Home / Connecticut / Storrs Mansfield
100 Warren Circle, Storrs Mansfield, CT 06268 · Capitol County · (860) 487-2300
98 certified beds, about 84 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 075402 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 10, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Connecticut average is 13.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 31 health citations since March 2020, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $24,460 in the last three years; the largest was $13,270, and the latest is dated December 4, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.86 hours per resident per day, against 3.73 across Connecticut and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.72 of those hours.
CMS links it to National Health Care Associates, an affiliated group of 42 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 31 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for controlled substances, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were securely stored in separately locked, permanently affixed compartments accessible only to authorized personnel, and failed to maintain accountability and chain of custody for controlled substances during reconciliation and disposal processes, resulting in one (1) bottle of Lorazepam becoming unaccounted for.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who was dependent on staff for transfers, the facility failed to ensure two (2) staff members were present during a mechanical lift transfer resulting in the resident tipping in the lift, hitting his/her head and sustaining an injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who was dependent on staff for transfers and exhibited behavioral symptoms, the facility failed to follow the resident's plan of care when the resident exhibited behaviors during a mechanical lift transfer which resulted with the resident sustaining an injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews, for two of six sampled residents (Residents #13 and #47) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the required staff assistance was utilized during the use of the mechanical lift, and for one of six sampled residents (Resident #33) the facility failed to ensure the required staff assistance was in place during a mechanical lift transfer and failed to ensure the resident was attached to the lift correctly, which resulted in an accident and injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that food stored in the refrigerator and freezer was labeled with an expiration and open date, and the staff failed to wear beard restraints.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #57) reviewed for pressure injuries, the facility failed to ensure facility staff used appropriate PPE when providing care to a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and failed to ensure infection control surveillance data collection reports were complete and compiled on a monthly basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, during a review of the facility antibiotic stewardship program, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's antibiotic surveillance tracking report of antibiotic use, patterns and resistant trends was completed and reviewed at the quarterly medical staff meetings and for one of five sampled residents (Resident #13) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure that the antibiotic stewardship was followed for a resident receiving antibiotics.
Inspectors wrote755 Based on review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews, the facility failed to establish a complete system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled medications in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews, for one of six sampled residents (Resident #33) reviewed for accidents and required a mechanical lift for transfers, the facility failed to ensure the resident was assessed by a registered nurse following an incident that occurred during a transfer with the mechanical lift.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for the misappropriation of personal property, the facility failed to ensure a controlled medication prescribed for Resident #1, Ativan, was not removed from the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for misappropriation of the resident's controlled medication, the facility failed report the missing medication to the state agency within the noted two (2) hours.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for hospitalizations, the facility failed to notify the provider timely of a change in condition leading to a hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, interviews, and review of facility documentation for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for grievances, the facility failed to update the resident's care plan and card regarding the resident's care preferences/concerns.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, interviews, and review of facility documentation for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that once a new piece of equipment was ordered the equipment had the necessary fall prevention measures in place.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders, failed to ensure a medication was administered in accordance with physician orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (2) of six (6) residents reviewed for (Resident #204), the facility failed to ensure a resident had appropriate supervision while in the bathroom, and that leg rests were removed from the wheelchair prior to a transfer, resulting in an injury and for accidents for (Resident # 31), the facility failed to ensure staff remove the plastic covering from a hot beverage within accordance to facility practice to prevent a burn and .
