Home / Connecticut / Vernon
180 Regan Road, Vernon, CT 06066 · Capitol County · (860) 871-0385
120 certified beds, about 115 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 075334 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on October 11, 2024, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Connecticut average is 13.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 19 health citations since October 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.13 hours per resident per day, against 3.73 across Connecticut and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.
49.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Connecticut average 37.4%).
CMS links it to Atlas Healthcare, an affiliated group of 30 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #5) with an allegation of neglect, the facility failed to ensure the potential abuse was reported to the state survey agency.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedure, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #5) with an allegation of mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of mistreatment/neglect was thoroughly investigated.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure an order was obtained timely for use of a continuous positive airway pressure machine.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and staff interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #96) reviewed for weight loss, the facility failed to notify the dietician in order to make recommendations when a significant weight loss occurred.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report injuries of unknown source to the state agency (SA) timely.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #96) reviewed for weight loss, and for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #706) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to revise the Resident Care Plan (RCP) when a change occured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical record, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident # 46) reviewed for Hospice, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for the application of arm protectors, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #96) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to obtain and document the resident's weekly weights per physician orders for a resident with a significant weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for positioning and mobility, the facility failed to provide range of motion (ROM) to a dependent resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, review of facility policy and staff interviews for 2 of 3 residents, (Resident #96 and #406), reviewed for nutrition and hydration, for Resident #96 the facility failed to implement interventions for a resident who continued to experience significant weight loss, and for Resident #406, the facility failed to consistently document intake and output for a resident on intravenous hydration.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #85) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was hospitalized for digoxin toxicity did not receive the same high risk medication (digoxin) on readmission from the hospital which resulted in a significant medication error.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation and interviews for the only sampled resident, (Resident #46), reviewed for hospice, the facility failed to collaborate and communicate the provision of hospice services with the contracted hospice provider.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations and facility policy for the only sampled resident (Resident #96) reviewed for cultural food preferences, the facility failed to ensure the dietician identified and provided Halal cuisine.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews and facility documentation for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to report a change of condition to the physician and/or Advanced Practice Registered Nurse timely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, clinical record review, facility documentation and facility policy review for one of five sampled residents (Resident #21) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), the facility failed to ensure that Resident #21 was provided with incontinence care timely.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, and interviews for one of five units reviewed for respiratory equipment, the facility failed to appropriately store Resident #145's Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (C-PAP) mask while not in use.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, observations, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three units reviewed for medication storage, the facility failed to discard Resident #46's expired Insulin and failed to date a multidose medication vial after opening.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of one resident (Resident #37) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure a therapeutic diet when administering a liquid oral supplement.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Resident #79 and #249) who required staff assistance with personal hygiene, the facility failed to ensure the number of designated staff in accordance with the physician orders were present while providing care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, for one of two medication rooms reviewed during the medication storage and labeling review, the facility failed to ensure expired supplements were removed from the supply.
5 fire safety citations on file: 4 on October 11, 2024, 1 on October 3, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Connecticut | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.13 | 3.73 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.76 | 3.37 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.57 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.04 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 49.6% | 37.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 37.5% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.97 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.28 on weekdays and 3.76 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.03 in April to June 2025 to 4.13 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.13 | 0.52 | 4.28 | 3.76 | 3.4% | 0 of 90 | 115 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.04 | 0.52 | 4.17 | 3.71 | 9.6% | 0 of 92 | 116 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.95 | 0.51 | 4.15 | 3.45 | 10.8% | 0 of 92 | 117 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.03 | 0.51 | 4.22 | 3.56 | 3.5% | 0 of 91 | 112 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Connecticut, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.66 | 0.61 | 3.80 | 3.31 | 6.0% | 1.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.53 | $20.14 to $22.68 | 21,380 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $35.43 | $32.05 to $36.94 | 8,540 |
| Registered nurses | $49.39 | $41.40 to $58.58 | 40,110 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Connecticut | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.1 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.0 | 16.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.3 | 17.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.1 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.5 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Vernon Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (55.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
55.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Connecticut: 75 better, 2 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 261 eligible stays.
10.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Connecticut: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 241 eligible stays.
5.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Connecticut: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 147 eligible stays.
66.7% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut58.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 150 residents counted.
1.6% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 189 residents counted.
2.5% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut1.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 189 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 69 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: VERNON MANOR SNF OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Atlas Healthcare, a group of 30 nursing homes averaging 3.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ct-3 Operations Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/27/2022 |
| Jmh Family LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Jmh Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Mls Family LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Mls Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Sgs Family LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Sgs Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Bak, Pinchos | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Ct-3 Opco Manager LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Bak, Pinchos | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Campanelli, Tamlyn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Dougherty, Kristi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Giannini, Kristin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Goldberger, Shlomo | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Gottlieb, Moshe | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Sonnenschein, Moshe | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Jmh Family LLC | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Jmh Family Trust | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Js Evans Investments LLC | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Malt Family Trust | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Mls Family LLC | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Mls Family Trust | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Sgs 2010 Family Trust | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Sgs Family LLC | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Sgs Family Trust | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Tyh 2017 Trust | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Gottlieb, Moshe | Limited partnership interest | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Sonnenschein, Moshe | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Av SNF Realty Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Ct-3 Opco Manager LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/15/2025 | |
| Jmh Family LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Jmh Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Mls Family LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Mls Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Sgs Family LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Sgs Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Vernon Manor SNF Realty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/15/2025 | |
| Bak, Pinchos | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Campanelli, Tamlyn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Dougherty, Kristi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Giannini, Kristin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Goldberger, Shlomo | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Gottlieb, Moshe | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Sonnenschein, Moshe | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/27/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Connecticut. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.