Find a nursing home

Home / Oklahoma / Tulsa

Montereau, Inc.

6800 South Granite Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74136 · Tulsa County · (918) 491-5250

74 certified beds, about 59 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare since 2004

Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375460 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 7, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 20 health citations since May 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,901 in the last three years; the largest was $14,901, and the latest is dated May 19, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.77 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.23 of those hours.

88.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
14D
4E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 7, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address immediate needs of residents for 2 (#1 and #48) of 8 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The administrator identified 56 residents resided in the facility.
  2. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders for 1 (#56) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for timely administration of medications. The administrator identified 56 residents resided in the facility.
November 21, 2025Complaint inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    F725 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 24, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to answer call lights in a timely manner for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for call light response. The DON identified 46 residents resided at the facility.
  2. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 24, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured for 2 (first floor North treatment cart #2 and second floor South treatment cart #2) of 2 treatment carts observed to be unlocked and unattended. The DON identified six treatment carts and six medication carts in the facility.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 24, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appointments were scheduled for a resident for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for appointments. The DON identified 46 residents resided in the facility.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 24, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were implemented for the treatment of pressure ulcers for 1 (#3) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for nutritional supplements. The DON identified 20 residents received nutritional supplements.
  5. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 24, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered at the ordered time for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The DON identified 46 residents received medications in the facility.
May 19, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. J
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteOn [DATE], a past non-compliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to assess, monitor, and intervene for a resident with a history of skin breakdown. The facility failed to accurately identify the status of a resident at high risk for skin breakdown, failed to accurately and timely document the resident's skin condition, failed to accurately care plan, provide, and monitor the success or failure of interventions for the resident's deteriorating skin condition, and failed to communicate the resident's deteriorating skin condition to other disciplines of the resident's care team. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and intervene for 1 (#1) of 7 sampled residents who had pressure ulcers/wounds or were at high risk for the development of pressure ulcers/wounds. [...]
October 11, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were utilized during indwelling urinary catheter care for two (#4 and #6) of three sampled residents who were reviewed with indwelling urinary catheters. The DON identified eight residents with indwelling urinary catheters and 25 residents on enhanced barrier precautions.
July 8, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated with dignity and respect for one (#7) of one resident sampled for dignity and respect. The Administrator identified 67 residents resided in the facility.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the choice to formulate an advanced directive for three (#7, 40, and #208) of seven sampled residents whose advance directive acknowledgements were reviewed. The administrator identified 67 residents who resided in the facility.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for four(#40, 41, 50, and #111) of seventeen sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan completion. The Administrator identified 67 residents resided in the facility. Findings. A Comprehensive Care Plans policy, undated, read in part, .The comprehensive care plan will be developed within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive MDS assessment . 1. Resident #50 had diagnoses which included cellulitis of abdominal wall and multiple sclerosis. Resident #50 admitted on [DATE], a comprehensive care plan was not completed after admission MDS assessment completed on 05/18/24. On 07/03/24 at 8:15 a.m., MDS Coordinator #1 was asked the facility policy for completion of a comprehensive careplan. [...]
April 1, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by immediately reporting abuse for one of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The Administrator identified 67 residents resided in the facility.
May 19, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident food was prepared and served in a sanitary manner. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 61 residents received their meals from the kitchen.
  2. E
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to utilizing a side or bed rail, assess the risk for entrapment, review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative, and/or obtain informed consent prior to use of bed rails for three (#7, 53, and #120) of seven residents reviewed for accidents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 61 residents resided in the facility.
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for two (#26 and #34) of 19 residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 61 residents resided in the facility.
  4. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2023
    Inspectors wrote2. Res #27 had diagnoses which included major depression disorder. An Annual assessment, dated 07/20/22 documented the the resident received antidepressant medication. The resident's care plan was reviewed and did not contain a plan of care related to the resident's use of antidepressant medications. A Physician's Order, dated on 02/07/23, documented the resident was taking sertraline (an antidepressant medication) 25 mg, two tablets every day. A Quarterly assessment, dated 04/17/23, documented the resident received antidepressant medication. On 05/17/23 at 9:31 a.m., the resident was observed in her bed watching television. On 05/18/23 at 9:08 a.m., MDS Coordinator #1 stated she was unsure if she developed a care plan related to the resident receiving antidepressant medication. [...]
  5. D
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu for pureed diet and ensure the meals met the nutritional needs of the residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 11 residents had mechanically altered diets including pureed and all chopped food.
  6. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medical records were readily accessible and systematically organized. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 61 residents resided in the facility.
  7. D
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    F881 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to utilize their antibiotic stewardship policy to monitor antibiotic use for one (#7) of one resident reviewed for antibiotic use. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 61 residents resided in the facility.

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
May 19, 2025Fine $14,901

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.773.793.86
Registered nurses0.230.340.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.443.443.42
Nurse aides2.83
Licensed practical nurses1.71
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)88.1%55.5%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover100.0%53.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.95 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.90 on weekdays and 4.44 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.92 in April to June 2025 to 4.77 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.770.234.904.44 1.9%0 of 9059
Oct to Dec 20255.020.405.104.84 0.7%0 of 9256
Jul to Sep 20255.580.385.785.05 0.0%0 of 9265
Apr to Jun 20255.920.406.135.40 18.6%0 of 9166
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 20263.790.323.943.422.2%1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Oklahoma

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Oklahoma, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$17.27$15.82 to $18.3919,410
LPNs and LVNs$28.04$24.06 to $29.8411,540
Registered nurses$39.87$37.19 to $47.5538,270
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Montereau, Inc.. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.513.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.54.73.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.11.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.44.74.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.817.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
29.127.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
13.016.612.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.52.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.43.01.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Montereau, Inc.'s Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (61.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

61.1% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 310 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 305 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 193 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

66.7% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 177 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.4% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 264 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

3.2% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 264 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 120 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: MONTEREAU INC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Nield, ScottW-2 managing employeeIndividual03/01/2022
Moore, SaunyaCorporate officerIndividual12/28/2020
Sanaia, AminCorporate officerIndividual08/01/2022

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 7, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 7, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 11, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."

Other nursing homes nearby

Oklahoma contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Montereau, Inc.'s Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Montereau, Inc. 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Montereau, Inc. get at its last inspection?
2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 7, 2026. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.
Has Montereau, Inc. been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,901 in the last three years.
Does Montereau, Inc. accept Medicaid?
CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
Who owns Montereau, Inc.?
CMS lists 3 owners and managers. Legal business name: MONTEREAU INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection