R)42, when R42 eloped (when a cognitively impaired resident leaves the facility without staff knowledge or supervision) from the facility. This placed R42 at risk for injuries from accidents or hazards. The facility further failed to implement care planned interventions aimed to protect R225 and R205 from injuries related to falls and failed to thoroughly investigate and determine the root cause of falls for R205. This placed the residents at increased risk for injury related to falls.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents with three reviewed for catheter and incontinence care. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent incontinence care for Resident's (R) 30 and R44, and catheter care for R225. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for infections and impaired psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: -The electronic medical record (EMR) indicated the following diagnosis for R30: muscle weakness, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). hypertensive heart disease (chronic high blood pressure), insomnia (difficulty falling asleep), traumatic brain injury (TBI), constipation, and abnormalities of gait and coordination. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services for Resident (R) 6, R23, and R49 when the facility failed to date and store oxygen tubing (device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow to a patient or person in need of respiratory help) for R6, and failed to clean, date and store the equipment in accordance with professional standards of practice for R23 and R49. These deficient practice placed the resident's at risk for respiratory infection and/or illness.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents with one resident reviewed for behavioral health. Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted Resident (R)42's emotional and psychosocial well-being when the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered plan of care to support R42's behavioral health needs. The facility failed to identify and implement individualized interventions specific to R42's mental health diagnoses and his behaviors and failed to identify triggers or stressors which contributed to behavioral manifestations. The facility further failed to evaluate the care and services for effectiveness related to R42's behaviors. This deficient practice placed R42 at risk for impaired psychosocial wellbeing and inadequate behavioral health care.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide the needed dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care and services for Resident (R) 13, which placed her at risk for increased behaviors, confusion. decline in ability to maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice placed her at risk of increased confusion, isolation, and lack of appropriate activities and interaction.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents; six sampled for unnecessary medication review. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the lack of behavior monitoring for R39, R13, and R27 who received psychotropic (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications including antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions), medications; and the lack of an indication for administration for Lasix (diuretic- medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine) for R13. This deficient practice had the risk for unnecessary medication use and physical complications for all residents affected.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents; six sampled for unnecessary medication review. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent bowel monitoring and failed to obtain an order to administer an as needed (PRN) laxative (medication used to loosen stool or stimulate a bowel movement) for Resident (R) 45; failed to ensure carvedilol (antihypertensive- medication used to treat hypertension [high blood pressure]) was not given outside ordered parameters for R205; failed to ensure an indication for administration for Lasix (diuretic- medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine) was documented for R13. This deficient practice had the risk for unnecessary medication use and physical complications.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included 16 residents; six sampled for unnecessary medication review. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) psychotropic (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medication had a 14-day stop date or a documented rationale for extended duration for R39 and facility failed to provide behavior monitoring for R39, R13, and R27 who received psychotropic medications, including antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medications. This deficient practice had the risk for unnecessary medication use and physical complications for all residents affected.
31 fire safety citations on file: 7 on August 20, 2025, 10 on January 4, 2024, 14 on April 6, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.48 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.46 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.97 | 3.60 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.13 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.89 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 52.2% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 42.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 2.89 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.68 on weekdays and 2.97 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.53 in April to June 2025 to 3.48 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.48 | 0.46 | 3.68 | 2.97 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 62 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.71 | 0.46 | 3.94 | 3.12 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 60 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.85 | 0.45 | 4.06 | 3.30 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 59 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.53 | 0.46 | 3.73 | 3.01 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 64 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 4.19 | 3.56 | 4.8% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.41 to $21.24 | 24,610 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.69 | $27.05 to $33.40 | 7,530 |
| Registered nurses | $38.14 | $35.24 to $45.53 | 33,800 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 16.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.1 | 18.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.2 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.3 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Life Care Center of Kansas City's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Kansas: 42 better, 17 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 21 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 30 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 15 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Kansas55.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Kansas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Kansas2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Kansas99.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CONSOLIDATED RESOURCES HEALTH CARE FUND I LP. CMS links this home to Life Care Centers of America, a group of 194 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fund I Investments Limited Partnership | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 96% | 08/23/1995 |
| Developers Investment Company Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/23/1995 | |
| Eklund, Amber | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/16/2024 | |
| Jones, Mary | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/28/2022 | |
| Kabuti, Caroline | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/06/2016 | |
| Cross, Cindy | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/21/1994 | |
| Fletcher, Todd | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/02/2020 | |
| Henry, Terry | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/16/1999 | |
| Lay, Lisa | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/09/2018 | |
| Swanker, Richard | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2011 | |
| Thurmond, Joan | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/22/2000 | |
| Ziegler, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/16/1999 | |
| Consolidated Resources Health Care Fund I LP | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/1990 | |
| Hcf Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/23/1995 | |
| Life Care Centers of America, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/1990 | |
| Akkulugari, Shyam | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/08/2021 | |
| Eklund, Amber | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/16/2024 | |
| Jones, Mary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/28/2022 | |
| Kabuti, Caroline | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/06/2016 | |
| Preston, Aubrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/06/2025 | |
| Crhc LLC | General partnership interest | Organization | 01/01/2017 | |
| Hcf Inc | General partnership interest | Organization | 08/23/1995 | |
| Developers Investment Company Inc | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 08/23/1995 | |
| Fund I Investments Limited Partnership | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 08/23/1995 | |
| Hcf Inc | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 08/23/1995 | |
| Fund I Investments Limited Partnership | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/30/2000 | |
| Life Care Centers of America, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/18/2025 | |
| Akkulugari, Shyam | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/07/2025 | |
| Jones, Mary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/18/2025 | |
| Preston, Forrest | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/30/2000 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.