523 North Main Street, Bountiful, UT 84010 · Davis County · (801) 951-2273
122 certified beds, about 77 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2004
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 465156 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 25, 2026, inspectors cited 18 health deficiencies (the Utah average is 8.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since July 2022, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.54 hours per resident per day, against 4.09 across Utah and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.39 of those hours.
53.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Utah average 50.7%).
CMS links it to Monument Health Group, an affiliated group of 11 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not implement pressure ulcer interventions to prevent infection and new ulcers from developing. This will be cited at a harm level. Resident identifier: 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident right to self-administer medications was clinically appropriate and safe. Specifically for 4 out of 40 sampled residents, residents were observed to have medications in their rooms and were not evaluated to determine if they were safe to self-administer medications. Resident identifiers: 8, 22, 35, and 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident who entered the facility with an indwelling catheter or subsequently received one was assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization was necessary. Specifically, for 3 out of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not discontinue residents' Foley catheters when there were no indications for use. Additionally, facility staff were not trained on the use of a PureWick for a resident and the PureWick tubing was observed draped over the head of the bed and not able to down drain. Resident identifiers: 3, 46, and 98.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record the laboratory reports that were dated and contained the name and address of the testing laboratory. Specifically, for 3 out of 40 sampled residents, laboratory results were not located in the medical record. Resident identifiers: 4, 46, and 99.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food items in the refrigerator and freezer were undated and opened to air. Additionally, food items in resident refrigerators were undated and/or expired.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident who was given a psychotropic drug had adequate monitoring of that drug. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, a resident receiving an antidepressant did not receive a gradual dose reduction (GDR) in two separate quarters (with at least one month between the attempts), unless clinically contraindicated. Resident identifier: 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not implement written policies and procedures on prohibiting and preventing abuse and investigating any such allegations. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, staff were aware of allegations of roughness during care but did not escalate the allegation up the chain of command to be investigated as a possible allegation of abuse. Resident identifier: 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not document in the resident's medical record the information that was provided to the receiving provider which must include a minimum of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident; the resident representative contact information; advanced directive information; comprehensive care plan; a copy of the resident discharge summary; and all necessary information to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. Specifically, for 2 out of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not document in the resident's medical record the information conveyed to the receiving provider when the resident was transferred to the Emergency Room. Resident identifiers: 18 and 54.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the services provided met professional standards of quality. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, a resident's tube feeding was labeled with an incorrect formula, an incorrect administration rate, and was not labeled with the initials of the nurse who initiated the infusion. Furthermore, additional tube feedings were missing required labeling information. Resident identifier: 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, a resident did not receive bathing assistance per their schedule. Resident identifier 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, for 2 out of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident left the facility and called his daughter to report he was lost and a week later another resident, who needed to be supervised during a Leave of Absence, left the facility. Resident identifiers: 29 and 110.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, a resident reported that his Tramadol dose was frequently administered late and it impacted his pain control. Resident identifier: 54.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility must ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, a resident receiving dialysis had incomplete communication notes. Resident identifier: 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, a resident taking a phosphate binder was not administered the medication with meals. Resident identifier: 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in compartments under proper temperature controls. Specifically, observations were made of multiple medications stored in a refrigerator that had a registered temperature of 24 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Resident identifiers: 5, 41, 46, and 73.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not file in the resident's medical record signed and dated reports of radiological services. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sample residents, a resident's Electrocardiogram (EKG) report was not located in the medical record. Resident identifier: 99.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility did not keep confidential all information contained in the resident medical records and safeguard against unauthorized access. Specifically, observations were made of the licensed nurse leaving the computer unattended and open to resident medical records and leaving the report sheet with resident health information unattended and visible on the medication cart.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment. Specifically, for 2 out of 40 sampled residents, personal protective equipment (PPE) was not worn for high contact care for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Resident identifiers: 3 and 15.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 out of 8 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that all residents received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choice. Specifically, a resident was not provided wound vac supplies in a timely manner. Resident identifier: 2.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 out of 8 sampled residents, the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents. Specifically, residents were not provided multiple medications due to them being out of stock and unavailable from the pharmacy. Resident identifiers: 2 and 8.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors. Specifically, 1 out of 8 sampled residents did not receive their intravenous (IV) antibiotics every 8 hours as ordered by the hospital. Resident identifier: 2.