Home / Pennsylvania / Plymouth Meeting
251 Stenton Avenue, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 · Montgomery County · (610) 828-2272
60 certified beds, about 53 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395847 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 20, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
None of its 23 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.40 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.39 of those hours.
29.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Marquis Health Services, an affiliated group of 90 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician' orders related to insulin administration for one of 15 residents reviewed. (Resident R10)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, record review, and interviews with residents and staff it was determined that the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment for three of three nursing units reviewed related to the air temperatures. (100 Wing, 200 Wing, 300 Wing)Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Homelike Environment with a revision dated of February 11, 2026 states, Policy Statement- Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. Further review of the policy states, 2. The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include:.h. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication for two of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents R1, and R47).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to administer pain medication in accordance with physician orders for two of four residents reviewed for pain management (Residents R11, and R29).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician documented the pharmacist identified irregularities were reviewed and failed to document the action taken or not taken to address irregularities for two of five residents reviewed. (Resident R18 and resident R42)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, review of facility documents and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to verifying medication orders for one of nine resident reviewed. (Resident R1)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that residents were free of misappropriation of resident property related to diversion of a narcotic medicaton for five of five residents prescribed narcotic medications. (Resident R18, Resident R49, Resident R29, Resident R165, Resident R21)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, review of facility policies and procedures and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly notify a resident's representative and physician of a skin impairment for one of 15 residents reviewed. (Resident R28).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and facility documentation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required advance notice through a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage related to the termination of Medicare services for three of three residents reviewed (Resident R166, Resident R167 and Resident R35).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, facility policy review, staff and residents' interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents access to grievance information on two out of three nursing units. (2nd floor and First floor Stenton unit).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, a review of select facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the evaluation of resident's need and use of restraints, including evaluation of the least restrictive measure needed to treat the resident's medical symptom and failed to obtain informed consent prior to the use of restraint for two of two sampled residents with residents reviewed. (Residents R22 and R56)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility policies and procedures, interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation of one alleged violation of unknown source of injury for one of 15 residents reviewed. (Resident R28).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of clinical records, facility policies, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion, received appropriate services to prevent further decline in range of motion and maintain appropriate positioning for one of 15 residents reviewed. (Resident R16). Finding Include: Observation of Resident R16 on July 19, 2024, at 1:04 p.m. revealed that the resident was seated in Geri-chair (a large, padded chair that is designed to help seniors with limited mobility). Resident had contractures to upper and lower extremities and resident did not maintain a normal body alignment. Resident was not wearing a splint or brace. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, reviews of clinical records, facility policies and procedures, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate treatment and care for intravenous catheter (IV) line in accordance with professional standards of practice for three of three residents reviewed with IV (Resident R6, R51, R28).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided prior to wound care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one resident observed (Resident R50).
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of facility documentation, clinical records, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary pharmaceutical services for three of 15 residents reviewed. (Resident R22, R44 and R2)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a response to the consultant pharmacist's recommendation related to the potentially unnecessary medications in a timely manner for two of five residents reviewed. (Resident R63 and Resident R8).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician provided a clinical rationale and the duration for the continued use of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic (affecting the mind) medication beyond 14 days for two of four residents reviewed (Resident R57 and R56).
Inspectors wroteReview of clinical records, review of facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals are stored and labeled in accordance with professional standards for one of three medication carts observed. (Medication carts: McKracken Nursing Unit Front, McKracken Nursing Unit Back and Senton Nursing Unit)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility policies and documentation, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, resident's clinical record, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control procedures was followed during medication administration for two of four residents observed (Resident R8 and Resident R41).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to post contact information for the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program as required for one of four nursing units that was accessible to residents. (First floor B)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policies, clinical record review, and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to assess, develop, and implement interventions to address a significant weight loss in a timely manner for one of 7 residents (Resident R33).
12 fire safety citations on file: 3 on May 20, 2026, 3 on May 9, 2025, 6 on July 19, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.40 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.39 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 5.01 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.27 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.74 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 29.6% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 31.6% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 3 |
CMS expects 9.38 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.56 on weekdays and 5.01 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.50 in April to June 2025 to 5.40 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.40 | 1.39 | 5.56 | 5.01 | 1.4% | 0 of 90 | 53 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.32 | 1.24 | 5.43 | 5.06 | 0.6% | 0 of 92 | 55 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.36 | 1.16 | 5.53 | 4.92 | 1.1% | 0 of 92 | 53 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.50 | 1.14 | 5.66 | 5.08 | 1.3% | 0 of 91 | 52 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.9 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.4 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.1 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Montgomery Subacute and Respiratory Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (29.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
29.2% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.
9.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 35 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
2.6% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MONTGOMERY SNF OPERATOR LLC. CMS links this home to Marquis Health Services, a group of 90 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Israel Discount Bank of New York - Idb Bank of York | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 12/06/2022 | |
| Israel Discount Bank of New York - Idb Bank of York | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 12/06/2022 | |
| Harman, Dina | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/06/2022 | |
| Long, Troy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/17/2023 | |
| Murray, Robert | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/06/2025 | |
| Viroja, Yogesh | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/06/2022 | |
| Murray, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 03/06/2025 | |
| Posen, Mindee | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/06/2022 | |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/06/2022 | |
| Nutraco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/06/2022 | |
| Jacob, Joby | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/06/2022 | |
| Murray, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/06/2025 | |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2025 | |
| Montgomery Real Property LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/06/2022 | |
| Nfr 2020 Irrv Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/06/2022 | |
| Nutraco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2025 | |
| Quinto Nexgen LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/06/2022 | |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2025 | |
| Rsbrmk Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/06/2022 | |
| Sk Nexgen Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/06/2022 | |
| Tryko Nexgen Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/06/2022 | |
| Uak 2020 Irrv Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/06/2022 | |
| Ukr Nexgen LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/06/2022 | |
| Yk Nexgen Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/06/2022 | |
| Yr Nexgen Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/06/2022 | |
| Harman, Dina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/06/2022 | |
| Jacob, Joby | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/06/2022 | |
| Long, Troy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/17/2023 | |
| Murray, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/06/2025 | |
| Posen, Mindee | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/06/2022 | |
| Viroja, Yogesh | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/06/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.