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations and interviews for two out of seven residents (Residents #2 and #23) reviewed for dining, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Residents # 13 and # 21) who was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers, the facility failed to conduct a thorough and or an initial wound assessment on admission as a baseline to determine wound healing or deterioration
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident # 43) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that an investigation of alleged abuse was reported to the state agency in the required time frame.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident # 43) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that an investigation of alleged abuse was thoroughly investigated.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy review, and interviews for one residents (Resident # 11) reviewed for specialized treatment, the facility failed to ensure a clamp was at the bedside as directed per the plan of care
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of policy and interviews for one sampled residents ( Resident # 44) reviewed for death, the facility failed to ensure that staff followed the facility's policy and procedure for Pronouncement of a Death by a Registered Nurse.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and interviews for one sample resident (Resident # 44) on hospice, the facility failed to obtain a physician's orders for a RN May Pronounce at time of Death.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a licensed nurse remained present while non licensed staff members were in the medication room.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interview for 2 sample residents ( Residents #7 and # 47) reviewed for Resident Assessment, the facility failed to ensure the residents discharge assessment was completed and submitted to the state agency timely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation and interviews for one of two sampled residents (Resident #58) reviewed for pressure ulcer/injuries, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant change in skin condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility documentation and interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident #125) reviewed for an allegation of mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure that the allegation was reported to the state survey agency and failed to report the outcome of the investigation to the state survey agency within five days of the allegation.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility documentation and interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident #125) reviewed for an allegation of mistreatment, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the allegation and failed to protect the resident once an allegation of mistreatment was made.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation and staff interviews for one of two sampled residents (Resident #58) reviewed for pressure ulcer/injuries, the facility failed to implement interventions to aid in the prevention of a pressure ulcer and failed to complete weekly wound assessments.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #36) reviewed for oxygen therapy, the facility failed to maintain acceptable infection control practices during the implementation of care, handling, cleaning, storage and disposal of respiratory equipment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff had hair coverings in place while preparing food.
5 fire safety citations on file: 3 on April 11, 2023, 2 on March 12, 2020.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| December 4, 2025 | Fine | $11,190 |
| April 10, 2025 | Fine | $13,270 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Connecticut | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.86 | 3.73 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.61 | 3.37 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.34 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.80 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 37.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 4.29 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.97 on weekdays and 3.61 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 16.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.91 in July to September 2025 to 3.86 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.86 | 0.72 | 3.97 | 3.61 | 16.7% | 0 of 90 | 84 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.93 | 0.71 | 4.05 | 3.62 | 19.8% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.91 | 0.62 | 4.03 | 3.61 | 13.6% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Connecticut, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.66 | 0.61 | 3.80 | 3.31 | 6.0% | 1.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.53 | $20.14 to $22.68 | 21,380 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $35.43 | $32.05 to $36.94 | 8,540 |
| Registered nurses | $49.39 | $41.40 to $58.58 | 40,110 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Connecticut | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.9 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 16.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.8 | 17.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.7 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.3 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Mansfield Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (60.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
60.2% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Connecticut: 75 better, 2 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 146 eligible stays.
11.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Connecticut: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 145 eligible stays.
7.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Connecticut: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 105 eligible stays.
61.1% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut58.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 94 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut1.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 94 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Connecticut100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MANSFIELD ACQUISITION OPERATOR LLC. CMS links this home to National Health Care Associates, a group of 42 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedar Hill Capital Associates LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 28% | 08/01/2024 |
| Juniper Capital Associates LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 20% | 08/01/2024 |
| Ysro Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 20% | 08/01/2024 |
| Gilmartin, Thomas | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ilana Ostreicher Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 14% | 08/01/2024 |
| Marc Ephram Ostreicher Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 14% | 08/01/2024 |
| Oak Management Capital LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 20% | 08/01/2024 |
| David Ostreicher Family Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Shayna Steg Family Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, David | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, Ilana | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, Marc | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, Marvin | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, Michelle | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Steg, Shayna | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Juniper Capital Associates LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Steg, Shayna | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Cedar Hill Capital Associates LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ilana Ostreicher Family Trust | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Mansfield Acquisition Realty LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Marc Ephram Ostreicher Family Trust | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Michelle Ostreicher Family Trust | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Oak Management Capital LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Shayna Steg Family Trust | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Yitzchok Steg Family Trust | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ysro Trust | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, David | 5% or greater security interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, Ilana | 5% or greater security interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, Marc | 5% or greater security interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, Marvin | 5% or greater security interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| National Health Care Associates Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Harris, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Laguardia, Ralph | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, Marc | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Lopiansky, Rebecca | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 06/17/2025 | |
| Steg, Yitzchok | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 06/10/2025 | |
| David Ostreicher Family Trust | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Cedar Hill Capital Associates LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| David Ostreicher Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ilana Ostreicher Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| National Health Care Associates Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Oak Management Capital LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Preferred Therapy Solutions LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Procare LTC Holding LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Shayna Steg Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Yitzchok Steg Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Harris, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2025 | |
| Laguardia, Ralph | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, Ilana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, Marc | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, Marvin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Steg, Shayna | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Connecticut. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.