Medilodge of Portage
7855 Currier Dr, Portage, MI 49002 · Kalamazoo County · (269) 323-7748
117 certified beds, about 106 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1979
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235399 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 14, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 36 health citations since December 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $35,317 in the last three years; the largest was $19,724, and the latest is dated February 29, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.63 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.08 of those hours.
44.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).
CMS links it to Medilodge, an affiliated group of 53 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 36 health citations on file.
May 14, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #2968884, #3004071, and #3000720Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident received appropriate care for skin breakdown and pressure ulcer development in 2 of 3 residents (Resident #119 and Resident #5) reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in Resident #119 developing a pressure ulcer infection and Resident #5 developing pressure ulcers.
- E Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake # 2790303 & 2968884. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely response to call lights to meet resident needs in 4 of 5 residents (Resident #8, #14, #58, & #119) reviewed for dignity, and 6 of 13 residents from the confidential group interview, resulting in long call light wait times for incontinence care, frustration, and impaired self-worth.
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1.) ensure the safety of residents to prevent falls, 2) provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent falls, and 3.) utilize footrests for wheelchair transport in 3 of 3 residents (Resident #40, #26, and #95) reviewed for accidents and hazards, resulting in Resident #40 having 22 falls over 2 months, Resident #40 and #95 being transferred without wheelchair footrests, and Resident #26 being improperly transferred. This deficient practice placed all 3 residents at risk for injury.
- E Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in the satisfaction of living. Findings Include:On 5/12/26 at 11:01 AM, observation of the D hall closet containing resident slings, found that the slings were hung up by one side on the hangers and left to drag onto the floor. When asked if this is how the slings are normally kept, Housekeeping Manager M stated that it happens all the time and that staff need to hang both sides of the sling up to keep it off the floor. On 5/13/26 at 9:47 AM, observation of the love seat and chair, located on the far side of the dining room, were found with increased accumulation of debris, sand, wrappers, paper trash and a yellow push pin. [...]
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized activities designed to support the psychosocial well-being of 1 of 1 resident (R65) reviewed for activities, resulting in a potential for feelings of social isolation, loneliness, boredom, and depressed mood.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter (tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder) was maintained in a sanitary manner for 1 (Resident #122) of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters, resulting in the urinary catheter bag lying on the floor creating an opportunity for contamination and the potential for urinary tract infection.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received oxygen as ordered in 1 resident of 1 resident (R9) reviewed for oxygen administration, resulting in the potential of respiratory health complications including exacerbation of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and/or retention of carbon dioxide (gas produced by cellular respiration in humans).
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to (1) ensure medications labeled/dated for 1 resident of 1 resident (R84) reviewed for medication labeling/dating, (2) ensure medications were stored in a secure manner in 2 of 2 treatment carts and 1 medication room/refrigerator (A Hall), resulting in the potential for residents to receive expired medications with altered potency and decreased efficacy, and residents, visitors, and/or staff access the medications, including narcotics, in the facility.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate medical records for 1 (Resident #77) of 21 residents reviewed for accurate medical records, resulting in an inaccurate representation of Resident #77's current care needs and the potential for unmet care needs.
January 15, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #2709386. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision with hot liquids for 1 resident (Resident #101) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents and safety resulting in Resident #101 receiving a second degree burn (causes pain and damages the outer and second layer of the skin) on her left arm on 12/27/2025 and a burn on her left hand on 12/30/2025 and the fear of receiving another burn.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #2709386. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an incident of neglect (a hot liquid burn) for 1 resident (Resident #101) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents/safety when Resident #101 did not have appropriate interventions in place based on an assessment related to hot liquid spills and did not receive the help she needed resulting in a second burn causing Resident #101 pain, distress and fear of getting burned again.
August 6, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake: 2575789, 2567564Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident sexual abuse in 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #102) reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for a decline in mental and psychosocial well-being.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a urinary drainage bag was not resting on the floor to prevent the risk of urinary tract infection for 1 (Resident #101) of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheter use, resulting in the potential for infection.
