Home / Pennsylvania / White Marsh
9209 Ridge Pike, White Marsh, PA 19128 · Philadelphia County · (610) 825-6560
244 certified beds, about 230 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1972
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395296 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 16, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 42 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $79,414 in the last three years; the largest was $79,414, and the latest is dated January 5, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.27 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.39 of those hours.
60.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Jonathan Bleier, an affiliated group of 18 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 42 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of resident records, staff interviews and review of facility documentation and policies, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation to rule out abuse and/or neglect for a resident who sustained multiple fractures for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility provided documentation, review of policy and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure that training related to psychosocial needs/behavioral health needs was provided for nine of 10 employees reviewed. (Employee E17, E18, E19, E20, E21, E22, E23, E24, and E25)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility meal test tray, review of resident council meeting minutes, resident interviews, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide foods that are palatable, attractive, and at appetizing temperatures. Findings Include: A meal test tray was completed on April 15, 2026. While in the kitchen trays of coffee cups were seen being prepared by a dietary staff at 12:45 p.m. The test tray left the kitchen at 1:18pm and went out to the B wing unit. The test tray was served at 1:24 p.m. The test tray contained a plate of baked ziti, broccoli, and garlic bread. The baked ziti was tasted and was not appetizing. The baked ziti was too overdone that is disintegrated without having to chew it. There were two beverages served, a milk and a coffee. The coffee temperature was 174.2 degrees. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews with residents and staff, and review of the facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable and homelike environment in one of the five nursing units observed (C Wing). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Resident Rights last revised April 6, 2026 states, Policy: Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Procedure: 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a. A dignified existence b. Safe and home-like environment Interview held with Resident R114 on April 13, 2026 at 12:13 p.m. resident states that the facility has a problem with a hole in the bathroom on C-wing and it has not been fixed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of resident's clinical records, facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of one residents were free from verbal abuse (Resident R246).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included the minimum information necessary to properly care for a resident related to urinary catheter within 48 hours of admission for one of one resident reviewed. (Resident R232)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policy, review of clinical records and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined facility did not ensure to develop and implement a resident centered care plan for one of 36 residents reviewed related to substance use disorder. (Resident R245)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical record, facility documentation, and interview with staff, it was determined the facility did not ensure adequate supervision for one resident with a history of substance use disorder (SUD). (Resident R245).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff, reviews of facility policies and procedures, and hospital records, it was determined the facility failed to assess, monitor, and implement intervention to ensure that nutritional and hydration needs were met for one of 11 residents reviewed. (Resident R1). This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident CL1 who did not consume sufficient fluid and caloric intake resulting in abnormal blood values, requiring transfer, and admission to the hospital for the treatment of dehydration/electrolyte imbalance. (Resident CL1)
Inspectors wroteBased upon review of resident records, and interviews with residents and staff determined the facility failed to follow a resident's care plan consistent with the resident's rights that meets a resident's mental and psychosocial needs by failing to ensure one resident does not receive male care givers as indicated of 15 resident records reviewed (Resident R2).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews with residents and staff, review of clinical records, facility documentation and in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were accurately documented for one of 15 resident records reviewed (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, reviews of clinical records, facility policies and procedures, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of eight residents' clinical records reviewed. (Resident R2)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at palatable temperatures for eight of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R169, R91, R178, R25, R131C, R45, R199 and R110).
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of closed clinical records, facility policies and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an appropriate discharge was documented in the resident's clinical record for one of four closed records reviewed. (Resident R523) Findings Include: Review of Resident R523's Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident was discharged from the facility and the resident was not anticipated to return to the facility. It was revealed that the discharge was unplanned and the resident was discharged to the hospital. Review of clinical record for Resident R523 on April 8, 2025 revealed that there was no documentation available in the clinical record to indicate a reason for residents discharge. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated transfers to the hospital and that a resident's representative was made aware of a facility-initiated transfer in writing, for one of four clinical records reviewed. (Residents R136) Findings Include: Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident was discharged from the facility and the resident was not anticipated to return to the facility. It was revealed that the discharge was unplanned and he was discharged to the hospital. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility policies and staff interview, it was determined that the PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was not appropriately completed according to the resident assessment for one of five residents reviewed (Residents R184).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to developed a comprehensive care plan with measurable objectives for a resident who exhibited aggressive behaviors towards other residents for one of 35 clinical records reviewed. (Resident R325)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident's care plans, related to accuracy of information, for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R184).
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of clinical records, interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician for one of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R175). Findings Include: Review of Resident R175's nursing notes dated March 7, 2025 revealed that unit manager spoke to resident regarding his low hemoglobin, in the past was on Epoetin alfa injection which the resident was refusing. Per resident, he would take the shot if it prevented him from going to emergency for transfusions. Physician was aware and had new order to place injection. Review of physician order for Resident R175 dated March 9, 2025 revealed an order for Epoetin Alfa-epbx Injection Solution 10000 UNIT/ML, inject 1ML subcutaneously one time a day every Tuesday Thursday and Sunday for anemia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, a review of facility policies and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain the highest practicable level of pain management was maintained for two of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R9 and R132).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations,staff interviews and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the recommended therapeutic diet that she made, was provided to a resident for 1 out of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R210).
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of facility documents and resident clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R89). Findings Include: Review of Resident R89's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated September 1, 2022, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnosis of altered mental status. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, homelike environment on three of five nursing units(A, B, E Nursing Units) E unit shower room.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observations, interviews and review of clinical records and facility policy, determined the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of Multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission for three residents with indwelling medical devices and hand hygiene for one resident during medication administration (Resident R21, R87 and R129) of 35 residents records reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility documentation, facility policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program that includes a system that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage for three of four months of antibiotic stewardship program data reviewed. (January 2024, February 2024, March 2024 and April 2024). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship-Surveillance dated February 8, 2024, revealed the Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using a facility: approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility-wide antibiotic stewardship. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation related to missing medication for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R205).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility policies and procedures, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation of an alleged violation for one of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R81).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, review of facility policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was not appropriately completed according to the resident assessment for two of three residents reviewed related to PASRR assessments (Residents R25 and R208).
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of facility policy, review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not develop a baseline care plan for a newly admitted residents with history of drug abuse for one of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R527) Findings Include: Review of clinical record for Resident R527 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis including opioid abuse, psychoactive substance abuse and schizophrenia (A disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). Review of a physician progress note for Resident R527 dated March 5, 2024 revealed that the resident had history of opioid( heroin) abuse. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive resident care plan was developed and implemented related to adaptive equipment required for swallowing liquids properly (Resident R40) and failed to implement care and services identified on a comprehensive care plan regarding unwanted behaviors and mealtime (Resident R81) for two of 35 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical review, staff interviews and medication manufacture's medication insert, it was determined the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of 35 residents reviewed (resident R 96) regarding proper medication order.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were followed related to insulin for two residents (Residents R6 and R42) and adaptive equipment for one resident (Resident R40) of 35 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement treatment and services to prevent pressure ulcers for two of 35 sampled residents reviewed. (Resident R59 and Resident R177)
Inspectors wroteBased on the observations, review of clinical records, facility policies, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion, received appropriate services to prevent further decline in range of motion and maintain appropriate positioning for one of 35 resident s reviewed. (Resident R70). Finding Include: Review of facility policy ADL Care, Contractures, Preventative Care and Treatment and Restorative ROM Program, dated March 12, 2024, revealed that A plan of care will be developed based on the resident's individual ADL ROM/impaired joint mobility Needs. -There must be a clearly defined problem statement that identifies the restorative need; -The restorative nursing program is not the problem statement, it is an intervention; -There must be a measurable goal related to the problem; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of facility records, observations, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate accounting of controlled drugs for one of three medication storage rooms reviewed (B unit medication room). Finding Include Observation of facility B unit medication room with Employee E32, Licensed Practical Nurse, on June 6, 2024, at 9:17 a.m., revealed a bottle of lorazepam liquid medication in the refrigerator. The bottle contained 14 ml of medications left in the bottle. Employee E32 confirmed the amount of medication left in the bottle. Review of narcotic count sheet for the lorazepam medication revealed that the amount should have been left should have been 4.5 ml. Employee E32 stated noticed the discrepancy 2 days ago and the amount was almost 10 ml extra that what was accounted for. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of clinical records, interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents drug regimen was free of unnecessary drugs related to the use of antipsychotic medication without adequate monitoring for one of five resident reviewed for drug regimen. (Resident R207.) Findings Include: Review of physician order for Resident R207 dated April 3, 2024, revealed an order for Quetiapine Fumarate 25 mg, half tablet by mouth at bedtime for schizophrenia. Review of pharmacy review of Resident R207 dated May 19, 2024, revealed that Please watch for ataxia and falls secondary to Seroquel. Seroquel may cause extra pyramidal symptoms ([NAME] effects of some medications, such as antipsychotic drugs, that can affect movement.), tardive dyskinesia (a chronic, drug-induced movement disorder that causes involuntary, repetitive body movements. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide accurate meal trays for one of two residents and failed to provide food products based on the resident's food preference for three of 35 residents (Resident R88, 107, R212). Review of facility policy Resident Preferences, last revised January 2024, indicates Residents' individual choices including religious, cultural, and ethnic needs and preferences are obtained. Residents are served meals that offer choices and comply with food preferences. On June 5, 2024, at 12:13 p.m. Resident R212 reported that food preferences are not being honored. His/her ticket is preference for double portions protein, and he/she is not getting them during meals times. On June 5, 2024, at 12:25 p.m. Resident's R212 lunch arrived, and lunch ticket indicated double meat sandwich to meals tray. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain appropriate supervision for two of three residents reviewed (Resident R1 and R6). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Suicide Prevention, reviewed September 2023, revealed it is the policy of the facility to ensure that residents who voice and/or display suicidal ideation actions receive services and interventions to help them manage feelings and maintain their psychosocial wellbeing. Procedure includes implement 1:1 oversight until resident does not exhibit any suicidal ideations. Place resident on close observation as needed after 1:1 observation determined not needed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, review of video footage and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of four residents reviewed was free from verbal, physical and psychological abuse from a nursing staff. (Resident R1) This failure resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation for Resident R1 who was rough handled, yelled at with the use of profane language, struck in the chest sustaining injuries to the fourth finger on the right hand and chest area and demonstrated signs of fear when approached by nursing staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility to make certain that residents were protected from verbal, physical and psychological abuse from a nursing staff for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident R1) This failure resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation for Resident R1.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe and functional environment for residents and staff in four of five central bathing rooms (A wing, B wing, C wing, D wing) and in the boiler room.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the resident was provided needed care and services related to follow up medical appointments for surgery clearance as recommended for one of four clinical records reviewed (Resident R3).
1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on April 18, 2025.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 5, 2024 | Fine | $79,414 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.27 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.39 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.06 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.88 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.99 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 60.3% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.23 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.35 on weekdays and 3.06 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.39 in April to June 2025 to 3.27 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.27 | 0.39 | 3.35 | 3.06 | 0.3% | 0 of 90 | 230 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.51 | 0.36 | 3.58 | 3.32 | 19.0% | 0 of 92 | 222 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.41 | 0.35 | 3.51 | 3.15 | 37.7% | 0 of 92 | 222 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.39 | 0.35 | 3.45 | 3.24 | 42.1% | 0 of 91 | 222 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.2 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.6 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.2 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.4 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.4 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Meadowview Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (50.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
50.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 91 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 108 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.
48.5% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 101 residents counted.
1.5% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 131 residents counted.
2.3% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 131 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WM OPERATING LLC. CMS links this home to Jonathan Bleier, a group of 18 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wm Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/01/2016 |
| Bleier, Jonathan | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 02/01/2016 |
| Sod, Yaakov | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 02/01/2016 |
| Fox, Catherine | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/01/2016 | |
| Sofia, Lisa | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/01/2016 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.