Home / Pennsylvania / Wyndmoor
8833 Stenton Avenue, Wyndmoor, PA 19038 · Montgomery County · (215) 836-2100
181 certified beds, about 165 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1975
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395334 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 5, 2026, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 40 health citations since November 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,015 in the last three years; the largest was $14,015, and the latest is dated January 5, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.39 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.38 of those hours.
53.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Jonathan Bleier, an affiliated group of 18 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 40 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, Insulin Glargine's manufacturer's guidelines, and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to monitor the blood sugar of resident on Insulin Glargine which resulted in harm to one resident that was transferred to the hospital with Hypoglycemia for one of ten residents on insulin reviewed (Resident R1). This was identified as Past Non-Compliance. Findings Include: Review of the Insulin Glargine's (Lantus) manufacture's guideline revealed under section titled Dosage and Administration: individualized dosage based and metabolic needs, blood glucose monitoring, glycemic control type of diabetes and prior insulin use. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documentation and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure timely notification to the physician of fall incident sustained by Resident R1. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R1 who experienced a delay of treatment after a fall in the shower room with injuries, requiring transfer to the hospital and diagnoses of subdural hematoma, left zygomatic fracture, and acute right 3rd - 4th rib fractures for one of four residents reviewed. This deficiency is being cited as past non- compliance. (Resident R1)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documentation and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that Resident R1 was free of neglect. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R1 who sustained a fall in the shower room with resulting physical injuries; delay in timely assessment and medical treatment for one of four residents reviewed. This deficiency was cited as past non compliance,(Resident R1)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility schedules, staff interviews, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were provided bathing and showering services in accordance with their assessed needs and physician orders for six of eight residents reviewed. (Residents R33, R43, R174, R164, R185, R180)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel files, facility documentation, policy review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the required licensure and certifications for three of three employees reviewed. (Employee E13, Employee E14, Employee E15)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policy, as well as interview with staff and residents, it was determined that facility did not ensure to honor residents' preferences related to fresh air breaks and activities for two of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R58 and Resident R16). Findings inclide: Review of facility policy 'Activity Programs,' reviewed on April 2025, indicates that activity programs are designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Further review of policy indicates that activities offered are based on the comprehensive resident-centered assessment and the interest and preferences of each resident. Interview with Resident R58 on Monday, December 29, 2025, at 11:45 am, revealed that the only residents who are accommodated with fresh air breaks are the ones who smoke. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately document resident council concerns as grievances, failed to record follow-up actions and resolutions in resident council minutes, and did not ensure that residents were informed of outcomes, affecting the resident council's ability to function as a formal grievance forum for 7 of 19 residents in resident council attendance. (Resident 33, R44, R70, R85, R152 and R167)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and incident/accident documentation, the facility failed to demonstrate that it conducted a thorough, timely, and documented investigation into an allegation of misappropriation of resident property, for one of 33 residents reviewed. (Resident R70)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment was completed upon admission for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R 175)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, review of facility policy and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive resident centered care plan for three of 33 residents reviewed. (Residents R69, and R175)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of a facility document, interviews with residents and staff and review of clinical records, revealed that the facility failed to meet the standard of care for diabetes management and hypoglycemia monitoring in a timely manner for one of 11 residents reviewed. (Resident R164)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility provided documentation, review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined facility did not ensure to complete medication regimen reviews according to professional standards of practice for two of five residents reviewed (Residents R3, and R8)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy and procedures and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to water cup distribution for three of 33 residents observed. (Resident R8, Resident R121 and Resident R18)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that care plans were updated in a timely manner for one of 10 records reviewed related to resident's behaviors (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interviews, and review of clinical records, it was determined the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain adequate grooming and hygiene for one of 33 sampled residents (Resident R315).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations of the food and nutrition services department, interviews with staff, reviews of policies and procedures and the pest control operator's reports, it was determined that the main kitchen was not maintained and operated to ensure an effective pest control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with residents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain or enhance the dignity and respect for two of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R38 and R124).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive assessment was completed accurately related to language and communication for one of 33 records reviewed (R417).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review and interview with staff and residents and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility did not develop a person-centered baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission related to language and communication for two residents, for a surgically wired jaw for one resident, and mental healthcare needs for one resident of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R158, R315, R417, R420).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and interview with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans to address resident care needs related to a diagnosis of anemia and psychotropic medications for one of 33 resident records reviewed (Resident R314).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to revise the care plan for tube feeding management, for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R63).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations of care and services, review of clinical record and review of facility policy and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the nursing staff failed to obtain and schedule examinations with a specialist as indicated by the physician and to ensure that a medication was administered during the time period prescribed by the physician for two of 47 residents reviewed. (Resident R16 and Resident R315)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of clinical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of five percent or greater for two of four residents observed during medication administration (Residents R4, and R77).