April 9, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen.
- E Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that grievances were promptly documented, investigated and resolved for 9 of 9 residents that participated in the Resident Council (RC) meeting.
- E Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteDuring the RC meeting on 4/8/25 at 10:00 am, 9 of the 9 participants reported the food was always , always cold with overcooked vegetables that were mushy. The RC participants reported items were missing of trays at every meal either a tea bag, salad, bread, dessert, food requests/preferences not honored. RC participants stated the facility had food committee in place, but all 9 RC participants unanimously agreed there had been no improvement. Resident 91 Review of the clinical record including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected Resident 91 (R91) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included sepsis due to escherichia Coli (E. Coli). R91 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 04/07/25 at 02:27 PM during an interview R91 reported food was terrible, had no flavor and always cold. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to dignity with grooming of facial hair in 1 resident (Resident #101) of 5 residents reviewed for dignity resulting in the potential for feelings of diminished self-worth, sadness, and frustration.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement ordered restorative program services provided to maintain, increase, or improve range of motion for 1 resident (Resident #41) of 2 residents reviewed for positioning/mobility, resulting in the potential for decreased range of motion and related complications such as development/worsening of contractures (shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons or tissue leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) and pain.
February 4, 2025Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise a person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #106) of 7 residents reviewed for person-centered care plan revisions resulting in an inaccurate reflection of the resident's current care needs.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #MI00146503 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that professional standards of nursing practice were maintained related to physician orders for 1 (Resident #100) of 1 resident reviewed for professional nursing standards and physician orders resulting in inaccurate physician orders and the potential for medication error.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper placement of an aspen collar (immobilization brace for the neck) was in place during a transfer for 1 (Resident #105) of 1 resident reviewed for aspen collar use resulting in the potential for re-fracturing, delayed healing and/or potential re-injury.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #MI00146503 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain clear, concise, and accurate medical records for 1 (Resident #100) of 7 residents reviewed for clear, concise, and accurate medical records resulting in inaccurate documentation of medication orders and the potential for a diminished medical outcome.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) specifically face masks, was worn correctly by staff throughout the facility during a covid outbreak, resulting in the potential for the spread of infection and disease transmission for residents residing in the facility.
February 29, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 11 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteThis citation has two Deficient Practice Statements (DPS). DPS 1 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment and adequate safety measures for one resident (R9) of 22 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards, resulting in a fall with injury and the potential of additional falls with injuries.
- E Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of the premises. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in the satisfaction of living, affecting residents in following areas:
- E Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe hand railing on Dogwood Trail, resulting in the potential of injury, affecting all residents with the need of handrail assistance while on that hall, a safe way to stabilize or propel themselves.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted and enhanced resident dignity for 1 resident (Resident #6) of 3 reviewed for dignity, resulting in the potential of feelings of embarrassment, loss of self-worth, and decreased quality of life.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was accessible to two residents (R89 and R93) of 22 residents reviewed for accommodations of needs, resulting in the potential of unmeet care needs.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in 1 of 22 residents (Resident #80) reviewed for accuracy of assessments, resulting in an inaccurate reflection of the resident's status.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop person centered, comprehensive care plans for 2 residents (Resident #408 and Resident #82) of 22 sample residents reviewed for care planning, resulting in a potential for re-traumatization of a Resident with PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), and a potential for unmet care needs for a resident with an implanted medical device.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) care was provided for 1 (Resident #6 ) of 2 residents reviewed for ADL care, resulting in the potential for avoidable negative physical and psychosocial outcomes for resident's dependent on staff for assistance.