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility did not label all drugs and biological's used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include appropriate accessory instructions and the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, an insulin pen and a vial of Lidocaine were not labeled with an open date and were open and available for use. In addition, narcotics were repackaged into the narcotic cards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 1 out of 26 sampled residents, a resident that was dependent on staff and required maximum assistance for bed mobility and toilet use had a brief change performed by one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), rolled out of the bed, and received contusions and suffered emotional distress. Resident identifier: 41.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record the review, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. Specifically, for 1 out of 26 sampled residents, a resident that was observed and verbally expressed their pain was not provided pain medication in a timely manner. Resident identifier: 41.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Specifically, for 1 out of 26 sampled residents, behavioral health services were not provided to a resident who was assessed to need them. Resident identifier: 29.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 5 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive assessment, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's preferences. Specifically, a resident with multiple co-morbidities who had a change in condition, was hospitalized after failure to identify the change in condition in a timely manner. The deficient practice for resident 1 was found to have occurred at a harm level. Resident identifier: 1.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that for 1 of 5 sampled residents that the facility did not notify the facility's physician or resident representative of a significant change in a resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status. Specifically, the facility did not inform a resident's physician of the resident's change in mental status prior to sending her out for a hemodialysis appointment. Upon arrival to the appointment, the hemodialysis center then sent the resident out to the hospital due to her altered mental status. Resident Identifier:
13 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 25, 2026, 8 on April 29, 2024, 4 on July 11, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Utah | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.54 | 4.09 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.39 | 1.25 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.11 | 3.58 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.84 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.30 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.8% | 50.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 43.3% | 40.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.95 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.71 on weekdays and 3.11 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.46 in April to June 2025 to 3.54 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.54 | 1.39 | 3.71 | 3.11 | 0.1% | 0 of 90 | 77 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.68 | 1.37 | 3.84 | 3.28 | 4.7% | 0 of 92 | 74 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.72 | 1.28 | 3.92 | 3.18 | 13.4% | 0 of 92 | 77 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.46 | 1.17 | 3.62 | 3.06 | 24.1% | 0 of 91 | 76 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Utah, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.91 | 1.11 | 4.10 | 3.44 | 2.8% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.15 | $17.81 to $21.32 | 12,260 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.40 | $25.71 to $35.86 | 1,680 |
| Registered nurses | $40.67 | $38.49 to $50.54 | 27,420 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Utah | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.9 | 11.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.1 | 15.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 3.9 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.5 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 32.0 | 16.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.4 | 11.6 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Monument Healthcare Stonecreek's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (58.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
58.8% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Utah: 40 better, 0 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 128 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Utah: 3 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 154 eligible stays.
7.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Utah: 2 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 74 eligible stays.
37.3% this home
Median of homes: Utah63.5% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Utah0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 70 residents counted.
3.0% this home
Median of homes: Utah1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 70 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Utah100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GUNNISON VALLEY HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Monument Health Group, a group of 11 nursing homes averaging 2.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murray, Brian | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2020 | |
| Gunnison Valley Hospital | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/2018 | |
| Health Group Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/07/2025 | |
| Monument Health Group LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/07/2025 | |
| Clawson, Travis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Galindo, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Marriott, Stephen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Merkley, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/16/2026 | |
| Murray, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2020 | |
| Robertson, Brett | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Samuelian, Spencer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Santibanez, Jorge | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Seastrand, Jason | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| West, Christian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| West, Shay | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Gunnison Valley Hospital | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/28/2025 | |
| Health Group Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/28/2025 | |
| Monument Health Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/28/2025 | |
| Monument Health Properties LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/07/2025 | |
| Monument Real Estate North Bountiful LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/07/2025 | |
| Clawson, Travis | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Galindo, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Marriott, Stephen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Merkley, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/16/2026 | |
| Murray, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2020 | |
| Robertson, Brett | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Samuelian, Spencer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Santibanez, Jorge | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| Seastrand, Jason | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| West, Christian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| West, Shay | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/07/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Utah. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.