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to identify a bed against the wall and an abdominal binder as a possible restraint and failed to assess the functional status of the resident to determine the use of the restraint for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R5) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Restraints (Physical) with a revision date of May 5, 2023 states, Policy: The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity, including: The right to be free from any physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, interviews with staff, and review of facility policy and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one out of eight residents reviewed were monitored for acceptable parameters of weight. (Resident R5) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Weight and Height Assessment and Interventions with a revision date on March 18, 2024 states, Policy: Purposes of this procedure are to determine the resident's weight and height, to provide a baseline and ongoing record of the resident's body weight as an indicator of the nutritional status and medical condition of the resident, and to provide a height in order to determine the ideal weight of the resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain ongoing communication between the facility and a dialysis provider for two residents reviewed. (Residents R2 and R5) Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Dialysis Management (Hemodialysis) with a revision date of March 28, 2024 revealed, It is policy of the facility to ensure that residents who require outpatient hemodialysis treatment have appropriate arrangements made by the facility with an outpatient treatment center in order to provide such services as directed by the physician. Further review of the policy states, If Dialysis is provided at off-site Dialysis Center: 5. Develop a resident binder/folder to send to dialysis with the resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, observation, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe comfortable homelike environment relating to daily cleaning and pest control for two of 15 residents reviewed. (Resident R12 and R15)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policies, and interview with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one of 14 residents reviewed received assistance with toileting and personal hygiene in a timely manner. (Resident R2)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. Findings Include: An initial tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on February 25, 2024, at 9:15 a.m. with the Assistant Food Service Director, Employee E4, which revealed the following: Observations of the trash area revealed a large trash compactor. Continued observations revealed a significant build-up of trash, food, and debris surrounding and along the perimeter of the trash compactor. Interview with the Assistant Food Service Director, Employee E4, on February 24, 2024, at 9:20 a.m. confirmed the observations. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed accommodate the residents' needs by failing to provide proper bedding for sleeping for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident R83).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility did not complete a comprehensive care plan for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R128).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received assistance with activities of daily living for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident R40). Findings Include: Review of facility policy ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Care - Supporting Resident revised 01/31/2023 revealed residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Review of Resident R40's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated January 25, 2024, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of muscle weakness and abnormalities of gait and mobility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify physician orders related to insulin, for one of two residents reviewed related to insulin (Resident R14).
Inspectors wroteBased upon interview with resident and staff, review of clinical records and facility policy and procedures, it was revealed the facility failed to ensure that residents who were continent of bladder and bowel on admission received services and assistance to maintain continence for one of 34 resident records reviewed (Resident R122).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with respiratory therapy per physician orders for two of two residents reviewed (Residents R40 and R2). Findings Include: Review of facility policy BIPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure - a type of ventilator that helps with breathing by delivering different levels of air pressure to the lungs) and CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) Policy and Procedure revised May 2021, revealed BIPAP and CPAP is administered by licensed nurses with a physician's order. BIPAP and CPAP may be prescribed for some residents to augment resident breathing when they have difficulty maintaining adequate ventilation. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews with resident and staff and review of clinical records and facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to a resident consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan and the resident's preferences for one of 34 resident records reviewed (Resident R230).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, observations, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed provide food items consistent with the prescribed diet order for one of five residents observed during dining (Resident R40). Findings Include: Review of facility diet guide sheet revealed Sunday lunch offerings on February 25, 2024, was breaded chicken, beef chopped steak, baked fish, mashed potatoes, steamed rice, yellow squash, carrots, and tropical fruit. Per the diet guide sheet, a resident on a Renal (a specialized diet for people with kidney problems)/CCD (carbohydrate controlled) diet should receive steamed rice instead of mashed potatoes. Review of Resident R40's physician orders revealed the resident was ordered a Carbohydrate Controlled/Renal diet dated January 23, 2024. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, interview with staff and residents and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to shower residents on a regular basis for seven out of seven residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6 and R7)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility documentation and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare and serve items as planned on the menu and failed to provide residents with their requested foods of preference for four of seven residents interviewed (Residents R7, R8, R9 and R11).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and a staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's representative was notified timely about a change in condition requiring antibiotic therapy for one of four records reviewed (Residents R1).
14 fire safety citations on file: 5 on January 5, 2026, 4 on December 5, 2024, 5 on February 28, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 5, 2026 | Fine | $14,015 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.39 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.38 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.17 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.99 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.02 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.9% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 26.7% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.22 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.48 on weekdays and 3.17 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 43.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.52 in April to June 2025 to 3.39 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.39 | 0.38 | 3.48 | 3.17 | 43.1% | 0 of 90 | 165 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.46 | 0.39 | 3.56 | 3.22 | 51.2% | 0 of 92 | 164 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.46 | 0.41 | 3.59 | 3.13 | 54.8% | 0 of 92 | 161 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.52 | 0.36 | 3.62 | 3.27 | 59.5% | 0 of 91 | 162 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.0 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.3 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.9 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.5 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.5 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Chestnut Hill Lodge Health and Rehab Ctr's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (37.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
37.4% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 104 eligible stays.
11.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 106 eligible stays.
8.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 60 eligible stays.
48.6% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 110 residents counted.
1.8% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 110 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CH OPERATING, LLC. CMS links this home to Jonathan Bleier, a group of 18 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ch Operating Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/04/2018 |
| Crestview 360 Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/04/2018 | |
| Crestview 720 Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/04/2018 | |
| Bleier, Jonathan | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/04/2018 | |
| Pappas, Peter | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 11/14/2022 | |
| Bleier, Jonathan | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/04/2018 | |
| Pappas, Peter | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/21/2023 | |
| Sod, Yaakov | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/04/2018 | |
| Sofia, Lisa | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/04/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.