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was a trauma survivor received care and services that addressed their psychosocial needs in 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #408) for trauma-informed care, resulting in Resident #408 experiencing emotional distress, and thoughts of physical aggression toward others.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to discontinue psychotropic medications prescribed as needed (PRN), after 14 days and/or document rationale to extend prn psychotropic medication use in 1 of 5 residents (Resident #80) reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the potential for adverse side effects and inability to monitor the effectiveness of the prescribed treatment due to lack of documented supporting evidence.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed to ensure 1). proper hand hygiene was performed during brief change for one resident (R89), 2). adequate condition for cleanliness of personal equipment (R89), and 3). appropriate PPE (Personal Protection Equipment) use in a Transmission-Based Precautions Isolation room, of 22 residents reviewed for infection control, resulting in the potential for bacterial harborage, cross contamination, and the spread of disease to a vulnerable population.
December 7, 2023Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess a resident's skin integrity, and update interventions to prevent the development and worsening of a medical device related pressure ulcers for 1 (Resident #100) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure wounds, resulting in Resident #100 developing unstageable/non-healing pressure ulcers after a cast like boot (for leg fracture) had not been removed for assessment of skin integrity by nursing staff in accordance with physicians orders.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to report and injury of unknown origin in 1 of 1 residents (Resident #100) reviewed for abuse reporting resulting in the potential for further injuries to go undetected , and not reported and/or thoroughly investigated.
Fire safety inspections
9 fire safety citations on file: 6 on May 14, 2026, 3 on April 9, 2025.
Every fire safety citation9 citations
- F Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- F Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 29, 2024 | Fine | $19,724 |
| December 7, 2023 | Fine | $15,593 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.63 | 3.99 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.08 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.87 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.10 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.45 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 44.8% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 34.6% | 39.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.54 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.94 on weekdays and 2.87 on weekends, 27% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.81 in April to June 2025 to 3.63 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 1.08 | 3.94 | 2.87 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 106 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.02 | 1.05 | 4.33 | 3.21 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 107 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.87 | 0.95 | 4.16 | 3.14 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 107 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.81 | 0.98 | 4.11 | 3.05 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 111 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Michigan, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.45 | 3.3% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Michigan
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.03 | $18.35 to $21.59 | 43,290 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.47 | $29.83 to $35.52 | 10,880 |
| Registered nurses | $45.34 | $39.46 to $49.74 | 104,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.1 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.3 | 12.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.6 | 14.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.0 | 24.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 11.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: PORTAGE OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Medilodge, a group of 53 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ark Opco Group, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/01/2015 |
| B&y Healthcare S Corp | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2015 | |
| B&y Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2015 | |
| Cody Healthcare S Corp | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2015 | |
| Craig Flashner 2007 Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2015 | |
| Norcross, Robert | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Rogers, Stacey | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Kirk, Kristine | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/02/2016 | |
| Flashner, Craig | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Perlstein, Yitzchok | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Noble Healthcare Management, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/2015 | |
| Prestige Administrative Services, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2016 | |
| Flashner, Craig | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/02/2015 | |
| Perlstein, Yitzchok | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/02/2015 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 13 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- Can we see a resident room, a shower room and the dining room on this visit?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.87 hours per resident per day, below the Michigan average of 3.50.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Harold and Grace Upjohn Community Care Center Kalamazoo, 4.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 61 citations
- Medilodge of Kalamazoo Kalamazoo, 6.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Friendship Village Kalamazoo, 7.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Villa at Borgess Place Kalamazoo, 8.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 70 citations
- Medilodge of Westwood Kalamazoo, 8.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 64 citations
- Bronson Commons Mattawan, 10.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- The Laurels of Galesburg Galesburg, 10.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 67 citations
- Plainwell Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation Communi Plainwell, 14.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 54 citations
Michigan contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, Bureau of Survey and Certification, Long Term Care Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Michigan Long Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-866-485-9393. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: LARA State Licensing Search, where Michigan publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Medilodge of Portage's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Medilodge of Portage 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Medilodge of Portage get at its last inspection?
- 9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 14, 2026. The Michigan average is 9.9.
- Has Medilodge of Portage been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $35,317 in the last three years.
- Does Medilodge of Portage accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Medilodge of Portage?
- CMS lists 14 owners and managers, and links the home to Medilodge. Legal business name: PORTAGE OPCO LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.